Sitting

坐着
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    白领在职业久坐行为(OSB)上花费的时间越来越多,因此面临不良健康结果的风险。然而,OSB与恢复需求(NFR)之间的关联,幸福的重要指标,是未知的,因此进行了检查。
    使用来自整群随机对照试验的基线数据。一个由89名白领工人组成的小组佩戴了7天的三轴加速度计。使用工作经验和评估问卷测量NFR。成分数据分析用于确定不同OSB回合的成分(短,中等和长期)和职业体力活动(OPA)(轻度,温和、充满活力和站立)。进行线性回归分析以探索职业组成与NFR之间的关联。
    在长期OSB发作中花费的时间相对较多与较低的NFR(β:-11.30,95%CI:-20.2至-2.4)相关。短期和中期OSB发作和OPA与NFR无关。
    OSB回合之间的关联,OPA和NFR暗示了相反的趋势,建议在未来的研究中需要考虑不同回合长度的OSB。
    UNASSIGNED: White collar workers spend an increasing amount of time in occupational sedentary behavior (OSB) and are thereby at risk for adverse health outcomes. Nevertheless, the association between OSB and the need for recovery (NFR), an important indicator of wellbeing, is unknown and therefore examined.
    UNASSIGNED: Baseline data from a cluster randomized controlled trial was used. A subgroup of 89 white collar workers wore a triaxial accelerometer for 7 days. NFR was measured using the Questionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work. Compositional data analysis was applied to determine the composition of different OSB bouts (short, medium and long) and occupational physical activity (OPA) (light, moderate and vigorous and standing). Linear regression analyses were performed to explore the associations between occupational compositions and NFR.
    UNASSIGNED: Relatively more time spent in long OSB bouts was associated with a lower NFR (β: -11.30, 95% CI: -20.2 to -2.4). Short and medium OSB bouts and OPA were not associated with NFR.
    UNASSIGNED: Associations between OSB bouts, OPA and NFR hinted at contrasting trends, suggesting the need to consider different bout lengths of OSB in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景。高水平脊髓损伤(SCI)破坏躯干控制,导致坐姿和站立时直立姿势任务的表现受损。我们先前表明,具有脊髓硬膜外刺激的新型机器人姿势站立训练旨在促进站立(Stand-scES),大大改善了高水平运动完全SCI个体的站立躯干控制。这里,我们旨在评估在同一人群中使用Stand-scES进行机器人姿势站立训练对坐姿控制的影响。(2)方法。患有颈椎(n=5)或高胸椎(n=1)运动完全SCI的个体接受了大约80次(1小时/天;5天/周)的机器人姿势站立训练,这是用自由的双手进行的(即,不使用车把),并包括站立和稳定的行李箱控制,自我发起的躯干和手臂运动,和躯干扰动。在标准治疗垫上评估坐姿控制,有或没有旨在促进坐姿的scES(Sit-scES),机器人姿势站立训练前后。在5分钟的时间窗口内评估独立的坐姿时间和躯干质心(CM)位移,以评估稳定的坐姿控制。还尝试从坐姿进行自我发起的前后躯干和内外侧运动,目标是在各自的基本方向上覆盖最大的距离。最后,四个神经肌肉恢复量表项目侧重于坐姿躯干控制(坐下,坐起来,坐着的行李箱延伸,反向仰卧起坐)进行评估。(3)结果。总之,对于考虑用于分析的坐姿结果,机器人姿势站立训练既没有促进统计学上的显著差异,也没有促进较大的效应大小.(4)结论。本研究的结果,加上以前的观察,可能建议使用Stand-scES进行机器人姿势站立训练可促进特定姿势和/或任务的躯干运动学习,本身,不足以显著影响坐姿控制。
    (1) Background. High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts trunk control, leading to an impaired performance of upright postural tasks in sitting and standing. We previously showed that a novel robotic postural stand training with spinal cord epidural stimulation targeted at facilitating standing (Stand-scES) largely improved standing trunk control in individuals with high-level motor complete SCI. Here, we aimed at assessing the effects of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES on sitting postural control in the same population. (2) Methods. Individuals with cervical (n = 5) or high-thoracic (n = 1) motor complete SCI underwent approximately 80 sessions (1 h/day; 5 days/week) of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES, which was performed with free hands (i.e., without using handlebars) and included periods of standing with steady trunk control, self-initiated trunk and arm movements, and trunk perturbations. Sitting postural control was assessed on a standard therapy mat, with and without scES targeted at facilitating sitting (Sit-scES), before and after robotic postural stand training. Independent sit time and trunk center of mass (CM) displacement were assessed during a 5 min time window to evaluate steady sitting control. Self-initiated antero-posterior and medial-lateral trunk movements were also attempted from a sitting position, with the goal of covering the largest distance in the respective cardinal directions. Finally, the four Neuromuscular Recovery Scale items focused on sitting trunk control (Sit, Sit-up, Trunk extension in sitting, Reverse sit-up) were assessed. (3) Results. In summary, neither statistically significant differences nor large Effect Size were promoted by robotic postural stand training for the sitting outcomes considered for analysis. (4) Conclusions. The findings of the present study, together with previous observations, may suggest that robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES promoted trunk motor learning that was posture- and/or task-specific and, by itself, was not sufficient to significantly impact sitting postural control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    存在对直立活动(坐着,站立,和行走)急性缺血性中风后的早期可能是在此关键阶段脑灌注的减少。我们的目的是估计48小时内及以后直立姿势(坐着和站着)对脑血流动力学的影响,中风后3-7天,在有和没有闭塞性疾病的中风患者和对照组中。
    我们在0°头部位置使用经颅多普勒研究了MCAv,然后在30°,70°,90°坐姿,站立90°,在中风后<48小时,后来在中风后3-7天。使用混合效应线性回归模型来估计0°和其他位置之间的MCAv差异,并比较各组之间的MCAv变化。
    总共42名中风参与者(前循环和后循环)(13名患有闭塞性疾病,29个没有)和22个对照被招募。在患有闭塞性疾病的中风(中风后<48小时)中,受影响的半球MCAv降低:从0°坐姿到90°坐姿(-9.9cm/s,95%CI[-16.4,-3.4])和0°至90°站立(-7.1cm/s,95CI[-14.3,-0.01])。在没有闭塞性疾病的中风中,受影响的半球MCAv也降低:从0°坐姿到90°坐姿(-3.3cm/s,95CI[-5.6,-1.1])和从0°到90°站立(-3.6cm/s,95CI[-5.9,-1.3])(p值相互作用卒中与无闭塞性疾病=0.07)。在对照组中也观察到直立时MCAv的降低:从0°到90°坐姿(-3.8cm/s,95CI[-6.0,-1.63])和从0°到90°站立(-3cm/s,95CI[-5.2,-0.81])(p值交互作用卒中与controls=0.85)。前循环卒中的亚组分析显示,受累半球MCAv的变化模式相似,患有闭塞性疾病的患者(n=11)和没有闭塞性疾病的患者(n=26)之间存在显着的相互作用(p=0.02)。卒中后<48小时MCAv从0°到直立的变化与3-7天相似。在<48小时时MCAv的变化与30天改良的Rankin量表之间没有发现关联。
    中风后<2天移动到更直立的位置确实会降低受影响半球的MCAv;但是,这些变化对于有或没有闭塞性疾病的卒中参与者(前循环和后循环)没有显着差异,也不是为了控制。患有闭塞性疾病的前循环中风中MCAv的降低与没有闭塞性疾病的显着不同。然而,样本量很小,并且需要更多的研究来证实这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Concerns exist that a potential mechanism for harm from upright activity (sitting, standing, and walking) early after an acute ischaemic stroke could be the reduction of cerebral perfusion during this critical phase. We aimed to estimate the effects of upright positions (sitting and standing) on cerebral hemodynamics within 48 h and later, 3-7 days post-stroke, in patients with strokes with and without occlusive disease and in controls.
    UNASSIGNED: We investigated MCAv using transcranial Doppler in 0° head position, then at 30°, 70°, 90° sitting, and 90° standing, at <48 h post-stroke, and later at 3-7 days post-stroke. Mixed-effect linear regression modeling was used to estimate differences in MCAv between the 0° and other positions and to compare MCAv changes across groups.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 42 stroke participants (anterior and posterior circulation) (13 with occlusive disease, 29 without) and 22 controls were recruited. Affected hemisphere MCAv decreased in strokes with occlusive disease (<48 h post-stroke): from 0° to 90° sitting (-9.9 cm/s, 95% CI[-16.4, -3.4]) and from 0° to 90° standing (-7.1 cm/s, 95%CI[-14.3, -0.01]). Affected hemisphere MCAv also decreased in strokes without occlusive disease: from 0° to 90° sitting (-3.3 cm/s, 95%CI[-5.6, -1.1]) and from 0° to 90° standing (-3.6 cm/s, 95%CI [-5.9, -1.3]) (p-value interaction stroke with vs. without occlusive disease = 0.07). A decrease in MCAv when upright was also observed in controls: from 0° to 90° sitting (-3.8 cm/s, 95%CI[-6.0, -1.63]) and from 0° to 90° standing (-3 cm/s, 95%CI[-5.2, -0.81]) (p-value interaction stroke vs. controls = 0.85). Subgroup analysis of anterior circulation stroke showed similar patterns of change in MCAv in the affected hemisphere, with a significant interaction between those with occlusive disease (n = 11) and those without (n = 26) (p = 0.02). Changes in MCAv from 0° to upright at <48 h post-stroke were similar to 3-7 days. No association between changes in MCAv at <48 h and the 30-day modified Rankin Scale was found.
    UNASSIGNED: Moving to more upright positions <2 days post-stroke does reduce MCAv in the affected hemisphere; however, these changes were not significantly different for stroke participants (anterior and posterior circulation) with and without occlusive disease, nor for controls. The decrease in MCAv in anterior circulation stroke with occlusive disease significantly differed from without occlusive disease. However, the sample size was small, and more research is warranted to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在80岁及以上的人群中,久坐行为最为普遍,被称为最古老的。当前的文献强调久坐行为模式的重要性,但需要进一步的证据来了解这些模式与特定健康结局的关系,并确定针对年龄最大的患者的量身定制干预措施的风险状况.因此,这项研究的目的是根据他们的久坐模式和健康结果来确定80岁以上的成年人的概况,并检查个人资料和社会人口统计之间的关联。
    从2021年2月至2022年12月在法兰德斯(比利时)进行了一项横断面研究,通过便利抽样招募了90名老年人(80岁以上),采用口碑,社交媒体和当地服务中心。潜在轮廓分析确定了基于设备的久坐模式,并评估了它们与身体和认知功能的关联,心理健康相关生活质量(QoL),社会孤立。分析了这些概况与社会人口统计学因素的关联。
    确定了三个不同的配置文件:(1)“认知和身体虚弱”配置文件,(2)“健康”概况和(3)“较低的心理健康相关QoL”概况。那些“认知和身体虚弱”的人表现出最不有利的久坐模式,住在疗养院的可能性更高。其他社会人口统计学变量没有发现显著差异,随着年龄的增长,性别,教育程度和家庭情况。
    年龄最大的人口中有三个不同的特征,基于认知和身体功能,心理健康相关的QoL,和久坐的行为模式,已确定。较低的身体和认知功能与不健康的久坐模式有关。更大样本的进一步研究对于揭示社会人口统计学和高危亚组之间的潜在联系至关重要。加强我们对这一人群的久坐行为和老年健康结果的理解。
    UNASSIGNED: Sedentary behavior is most prevalent among those aged 80 years and above, referred to as the oldest-old. Current literature emphasizes the significance of sedentary behavior patterns, but further evidence is required to understand how these patterns relate to specific health outcomes and to identify at-risk profiles for tailored interventions in the oldest-old. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify profiles of adults aged 80+ years based on their sedentary patterns and health outcomes, and to examine associations between profiles and socio-demographics.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Flanders (Belgium) from February 2021 to December 2022 recruiting 90 older adults (80+) through convenience sampling, employing word of mouth, social media and local service centers. Latent profile analysis identified device-based sedentary patterns and assessed their associations with physical and cognitive functioning, mental health-related quality of life (QoL), and social isolation. Associations of these profiles with socio-demographic factors were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Three distinct profiles were identified: (1) the \'cognitively and physically frail\' profile, (2) the \'healthy\' profile and (3) the \'lower mental health-related QoL\' profile. Those in the \'cognitively and physically frail\' profile exhibited the least favorable sedentary pattern, and had a higher likelihood of residing in a nursing home. No significant differences were found for the other socio-demographic variables, being age, sex, educational degree and family situation.
    UNASSIGNED: Three distinct profiles in the oldest-old population, based on cognitive and physical functioning, mental health-related QoL, and sedentary behavior patterns, were identified. Lower physical and cognitive functioning was associated with unhealthy sedentary patterns. Further research with larger samples is crucial to uncover potential links between socio-demographics and at-risk subgroups, enhancing our understanding of sedentary behavior and geriatric health outcomes in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管它广泛用于颅骨和脊柱手术,导航支持和基于显微镜的增强现实(AR)尚未找到进入坐位后颅窝手术的方法。虽然这个位置提供了手术的好处,导航精度及其导航本身的使用似乎有限。术中超声(iUS)可以在手术过程中的任何时候应用,提供可用于准确性验证和导航更新的实时图像。在这项研究中,评估了其在坐姿中的适用性。使用标准参考阵列和新的基于刚性图像的MRI-iUS共配准,回顾性分析了15例后颅窝病变患者的数据,这些患者在坐位接受了基于磁共振成像(MRI)的导航支持手术。导航精度是根据轮廓病变的空间重叠和两个数据集中相应界标之间的距离进行评估的。分别。基于图像的共配准显着改善(p<0.001)轮廓病变的空间重叠(0.42±0.30vs.0.65±0.23),并显着减少(p<0.001)相应地标之间的距离(8.69±6.23mmvs.3.19±2.73mm),允许充分使用导航和AR支持。因此,导航iUS可以作为一种易于使用的工具,为坐姿的后颅窝手术提供导航支持。
    Despite its broad use in cranial and spinal surgery, navigation support and microscope-based augmented reality (AR) have not yet found their way into posterior fossa surgery in the sitting position. While this position offers surgical benefits, navigation accuracy and thereof the use of navigation itself seems limited. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can be applied at any time during surgery, delivering real-time images that can be used for accuracy verification and navigation updates. Within this study, its applicability in the sitting position was assessed. Data from 15 patients with lesions within the posterior fossa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based navigation-supported surgery in the sitting position were retrospectively analyzed using the standard reference array and new rigid image-based MRI-iUS co-registration. The navigation accuracy was evaluated based on the spatial overlap of the outlined lesions and the distance between the corresponding landmarks in both data sets, respectively. Image-based co-registration significantly improved (p < 0.001) the spatial overlap of the outlined lesion (0.42 ± 0.30 vs. 0.65 ± 0.23) and significantly reduced (p < 0.001) the distance between the corresponding landmarks (8.69 ± 6.23 mm vs. 3.19 ± 2.73 mm), allowing for the sufficient use of navigation and AR support. Navigated iUS can therefore serve as an easy-to-use tool to enable navigation support for posterior fossa surgery in the sitting position.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:新冠肺炎大流行引发了工作模式的持久转变,许多员工现在在家工作(w@h)。这种转变加剧了办公室工作人员现有的高水平的职业久坐行为(SB),这是对健康和福祉的公认风险。本研究旨在使用能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型来更好地了解这两个员工的SB,和直线经理的行为,以帮助员工在w@h时降低SB,并确定如何最好地支持员工以减少SB。
    方法:三个在线焦点小组,员工年龄在18-40岁之间,以桌面为基础的角色(例如行政/销售/客户服务)(n=21),和三名直线经理(n=21)进行了调查。焦点小组促进了关于参与者当前行为的讨论,什么影响它,以及当w@h时可以做些什么来降低员工SB。在COM-B框架的指导下对焦点组数据进行了主题分析,以了解对行为的影响,并确定有希望的干预策略。
    结果:大多数参与者认识到w@h提升了员工职业SB,和直线经理报告了支持员工管理工作量的重要性,鼓励和建模休息。有能力对员工和直线经理的行为有多重影响,机会和动机都被认为是有影响力的,虽然不平等。例如,一个主要主题与员工在w@h时减少SB的身体机会有关,包括模糊的工作-生活界限。身体机会的变化也使支持员工对直线经理具有挑战性。此外,W@h环境包括独特的社交机会,对这两个群体的行为产生了负面影响,包括永远在线的期望,和社会规范。提出了在个人和组织层面降低w@h时降低SB的一系列策略。
    结论:很明显,当w@h时,SB受到一系列因素的影响,因此,多组分干预策略可能最有效地降低SB。未来的干预研究是评估和完善策略的优先事项,并告知w@h指导,以保护SB升高对继续w@h的人的短期和长期健康后果。
    BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic initiated an enduring shift in working patterns, with many employees now working at home (w@h). This shift has exacerbated existing high levels of occupational sedentary behaviour (SB) in office workers, which is a recognised risk to health and well-being. This study aimed to use the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to better understand both employees\' SB, and line managers behaviour to assist employees to reduce SB when w@h, and identify how employees can best be supported to reduce SB.
    METHODS: Three online focus groups with employees aged 18-40 working in desk-based roles (e.g. administrative / sales / customer services) (n = 21), and three with line managers (n = 21) were conducted. The focus groups facilitated discussion regarding participants\' current behaviour, what impacts it, and what could be done to reduce employee SB when w@h. The focus group data were thematically analysed guided by the COM-B framework to understand influences on behaviour, and to identify promising intervention strategies.
    RESULTS: Most participants recognised that w@h had elevated employee occupational SB, and line managers reported the importance of supporting employees to manage their workload, and encouraging and modelling taking breaks. There were multiple influences on both employee and line manager behaviour with capability, opportunity and motivation all perceived as influential, although not equally. For example, a major theme related to the reduced physical opportunities for employees to reduce their SB when w@h, including blurred work-life boundaries. Changes in physical opportunities also made supporting employees challenging for line managers. Additionally, the w@h environment included unique social opportunities that negatively impacted the behaviour of both groups, including an expectation to always be present online, and social norms. A range of strategies for reducing SB when w@h at both individual and organisational level were suggested.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was evident that SB when w@h is influenced by a range of factors, and therefore multi-component intervention strategies are likely to be most effective in reducing SB. Future intervention research is a priority to evaluate and refine strategies, and inform w@h guidance to protect both the short-term and long-term health consequences of elevated SB for those who continue to w@h.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期糖尿病患者的气道管理对麻醉医师提出了重大挑战,因为关节僵硬综合征影响了寰枕关节。在某些情况下需要固定,由于明显的原因,Mallampati试验必须经常在仰卧位进行。
    因此,我们确定了糖尿病人群中坐位和仰卧位改良Mallampati试验预测困难气管插管的诊断精度(敏感性和特异性).
    对接受全身麻醉和经气管插管的成年糖尿病患者进行了单中心前瞻性观察研究。在麻醉前检查期间,观察者以坐姿记录了改良的Mallampati。在手术室时确定仰卧位的Mallampati,注意到插管的困难,并计算了诊断精度。主要目标是通过计算灵敏度来预测困难的气道,特异性,正预测值,和阴性预测值。
    在150名参与者中,Mallampati在坐姿中的分级能够正确识别42.5%的困难插管病例,而Mallampati的仰卧位为97.5%。Mallampati分级在坐位中能够正确识别89.1%的易插管病例,Mallampati仰卧位为63.6%。仰卧位Mallampati与CL分级的相关性有统计学意义(P<0.001)。
    在糖尿病患者中,改良的仰卧位Mallampati试验可被认为是比坐姿更准确、更敏感的插管困难预测指标.
    UNASSIGNED: Airway management of patients with long-standing diabetes poses a major challenge for anaesthesiologists due to stiff joint syndrome affecting the atlanto-occipital joint. In certain cases requiring immobilization, the Mallampati test must often be performed in the supine position for obvious reasons.
    UNASSIGNED: Hence, we determined the diagnostic precision (sensitivity and specificity) of the modified Mallampati test in sitting and supine positions among the diabetic population in predicting difficult tracheal intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center prospective observational study on adult diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation was carried out. An observer recorded the modified Mallampati in the sitting posture during the pre-anesthetic examination. The Mallampati in the supine position was determined while in the operating room, and the difficulty of intubation was noted, and diagnostic precision was calculated. The main objective was to predict a difficult airway by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of the 150 participants, Mallampati grading in a sitting position was correctly able to identify 42.5% of difficult intubation cases, whereas it was 97.5% with Mallampati in the supine position. Mallampati grading in the sitting position was able to correctly identify 89.1% of easy intubation cases, which was 63.6% with Mallampati in the supine position. The correlation of Mallampati in the supine position with CL grading was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Among diabetic patients, the modified Mallampati test in the supine position can be considered a more accurate and sensitive predictor of difficult intubation than the sitting posture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在24小时运动行为中花费的时间(身体活动[PA],睡眠,围产期的久坐行为[SB])对母婴健康很重要。我们描述了怀孕和产后24小时运动行为和行为指南达成的变化,并确定了行为变化的相关性。
    此次要数据分析包括来自美国的准妈妈生活方式干预(LIFE-Moms)联盟的标准护理组(n=439),包括超重和肥胖的人。使用腕部加速度测量法测量妊娠早期(9-15周)和晚期(35-36周)的运动行为,产后1年。将睡眠和中度至重度PA(MVPA)与成人和妊娠特定指南进行了比较。分别。SB被分类为四分位数。使用问卷对PA和SB背景进行量化。混合模型用于检查行为和指南的变化并确定相关性。
    参与者为31.3±3.5岁,53.5%是黑人或西班牙裔,和45.1%的人超重。睡眠持续时间随时间减少,但参与者始终符合指南(范围:85.0-93.6%)。SB在怀孕期间增加,产后减少,光PA和MVPA遵循相反的模式。参与者在妊娠晚期(1.2±0.7指南)中遇到的指南略少,但产后(1.7±0.8指南)比早孕(1.4±0.8指南)多。黑人或西班牙裔种族/种族,较高的孕前体重指数,和非日间工作轮班(例如,夜班)确定了较低的指南依从性和不同的PA和SB背景的相关性。
    围产期干预措施应考虑预防SB升高和维持MVPA的策略,以提高指南的依从性。
    UNASSIGNED: Time spent among the 24-h movement behaviors (physical activity [PA], sleep, sedentary behavior [SB]) in the perinatal period is important for maternal and child health. We described changes to 24-h movement behaviors and behavior guideline attainment during pregnancy and postpartum and identified correlates of behavior changes.
    UNASSIGNED: This secondary data analysis included the standard of care group (n = 439) from the U.S.-based Lifestyle Interventions For Expectant Moms (LIFE-Moms) consortium, including persons with overweight and obesity. Wrist-worn accelerometry was used to measure movement behaviors early (9-15 weeks) and late (35-36 weeks) pregnancy, and ∼ 1-year postpartum. Sleep and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were compared to adult and pregnancy-specific guidelines, respectively. SB was classified into quartiles. PA and SB context were quantified using questionnaires. Mixed models were used to examine changes in behaviors and guidelines and identify correlates.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were 31.3 ± 3.5 years, 53.5 % were Black or Hispanic, and 45.1 % had overweight. Sleep duration decreased across time, but participants consistently met the guideline (range: 85.0-93.6 %). SB increased during pregnancy and decreased postpartum, while light PA and MVPA followed the inverse pattern. Participants met slightly fewer guidelines late pregnancy (1.2 ± 0.7 guidelines) but more postpartum (1.7 ± 0.8 guidelines) than early pregnancy (1.4 ± 0.8 guidelines). Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, higher pregravid body mass index, and non-day work-shift (e.g., night-shift) were identified correlates of lower guideline adherence and varying PA and SB context.
    UNASSIGNED: Perinatal interventions should consider strategies to prevent SB increase and sustain MVPA to promote guideline adherence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:坐姿的关联,站立,身体活动和睡眠与心脏代谢健康和血糖控制指标是相互关联的。我们旨在确定与最佳代谢和血糖控制相关的24小时时间使用成分,并确定这些成分是否因糖尿病状态而变化。
    方法:检查了马斯特里赫特研究中2388名年龄在40-75岁的参与者(48.7%为女性;平均年龄60.1[SD=8.1]岁;n=684名2型糖尿病患者)的大腿穿着activPAL数据。组成等距对数比是从平均24小时使用时间生成的(坐,站立,光强度体力活动[LPA],中等至剧烈的身体活动[MVPA]和睡眠),并随着腰围的结果而消退,空腹血糖(FPG),2h血浆葡萄糖,HbA1c,以z分数表示的松田指数,和聚集的心脏代谢风险评分。总体分析根据人口统计学进行了调整,吸烟,饮食摄入和糖尿病状态,和糖尿病状态的相互作用进行了单独检查。用等时取代确定用另一种行为代替30分钟时的估计差异。为了确定最佳时间使用,对研究足迹范围内所有可能的24h组合物组合(每种行为的第1-第99百分位数)进行了调查,以确定与每种结局指标的最佳结局(前5%)横断面相关的组合.
    结果:组合物的久坐时间较低,站立时间较长,体力活动和睡眠与结局有最有益的关联.2型糖尿病参与者的关联更强(相互作用p<0.05),对腰围有更大的估计好处,2型糖尿病患者的FPG和HbA1c在坐位时被LPA或MVPA取代,与整体样本相比。24小时使用的平均(范围)最佳组成,考虑到所有结果,坐着6小时(范围5小时40分钟-7小时10分钟),5h10min(4h10min-6h10min)静置,LPA为2小时10分钟(2小时-2小时20分钟),2小时10分钟(1小时40分钟-2小时20分钟)的MVPA和8小时20分钟(7小时30分钟-9小时)的睡眠。
    结论:坐着的时间更短,站立的时间更多,进行体力活动和睡眠与较好的心脏代谢健康相关。与正常血糖代谢的患者相比,2型糖尿病患者的行为时间使用替代与血糖控制的相关性明显更强。尤其是当坐着的时间与更多的体力活动平衡时。
    OBJECTIVE: The associations of sitting, standing, physical activity and sleep with cardiometabolic health and glycaemic control markers are interrelated. We aimed to identify 24 h time-use compositions associated with optimal metabolic and glycaemic control and determine whether these varied by diabetes status.
    METHODS: Thigh-worn activPAL data from 2388 participants aged 40-75 years (48.7% female; mean age 60.1 [SD = 8.1] years; n=684 with type 2 diabetes) in The Maastricht Study were examined. Compositional isometric log ratios were generated from mean 24 h time use (sitting, standing, light-intensity physical activity [LPA], moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] and sleeping) and regressed with outcomes of waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h plasma glucose, HbA1c, the Matsuda index expressed as z scores, and with a clustered cardiometabolic risk score. Overall analyses were adjusted for demographics, smoking, dietary intake and diabetes status, and interaction by diabetes status was examined separately. The estimated difference when substituting 30 min of one behaviour with another was determined with isotemporal substitution. To identify optimal time use, all combinations of 24 h compositions possible within the study footprint (1st-99th percentile of each behaviour) were investigated to determine those cross-sectionally associated with the most-optimal outcome (top 5%) for each outcome measure.
    RESULTS: Compositions lower in sitting time and with greater standing time, physical activity and sleeping had the most beneficial associations with outcomes. Associations were stronger in participants with type 2 diabetes (p<0.05 for interactions), with larger estimated benefits for waist circumference, FPG and HbA1c when sitting was replaced by LPA or MVPA in those with type 2 diabetes vs the overall sample. The mean (range) optimal compositions of 24 h time use, considering all outcomes, were 6 h (range 5 h 40 min-7 h 10 min) for sitting, 5 h 10 min (4 h 10 min-6 h 10 min) for standing, 2 h 10 min (2 h-2 h 20 min) for LPA, 2 h 10 min (1 h 40 min-2 h 20 min) for MVPA and 8 h 20 min (7 h 30 min-9 h) for sleeping.
    CONCLUSIONS: Shorter sitting time and more time spent standing, undergoing physical activity and sleeping are associated with preferable cardiometabolic health. The substitutions of behavioural time use were significantly stronger in their associations with glycaemic control in those with type 2 diabetes compared with those with normoglycaemic metabolism, especially when sitting time was balanced with greater physical activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工作中的久坐行为是动脉粥样硬化的主要原因,特别是在第三级工人中。然而,尚无研究评估活动工作站对脂蛋白亚组分谱的影响.这项研究旨在评估12周便携式脚踏机(PPMs)对健康久坐工人脂蛋白亚组分的影响。
    方法:健康管理人员随机分为使用PPMs的干预组12周或使用普通桌子的对照组。使用Lipoprint®电泳评估脂蛋白亚组分。使用混合模型和敏感性分析(四个模型)探索主要结果。
    结果:我们包括40名参与者(43.7±8.6岁,100%女性BMI23.8±3.4kg/m2;工作久坐时间7.7±1.8h/天)。各组在任何结果的基线没有差异。32名参与者完成了试验。脂蛋白亚组分的变化对于LDL谱尤其明显。与LDL及其亚组分相关的所有参数都有一个相互作用时间x组:总LDL-胆固醇(p=0.012),LDL颗粒大小(p=0.027),大LDL亚组分1和2(p=0.001),和小的致密LDL亚组分3至7(p=0.046),使用粗略的模型。相互作用反映了群体之间变化方向的差异。干预组的LDL粒径显着增加(从t0时的271.9±2.5增加到t1时的272.8±1.9µngström,p=0.037),而对照组则没有变化(t0时的272.5±1.7到t1时的271.8±1.5,p=0.52)。无论采用何种模型,所有的相互作用都是持续显著的。影响变量主要是与总LDL-胆固醇增加相关的工作压力(系数3.15,95CI0.20至6.11mg/dl,p=0.038),以及与大低密度脂蛋白相关的BMI,大型HDL,IDL-C和甘油三酯。
    结论:在健康行政工作者的工作中进行12周的PPMs干预后,脂蛋白谱得到改善。主要显示LDL和LDL亚组分的变化。脂蛋白谱因工作压力而恶化,BMI和年龄。
    背景:NCT04153214。
    BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour at work is a major cause of atherosclerosis, particularly in tertiary workers. However, no studies have ever assessed the effect of active workstation on lipoprotein subfraction profile. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of 12-week portable pedal machines (PPMs) on lipoprotein subfraction profile among healthy sedentary workers.
    METHODS: Healthy administrative workers were randomized into an intervention group using PPMs for 12 weeks or a control group using normal-desk. Lipoprotein subfractions were assessed using Lipoprint® electrophoresis. Main outcomes were explored using mixed models with sensitivity analyses (four models).
    RESULTS: We included 40 participants (43.7 ± 8.6 years old, 100% women, BMI 23.8 ± 3.4 kg/m2; sedentary time at work 7.7 ± 1.8 h/day). Groups did not differ at baseline in any outcomes. 32 participants finished the trial. Changes in lipoprotein subfractions were especially marked for LDL profile. There was an interaction time x group for all parameters related to LDL and their subfractions: total LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.012), LDL particle size (p = 0.027), large LDL subfractions 1 and 2 (p = 0.001), and small dense LDL subfractions 3 to 7 (p = 0.046), using the crude model. The interaction reflects difference in the direction of changes between groups. The LDL particle size significantly increased in the intervention group (from 271.9 ± 2.5 at t0 to 272.8 ± 1.9 Ångström at t1, p = 0.037) while it did not change in the control group (272.5 ± 1.7 at t0 to 271.8 ± 1.5Å at t1, p = 0.52). All interactions were constantly significant whatever the models. Influencing variables were mainly stress at work that was associated with an increase in total LDL-cholesterol (coefficient 3.15, 95CI 0.20 to 6.11 mg/dl, p = 0.038), and BMI that was associated with Large-LDL, Large-HDL, IDL-C and triglycerides.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lipoprotein profile was improved after a 12-week PPMs intervention at work in healthy administrative workers. Changes were mainly showed for LDL and LDL subfractions. Lipoprotein profile was worsened by stress at work, BMI and age.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04153214.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号