Resin Cements

树脂水泥
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的有三个方面。首先,介绍并详细介绍了一种化学蚀刻不锈钢正畸托槽底座的新方法。其次,该研究试图调查与喷砂基底相比,化学蚀刻后支架内微观结构的结构变化,使用电子显微镜分析。最后,该研究旨在评估和比较具有化学蚀刻底座的正畸托槽与具有喷砂底座的正畸托槽的长期耐久性和生存能力,两者都使用传统的酸蚀刻技术与TransbondXT粘合剂粘合,在18个月的随访期间。
    该研究是一项随机对照试验,采用三重盲法和裂口研究设计,由两组组成。喷砂组中的托架是通过用50μm的SiO2颗粒对托架底部的凹版表面进行喷砂来制备的。使用氢氟酸使酸蚀刻组中的碱粗糙化。在电子显微镜下观察支架的底部以分析地形变化。
    总共5,803个括号(3,006酸蚀,对310名患者进行了2797次喷砂)的粘合,在一个分口设计由同一个操作员。随访18个月。在酸蚀和喷砂组中,故障率分别为2.59%和2.7%,分别。Kaplan-Meier图中的曲线非常接近,两组生存分布在log-rank(Mantel-Cox)检验中无统计学意义;x2=0.062(P值=0.804)。
    如果支架的底部可以用作喷砂的替代方案,则酸蚀刻可以在椅子侧进行。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was threefold. Firstly, it aimed to introduce and detail a novel method for chemically etching the bases of stainless-steel orthodontic brackets. Secondly, the study sought to investigate the structural alterations within the brackets\' microstructure following chemical etching compared to those with sandblasted bases, using electron microscopy analysis. Lastly, the study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term durability and survivability of orthodontic brackets with chemically etched bases versus those with sandblasted bases, both bonded using the conventional acid etch technique with Transbond XT adhesive, over an 18-month follow-up period.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was a randomized clinical control trial with triple blinding and split-mouth study design and consisted of two groups. The brackets in the sandblasted group were prepared by sandblasting the intaglio surface of the base of the bracket with 50 µm SiO2 particles. Hydrofluoric acid was used to roughen the base in the acid-etched group. The bases of the brackets were viewed under an electron microscope to analyze the topographical changes.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,803 brackets (3,006 acid-etch, 2,797 sandblasted) in 310 patients were bonded, in a split-mouth design by the same operator. The patients were followed for 18 months. The failure rate of 2.59% and 2.7% was noted in an acid-etched and sandblasted group, respectively. There was a close approximation of curves in the Kaplan-Meier plot, and the survival distribution of the two groups in the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was insignificant; x2 = 0.062 (P value = 0.804).
    UNASSIGNED: Acid etching if the bases of the brackets can be used as an alternative to sandblasting furthermore acid etching can be performed on the chair side.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:正畸治疗过程中常见的情况是正畸托槽粘结失败。这项研究调查了基于Er:YAG激光从金属和陶瓷支架的底座上去除粘合剂以进行重新粘合的影响。
    方法:从患者中收集168颗前磨牙。在第1、2、3和4组中,使用84个金属托槽粘合在前磨牙的颊表面上,而在第1组中应用了84个陶瓷托槽,II,III和IV。组1/I代表初始键合基团,第2/II组是带有新括号的重新结合组,而第3/III组和第4/IV组分别接受Er:YAG激光或火焰处理的回收支架。使用通用试验机在所有样品中进行第一和第二脱粘,以确定剪切粘结强度(SBS)。使用立体显微镜评价粘合剂残留指数(ARI)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估新的和处理过的托槽底座。通过单向方差分析了初始键合和重新键合能力的差异,ARI的差异用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行评估.
    结果:在激光处理的陶瓷托槽上观察到更大量的粘合剂残留物。第3组(26.13MPa)的回收金属支架的SBS值与第1组(23.62MPa)相当,而与第4组(12.54MPa)则有显着差异。当使用陶瓷托槽比较4组时,没有观察到这些值的显著差异。第4组ARI评分(2~3分)与其他3组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于第一组,II,III和IV,ARI评分相似(P>0.05).SEM分析未显示由Er:YAG激光处理的金属或陶瓷材料组成的支架底座明显损坏。
    结论:Er:YAG激光治疗作为一种去除粘合剂而不损坏支架的方法,优于火焰治疗。Er:YAG激光治疗后的SBS值和ARI评分与新支架相似,为Er:YAG激光治疗提供进一步的支持,作为回收脱粘支架的可行手段。
    BACKGROUND: Failure of orthodontic bracket bonds is a common occurrence during orthodontic treatment. This study investigated the impact of Er: YAG laser-based removal of adhesive from the bases of metal and ceramic brackets for re-bonding.
    METHODS: A total of 168 extracted premolars were collected from patients. 84 metal brackets were used to be bonded on the buccal surface of the premolars in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, while 84 ceramic brackets were applied in Groups I, II, III and IV. Group 1/I represented the initial bonding group, with Group 2/II being the re-bonding group with new brackets, while Groups 3/III and 4/ IV received recycled brackets treated by Er: YAG laser or flaming respectively. Both the first and second de-bonding were performed in all samples using a universal testing machine to determine the shear bond strength (SBS). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated using a stereo-microscope. The new and the treated bracket bases were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Differences in initial bonding and re-bonding ability were analyzed through one-way ANOVAs, and differences in ARI were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.
    RESULTS: Greater amounts of adhesive residue were observed on ceramic brackets treated by laser. The SBS values for recycled metal brackets in Group 3 (26.13 MPa) were comparable to Group 1 (23.62 MPa) whereas they differed significantly from Group 4 (12.54 MPa). No significant differences in these values were observed when comparing the 4 groups with ceramic brackets. ARI score in Group 4 (2-3 points) differed significantly from the three other groups (P < 0.05). For Group I, II, III and IV, similar ARI scores were observed (P > 0.05). SEM analysis didn\'t show apparent damage of bracket bases consisting of either metal or ceramic material treated by Er: YAG laser.
    CONCLUSIONS: Er: YAG laser treatment was superior to flame treatment as a means of removing adhesive without damaging the brackets. SBS values and ARI scores following Er: YAG laser treatment were similar to those for new brackets, offering further support for Er: YAG laser treatment as a viable means of recycling debonded brackets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用实验支架设计评估牙釉质粘合能力和正畸粘合剂树脂的转化程度。材料和方法。研究中使用了13颗牛齿。对实验支架进行了修改,在其主体的中心有一个半透明区域。搪瓷蚀刻后,正畸正畸粘合剂(FGM,Joinville,巴西)应用在支架底座上进行粘接。将各组划分如下(每组n=10):(1)具有标准支架的对照(CB)和(2)具有实验支架的点支架(SB),其在中心使用碳化物钻具有0.8mm的半透明区域。剪切粘结强度(SBS)在24小时后在万能试验机和粘合剂剩余指数(ARI)中评价。使用拉曼光谱(n=3/组)分析转化程度(DC)。然后使用Studentt检验和Mann-Whitney统计方法分析数据。
    与CB组(8.77MPa)相比,SB组表现出更高的平均SBS(10.33MPa)。然而,组间无统计学差异(p=0.376)。SB组和CB组的平均ARI得分为1分。拉曼分析显示,与CB组(25.9%)相比,SB组(49.3%)的转化率更高。
    实验支持物显示出更高的粘合剂转化率,虽然粘结强度没有显著增加。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the enamel bonding ability and orthodontic adhesive resin degree of conversion using the experimental bracket design. Material and Methods. Thirteen bovine teeth were used in the study. The experimental bracket was modified with a translucent region in the center of its body. After enamel etching, Orthocem orthodontic adhesive (FGM, Joinville, Brazil) was applied on the bracket base for bonding. The groups were divided as follows (n = 10 per group): (1) control (CB) with standard brackets and (2) spot bracket (SB) with experimental brackets featuring a 0.8 mm translucent region at the center using carbide bur. Shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 hours in a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant index (ARI). The degree of conversion (DC) was analyzed using Raman spectroscopy (n = 3 per group). Data were then analyzed using Student\'s t-test and Mann-Whitney statistical methods.
    UNASSIGNED: The SB group exhibited a higher mean SBS (10.33 MPa) compared to the CB Group (8.77 MPa). However, there was no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.376). Both SB and CB groups had a mean ARI score of 1. Raman analysis revealed a higher degree of conversion in the SB group (49.3%) compared to the CB group (25.9%).
    UNASSIGNED: The experimental support showed a higher degree of adhesive conversion, although there was no significant increase in bond strength.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了研究使用不同陶瓷材料制造的前腔内修复体的抗断裂性和失效模式,并使用各种胶结方法粘结。
    方法:根据所使用的陶瓷材料,将40颗上颌中切牙分为两个主要组;组I(Zir):氧化锆内分泌(ZolidHT,Ceramill,Amanngirrbach)和GroupII(E-Max):e-max内冠(IPSe.maxCAD,IvoclarVivadent)。根据胶结方案,将两组进一步分为两个亚组;IA亚组“ZirMDP”:用MDP底漆+MDP树脂水泥胶结的内胎,IB亚组(ZirNon-MDP):用MDP底漆+非MDP树脂水泥胶结,IIA亚组(E-maxMDP):用MDP底漆+MDP树脂水泥胶结,IIB亚组(E-maxNon-MDP):用MDP底漆+非MDP树脂水泥胶结。(n=10/亚组)。使用CAD/CAM制造内皮。牙齿经受10,000个热循环。在45o处以腭力方向进行骨折测试,直到发生骨折。测试结果以牛顿记录。使用立体显微镜检查故障模式。利用单向ANOVA测试来比较关于断裂强度值的不同组。Tukey的PostHoc被用于多重比较。
    结果:不同组的断裂强度比较分析得出的差异不显著,如p值超过0.05所示。尽管如此,关于故障模式出现了一个可观察到的趋势。具体来说,在所有组的牙釉质交界处(CEJ)下方的内冠状/牙齿复合体内的骨折均具有统计学意义,除了IIB组,\"E-max非MDP,“内冠状/牙齿复合体内的骨折发生在CEJ上方。
    结论:将基于MDP的底漆与基于MDP的树脂粘固剂结合使用不会对前腔内骨折强度产生显著影响。
    结论:无论组合物中是否存在MDP单体,当与MDP基陶瓷底漆一起使用时,粘合剂树脂水泥获得了非常成功的断裂强度。此外,表现出超过牙本质的弹性模量的陶瓷材料是不鼓励的,因为它们倾向于在牙齿结构内引起灾难性的骨折。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fracture resistance and failure modalities of anterior endocrown restorations fabricated employing diverse ceramic materials, and bonded using various cementation methodologies.
    METHODS: Forty maxillary central incisors were divided into two main groups based on the ceramic materials used; GroupI (Zir): zirconia endocrwons (Zolid HT+, Ceramill, Amanngirrbach) and GroupII (E-Max): e-max endocrowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). Both groups were further split into two subgroups depending on the cementation protocols; subgroup IA \"ZirMDP\": endocowns cemented with MDP primer + MDP resin cement, subgroup IB (ZirNon-MDP): cemented with MDP primer + non-MDP resin cement, subgroup IIA (E-maxMDP): cemented with MDP primer + MDP resin cement, subgroup IIB (E-maxNon-MDP): cemented with MDP primer + non-MDP resin cement. (n = 10/subgroup). Endocrowns were manufactured using CAD/ CAM. Teeth were subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles. The fracture test was performed at 45o with a palatal force direction until the fracture occurred. Test results were recorded in Newton. The failure mode was examined using a stereomicroscope. A One-way ANOVA test was utilized to compare different groups regarding fracture strength values. Tukey`s Post Hoc was utilized for multiple comparisons.
    RESULTS: The comparative analysis of fracture strength across the diverse groups yielded non-significant differences, as indicated by a p-value exceeding 0.05. Nonetheless, an observable trend emerged regarding the mode of failure. Specifically, a statistically significant prevalence was noted in fractures localized within the endocrown/tooth complex below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) across all groups, except for Group IIB, \"E-max Non-MDP,\" where fractures within the endocrown/tooth complex occurred above the CEJ.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining an MDP-based primer with an MDP-based resin cement did not result in a significant effect on the anterior endocrown fracture strength.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the presence of the MDP monomer in its composition, adhesive resin cement achieved highly successful fracture strength when used with MDP-based ceramic primers. Additionally, ceramic materials exhibiting elastic moduli surpassing those of dentin are discouraged due to their propensity to induce catastrophic fractures within the tooth structure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究调查了碳化二亚胺(EDC)与ClearfilSE自蚀刻粘合剂结合对剪切粘合强度(SBS)的影响,交联度,变性温度,牙本质的体外酶活性。
    方法:将收集的人声第三磨牙随机分为不同的组,有或没有EDC治疗(0.01-1M)。在测试SBS之前,将样品(n=16)储存24小时(立即)或12个月(老化)。获得细牙本质粉末并用相同的溶液处理。然后交联度,变性温度(Td),和酶活性进行了测试。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,以比较组间数据的差异(α=0.05)。
    结果:1.0MEDC组的即刻SBS明显下降,粘连性骨折更多,而其他组之间没有显着差异。SEM显示在所有处理下的均匀界面。经过12个月的老化,SBS显著下降。在0.3和0.5M组中发现SBS的减少较少。由于热和酶学性质的考虑,0.3和0.5M处理也显示出较高的交联度和Td,酶活性较低。
    结论:0.3和0.5MEDC可能有利于将自蚀刻粘结强度的老化延迟12个月。但仍需深入研究。
    BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of carbodiimide (EDC) combined with Clearfil SE self-etch adhesive on the shear bond strength (SBS), crosslinking degree, denaturation temperature, and enzyme activity of dentin in vitro.
    METHODS: Collected human sound third molars were randomly divided into different groups with or without EDC treatment (0.01-1 M). The specimens (n = 16)were stored for 24 h (immediate) or 12 months (aging) before testing the SBS. Fine dentin powder was obtained and treated with the same solutions. Then the crosslinking degree, denaturation temperature (Td), and enzyme activity were tested. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the differences of data between groups (α = 0.05).
    RESULTS: There was a significant drop in immediate SBS and more adhesive fracture of 1.0 M EDC group, while there were no significant differences among the other groups. SEM showed a homogeneous interface under all treatments. After 12 months of aging, the SBS significantly decreased. Less decreases of SBS in the 0.3 and 0.5 M groups were found. Due to thermal and enzymatical properties consideration, the 0.3 and 0.5 M treatments also showed higher cross-link degree and Td with lower enzyme activity.
    CONCLUSIONS: 0.3 and 0.5 M EDC may be favorable for delaying the aging of self-etch bond strength for 12 months. But it is still needed thoroughly study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进行这项研究是为了评估使用常规的双重固化树脂水泥或自粘树脂水泥胶结至根管牙本质时,重新连接和非重新连接的玻璃纤维桩的机械性能。
    使用了两种类型的树脂水泥:常规和自粘。此外,采用了2种胶结方案,涉及加固和非加固玻璃纤维柱。总的来说,对72个牛门牙进行胶结,并进行了推出粘结强度测试(n=10),然后进行了破坏模式分析。沿根管评估横截面显微硬度(n=5),和界面分析(n=3)使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行。通过3向方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验(α=0.05)分析了推出粘结强度和横截面显微硬度测试的数据。
    对于非中继玻璃纤维支柱,常规树脂水泥比自粘水泥具有更高的挤出粘结强度。相关的玻璃纤维柱在树脂粘固剂之间产生了可比的结果。II型失效是两种树脂水泥最常见的失效模式,无论胶结方案如何。重新连接的玻璃纤维柱的使用改善了两种水泥的横截面显微硬度值。SEM图像显示门牙中的空隙和气泡与未保留的玻璃纤维桩。
    机械性能受到胶结方案的影响。Relined玻璃纤维柱具有最高的推出粘结强度和横截面显微硬度值,无论使用的树脂水泥(传统的双重固化或自粘)。相反,对于非加固玻璃纤维柱,传统的双重固化树脂水泥比自粘树脂水泥效果更好。
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of relined and non-relined fiberglass posts when cemented to root canal dentin using a conventional dual-cure resin cement or a self-adhesive resin cement.
    UNASSIGNED: Two types of resin cements were utilized: conventional and self-adhesive. Additionally, 2 cementation protocols were employed, involving relined and non-relined fiberglass posts. In total, 72 bovine incisors were cemented and subjected to push-out bond strength testing (n = 10) followed by failure mode analysis. The cross-sectional microhardness (n = 5) was assessed along the root canal, and interface analyses (n = 3) were conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data from the push-out bond strength and cross-sectional microhardness tests were analyzed via 3-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post-hoc test (α = 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: For non-relined fiberglass posts, conventional resin cement exhibited higher push-out bond strength than self-adhesive cement. Relined fiberglass posts yielded comparable results between the resin cements. Type II failure was the most common failure mode for both resin cements, regardless of cementation protocol. The use of relined fiberglass posts improved the cross-sectional microhardness values for both cements. SEM images revealed voids and bubbles in the incisors with non-relined fiberglass posts.
    UNASSIGNED: Mechanical properties were impacted by the cementation protocol. Relined fiberglass posts presented the highest push-out bond strength and cross-sectional microhardness values, regardless of the resin cement used (conventional dual-cure or self-adhesive). Conversely, for non-relined fiberglass posts, the conventional dual-cure resin cement yielded superior results to the self-adhesive resin cement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术在粘结间接修复物之前,用止血剂污染牙本质负面地影响粘结强度。然而,关于哪些材料可用于清洁止血剂污染的共识尚未探讨。这项研究的目的是通过与其他三种表面清洁剂进行比较,来评估在被止血剂污染的牙本质表面上应用的Katana清洁剂对自粘树脂水泥的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。材料和方法将90例牙本质标本分为无污染组(对照组)(n=10),4组污染了25%的氯化铝(ViscostatClear)(n=40),和4组被20%硫酸铁(Viscostat)污染(n=40)。随后,每个污染组使用4种不同的清洁剂(水冲洗,磷酸,氯己定,和Katana清洁剂)。然后,自粘树脂水泥直接粘合到处理过的表面。所有样品都经历了5000个热循环的人工老化。使用万能试验机测量剪切粘结强度。结果双向方差分析显示,以污染物类型为主要因素的差异无统计学意义(p=0.655)。以清洁剂类型为主要因素具有高度显著性(p<0.001),污染物和清洁剂之间的相互作用不显著(p=0.51)。清洁剂类型是影响粘结强度的主要因素。磷酸和氯己定显示出比Katana清洁剂更好的性能。结论磷酸和氯己定清洁牙本质表面污染的性能优于Katana清洁剂。
    BACKGROUND Dentin contamination with hemostatic agents before bonding indirect restorations negatively affects the bond strength. However, the consensus on which materials could be used to clean contamination of hemostatic agents has not been explored. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Katana Cleaner applied on the surface of dentin contaminated with hemostatic agents on the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin cement by comparing it with three other surface cleaners. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety dentin specimens were divided into a no contamination group (control) (n=10), 4 groups contaminated with 25% aluminum chloride (Viscostat Clear) (n=40), and 4 groups contaminated with 20% ferric sulfate (Viscostat) (n=40). Subsequently, 4 different cleaners were used for each contamination group (water rinse, phosphoric acid, chlorhexidine, and Katana Cleaner). Then, self-adhesive resin cement was directly bonded to the treated surfaces. All specimens were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles of artificial aging. The shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. RESULTS Two-way analysis of variance showed that the contaminant type as the main factor was statistically non-significant (p=0.655), cleaner type as the main factor was highly significant (p<0.001), and interaction between the contaminant and cleaner was non-significant (p=0.51). The cleaner type was the main factor influencing the bond strength. Phosphoric acid and chlorhexidine showed better performance than Katana Cleaner. CONCLUSIONS Cleaning dentin surface contamination with phosphoric acid and chlorhexidine had better performance than with Katana Cleaner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项预先注册的离体研究检查了树脂渗透剂(图标)的牙本质杂化层形成,当与改良的隧道准备(仅咬合腔)和内部/外部龋齿浸润相结合时,参考厚度(HLT)和均匀性。粘合剂Syntac和ScotchbondMP用作对照(组1和3)或与图标组合(组2和4)。使用来自20个供体的健康第三磨牙进行分裂牙设计,每个实验组产生20个制备的牙本质腔。腔表面(n=80)被蚀刻(37%H3PO4),冲洗,空气干燥。在用乙醇再润湿之后施加相应的引物。用荧光染料标记后,Syntac粘合剂/Heliobond或ScotchbondMP粘合剂单独使用或补充Icon。HLT,通过扫描电子显微镜评估,差异不显著(P>0.05),和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜显示所有组中均匀混合/聚合的树脂-牙本质相互扩散区。图标可以成功地整合到乙醇-湿牙本质结合策略中,并将导致紧凑和均匀的混合层的可比厚度被认为相当于非图标控制,因此,在近端龋齿的内部/外部浸润的情况下,可以保留牙齿的边缘脊和齿间间隙。
    This preregistered ex vivo investigation examined the dentinal hybrid layer formation of a resinous infiltrant (Icon), with reference to both thickness (HLT) and homogeneity when combined with modified tunnel preparation (occlusal cavity only) and internal/external caries infiltration. The adhesives Syntac and Scotchbond MP were used as controls (Groups 1 and 3) or in combination with Icon (Groups 2 and 4). A split-tooth design using healthy third molars from 20 donors resulted in 20 prepared dentine cavities per experimental group. The cavity surfaces (n = 80) were etched (37% H3PO4), rinsed, and air-dried. Rewetting with ethanol was followed by application of the respective primers. After labeling with fluorescent dyes, either Syntac Adhesive/Heliobond or Scotchbond MP Adhesive was used alone or supplemented with Icon. HLT, as evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, did not significantly differ (P > 0.05), and confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed homogeneously mixed/polymerized resin-dentine interdiffusion zones in all groups. Icon can be successfully integrated into an ethanol-wet dentine bonding strategy, and will result in compact and homogeneous hybrid layers of comparable thickness considered equivalent to the non-Icon controls, thus allowing for preservation of the tooth\'s marginal ridge and interdental space in the case of internal/external infiltration of proximal caries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高速电动手持件最近在牙科专业人员中越来越受欢迎。优点包括更光滑的表面处理和增加的切割效率。
    目的:主要目的是比较使用高速空气涡轮和电动手持件在支架脱粘后树脂清理后的搪瓷表面粗糙度。次要目标是记录树脂清理所需的时间。
    方法:在水泥-牙釉质交界处清洁并切片40颗未鉴定的新鲜提取的人前磨牙。冠嵌入丙烯酸块中。搪瓷表面粗糙度参数(Ra,Rz,Rp和Rv)使用触针轮廓仪测量。托架使用光固化正畸粘合剂粘合,并在蒸馏水中储存24小时。托架脱粘后,将标本随机分为两组:第一组:使用安装在高速空气涡轮上的12槽硬质合金钻头进行树脂清理;第二组:使用电动手机。在树脂清理之后和在使用浮石和橡胶杯抛光之后测量表面粗糙度参数。记录树脂清理所需的时间。使用重复测量方差分析和独立样本t检验比较两组之间的釉质表面粗糙度和时间差异,分别为P≤0.05。
    结果:电动手机组的Ra值明显更高,Rz和Rp均在树脂清理和抛光之后。对于电动手机组,树脂清理所需的时间明显更长。
    结论:考虑到表面粗糙度和时间,电动手机似乎没有增加更大的有效性或效率,以树脂清理后正畸托槽脱粘。
    BACKGROUND: High speed electric handpieces have recently been growing in popularity among dental professionals. Advantages include smoother surface preparation and increased cutting efficiency.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare enamel surface roughness following resin cleanup after bracket debonding using highspeed air turbine versus electric handpiece. The secondary objective was to record the time needed for resin-clean up.
    METHODS: Forty deidentified freshly extracted human premolars were cleaned and sectioned at the cement-enamel junction. The crowns were embedded in acrylic blocks. Enamel surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rz, Rp and Rv) were measured using a stylus profilometer. Brackets were bonded using a light-cure orthodontic adhesive and stored in distilled water for 24 h. Following bracket debonding, the specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups: First group: resin clean-up was carried out using a 12-fluted carbide bur mounted on a high-speed air turbine; and second group: where an electric handpiece was used. Surface roughness parameters were measured following resin clean up and after polishing using pumice and a rubber cup. Time needed for resin clean-up was recorded. Differences in enamel surface roughness and time between groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVA and independent samples t-test, respectively at P ≤ 0.05.
    RESULTS: The electric handpiece groups showed significantly higher values for Ra, Rz and Rp both following resin cleanup and polishing. Time taken for resin cleanup was significantly longer for the electric handpiece group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering both surface roughness and time, electric handpiece do not seem to add greater effectiveness or efficiency to resin cleanup following orthodontic bracket debonding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:密封剂的应用是一种行之有效的预防咬合龋齿的方法;然而,关于这一主题的长期研究很少。这项研究旨在评估长期随访期间玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)和树脂基密封剂(RBS)对第二恒磨牙的存活率和临床有效性。材料和方法:本研究招募了16名年龄在11-13岁之间的患者,所有四个永久性第二磨牙都完全爆发。所有患者都接受了1年和3年的随访;然而,一名参与者在10年后没有反应,因此被排除在最终分析之外.口腔健康状况评估基于WHO标准。共有32颗牙齿接受了RBS(Clinpro),用GIC(富士IX)密封了另外32颗牙齿。密封剂保留率根据Kilpatrick标准在1年后测定,3年,10年,分别。统计分析包括卡方检验,Kaplan-Meier方法,和Cox比例风险模型。结果:在基线,七个男孩和八个女孩参加了这项研究,平均年龄12.3±0.9岁。1年的随访结果显示,90%的RBS和43.3%的GIC密封剂被完全保留,无龋齿病变记录(p=0.01)。3年的随访结果表明,23.3%的RBS和0%的GIC密封剂表现出完全保留(p=0.034)。此外,RBS组10.0%的咬合面和GIC组13.3%的咬合面被填充(p>0.05)。总共6.7%的RBS显示完全保留。10年后,三分之一的密封牙齿(30.0%的牙齿用RBS密封,36.7%的牙齿使用GIC)被填充。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在整个随访期间,与GIC相比,RBS组的生存率更高(p=0.001)。结论:尽管RBSs的存活率高于GIC密封剂,在10年的随访中,它们在预防永久性第二磨牙裂龋方面的有效性没有显著差异.
    Background and Objective: Sealant application is a proven method to prevent occlusal caries; however, long-term studies on this topic are scarce. This study aimed to assess the survival rate and clinical effectiveness of glass ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-based sealants (RBSs) on second permanent molars over a long-term follow-up period. Materials and methods: Sixteen patients aged 11-13 years with all four completely erupted permanent second molars were enrolled in the study. All patients attended 1-year and 3-year follow-ups; however, one participant did not respond after 10 years and was excluded from the final analyses. The oral health status evaluation was based on WHO criteria. A total of 32 teeth received an RBS (Clinpro), and a further 32 teeth were sealed with GIC (Fuji IX). The sealant retention was determined according to the Kilpatrick criteria after 1 year, 3 years, and 10 years, respectively. Statistical analysis included a chi-square test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: At baseline, seven boys and eight girls participated in the study, with a mean age of 12.3 ± 0.9 years. The 1-year follow-up results revealed that 90% of the RBSs and 43.3% of the GIC sealants were completely retained, and no caries lesions were recorded (p = 0.01). The 3-year follow-up results showed that 23.3% of the RBSs and 0% of the GIC sealants demonstrated complete retention (p = 0.034). Moreover, 10.0% of the occlusal surfaces in the RBS group and 13.3% of the occlusal surfaces in the GIC group were filled (p > 0.05). A total of 6.7% of the RBSs showed complete retention. One-third of the sealed teeth (30.0% of the teeth sealed with RBSs and 36.7% of teeth applied with GIC) were filled after 10 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a higher survival rate in the RBS group when compared with the GIC over the entire follow-up period (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Although the survival rate of RBSs was higher than GIC sealants, their effectiveness in preventing fissure caries in permanent second molars did not differ significantly over a 10-year follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号