OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of urethane methacrylate precursor (UMP) on the enzymatic resistance of demineralized dentin (DD) matrices.
METHODS: Experimental treatments containing 0 (control), 1, and 5 mmol/L UMP dissolved in an acetone (Ace) solution were formulated. Dentin matrix specimens were demineralized in vitro and immersed in the experimental treatments for 1 h. The treated specimens were then stored in 0.1 mg/mL collagenase solution for 24 h, after which their dry mass loss and hydroxyproline (HYP) release were assessed. The swelling ratios of specimens in each group were also evaluated. The interaction between UMP and the dentin matrix was observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Endogenous enzyme activity in dentin was evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
RESULTS: Compared with the other treatment groups, treatment with 1 mM and 5 mM UMP-Ace significantly decreased the dry mass loss, HYP release and swelling ratio of the DD matrix (p < 0.05). FE-SEM and CLSM observations showed that treatment with UMP-Ace protected the structure of the dentin matrix and decreased porosity within the dentin-collagen network.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 1 mM and 5 mM UMP-Ace protects DD matrix against collagenase degradation and may be clinically useful for improving the durability of the hybrid layer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and strength of three various dentin-bonding agents used with adhesives on primary teeth.
METHODS: The study used 80 recently extracted, healthy human maxillary anterior primary teeth that had undergone physiologic resorption, or over-retention. Teeth were cut to expose a flat dentin surface at a depth of 1.5 mm. All samples were divided into four groups (20 samples in each group) as follows: Group I-Control group, Group II-Primary teeth bonding with 6th-generation bonding agent, Group III-Primary teeth bonding with 7th-generation bonding agent, Group IV-Primary teeth bonding with 8th-generation bonding agent. All of the samples\' dentinal surfaces were covered with composite resin using a Teflon mold after adhesive had been applied. A universal testing machine (INSTRON) was used to assess the shear bond strength. Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The maximum mean shear bond strength was found in 8th-generation bonding agent (30.76 ± 0.16), followed by 7th-generation bonding agent (26.08 ± 0.21), 6th-generation bonding agent (25.32 ± 0.06), and control group (6.18 ± 0.09). Statistically significant difference was found between the three different bonding agents (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: On conclusion, the 8th-generation bonding agent demonstrated a greater shear bond strength to dentin than the 7th and 6th-generation bonding agent.
CONCLUSIONS: The emergence of different bonding techniques to the market improves the durability and quality of restorations. An effective bonding to the tooth would also reduce bacterial penetration, marginal microleakage, possibility of pulpal inflammation preserve tooth structure, and postoperative sensitivity by allowing less cavity preparation. How to cite this article: Alqarni AS, Al Ghwainem A. Assessment of the Efficacy and Bond Strength of Different Dentin-bonding Agents with Adhesives on Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):342-345.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different adhesives and veneering resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).
METHODS: A total of 138 PEEK specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups according to adhesive material application: Control (C, no application), Adhese Universal (A) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Gluma Bond Universal (G) (Heraeus Kulzer, South Bend, IN, USA), G-PremioBOND (P) (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Single Bond Universal (S) (3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and visio.link (V) (Bredent, Senden, Germany). Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of veneering material: Estenia direct composite (D) and Gradia Plus indirect composite (IN) (both GC Corporation). After the veneering process, the specimens were aged by thermal cycling. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for SBS analysis (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: The highest SBS results were obtained in the VIN group, followed by the VD, PD, GIN, AIN, AD, SIN, SD, PIN, GD, CIN and CD groups, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the type of veneering composite when the same adhesive was applied (P > 0.05), except for Gluma Bond Universal (P = 0.009). All the adhesives tested showed clinically acceptable SBS results.
CONCLUSIONS: Visio.link offered the highest adhesion to PEEK, whereas the tested universal adhesives may be used as an alternative to visio.link in clinical settings. It was determined that changing the veneer type has no statistical difference when the same adhesive material is used.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was threefold. Firstly, it aimed to introduce and detail a novel method for chemically etching the bases of stainless-steel orthodontic brackets. Secondly, the study sought to investigate the structural alterations within the brackets\' microstructure following chemical etching compared to those with sandblasted bases, using electron microscopy analysis. Lastly, the study aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term durability and survivability of orthodontic brackets with chemically etched bases versus those with sandblasted bases, both bonded using the conventional acid etch technique with Transbond XT adhesive, over an 18-month follow-up period.
UNASSIGNED: The study was a randomized clinical control trial with triple blinding and split-mouth study design and consisted of two groups. The brackets in the sandblasted group were prepared by sandblasting the intaglio surface of the base of the bracket with 50 µm SiO2 particles. Hydrofluoric acid was used to roughen the base in the acid-etched group. The bases of the brackets were viewed under an electron microscope to analyze the topographical changes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,803 brackets (3,006 acid-etch, 2,797 sandblasted) in 310 patients were bonded, in a split-mouth design by the same operator. The patients were followed for 18 months. The failure rate of 2.59% and 2.7% was noted in an acid-etched and sandblasted group, respectively. There was a close approximation of curves in the Kaplan-Meier plot, and the survival distribution of the two groups in the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was insignificant; x2 = 0.062 (P value = 0.804).
UNASSIGNED: Acid etching if the bases of the brackets can be used as an alternative to sandblasting furthermore acid etching can be performed on the chair side.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of proanthocyanidin and C. sinensis-polyphenols on microtensile bonding properties of prepared teeth with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC).
METHODS: This was an in vitro study.
METHODS: Seventy-eight maxillary premolars were selected and mounted into auto-polymerizing acrylic resin blocks. The samples were prepared and metal crowns were fabricated. The samples were randomly divided into three groups. Samples under Group 1 were not treated with any of the extracts and followed conventional bonding protocol. Samples under Group 2 and Group 3 were treated with proanthocyanidin and C. sinensis-polyphenols, respectively. After dentin treatment, these samples were luted to metal crowns using resin-modified GIC. Universal testing machine was used to measure the load at which the crowns were debonded and microtensile bond strength in MPa was calculated.
METHODS: The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD.
RESULTS: Samples treated with C. sinensis polyphenols (Group 3) had maximum bond strength followed by Group 2, where the samples were treated with proanthocyanidin.
CONCLUSIONS: C. sinensis polyphenols due to their anti-proteolytic and antioxidant properties showed improved bond strength compared to proanthocyanidin, a cross-linking agent, followed by conventional bonding protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the influence of photoinitiator types on degree of conversion (DC), rate of polymerization (RP), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM), and light transmittance (LT) of filled and unfilled light-curable resin cements through different thicknesses and shades of lithium disilicate ceramics.
METHODS: Lithium disilicate ceramic discs (IPS Emax Press, background [0.0], 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm, shades A1 and BL3) were prepared. Experimental resin-based cements [TEGDMA/BisGMA (50/50 mass%)] were prepared using either camphorquinone (CQ)/amine (0.44/1.85 mol%) or TPO (0.44 mol%)], and a micro and nanofiller loads of nil (unfilled); 40/10 mass%; and 50/10 mass%). Resin cements (0.2 mm thick) were placed on the lower surface of the ceramic specimens and light-activated for 30 s from the upper surface using a Bluephase Style curing light (exitance at tip: 1236 mW/cm2 ± 1.20). LT and distribution of irradiance through the ceramics were measured using a UV-vis spectrometer and a beam profile camera, respectively (n = 3). The DC and RP were measured in real-time using mid infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode (n = 3). FS and FM were measured using a universal testing machine (n = 5). Statistical analyses were performed on LT, DC, RP, FS, and FM data using a general linear model, and supplementary ANOVA and post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test were also performed (α = .05).
RESULTS: Thicknesses, shades, photoinitiator type, and fillers load significantly influenced the optical and mechanical characteristics of the resin-based materials (p < 0.05). The BL3 shade ceramic provided higher values of DC, RP, FS, FM, and LT compared with the A1 shade (p < 0.05). Increasing ceramic thickness decreased the properties of the resin-based materials (p < 0.05). Generally, TPO improved mechanical properties of the resin cement compared with CQ (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The luting process of indirect restorations may be improved by using high molar absorptivity, more reactive, and more efficient photoinitiators such as TPO, as opposed to conventional CQ. The use of such initiator may allow the placement of thicker and more opaque indirect restorations.

The purpose of this study was to determine the most effective method for bonding composite resin to artificially aged amalgam. A spherical amalgam alloy was triturated and condensed by hand into cylindrical plastic molds (6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height) to create 90 specimens, which were then aged for 2 weeks in closed plastic containers at 23°C. The amalgam surfaces underwent 1 of 3 surface treatments (n = 30 per treatment): (1) air particle abrasion (APA) with 50-μm aluminum oxide particles applied with a force of 45 psi from a 10-mm distance, followed by rinsing with deionized water for 60 seconds; (2) APA following the same protocol with subsequent application of a metal primer (Alloy Primer); or (3) coating with 30-μm silica (CoJet) at a force of 45 psi from a 10-mm distance until the surface turned black. Specimens were then treated with 1 of 3 adhesives (n = 10 per adhesive per surface treatment): (1) 2-step total-etch adhesive (OptiBond Solo Plus), (2) 1-step self-etching adhesive (Scotchbond Universal), or (3) dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F 2.0). Each adhesive was applied to the treated amalgam surfaces following its manufacturer\'s instructions. The specimens were placed in a bonding clamp, and nanocomposite resin columns, 2.38 mm in diameter and 2.00 mm in height, were photocured (40 seconds, 500 mW/cm2) against the treated amalgam surfaces. The specimens were stored for 24 hours in 37°C deionized water and underwent shear bond strength testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis with the Tukey test at 95% confidence. The mean (SD) shear bond strength values ranged from 12.3 (1.2) MPa for aluminum oxide-treated surfaces bonded with OptiBond Solo Plus to 25.9 (4.6) MPa for silicoated surfaces bonded with Panavia F 2.0. All bonding agents produced the highest shear bond strength when the amalgam surface was silicoated. These results indicate that composite can be effectively bonded to amalgam via silicoating.

Ceramic based on zirconium dioxide (ZD) is a modern, durable material for the manufacture of dentures. It is known that ZD is not etched as glass-ceramic, making it difficult to prepare this material before fixing.
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of various methods of surface treatment of ZD-based ceramic on adhesive strength.
METHODS: Sandblasting with Al2O3 particles sized 50 μm and application of primers with 10-MDP phosphate monomer were used. Adhesive strength values for following 4 groups of samples were obtained: 1st group - RelyX U200 + sandblasting + Compofix new primer (n=9); 2nd group - Compofix + sandblasting + Compofix new primer (n=9); 3rd group - Panavia F 2.0 + sandblasting (n=9); 4th group (control) - Variolink Esthetic DC + sandblasting + Monobond Plus primer (n=9).
RESULTS: The highest strength of adhesion was in the 4th group - 48.71±5.71MPa, the smallest in the 3rd group - 9.49±35.24 MPa. Fully domestic components used in the 2nd group allowed to obtain values of 42.50±9.79 MPa. Adhesive strength in the 1st group was 34.11±4.78 MPa.
CONCLUSIONS: The absence of the 10-MDP-based primers application in the preparation of ZD ceramic reduces the adhesive strength between resin cement and its surface. The domestic set for fixation of dentures can be effectively used for ZD on the same basis as European analogue.
Керамика на основе диоксида циркония (ДЦ) является современным, прочным материалом для изготовления зубных протезов. Известно, что ДЦ не поддается травлению как стеклокерамика, что создает трудности для его подготовки перед фиксацией.
UNASSIGNED: Изучить влияние различных методов подготовки поверхности ДЦ керамики на прочность адгезии.
UNASSIGNED: Использовалась пескоструйная обработка Al2O3 с размером частиц 50 мкм и нанесение праймеров на основе фосфатного мономера 10-MDP. Получены значения прочности адгезии для 4 групп образцов: 1-я группа — RelyX U200 + пескоструйная обработка + новый праймер Компофикс (n=9); 2-я группа — Компофикс + пескоструйная обработка + новый праймер Компофикс (n=9); 3-я группа — Panavia F 2.0 + пескоструйная обработка (n=9); 4-я группа (контроль) — Variolink Esthetic DC + пескоструйная обработка + праймер Monobond Plus (n=9).
UNASSIGNED: Наиболее высокая адгезионная прочность была в 4-й группе — 48,71±5,71 МПа, наименьшая — в 3-й группе, равная 9,49±35,24 МПа. Полностью отечественные компоненты, использованные во 2-й группе, позволили получить значения 42,50±9,79 МПа. Прочность адгезии в 1-й группе — 34,11±4,78 МПа.
UNASSIGNED: Отсутствие применения праймеров на основе 10-MDP при подготовке ДЦ керамики снижает адгезионную прочность между полимерным цементом и ее поверхностью. Отечественный комплект для фиксации зубных протезов может быть эффективно использован для ДЦ наравне с европейским аналогом.

BACKGROUND: Failure of orthodontic bracket bonds is a common occurrence during orthodontic treatment. This study investigated the impact of Er: YAG laser-based removal of adhesive from the bases of metal and ceramic brackets for re-bonding.
METHODS: A total of 168 extracted premolars were collected from patients. 84 metal brackets were used to be bonded on the buccal surface of the premolars in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, while 84 ceramic brackets were applied in Groups I, II, III and IV. Group 1/I represented the initial bonding group, with Group 2/II being the re-bonding group with new brackets, while Groups 3/III and 4/ IV received recycled brackets treated by Er: YAG laser or flaming respectively. Both the first and second de-bonding were performed in all samples using a universal testing machine to determine the shear bond strength (SBS). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated using a stereo-microscope. The new and the treated bracket bases were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Differences in initial bonding and re-bonding ability were analyzed through one-way ANOVAs, and differences in ARI were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: Greater amounts of adhesive residue were observed on ceramic brackets treated by laser. The SBS values for recycled metal brackets in Group 3 (26.13 MPa) were comparable to Group 1 (23.62 MPa) whereas they differed significantly from Group 4 (12.54 MPa). No significant differences in these values were observed when comparing the 4 groups with ceramic brackets. ARI score in Group 4 (2-3 points) differed significantly from the three other groups (P < 0.05). For Group I, II, III and IV, similar ARI scores were observed (P > 0.05). SEM analysis didn\'t show apparent damage of bracket bases consisting of either metal or ceramic material treated by Er: YAG laser.
CONCLUSIONS: Er: YAG laser treatment was superior to flame treatment as a means of removing adhesive without damaging the brackets. SBS values and ARI scores following Er: YAG laser treatment were similar to those for new brackets, offering further support for Er: YAG laser treatment as a viable means of recycling debonded brackets.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different chemical compositions of primers on the bond strength between nano-ceramic, polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and zirconia ceramic materials and dual-cure cement.
METHODS: Fifty 2 mm-thick specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, Cerasmart, and Katana Zirconia UTML. The specimens were embedded in acrylic blocks. To standardize the surfaces, 600 grit silicon carbide abrasives were applied underwater for 60 seconds. Then, each section underwent grit-blasting using Al₂O₃ with a particle size of 50 µm at 10 mm and a pressure of 2 bar for 10 seconds. Each prepared sample from the experimental groups received the appropriate primer (Z-PRIME Plus, G-Multi Primer, Alloy Primer, Clearfil Primer Plus) according to the manufacturers\' instructions. Subsequently, the prepared CAD-CAM specimens underwent cementation using Duo-Link Universal Adhesive Resin Cement with a cylinder mold of 2.6 mm diameter and 3 mm height. The cement was light-cured for 20 seconds from both sides. The specimens obtained were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The shear bond strength test of the specimens was performed using a Bisco Shear Bond Tester device. The data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test (P< 0.05).
RESULTS: The highest bond strength was observed in Z-Prime Plus applied specimens, regardless of material differences (Cerasmart 11.60±4.61; Vita Enamic 12.93±3.86; Katana Zirconia 13.85±4.00). The lowest bond strength, showing differences according to materials (P< 0.05), was found for Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus-Cerasmart (7.88±3.90), Alloy Primer-Vita Enamic (7.90±2.14), and G Multi Primer-Katana Zirconia UTML (4.98±3.67).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure of the restoration usually occurs at the weakest point in this three-element structure, thus correct primer selection according to material type is important. Additionally, for all CAD-CAM materials used in the study, Z-Prime Plus showed significantly greater adhesion strength than other systems so it may be more appropriate for use in clinics.