Anthropology, Cultural

人类学,文化
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于未来医疗保健的全球讨论强调,学习跨行业合作对于确保患者安全和满足不断变化的医疗保健需求至关重要。关于跨专业教育(IPE)的研究多种多样,但在课程设计以及如何在实践中制定IPE方面存在差距。
    目的:本研究项目将确定。1)IPE在临床安置中是如何出现的,进化,并由学生在嵌入当地医疗保健实践中制定,2)为四个国家/地区的临床实习学生设计IPE的关键因素。
    方法:一项涉及四个国家的研究(瑞典,挪威,澳大利亚和新西兰)将在2023年至2027年之间采用实践架构理论。这个项目被设计成一个国际性的,合作的多病例人种学研究,使用实践架构(TPA)的理论框架。它将包括四个IPE的人种学案例研究,每个国家都有一个。数据将按以下顺序收集:(1)在跨专业实习期间对学生的参与者观察,(2)与临床实习学生和利益相关者/专业人员的访谈,(3)非临床文件可用于支持分析,和收集的照片可以用作记忆辅助记录上下文。对“格言”的分析,行为和关系将解决文化话语的特点,物质经济,构成TPA三个关键维度的社会政治因素。将分别分析四个国际案例中的每一个。将进行跨案例分析,以在四所合作大学中建立共同的学习和关键的IPE设计元素。
    结论:在数据分析中使用TPA框架和方法将有可能确定四个研究地点的可比维度,使核心问题得到解决对于IPE设计至关重要。人种学领域研究将产生详细的描述,考虑到特定国家的文化和实践背景。该研究还将产生关于如何合作研究IPE的新知识。
    BACKGROUND: The global discourse on future health care emphasises that learning to collaborate across professions is crucial to assure patient safety and meet the changing demands of health care. The research on interprofessional education (IPE) is diverse but with gaps in curricula design and how IPE is enacted in practice.
    OBJECTIVE: This research project will identify. 1) how IPE in clinical placements emerges, evolves, and is enacted by students when embedded in local health care practices, 2) factors critical for the design of IPE for students at clinical placements across the four countries.
    METHODS: A study involving four countries (Sweden, Norway, Australia and New Zealand) using the theory of practice architectures will be undertaken between 2023 and 2027. The project is designed as an international, collaborative multiple-case ethnographic study, using the theoretical framework of practice architectures (TPA). It will include four ethnographic case studies of IPE, one in each country. Data will be collected in the following sequence: (1) participant observation of students during interprofessional placements, (2) interviews with students at clinical placement and stakeholders/professionals, (3) Non-clinical documents may be used to support the analysis, and collection of photos may be use as memory aids for documenting context. An analysis of \"sayings, doings and relatings\" will address features of the cultural- discursive, material-economic, social-political elements making up the three key dimensions of TPA. Each of the four international cases will be analysed separately. A cross case analysis will be undertaken to establish common learning and critical IPE design elements across the four collaborating universities.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of TPA framework and methodology in the analysis of data will make it possible to identify comparable dimensions across the four research sites, enabling core questions to be addressed critical for the design of IPE. The ethnographic field studies will generate detailed descriptions that take account of country-specific cultural and practice contexts. The study will also generate new knowledge as to how IPE can be collaboratively researched.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:烧伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题,与住房条件和社会经济地位密切相关。社会经济贫困社区的居民由于住房条件较老和较差以及获得防火措施的机会有限,遭受危险的风险增加。个人行为,如物质使用,吸烟,囤积经常被强调为住宅火灾的主要原因,掩盖了更广泛的社会经济和结构因素,这些因素在住房安全中也起着重要作用。本文探讨了住房条件不足和导致烧伤的火灾风险增加之间的相关性,关注塑造日常城市火灾风险的环境因素,经验,以及居住在温哥华市区东区(DTES)的单间入住(SRO)住房中的居民和在火灾中工作的工作人员的反应,健康,住房(社会和私人),和非营利部门。
    方法:作为正在进行的人种学研究的一部分,我们与温哥华消防救援服务(VFRS)合作,私下进行参与者观察,非营利组织,和政府拥有的SRO,模块化住宅,一个临时的庇护所。本文综合了来自第一作者自我反思期刊的参与者观察的见解,包括与SRO租户等大约59个人的非正式对话,SRO经理/看护人,卫生工作者,烧伤幸存者,市政工作人员,非营利性员工,和消防员。
    结果:确定了导致不公平的日常城市火灾风险的紧急住房相关问题,例如SRO建筑和系统的结构缺陷,废物管理和储存不足,以及解决囤积问题的不公平方法。此外,获取信息的差异以及人际和结构柱头之间的相互作用是重要的因素,强调迫切需要干预。
    结论:像DTES这样的社区,面对不稳定的住房条件,弱势群体,以及复杂的健康和社会挑战,需要对防火和安全采取全面和整体的方法。认识到住房不稳定之间的相互作用,精神和身体健康问题,不受管制的有毒药物供应,毒品定罪,结构性不平等使各个部门的从业人员能够制定上下文驱动的防火策略。这种多方面的方法超越了个人行为的改变,对于解决导致服务不足的社区火灾风险的复杂问题至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Burn injuries are a significant public health concern, closely linked to housing conditions and socioeconomic status. Residents in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods are at increased risk of exposure to hazards due to older and poorer housing conditions and limited access to fire protection measures. Individual behaviours such as substance use, smoking, and hoarding are often highlighted as primary causes of residential fires, overshadowing the broader socioeconomic and structural factors that also play a significant role in housing safety. This paper explores the correlation between inadequate housing conditions and heightened fire risks leading to burn injuries, focusing on the contextual factors shaping everyday urban fire risks, experiences, and responses of residents living in Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) housing in Vancouver\'s Downtown East Side (DTES) and staff working in the fire, health, housing (social and private), and non-profit sectors.
    METHODS: As part of an ongoing ethnographic study, we partnered with the Vancouver Fire Rescue Services (VFRS) to conduct participant observations in private, non-profit, and government-owned SROs, modular homes, and a temporary shelter. This paper synthesizes insights from participant observations from the first author\'s self-reflexive journals, including informal conversations with approximately fifty-nine individuals such as SRO tenants, SRO managers/caretakers, health workers, burn survivors, municipal staff, not-for-profit staff, and firefighters.
    RESULTS: Urgent housing-related issues contributing to inequitable everyday urban fire risks were identified, such as structural deficiencies in SRO buildings and systems, inadequate waste management and storage, and inequitable approaches to addressing hoarding. Additionally, disparities in access to information and the interaction between interpersonal and structural stigmas were significant factors, underscoring the pressing need for intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Communities like DTES, facing precarious housing conditions, disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and complex health and social challenges, necessitate a comprehensive and holistic approach to fire prevention and safety. Recognizing the interplay between housing instability, mental and physical health issues, unregulated toxic drug supply, drug criminalization, and structural inequities allows practitioners from various sectors to develop contextually driven fire prevention strategies. This multifaceted approach transcends individual-level behaviour change and is crucial for addressing the complex issues contributing to fire risks in underserved communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:促进因素是鼓励采用孕产妇保健服务的潜在因素,而限制因素是那些限制妇女获得孕产妇保健服务的潜在因素。尽管文化规范或价值观是影响寻求健康行为的重要因素,对这些文化规范和价值观在初级卫生保健设施中使用孕产妇保健服务的促进和限制因素的探索有限。
    目的:了解影响初级卫生保健机构使用孕产妇保健服务的文化价值观和规范的促进和限制因素。
    方法:该研究是在两个初级医疗机构(农村和城市)中使用Roper和Shapira描述的重点人种学方法进行的。该研究包括从妊娠晚期到分娩的9名妇女的189小时观察。使用有目的的滚雪球技术,数据是通过21次深度访谈收集的,由13名妇女组成的两个焦点小组讨论,和现场笔记。使用Roper和Shapira(护理研究中的人种学,2000).
    结果:使用PEN-3文化模型的关系和期望域的推动者和养育者构造,产生了四个主题:1,医护人员的态度,2,初级医疗机构内部的因素,这揭示了促进和限制因素。剩下的主题,3,服务成本高,和4,社区内的上下文问题揭示了限制获得设施护理的因素。
    结论:文化规范和价值观的几个促进和限制因素显著影响妇女寻求健康的行为和初级保健设施的使用。需要进一步研究如何利用这些因素提供适合社区文化需求的整体护理。此外,恢复和加强尼日利亚的初级保健设施对于促进可以降低孕产妇死亡率和改善孕产妇健康成果的综合护理至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Facilitating factors are potential factors that encourage the uptake of maternal health services, while limiting factors are those potential factors that limit women\'s access to maternal health services. Though cultural norms or values are significant factors that influence health-seeking behaviour, there is a limited exploration of the facilitating and limiting factors of these cultural norms and values on the use of maternal health services in primary health care facilities.
    OBJECTIVE: To understand the facilitating and limiting factors of cultural values and norms that influence the use of maternal health services in primary healthcare facilities.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in two primary healthcare facilities (rural and urban) using a focused ethnographic methodology described by Roper and Shapira. The study comprised 189 hours of observation of nine women from the third trimester to deliveries. Using purposive and snowballing techniques, data was collected through 21 in-depth interviews, two focus group discussions comprising 13 women, and field notes. All data was analyzed using the steps described by Roper and Shapira (Ethnography in nursing research, 2000).
    RESULTS: Using the enabler and nurturer constructs of the relationships and the expectations domain of the PEN-3 cultural model, four themes were generated: 1, The attitude of healthcare workers and 2, Factors within primary healthcare facilities, which revealed both facilitating and limiting factors. The remaining themes, 3, The High cost of services, and 4, Contextual issues within communities revealed factors that limit access to facility care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Several facilitating and limiting factors of cultural norms and values significantly influence women\'s health-seeking behaviours and use of primary health facilities. Further studies are needed on approaches to harness these factors in providing holistic care tailored to communities\' cultural needs. Additionally, reinvigoration and strengthening of primary health facilities in Nigeria is critical to promoting comprehensive care that could reduce maternal mortality and enhance maternal health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:沟通对于确定患者如何理解诊断过程非常重要。涉及直接观察诊断过程中的交流的实证研究相对有限。这项人种学研究旨在确定在英国急性二级保健机构中促进或抑制患者与医生之间的共同理解的交流实践。
    方法:收集了英国三家医院的急性医疗部门的数据。研究人员在评估患者时观察医生;之后直接与医生和患者进行半结构化访谈。患者也在2-4周后接受了采访。创建了个人遭遇的案例研究(包括这些访谈和观察笔记),并由一个跨学科团队进行盘问,以确定医生和患者叙述之间的分歧和趋同。对这些数据进行了主题分析。
    结果:我们进行了228小时的观察,24名医生访谈,32例患者访谈和15例患者随访访谈。医生的沟通方式各不相同。患者的诊断理解有时与医生的理解不一致;访谈表明,他们经常做出错误的假设来理解收到的零散信息。专题分析确定了似乎有助于、或抑制,患者和医生之间共享诊断理解,揭示三个主题:(1)传达从病历中了解的内容,(2)思想过程和诊断推理的共享和(3)闭环和放电通信。关于诊断过程的清晰沟通最好促进了共同的理解,已经做了什么,在急性环境中可以实现什么。书面信息在这种通信中提供了未充分利用的工具。
    结论:在英国急性二级设置中,提供有关诊断过程的更多信息通常会促进医生和患者之间的共同理解,帮助最大限度地减少可能由于对诊断的预期或结论不一致而导致的混乱和不满,以及其中的不确定性。
    咨询了患者和公众参与组(不同年龄和背景)。他们为协议的设计做出了贡献,包括面试的时间安排,后续电话采访的可接受性,面试指南和参与者信息表的开发。
    OBJECTIVE: Communication is important in determining how patients understand the diagnostic process. Empirical studies involving direct observation of communication within diagnostic processes are relatively limited. This ethnographic study aimed to identify communicative practices facilitating or inhibiting shared understanding between patients and doctors in UK acute secondary care settings.
    METHODS: Data were collected in acute medical sectors of three English hospitals. Researchers observed doctors as they assessed patients; semistructured interviews were undertaken with doctors and patients directly afterwards. Patients were also interviewed 2-4 weeks later. Case studies of individual encounters (consisting of these interviews and observational notes) were created, and were cross-examined by an interdisciplinary team to identify divergence and convergence between doctors\' and patients\' narratives. These data were analysed thematically.
    RESULTS: We conducted 228 h of observation, 24 doctor interviews, 32 patient interviews and 15 patient follow-up interviews. Doctors varied in their communication. Patient diagnostic understanding was sometimes misaligned with that of their doctors; interviews revealed that they often made incorrect assumptions to make sense of the fragmented information received. Thematic analysis identified communicative practices that seemed to facilitate, or inhibit, shared diagnostic understanding between patient and doctor, revealing three themes: (1) communicating what has been understood from the medical record, (2) sharing the thought process and diagnostic reasoning and (3) closing the loop and discharge communication. Shared understanding was best fostered by clear communication about the diagnostic process, what had already been done and what was achievable in acute settings. Written information presents an underutilised tool in such communication.
    CONCLUSIONS: In UK acute secondary settings, the provision of more information about the diagnostic process often fostered shared understanding between doctor and patient, helping to minimise the confusion and dissatisfaction that can result from misaligned expectations or conclusions about the diagnosis, and the uncertainty therein.
    UNASSIGNED: A patient and public involvement group (of a range of ages and backgrounds) was consulted. They contributed to the design of the protocol, including the timing of interviews, the acceptability of a follow-up telephone interview, the development of the interview guides and the participant information sheets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行和当前的生活成本危机凸显了社会经济模式的健康差异,重新关注公共卫生公平。尽管政治言论援引了平等主义的文化叙事和阶级流动的机会,在澳大利亚,社会阶层仍然是健康结果的重要因素。对于社会科学家来说,类(尽管有力的批评)是一个关键的分析概念,理论上已经扩大到包括社会和文化习俗(习惯)。在公共卫生方面,然而,社会劣势的概念已经扩展到诸如健康公平和社会经济地位等框架,以掩盖“阶级”和习惯的方式。对阶级和公平概念的理解和操作化不仅影响协作和跨学科关系,以及公共卫生问题和健康促进干预措施和政策的框架。在这篇文章中,我们借鉴人类学家在澳大利亚健康促进计划中进行人种学的经验,以绘制和重新评估社会阶层和公平概念的交集。我们追踪这些程序中阶级的表现是如何出现的,以及在不同公共卫生环境中实现的阶级和公平版本。我们主张对阶级进行概念上的重新定位,以认识到其在不同政治中的形态变化和物化,学科和日常环境。在这样做的时候,我们强调\'class\'作为设计的一个显著维度,健康促进计划的实施和评估。
    The COVID-19 pandemic and current cost of living crisis have highlighted socioeconomically patterned health disparities, bringing renewed focus on equity in public health. Despite political rhetoric invoking cultural narratives of egalitarianism and opportunities for class mobility, social class remains a significant factor in health outcomes in the Australian context. For social scientists, class (despite robust critiques) is a key analytical concept that has been theoretically broadened to encompass social and cultural practices (habitus). In public health, however, concepts of social disadvantage have expanded toward frames such as health equity and socioeconomic status in ways that can obscure \'class\' and habitus. Understandings and operationalization of concepts of class and equity not only impact collaborative and interdisciplinary relationships, but also the framing of public health problems and health promotion interventions and policies. In this article, we draw on our experiences as anthropologists conducting ethnography in and of Australian health promotion programs to map and re-evaluate the intersection of concepts of social class and equity. We trace how representations of class emerged in these programs, and the versions of class and equity that materialized across different public health contexts. We argue for a conceptual repositioning of class that recognizes its shape-shifting qualities and of its materializations in different politics, disciplines and everyday contexts. In doing so, we highlight \'class\' as a salient dimension of the design, implementation and evaluation of health promotion programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The text attempts to understand the development of collaborative audiovisual knowledge practices in anthropology as situated and diffractive knowledge (Haraway, Barad, Smith). By considering specific stages in the history of collaborative and participatory projects, the article argues that collaborative filmmaking is not only a decentering of one-sided authorship and one-sided modes of representation, but also a media-specific form of knowledge that is bound to and embedded in social contexts. Through the example of colonial film, the article describes stations of demarcation and attempts to decolonize film. Current film experiments with marginalized groups have their origins in \"shared anthropologies\" (Rouch) and have further developed this approach through more consistent forms of Fourth Cinema and power sharing with Indigenous communities. Film is thus also able to depict amateur knowledge practices within collaborative research projects.
    Der Text schlägt vor, die Entwicklung kollaborativer audiovisueller Wissenspraktiken in der Anthropologie als situiertes und diffraktives Wissen zu verstehen (Haraway, Barad, Smith). Im Durchgang durch einige historische Stationen der Geschichte kollaborativer und partizipativer Projekte wird vorgeschlagen, dass kollaboratives Filmemachen nicht nur eine Dezentrierung einseitiger Autor:innenschaft und einseitiger Repräsentationsmodi ist, sondern auch eine medienspezifische Wissensform, die an soziale Kontexte gebunden und in diese eingebettet ist. Vor dem Hintergrund des Kolonialfilms werden Stationen der Abgrenzung und Versuche der Dekolonisierung des Films beschrieben. Aktuelle Filmexperimente mit marginalisierten Gruppen haben ihren Ursprung in den „shared anthropologies“ (Rouch) und haben diesen Ansatz durch konsequentere Formen des power sharing in Indigenen Kollaborationen und im Fourth Cinema weiterentwickelt. Film kann so auch Amateur:innenwissenspraktiken in kollaborativen Forschungsprojekten abbilden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    要分析护理专家教授确定的基本方面,口译,并在课堂对话过程中与学生进行组织,以促进他们的学习。
    定性研究,多中心研究的一部分,特别是从微观人种学方法中使用了人种学。麦德林一所公立大学护理学院的专家教授,哥伦比亚,被选中进行研究。实地工作分三个阶段进行:1:从两个不同的角度(一个专注于教授,另一个专注于学生)记录在视频中的两个形态生理学课程面对面课程中的非参与者观察;2:对教授和五名学生(第一类三个,第二类两个)进行大声思考访谈,他们在课堂上自发地与教授开始了两次以上的交流互动;3:平行转录,组织在说教序列(视频)。该分析得到了单元学生-教授(识别-评估-答案)学生[S-P(i-e-a)S\']的支持,并通过数据的连续比较。
    确定了四个类别:1:基本方面的识别:先验知识的重要性,2:解释:基本方面与学生心理过程之间的联系,3:答案的组织:先验知识和新知识之间的联系,和:4:与学生的学习需求同步,将其分组为一个元类别:学生的先验知识:学习的基本方面。
    学生的经验先验知识构成了确定的基本方面,解释,并由专家教授组织,以实现重要的学习。
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the essential aspects that the nursing expert professor identifies, interprets, and organizes during classroom dialogic processes with students to foster their learning.
    UNASSIGNED: Qualitative study, part of a multicenter study, which used ethnography of communication specifically from a micro-ethnographic approach. An expert professor from the Faculty of Nursing at a public university in Medellín, Colombia, was selected for the study. The fieldwork was done in three stages: 1:non-participant observations in two in-person classes of the Morphophysiology course recorded on video from two different perspectives (one focusing on the professor and another on the students); 2:think-aloud interviews with the professor and five students (three from the first class and two from the second) who spontaneously started more than two communicative interactions with the professor during the classes; and 3:parallel transcriptions, organized in didactic sequences (videos). The analysis was supported by the unit Student-Professor (identification-evaluation-answer) Student [S-P(i-e-a)S\'], and by continuous comparisons of the data.
    UNASSIGNED: Four categories were identified: 1: Identification of essential aspects: importance of prior knowledge, 2: Interpretation: connection between essential aspects and students\' mental processes, 3: Organization of the answer: connection between prior knowledge and new knowledge, and: 4: Synchronization with the learning needs of the students, which were grouped in a meta-category: Prior knowledge of the students: essential aspects for learning.
    UNASSIGNED: Students\' experiential prior knowledge constitutes the essential aspects identified, interpreted, and organized by the expert professor to achieve significant learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:公众参与可以得到决策者的支持和限制。因此,公民要么以自上而下批准的格式参与,要么不得不转向颠覆。这些不同的参与实践,被邀请和不请自来,通常被研究人员视为相互排斥的。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了患者组织参与俄罗斯各种国家控制的审议机构的案例,这不适合患者参与实践的平滑二元区分。相反,确定的患者参与实践将看门人批准的互动与互动相结合,具有颠覆性和草根性。概念上,这意味着邀请参与和非邀请参与可以更好地理解为交织在一起的生态。
    方法:本文基于定性的人种学研究,其中包括对国家控制的公众参与机构会议的参与性观察,例如公共委员会,与这些机构的成员进行了51次半结构化访谈,并对相关政策和方法文件进行了分析。获得了记录和转录所有访谈的知情同意。已使用主题分析来产生结果。
    结果:俄罗斯患者组织通常非正式地工作,独立于国家批准的实践。一些颠覆性做法发生在官方会议之外,其他人成为广泛使用的最佳实践,其他人仍然是日常平凡的互动,这有助于维持患者组织的独立性,以对抗否则占主导地位和非民主的国家行为者。
    结论:患者参与的生态化方法,将邀请和非邀请的做法解释为相互关联的,对于尽管存在与专制环境相关的所有限制,但公民仍保持独立的情况具有更好的解释力。将邀请和不请自来的做法概念化为情境,或单独的时间和空间事件,是一个有用的理论框架,可以理解多样化和看似矛盾的公众参与实践。
    研究参与者传达了对初始研究框架的修订,以纳入他们的需求。反复的访谈可以对研究参与者的初步发现进行三角测量。这篇文章是与患者组织代表合著的,直接为数据分析和演示做出了贡献。
    BACKGROUND: Public participation can be both supported and limited by decision-makers. Therefore, citizens either participate in top-down approved formats or have to turn towards subversion. These different participation practices, called invited and uninvited, are often treated by researchers as mutually exclusive. In this article, we present the case of patient organisations\' involvement in various state-controlled deliberation bodies in Russia, which does not fit into a smooth binary distinction of the patient participation practice. Instead, identified patient participation practices combine interaction approved by gatekeepers with interaction, which are subversive and grassroots-initiated. Conceptually, it means that invited and uninvited participation can be better understood as intertwined ecologies.
    METHODS: The article is based on a qualitative ethnographic study, which includes participatory observations of the meetings of state-controlled public participation bodies, such as public councils, 51 semi-structured interviews with members of these bodies and an analysis of the relevant policy and methodological documents. Informed consent to record and transcribe all interviews was obtained. Thematic analysis has been used to produce the results.
    RESULTS: Russian patient organisations often work informally and independently of state-approved practices expected from them. Some subversive practices happen outside official meetings, others become widely used best practices and others remain everyday mundane interactions, which contribute to the maintenance of the independence of patient organisations against otherwise dominating and nondemocratic state actors.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ecologising approach to patient participation, which interprets invited and uninvited practices as interconnected, has better explanatory power for cases in which citizens maintain independence despite all limitations associated with authoritarian settings. Conceptualising invited and uninvited practices as situations, or separate time- and space-bound events, is a helpful theoretical framework for understanding diverse and seemingly contradictory public participation practices.
    UNASSIGNED: Research participants communicated amendments to the initial research framework to incorporate their needs. Repeated interviews allowed triangulation of preliminary findings with research participants. The article is co-authored with the patient organisation representative, who has contributed directly to data analysis and presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管智障人士的寿命至少增加了一般人群的寿命,对这些老年人来说,缺乏与老龄化相关的干预措施。因此,这项研究调查了教育者在一项新的量身定制的教育干预措施中的实施策略,目的是支持轻度智力障碍患者的衰老过程。采用了人种学研究设计,包括参与者的观察,字段注释,和对教育工作者的15次特别采访,在四个城镇传播了两年。在两个主题中表达了用于促进学习老龄化的策略,这两个主题通过每个人的参与和共同学习以及通过认可和巩固相互学习来促进社会团结。这些策略被用来创造一个以良好的氛围和尊重的互动为特征的学习环境。一起学习包括通过重复进行巩固,小组讨论,使用视觉学习材料,和学习访问。这种关于老龄化的新教育干预是有希望的,但是,也应开发资源较少的干预措施,并最好将其纳入残疾服务。在总结这种教育是否支持衰老过程之前,它需要从智障人士的角度来评估。
    Despite the fact that longevity in people with intellectual disability has increased at least as much as in the general population, there is a dearth of interventions related to ageing for these older people. Therefore, this study investigated educators\' implementation strategies in a new tailor-designed educational intervention with the goal of supporting the process of ageing for people with mild intellectual disability. An ethnographic research design was employed, including participant observations, field notes, and 15 ad hoc interviews with educators, spread over two years in four towns. The strategies used for facilitating learning about ageing were expressed in the two themes promoting social togetherness through everyone\'s participation and learning together and from each other through recognition and consolidation. These strategies were applied to create a learning environment characterised by a good atmosphere and respectful interaction. Learning together involved consolidation through repetition, group discussions, the use of visual learning materials, and study visits. This new educational intervention about ageing is promising, but less resource-intensive interventions should also be developed and preferably integrated into the disability service. Before concluding whether this education supports the ageing process, it needs to be evaluated from the perspective of people with intellectual disability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    童工是剥夺儿童许多基本权利的重要社会问题之一,让他们面临许多问题和后果,包括健康问题。因此,这项研究的目的是检查德黑兰劳动儿童的健康状况。这是一项使用Carspecken方法进行的人种学研究,并于2022年完成。这项研究的主要参与者包括居住在德黑兰的10-18岁的工作儿童。为了收集信息,研究人员出现在工作场所,学校,和工作儿童居住超过两年的地方,观察他们的生活和活动。还对童工和知情人士进行了正式和非正式的采访。总的来说,在这项研究中,对数百名工作儿童进行了评估和观察。研究人员和50多个孩子进行了友好的交谈,并对六名在职儿童进行了官方采访。此外,对知情人士和在职儿童的父母进行了10多次正式采访。除了观察和访谈,还检查和解释了诸如医疗记录和工作儿童图纸之类的文件。从观察中获得的信息,采访,文件被输入到MAXQDA软件中,并提取其原始代码。高级代码以及子类别和主要类别是由低级代码的聚合形成的。健康受损是由折磨身体的三个亚类(工作和环境创伤,性虐待,营养不良,疲劳,睡眠障碍和卫生条件不足),不安的头脑(焦虑的孩子,抑郁和孤立,自尊心降低和注意力不集中)和社交能力中断(消极的社会角色建模,侵略和暴力,固执和报复,骚扰和滋扰,应受谴责的社会行为,忽视他人的所有权,扰乱的关系和群体外的自我审查)。本研究的结果表明,工作儿童的健康受到各种身体损害,心理,和社交方式。因此,应该在国家和国际层面采取一些措施来改善他们的健康,例如修订有关儿童的现行法律,并告知儿童其权利。
    Child labor is one of the important social issues that deprive children of many fundamental rights, and make them face many problems and consequences, including health problems. Thus, this study was conducted with the aim of examining the health of working children in Tehran. This is an ethnographic study that was conducted using Carspecken\'s approach and was completed in 2022. The main participants of this study included working children aged 10-18 years living in Tehran. In order to collect information, the researcher was present at the workplace, school, and living places of working children for more than two years, observing their lives and activities. Formal and informal interviews were also conducted with the working children and informed people. In total, hundreds of working children were assessed and observed in this research. A friendly conversation was formed between the researcher and more than 50 children, and official interviews were conducted with six of the working children. Also, more than 10 official interviews were conducted with informed people and parents of working children. In addition to observations and interviews, documents such as medical records and drawings of working children were also examined and interpreted. The information obtained from observations, interviews, and documents was entered into MAXQDA software, and its raw codes were extracted. The high-level codes as well as sub and main categories were formed from the aggregation of low-level codes. Impaired health was formed from three subcategories of tormented body (work and environmental trauma, sexual abuse, malnutrition, fatigue, sleep disorder and inadequate hygiene), disquieted mind (anxious children, depression and isolation, reduced self-esteem and unfocused mind) and disrupted sociability (negative social role modeling, aggression and violence, stubbornness and vindictiveness, harassment and nuisance, reprehensible social behaviors, neglecting others\' ownership, disturbed relationships and out-group self-censorship). The results of the present study showed that the health of working children is compromised in various physical, psychological, and social ways. Therefore, some measures should be taken at the national and international levels to improve their health, such as revising the existing laws regarding children and informing children of their rights.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号