30-day mortality

30 天死亡率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于癌症本身及其治疗引起的免疫抑制,癌症患者易受感染。抗微生物抗性细菌的出现进一步使感染的治疗复杂化并增加死亡率和住院时间。本研究旨在调查微生物谱,抗菌素耐药性模式,危险因素,以及它们对这些患者临床结局的影响。
    方法:一项前瞻性研究在Patna的三级癌症医院进行,比哈尔邦,印度,其中包括18岁及以上微生物培养阳性的癌症患者。
    结果:这项研究分析了440名患者,其中53%(234)是女性,平均年龄49.27(±14.73)岁。共鉴定出541株分离株,其中48.01%(242)为多重耐药(MDR),29.76%(150)存在广泛耐药(XDR),敏感率为19.84%(112)。这项研究表明,接受手术的患者,化疗,住院了,有抗生素暴露史,并且有严重的中性粒细胞减少更容易受到MDR和XDR感染。平均住院时间为16.90(±10.23),18.30(±11.14),敏感患者为22.83(±13.22)天,MDR,和XDR感染,分别。该研究还显示,30天的总体死亡率为31.81%(140),而MDR和XDR组的30天死亡率分别为38.92%和50.29%(P<0.001)。确定可能导致死亡的危险因素,癌症复发,脓毒症,化疗,留置侵入性装置,如Foley导管,中心静脉导管和莱尔管,MASCC评分(<21)和肺炎。
    结论:本研究强调对癌症患者进行个性化干预的必要性,例如确定有感染风险的患者,明智的抗生素使用,感染控制措施,以及实施抗菌药物管理计划,以降低抗菌药物耐药感染率和相关死亡率以及住院时间。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are vulnerable to infections due to immunosuppression caused by cancer itself and its treatment. The emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria further complicates the treatment of infections and increases the mortality and hospital stays. This study aimed to investigate the microbial spectrum, antimicrobial resistance patterns, risk factors, and their impact on clinical outcomes in these patients.
    METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Patna, Bihar, India, which included cancer patients aged 18 years and older with positive microbial cultures.
    RESULTS: This study analysed 440 patients, 53% (234) of whom were females, with an average age of 49.27 (± 14.73) years. A total of 541 isolates were identified, among which 48.01% (242) were multidrug resistant (MDR), 29.76% (150) were extensively drug resistant (XDR), and 19.84% (112) were sensitive. This study revealed that patients who underwent surgery, chemotherapy, were hospitalized, had a history of antibiotic exposure, and had severe neutropenia were more susceptible to MDR and XDR infections. The average hospital stays were 16.90 (± 10.23), 18.30 (± 11.14), and 22.83 (± 13.22) days for patients with sensitive, MDR, and XDR infections, respectively. The study also revealed overall 30-day mortality rate of 31.81% (140), whereas the MDR and XDR group exhibited 38.92% and 50.29% rates of 30-day mortality respectively (P < 0.001). Possible risk factors identified that could lead to mortality, were cancer recurrence, sepsis, chemotherapy, indwelling invasive devices such as foley catheter, Central venous catheter and ryles tube, MASCC score (< 21) and pneumonia.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the necessity for personalized interventions among cancer patients, such as identifying patients at risk of infection, judicious antibiotic use, infection control measures, and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to reduce the rate of antimicrobial-resistant infection and associated mortality and hospital length of stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血清阴离子间隙(AG)可以潜在地应用于各种代谢性酸中毒的诊断,最近的一项研究报告了AG与2019年冠状病毒病患者(COVID-19)死亡率的相关性。然而,AG与呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者短期死亡率的关系尚不清楚.在这里,我们旨在调查AG与VAP患者30天死亡率之间的关系,并构建和评估VAP30天死亡风险的多变量预测模型。
    这项回顾性队列研究从重症监护医学信息集市III(MIMIC-III)数据库中提取了477例VAP患者的数据。将患者的数据分为训练集和测试集,比率为7:3。在训练集中,通过单变量Cox回归和逐步回归分析,将与VAP患者30日死亡率显著相关的变量纳入多变量预测模型.然后,在训练集和测试集中评估了多变量预测模型的预测性能,并与单个AG和其他评分系统(包括顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分)进行比较,混乱,尿素,呼吸频率(RR),血压,年龄(≥65岁)(CURB-65)评分,和血尿素氮(BUN),精神状态改变,脉搏,年龄(>65岁)(BAP-65)评分。此外,在性别亚组中探讨了AG与VAP患者30天死亡率的关系,年龄,和感染状况。评价指标为危害比(HR)、C指数,和95%置信区间(CI)。
    共有70名患者在30天内死亡。多变量预测模型由AG组成(HR=1.052,95%CI:1.008-1.098),年龄(HR=1.037,95%CI:1.019-1.055),机械通气的持续时间(HR=0.998,95%CI:0.996-0.999),和血管升压药的使用(HR=1.795,95%CI:1.066-3.023)。在训练集(C指数=0.725,95%CI:0.670-0.780)和测试集(C指数=0.717,95%CI:0.637-0.797)中,多变量模型的预测性能优于单个AG值。此外,在男性患者中也发现了AG与30天死亡率的关联(HR=1.088,95%CI:1.029-1.150),无论感染何种病原体(细菌感染:HR=1.059,95%CI:1.011-1.109;真菌感染:HR=1.057,95%CI:1.002-1.115)。
    AG相关的多变量模型对VAP患者的30天死亡率具有潜在的预测价值。这些发现可能为进一步探索简单、可靠的VAP短期死亡风险预测因子提供一定的参考。这可能进一步帮助临床医生在重症监护病房(ICU)的早期阶段识别具有高死亡风险的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Serum anion gap (AG) can potentially be applied to the diagnosis of various metabolic acidosis, and a recent study has reported the association of AG with the mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the relationship of AG with the short-term mortality of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is still unclear. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association between AG and the 30-day mortality of VAP patients, and construct and assess a multivariate predictive model for the 30-day mortality risk of VAP.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study extracted data of 477 patients with VAP from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Data of patients were divided into a training set and a testing set with a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, variables significantly associated with the 30-day mortality of VAP patients were included in the multivariate predictive model through univariate Cox regression and stepwise regression analyses. Then, the predictive performance of the multivariate predictive model was assessed in both training set and testing set, and compared with the single AG and other scoring systems including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the confusion, urea, respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure, and age (≥65 years old) (CURB-65) score, and the blood urea nitrogen (BUN), altered mental status, pulse, and age (>65 years old) (BAP-65) score. In addition, the association of AG with the 30-day mortality of VAP patients was explored in subgroups of gender, age, and infection status. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (HRs), C-index, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 70 patients died within 30 days. The multivariate predictive model consisted of AG (HR =1.052, 95% CI: 1.008-1.098), age (HR =1.037, 95% CI: 1.019-1.055), duration of mechanical ventilation (HR =0.998, 95% CI: 0.996-0.999), and vasopressors use (HR =1.795, 95% CI: 1.066-3.023). In both training set (C-index =0.725, 95% CI: 0.670-0.780) and testing set (C-index =0.717, 95% CI: 0.637-0.797), the multivariate model had a relatively superior predictive performance to the single AG value. Moreover, the association of AG with the 30-day mortality was also found in patients who were male (HR =1.088, 95% CI: 1.029-1.150), and whatever the pathogens they infected (bacterial infection: HR =1.059, 95% CI: 1.011-1.109; fungal infection: HR =1.057, 95% CI: 1.002-1.115).
    UNASSIGNED: The AG-related multivariate model had a potential predictive value for the 30-day mortality of patients with VAP. These findings may provide some references for further exploration on simple and robust predictors of the short-term mortality risk of VAP, which may further help clinicians to identify patients with high risk of mortality in an early stage in the intensive care units (ICUs).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:院内心肌梗塞(AMI)较少采用侵入性干预治疗,与院外AMI相比。我们旨在确定院内AMI患者的侵入性干预的决定因素,并评估其与死亡率的关系。与保守治疗相比。方法:这是萨克森州-安哈尔特州区域性心肌梗死登记处医院内AMI的横断面研究。根据治疗策略(侵入性干预与保守治疗)。进行Logistic回归评估侵入性干预的决定因素(与保守治疗)及其与30天死亡率的关系。结果:近67%的患者(259/386)接受了侵入性干预,其余的都是保守的。接受侵入性干预治疗的人比保守治疗的人更年轻,慢性心力衰竭的比例更低。与年轻患者相比,年龄>75岁,预先存在的心力衰竭,出现时心率较高与接受侵入性干预的几率较低相关.高血压(OR=2.86,95%CI[1.45-5.62])和STEMI与NSTEMI(1.96,[1.10-3.68])与较高的侵入性干预几率相关。与保守治疗相比,侵入性干预治疗30天死亡率的校正几率较低(0.25,[0.10-0.67])。结论:三分之一的住院AMI患者接受保守治疗。年龄更小,没有心力衰竭,降低心率,高血压,和STEMI是侵入性干预使用的决定因素。侵入性干预的30天死亡率较低,但仍需要纵向研究来评估保守与保守的疗效。医院AMI的侵入性策略。
    Background/Objectives: In-hospital myocardial infarctions (AMIs) are less often treated with invasive intervention, compared to out-of-hospital AMIs. We aimed to identify the determinants of invasive intervention in patients with in-hospital AMIs and assess its association with mortality, compared to conservative treatment. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of in-hospital AMIs in The Regional Myocardial Infarction Registry of Saxony-Anhalt. Patients\' characteristics and outcomes were compared based on the treatment strategy (invasive intervention vs. conservative treatment). Logistic regression was performed to assess the determinants of invasive intervention (vs. conservative treatment) and its association with 30-day mortality. Results: Nearly 67% of the patients (259/386) received invasive intervention, and the rest were treated conservatively. Those who were treated with an invasive intervention were younger and had a lower proportion of chronic heart failure than those treated conservatively. Age > 75 years compared to younger patients, pre-existing heart failure, and higher heart rate upon presentation were associated with lower odds of receiving invasive intervention. Hypertension (OR = 2.86, 95% CI [1.45-5.62]) and STEMI vs. NSTEMI (1.96, [1.10-3.68]) were associated with higher odds of invasive intervention. The adjusted odds of 30-day mortality were lower with invasive intervention compared to conservative treatment (0.25, [0.10-0.67]). Conclusions: One-third of the patients with in-hospital AMIs received conservative treatment. Younger age, absence of heart failure, lower heart rate, hypertension, and STEMI were determinants of invasive intervention usage. Invasive intervention had lower odds of 30-day mortality, but longitudinal studies are still needed to assess the efficacy of conservative vs. invasive strategies in in-hospital AMIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一种新型病毒,SARS-CoV-2引起了致命的全球大流行,特别影响老年人和合并症患者。髋部骨折影响老年人群,必须入院,并使这一群体面临感染COVID-19的特殊风险。这项研究调查了COVID-19感染对30天髋部骨折死亡率的影响。
    回顾了2020年3月和4月两个单位收治的75例成人髋部骨折的相关数据。平均年龄为83.5岁(范围65-98岁),大多数(53,70.7%)是女性。主要结局指标是与COVID-19感染相关的30天死亡率。
    COVID-19感染率为26.7%(20例),COVID-19阳性组(10/20,50%)与COVID-19阴性组(4/55,7.3%)的30天死亡率有显著差异,平均死亡时间为19.8天(95%置信区间:17.0-22.5)。从入院到手术的平均时间为43.1h和38.3h,在COVID-19阳性和COVID-19阴性组中,分别。所有COVID-19阳性患者均出现发热和咳嗽症状,死亡的10例都是缺氧。7例(35%)病例的放射学肺部检查结果与病毒性肺炎一致,导致死亡(占死亡率的70%)。30%(n=6)在社区感染了COVID-19,70%(n=14)在入院后出现症状。
    与COVID-19感染相关的髋部骨折具有较高的30天死亡率。对髋部骨折患者进行COVID-19检测和胸部X光检查有助于早期规划高风险手术,并允许患者和家属根据实际预后进行咨询。
    UNASSIGNED: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65-98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0-22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% (n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% (n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一种新型病毒,SARS-CoV-2引起了致命的全球大流行,特别影响老年人和患有合并症的人。髋部骨折影响老年人群,需要住院,并将这一人群置于COVID-19感染的特殊风险中。这项研究调查了COVID-19感染对30天髋部骨折死亡率的影响。
    回顾了2020年3月和4月两个单位收治的75例成人髋部骨折的相关数据。平均年龄为83.5岁(65-98岁),大多数(53,70.7%)是女性。主要结局指标是与COVID-19感染相关的30天死亡率。
    COVID-19感染率为26.7%(20例),COVID-19阳性组(10/20,50%)与COVID-19阴性组(4/55,7.3%)的30天死亡率差异显著,平均死亡时间为19.8天(95%置信区间17.0-22.5)。从入院到手术的平均时间为43.1小时和38.3小时,在COVID-19阳性和COVID-19阴性组中,分别。所有COVID-19阳性患者均出现发热和咳嗽症状,死亡的10例都是缺氧。7例(35%)病例的放射学肺部检查结果与病毒性肺炎一致,导致死亡(占死亡率的70%)。30%(n=6)在社区感染了COVID-19感染,70%(n=14)在入院后出现症状。
    与COVID-19感染相关的髋部骨折具有较高的30天死亡率。髋部骨折患者的COVID-19检测和胸部X光检查,有助于高风险手术的早期计划,并允许使用现实预后为患者和家庭提供咨询。
    UNASSIGNED: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2 has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with co-morbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions, and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Data related to seventy-five adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 was reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65-98 years) and most (53, 70.7%) were females. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in COVID-19 positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to COVID-19 negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval 17.0-22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 hours and 38.3 hours, in COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19 positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all ten cases who died were from hypoxia. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent with viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% (n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community and 70% (n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest x-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures, helps in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allows counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)是一种用于识别菌血症患者的简单方法;然而,预测它是不准确的。绩效状态评估涉及对日常活动的评估,可能有助于预测菌血症。我们旨在评估在qSOFA中添加东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG-PS)是否可以改善对怀疑感染的老年患者菌血症诊断的预测。方法收集2018年至2019年年龄≥65岁的疑似菌血症住院患者的数据。采用逻辑回归对两种预测模型进行对比。初始模型仅包含qSOFA评分,而第二个模型整合了东部肿瘤协作组-绩效状态(ECOG-PS)和qSOFA评分。结果在1,114名患者中,221(19.8%)有真正的菌血症。与qSOFA模型相比,qSOFA+ECOG-PS模型的曲线下面积在预测能力上没有显示出统计学上的显着改善(0.544vs.0.554,p=0.162)。结论添加ECOG-PS评分并不能改善qSOFA预测老年疑似感染患者菌血症的性能。
    Background The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a simple method for identifying patients with bacteremia; however, it is not accurate for predicting it. Performance status assessment involves the evaluation of daily activities and could be beneficial in predicting bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate whether adding Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) to qSOFA could improve the prediction of bacteremia diagnosis in older patients admitted with suspected infections. Methods Data were gathered from individuals aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized with suspected bacteremia from 2018 to 2019. Two prediction models were contrasted employing logistic regression. The initial model exclusively incorporated the qSOFA score, while the second model integrated the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) alongside the qSOFA score. Results Among 1,114 enrolled patients, 221 (19.8%) had true bacteremia. The area under the curve of the qSOFA+ECOG-PS model did not show a statistically significant improvement in predictive capacity compared with that of the qSOFA model (0.544 vs. 0.554, p=0.162). Conclusions Adding the ECOG-PS score did not improve the performance of qSOFA for predicting bacteremia in older patients with suspected infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颅骨或脊柱手术后并发症很普遍,和脆弱可以是一个关键的影响患者的因素。因此,我们评估了虚弱对30天死亡率的影响。我们比较了风险分析指数(RAI)的区别性,修正的虚弱指数-5(mFI-5)和增加患者年龄预测30天死亡率。
    纳入ACS-NSQIP数据库中2012-2020年间神经外科手术后出现重大并发症的患者。我们采用了接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线,并检查了RAI的判别阈值,mFI-5和增加患者年龄的30天死亡率。使用多变量分析检查独立关系。
    有19,096名患者被纳入研究和30天死亡率的ROC分析,RAI显示出优于判别效度阈值C统计量0.655(95%CI:0.644-0.666),与mFI-5C统计0.570(95%CI0.559-0.581)相比,并增加患者年龄C统计量0.607(95%CI0.595-0.619)。当患者人群根据手术类型(脊柱,颅骨或其他),脊柱手术对RAI的判别有效性阈值最高(Cstatistics0.717).此外,30日死亡率与虚弱风险层剂量反应相关(p<0.001).
    当神经外科手术后出现重大并发症时,虚弱的患者在30天内死亡的可能性高于非虚弱的患者。RAI显示出比mFI-5更高的判别有效性阈值和增加的患者年龄,使其成为一种更具临床相关性的工具,用于根据脆弱的风险等级识别和分层患者。这些发现强调了旨在优化虚弱患者的举措的重要性,减轻长期残疾。
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative complications after cranial or spine surgery are prevalent, and frailty can be a key contributing patient factor. Therefore, we evaluated frailty\'s impact on 30-day mortality. We compared the discrimination for risk analysis index (RAI), modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) and increasing patient age for predicting 30-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with major complications following neurosurgery procedures between 2012- 2020 in the ACS-NSQIP database were included. We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and examined discrimination thresholds for RAI, mFI-5, and increasing patient age for 30-day mortality. Independent relationships were examined using multivariable analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 19,096 patients included in the study and in the ROC analysis for 30-day mortality, RAI showed superior discriminant validity threshold C-statistic 0.655 (95% CI: 0.644-0.666), compared to mFI-5 C-statistic 0.570 (95% CI 0.559-0.581), and increasing patient age C-statistic 0.607 (95% CI 0.595-0.619). When the patient population was divided into subsets based on the procedures type (spinal, cranial or other), spine procedures had the highest discriminant validity threshold for RAI (Cstatistic 0.717). Furthermore, there was a frailty risk tier dose response relationship with 30-day mortalityy (p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: When a major complication arises after neurosurgical procedures, frail patients have a higher likelihood of dying within 30 days than their non-frail counterparts. The RAI demonstrated a higher discriminant validity threshold than mFI-5 and increasing patient age, making it a more clinically relevant tool for identifying and stratifying patients by frailty risk tiers. These findings highlight the importance of initiatives geared toward optimizing frail patients, to mitigate long-term disability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较肺炎克雷伯菌引起的菌血症肺炎的预后(K。肺炎)和大肠杆菌(E.大肠杆菌)病原体。
    方法:对2016-2019年162例肺炎克雷伯菌或大肠杆菌所致细菌性肺炎患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。分析的主要结果是患者30天死亡率。
    结果:有82例大肠杆菌细菌性肺炎患者(E.coli-BP)组和肺炎克雷伯菌菌血症肺炎(KP-BP)组80例。KP-BP组30天死亡率为43.75%(n=35/80),大肠杆菌-BP组为21.95%(n=18/82)(p<0.001)。在4个不同模型中对混杂变量进行调整后,KP-BP主要结局的风险比在模型1中为0.70(95%置信区间[CI]:[0.44-1.02]),在模型2中为0.72(95%CI:[0.46-1.14]),在模型3中为0.99(95%CI:[0.57-1.73]),在模型4中为1.22(95%CI:[0.69-2.18]).
    结论:诊断为KP-BP的患者表现出与诊断为大肠杆菌-BP的患者相似的预后。对于KP-BP患者,那些在重症监护病房的人的死亡风险明显更高,被耐碳青霉烯菌株感染,或有较高的序贯器官衰竭评估评分。在大肠杆菌-BP患者中,Pitt菌血症评分与30日死亡率密切相关.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognosis of bacteremic pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) pathogens.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data of 162 patients who were diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia caused by either K. pneumoniae or E. coli between 2016-2019. The primary outcome of the analysis was the patients\' 30-day mortality rate.
    RESULTS: There were 82 patients in the E. coli bacteremic pneumonia (E. coli-BP) group and 80 patients in the K. pneumoniae bacteremic pneumonia (KP-BP) group. The 30-day mortality rate was 43.75% (n=35/80) in the KP-BP group and 21.95% (n=18/82) in the E. coli-BP group (p<0.001). Following the adjustment for confounding variables in 4 distinct models, the hazard ratios for the primary outcome in KP-BP were determined to be 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.44-1.02]) in Model 1, 0.72 (95% CI: [0.46-1.14]) in Model 2, 0.99 (95% CI: [0.57-1.73]) in Model 3, and 1.22 (95% CI: [0.69-2.18]) in Model 4.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with KP-BP exhibited a similar prognosis as those diagnosed with E. coli-BP. For patients with KP-BP, the risk of mortality was significantly higher for those who were in the intensive care unit, were infected with carbapenem-resistant strains, or had a high sequential organ failure assessment score. In patients with E. coli-BP, the Pitt bacteremia score was strongly associated with the 30-day mortality rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近几十年来,与菌血症和念珠菌菌血症相关的发病率和死亡率显著增加.这项研究旨在探讨炎症标志物在评估肠球菌属混合血流感染(BSIs)的危重患者疾病严重程度中的临床意义。和念珠菌属。
    在这项回顾性研究中,对2019年1月至2022年12月期间入住重症监护病房(ICU)的被诊断为BSIs的患者进行分析.患者分为两组:混合病原体BSI组,两种肠球菌属。和念珠菌属。,和仅具有肠球菌属的单病原体BSI组。该研究检查了炎症标志物水平和疾病严重程度的差异,包括急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分,ICU住院时间,和30天死亡率,两组之间。此外,我们试图仔细检查上述参数之间的潜在关联。
    中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血浆C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,混合病原体BSI组的白细胞介素(IL)-6,IL-8和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)高于单病原体BSI组。Spearman等级相关分析显示,混合病原体BSI组NLR、血浆CRP和IL-6水平与疾病严重程度呈正相关。Further,血浆IL-8和TNF-α水平也与ICU住院时间和30天死亡率呈正相关.在多变量分析中,血浆CRP和IL-6水平与30天死亡率独立相关.
    由肠球菌属引起的混合病原体BSI。和念珠菌属。可能会导致NLR和血浆CRP增加,与肠球菌属引起的BSI相比,IL-6,IL-8和TNF-α水平。只有,从而导致危重患者疾病严重程度升高。
    UNASSIGNED: In recent decades, there has been a notable increase in the morbidity and mortality rates linked to bacteremia and candidemia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of inflammatory markers in assessing the disease severity in critically ill patients suffering from mixed-bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective research, patients diagnosed with BSIs who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the period of January 2019 to December 2022 were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: a mixed-pathogen BSI group with both Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp., and a single-pathogen BSI group with only Enterococcus spp. The study examined the differences in inflammatory marker levels and disease severity, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, duration of ICU stay, and 30-day mortality, between the two groups. Furthermore, we sought to scrutinize the potential associations among these aforementioned parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) and levels of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the mixed-pathogen BSI group were higher than those in the single-pathogen BSI group. Spearman\'s rank correlation analysis showed that NLRs and plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were positively correlated with disease severity in the mixed-pathogen BSI group. Further, the levels of plasma IL-8 and TNF-α were also positively correlated with ICU stay duration and 30-day mortality. In multivariate analysis, plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were independently associated with 30-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Mixed-pathogen BSIs caused by Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp. may give rise to increased NLRs and plasma CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in comparison to BSI caused by Enterococcus spp. only, thus leading to elevated disease severity in critically ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如果其他侵入性较小的诊断方法尚无定论,则疑似间质性肺病(ILD)的患者需要进行外科肺活检(SLB)诊断。我们通过在全国患者队列中使用集中数据库来评估SLB的结果。
    一项基于人群的回顾性研究,对68名连续患者(平均年龄58岁,58.8%的男性)在2008年至2020年期间在冰岛接受了SLB。从患者图表中获得患者信息,并记录围手术期和术后并发症以及30天和90天的死亡率。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,回顾了组织学活检和肺活量测定结果,和总生存期(Kaplan-Meier)估计。平均随访61.3个月(范围,3-155个月)。
    在68例SLB患者中,有41例(60.3%)在术前接受了支气管镜检查的非结论性经支气管活检(TBB)。肺活量测定显示用力肺活量(FVC)3.0L和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)2.3L,或预测值的73.0%和71.6%,分别。所有病例均使用了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)技术,并在92.6%的病例中提供了组织学和疾病特异性诊断;最常见的是非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)(29.4%)和普通间质性肺炎(UIP)(23.5%)。1例患者(1.5%)出现严重的术后并发症(出血过多),7例患者(10.3%)出现轻微并发症。中位胸管时间和住院时间为1天和2天,分别。无患者术后<90天死亡。1年和5年总生存率分别为95.6%和73.5%。分别,NSIP和UIP的5年生存率分别为85%和43.7%,分别。与NSIP和其他诊断相比,UIP的长期死亡率高四倍。
    VATS技术肺活检在大多数病例中提供了明确的组织学和疾病特异性诊断。手术是安全的,反映在并发症发生率低和住院时间短,因此可用于诊断和定制ILD患者的治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is required for diagnosis in patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) if other less invasive diagnostic methods are non-conclusive. We evaluated the outcome of SLB by using centralized databases in a whole-nation patient-cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: A population-based retrospective study on 68 consecutive patients (mean age 58 years, 58.8% males) that underwent SLB in Iceland between the years 2008 and 2020. Patient information was obtained from patient charts and peri- and postoperative complications were registered together with 30- and 90-day mortality. Computed tomography (CT) scans, histological biopsies and spirometry results were reviewed, and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier) estimated. Mean follow-up was 61.3 months (range, 3-155 months).
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 68 SLB-patients 41 (60.3%) had preoperatively undergone non-conclusive transbronchial biopsies (TBB) obtained with bronchoscopy. Spirometry showed forced vital capacity (FVC) 3.0 L and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 2.3 L, or 73.0% and 71.6% of predicted value, respectively. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique was used in all cases and provided a histologic and disease specific diagnosis in 92.6% of cases; most often being nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (29.4%) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (23.5%). One patient (1.5%) sustained a major postoperative complication (excessive bleeding) and seven patients (10.3%) minor complications. Median chest tube time and length of stay was 1 and 2 days, respectively. No patients died <90 days postoperatively. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years was 95.6% and 73.5%, respectively, and 5-year survival for NSIP and UIP was 85% and 43.7%, respectively. Long-term mortality for UIP was four times higher when compared with NSIP and other diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Lung biopsy with VATS-technique provided a definitive histological and disease specific diagnosis in majority of cases. The procedure is safe, reflected in low complication-rates and short hospital stay, and can therefore be used to diagnose and tailor treatment of ILD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号