30-day mortality

30 天死亡率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在分析急性白血病(AL)患者多药耐药(MDR)和碳青霉烯类耐药(CR)细菌血流感染(BSI)的危险因素以及革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)BSI的死亡率。这是四川大学华西医院进行的一项回顾性研究,其中包括2016年至2021年诊断为AL和合并GNBBSI的患者。共纳入206例AL中GNBBSI患者。所有患者30天死亡率为26.2%,MDRGNBBSI患者的比率为25.8%,CRGNBBSI患者的比率为59.1%。单因素和多因素分析显示,在过去30天内暴露于喹诺酮类药物(比值比(OR)=3.111,95%置信区间(95CI):1.523-5.964,p=0.001)是MDRGNBBSI的独立危险因素,而在过去30天内放置导尿管(OR=6.311,95CI:2.478-16.073,p<0.001)和暴露于头孢菌素(OR=2.340,95CI:1.090-5.025,p=0.029)和碳青霉烯类(OR=2.558,95CI:1.190-5.497,p=0.016)与CRGNBBSI独立相关。此外,CRGNBBSI(OR=2.960,95%CI:1.016-8.624,p=0.047),复发/难治性AL(OR=3.035,95%CI:1.265-7.354,p=0.013),感染性休克(OR=5.108,95%CI:1.794-14.547,p=0.002),BSI前血小板<30×109/L(OR=7.785,95%CI:2.055-29.492,p=0.003),不适当的经验性抗生素治疗(OR=3.140,95%CI:1.171-8.417,p=0.023)是伴有GNBBSI的AL患者30天死亡的独立危险因素。先前的抗生素暴露是MDRGNBBSI和CRGNBBSI发生的重要因素。CRGNBBSI增加了患有GNBBSI的AL患者的死亡风险。
    This study aims to analyze the risk factors for the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria bloodstream infection (BSI) in a patient with acute leukemia (AL) and the mortality in gram-negative bacteria (GNB) BSI. This is a retrospective study conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, which included patients diagnosed with AL and concomitant GNB BSI from 2016 to 2021. A total of 206 patients with GNB BSI in AL were included. The 30-day mortality rate for all patients was 26.2%, with rates of 25.8% for those with MDR GNB BSI and 59.1% for those with CR GNB BSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that exposure to quinolones (Odds ratio (OR) = 3.111, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.623-5.964, p = 0.001) within the preceding 30 days was an independent risk factor for MDR GNB BSI, while placement of urinary catheter (OR = 6.311, 95%CI: 2.478-16.073, p < 0.001) and exposure to cephalosporins (OR = 2.340, 95%CI: 1.090-5.025, p = 0.029) and carbapenems (OR = 2.558, 95%CI: 1.190-5.497, p = 0.016) within the preceding 30 days were independently associated with CR GNB BSI. Additionally, CR GNB BSI (OR = 2.960, 95% CI: 1.016-8.624, p = 0.047), relapsed/refractory AL (OR = 3.035, 95% CI: 1.265-7.354, p = 0.013), septic shock (OR = 5.108, 95% CI: 1.794-14.547, p = 0.002), platelets < 30 × 109/L before BSI (OR = 7.785, 95% CI: 2.055-29.492, p = 0.003), and inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (OR = 3.140, 95% CI: 1.171-8.417, p = 0.023) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in AL patients with GNB BSI. Prior antibiotic exposure was a significant factor in the occurrence of MDR GNB BSI and CR GNB BSI. CR GNB BSI increased the risk of mortality in AL patients with GNB BSI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    髋部骨折是老年患者常见的损伤,并与高死亡率相关。这项研究评估了单侧髋部骨折老年患者血清乳酸水平与30天死亡率之间的关系,并检查了这种关系对这些患者临床结局的预后价值。
    这次回顾展,单中心研究纳入了年龄≥65岁因低能量创伤而入院并在入院时被诊断为单侧髋部骨折的患者.额外的纳入标准是受伤前独立行走或助行器或拐杖辅助的患者,根据静脉血气分析的血清乳酸水平的现有数据,谁接受了手术。
    在纳入的330名患者中,30.9%出现术后并发症,10.3%在30天内死亡。使用2mmol/L的乳酸临界值来区分活着和死亡的患者,敏感性和特异性分别为41%和88%,分别。多因素logistic回归分析显示,高乳酸和低白蛋白水平以及男性与死亡率相关。
    确定老年髋部骨折患者死亡的危险因素很重要。男性,白蛋白水平低,尤其是乳酸水平升高是这些患者短期死亡率的独立预测因素.
    UNASSIGNED: Hip fractures are frequent injuries in older patients and are associated with high mortality rates. This study assessed the association between serum lactate level and 30-day mortality in older patients with unilateral hip fractures and examined the prognostic value of this association on the clinical outcomes of these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, single-center study included patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the emergency department due to low-energy trauma and diagnosed with unilateral hip fracture upon admission. The additional inclusion criteria were patients with independent ambulation or walker or cane assistance before the injury, with available data on serum lactate levels on venous blood gas analysis, and who underwent surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 330 included patients, 30.9% experienced postoperative complications and 10.3% died within 30 days. Using a lactate cut-off value of 2 mmol/L to distinguish between living and deceased patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 41% and 88%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high lactate and low albumin levels and male sex were associated with mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Identifying risk factors for mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures is important. Male sex, low albumin levels, and particularly increased lactate levels were independent predictors of short-term mortality in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于癌症本身及其治疗引起的免疫抑制,癌症患者易受感染。抗微生物抗性细菌的出现进一步使感染的治疗复杂化并增加死亡率和住院时间。本研究旨在调查微生物谱,抗菌素耐药性模式,危险因素,以及它们对这些患者临床结局的影响。
    方法:一项前瞻性研究在Patna的三级癌症医院进行,比哈尔邦,印度,其中包括18岁及以上微生物培养阳性的癌症患者。
    结果:这项研究分析了440名患者,其中53%(234)是女性,平均年龄49.27(±14.73)岁。共鉴定出541株分离株,其中48.01%(242)为多重耐药(MDR),29.76%(150)存在广泛耐药(XDR),敏感率为19.84%(112)。这项研究表明,接受手术的患者,化疗,住院了,有抗生素暴露史,并且有严重的中性粒细胞减少更容易受到MDR和XDR感染。平均住院时间为16.90(±10.23),18.30(±11.14),敏感患者为22.83(±13.22)天,MDR,和XDR感染,分别。该研究还显示,30天的总体死亡率为31.81%(140),而MDR和XDR组的30天死亡率分别为38.92%和50.29%(P<0.001)。确定可能导致死亡的危险因素,癌症复发,脓毒症,化疗,留置侵入性装置,如Foley导管,中心静脉导管和莱尔管,MASCC评分(<21)和肺炎。
    结论:本研究强调对癌症患者进行个性化干预的必要性,例如确定有感染风险的患者,明智的抗生素使用,感染控制措施,以及实施抗菌药物管理计划,以降低抗菌药物耐药感染率和相关死亡率以及住院时间。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are vulnerable to infections due to immunosuppression caused by cancer itself and its treatment. The emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria further complicates the treatment of infections and increases the mortality and hospital stays. This study aimed to investigate the microbial spectrum, antimicrobial resistance patterns, risk factors, and their impact on clinical outcomes in these patients.
    METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Patna, Bihar, India, which included cancer patients aged 18 years and older with positive microbial cultures.
    RESULTS: This study analysed 440 patients, 53% (234) of whom were females, with an average age of 49.27 (± 14.73) years. A total of 541 isolates were identified, among which 48.01% (242) were multidrug resistant (MDR), 29.76% (150) were extensively drug resistant (XDR), and 19.84% (112) were sensitive. This study revealed that patients who underwent surgery, chemotherapy, were hospitalized, had a history of antibiotic exposure, and had severe neutropenia were more susceptible to MDR and XDR infections. The average hospital stays were 16.90 (± 10.23), 18.30 (± 11.14), and 22.83 (± 13.22) days for patients with sensitive, MDR, and XDR infections, respectively. The study also revealed overall 30-day mortality rate of 31.81% (140), whereas the MDR and XDR group exhibited 38.92% and 50.29% rates of 30-day mortality respectively (P < 0.001). Possible risk factors identified that could lead to mortality, were cancer recurrence, sepsis, chemotherapy, indwelling invasive devices such as foley catheter, Central venous catheter and ryles tube, MASCC score (< 21) and pneumonia.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the necessity for personalized interventions among cancer patients, such as identifying patients at risk of infection, judicious antibiotic use, infection control measures, and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to reduce the rate of antimicrobial-resistant infection and associated mortality and hospital length of stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血清阴离子间隙(AG)可以潜在地应用于各种代谢性酸中毒的诊断,最近的一项研究报告了AG与2019年冠状病毒病患者(COVID-19)死亡率的相关性。然而,AG与呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者短期死亡率的关系尚不清楚.在这里,我们旨在调查AG与VAP患者30天死亡率之间的关系,并构建和评估VAP30天死亡风险的多变量预测模型。
    这项回顾性队列研究从重症监护医学信息集市III(MIMIC-III)数据库中提取了477例VAP患者的数据。将患者的数据分为训练集和测试集,比率为7:3。在训练集中,通过单变量Cox回归和逐步回归分析,将与VAP患者30日死亡率显著相关的变量纳入多变量预测模型.然后,在训练集和测试集中评估了多变量预测模型的预测性能,并与单个AG和其他评分系统(包括顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分)进行比较,混乱,尿素,呼吸频率(RR),血压,年龄(≥65岁)(CURB-65)评分,和血尿素氮(BUN),精神状态改变,脉搏,年龄(>65岁)(BAP-65)评分。此外,在性别亚组中探讨了AG与VAP患者30天死亡率的关系,年龄,和感染状况。评价指标为危害比(HR)、C指数,和95%置信区间(CI)。
    共有70名患者在30天内死亡。多变量预测模型由AG组成(HR=1.052,95%CI:1.008-1.098),年龄(HR=1.037,95%CI:1.019-1.055),机械通气的持续时间(HR=0.998,95%CI:0.996-0.999),和血管升压药的使用(HR=1.795,95%CI:1.066-3.023)。在训练集(C指数=0.725,95%CI:0.670-0.780)和测试集(C指数=0.717,95%CI:0.637-0.797)中,多变量模型的预测性能优于单个AG值。此外,在男性患者中也发现了AG与30天死亡率的关联(HR=1.088,95%CI:1.029-1.150),无论感染何种病原体(细菌感染:HR=1.059,95%CI:1.011-1.109;真菌感染:HR=1.057,95%CI:1.002-1.115)。
    AG相关的多变量模型对VAP患者的30天死亡率具有潜在的预测价值。这些发现可能为进一步探索简单、可靠的VAP短期死亡风险预测因子提供一定的参考。这可能进一步帮助临床医生在重症监护病房(ICU)的早期阶段识别具有高死亡风险的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Serum anion gap (AG) can potentially be applied to the diagnosis of various metabolic acidosis, and a recent study has reported the association of AG with the mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the relationship of AG with the short-term mortality of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is still unclear. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association between AG and the 30-day mortality of VAP patients, and construct and assess a multivariate predictive model for the 30-day mortality risk of VAP.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study extracted data of 477 patients with VAP from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Data of patients were divided into a training set and a testing set with a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, variables significantly associated with the 30-day mortality of VAP patients were included in the multivariate predictive model through univariate Cox regression and stepwise regression analyses. Then, the predictive performance of the multivariate predictive model was assessed in both training set and testing set, and compared with the single AG and other scoring systems including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the confusion, urea, respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure, and age (≥65 years old) (CURB-65) score, and the blood urea nitrogen (BUN), altered mental status, pulse, and age (>65 years old) (BAP-65) score. In addition, the association of AG with the 30-day mortality of VAP patients was explored in subgroups of gender, age, and infection status. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (HRs), C-index, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 70 patients died within 30 days. The multivariate predictive model consisted of AG (HR =1.052, 95% CI: 1.008-1.098), age (HR =1.037, 95% CI: 1.019-1.055), duration of mechanical ventilation (HR =0.998, 95% CI: 0.996-0.999), and vasopressors use (HR =1.795, 95% CI: 1.066-3.023). In both training set (C-index =0.725, 95% CI: 0.670-0.780) and testing set (C-index =0.717, 95% CI: 0.637-0.797), the multivariate model had a relatively superior predictive performance to the single AG value. Moreover, the association of AG with the 30-day mortality was also found in patients who were male (HR =1.088, 95% CI: 1.029-1.150), and whatever the pathogens they infected (bacterial infection: HR =1.059, 95% CI: 1.011-1.109; fungal infection: HR =1.057, 95% CI: 1.002-1.115).
    UNASSIGNED: The AG-related multivariate model had a potential predictive value for the 30-day mortality of patients with VAP. These findings may provide some references for further exploration on simple and robust predictors of the short-term mortality risk of VAP, which may further help clinicians to identify patients with high risk of mortality in an early stage in the intensive care units (ICUs).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在加拿大人群中实施sotrovimab效果的上市后监测是有限的。
    方法:本研究采用倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列设计。后续行动在2021年12月15日至2022年4月30日期间开始。该研究评估了定义为全因入院的任何严重结果,或确诊COVID-19阳性后30天内死亡。sotrovimab治疗和严重结局之间的协变量调整比值比使用逻辑回归进行分析。
    结果:有22,289人符合sotrovimab治疗标准。分析中包括1,603个治疗个体和6,299个未治疗个体。研究中的结果发生率为5.49%(治疗)和4.21%(未治疗),从诊断到治疗的中位时间为1.00天(IQR=2.00天)。在倾向匹配队列中,sotrovimab与较低的严重结局几率无关(OR=1.20;95%CI:0.91,1.58),调整混杂变量。
    结论:调整混杂变量后,sotrovimab治疗与COVID-19阳性日期后30天内出现严重结局的几率无关。
    OBJECTIVE: Post-marketing surveillance of sotrovimab\'s effect during implementation in the Canadian population is limited.
    METHODS: The study used a propensity score matched retrospective cohort design. Follow-up began between the periods of December 15, 2021 to April 30 2022. The study assessed any severe outcome defined as all-cause hospital admission, or mortality within 30 days of a confirmed COVID-19 positive test. Covariate adjusted odds ratios between sotrovimab treatment and the severe outcome was conducted using logistic regression.
    RESULTS: There were 22,289 individuals meeting treatment criteria for sotrovimab. There were 1,603 treated and 6,299 untreated individuals included in the analysis. Outcome occurrence in the study was 5.49% (treated) and 4.21% (untreated), with a median time from diagnosis to treatment of 1.00 days (IQR = 2.00 days). In the propensity-matched cohort, sotrovimab was not associated with a lower odds of a severe outcome (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.58), adjusting for confounding variables.
    CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for confounding variables, sotrovimab treatment was not associated with lower odds of a severe outcome within 30-days of COVID-19 positive date.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,周末急性入院与死亡率增加有关。我们的目标是评估30天的住院死亡率和随后对所有社区死亡的随访,因为急性入院21年后出院。
    方法:我们使用了21年(2002-2023年)来我们机构的所有急性医疗入院数据库。我们比较了周末(周六/周日)或工作日(周二/周三)入院的30天住院死亡率。出院后的结果是根据2021年12月的国家死亡登记册确定的。通过逻辑回归或Cox比例风险模型分析了30天住院和长期死亡率的预测因素。
    结果:研究人群包括57,059例患者中的109,232例入院。周末入院与30天住院死亡率降低有关,比值比(OR)0.70(95CI0.65,0.76)。30天住院死亡率的主要预测因素是急性疾病严重度评分(AISS)或6.9(95CI5.5,8.6)和合并症评分或2.4(95CI1.2,4.6)。出院后平均随访5.9年,19.0%已经死亡。死亡率最强的长期预测指标是入院AISSOR6.7(95CI4.6,9.9)。出院后的总生存半衰期为16.6年。与13.3年的工作日入院相比,周末入院的生存率为20.8年。
    结论:急性内科患者周末入院与30天住院死亡率降低但长期生存率降低相关。
    BACKGROUND: Acute medical admission at the weekend has been reported to be associated with increased mortality. We aimed to assess 30-day in-hospital mortality and subsequent follow-up of all community deaths following discharge for acute medical admission to our institution over 21 years.
    METHODS: We employed a database of all acute medical admissions to our institution over 21 years (2002-2023). We compared 30-day in-hospital mortality by weekend (Saturday/Sunday) or weekday (Tuesday/Wednesday) admission. Outcome post-discharge was determined from the National Death Register to December 2021. Predictors of 30-day in-hospital and long-term mortality were analysed by logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards models.
    RESULTS: The study population consisted of 109,232 admissions in 57,059 patients. A weekend admission was associated with a reduced 30-day in-hospital mortality, odds ratio (OR) 0.70 (95%CI 0.65, 0.76). Major predictors of 30-day in-hospital mortality were acute illness severity score (AISS) OR 6.9 (95%CI 5.5, 8.6) and comorbidity score OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.2, 4.6). At a median follow-up of 5.9 years post-discharge, 19.0% had died. The strongest long-term predictor of mortality was admission AISS OR 6.7 (95%CI 4.6, 9.9). The overall survival half-life after hospital discharge was 16.6 years. Survival was significantly worse for weekend admissions at 20.8 years compared to weekday admissions at 13.3 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: Weekend admission of acute medical patients is associated with reduced 30-day in-hospital mortality but reduced long-term survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估手术方式(RARC与ORC)和30天并发症的风险。
    方法:我们利用了2019年至2021年的美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)膀胱切除术目标数据库。主要结局是包括30天死亡率在内的主要并发症。再操作,心脏事件,和中风。次要结果包括个体大范围和膀胱切除术特异性并发症。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来最大程度地减少我们队列中的固有差异。我们进行了逻辑回归以评估感兴趣的结果与手术方式之间的关联。
    结果:我们发现手术方式和主要结果之间没有差异,然而,RARC与30天死亡率的风险降低70%相关(OR0.30,95%CI0.13-0.70),并且在呼吸方面具有良好的结果,深静脉血栓形成,伤口并发症,和逗留时间的长短。考虑到观察方法,局限性与残余混杂有关。
    结论:RARC与多个30天并发症的风险降低相关,包括死亡率,以及器官系统和膀胱切除术的具体结果。这些数据支持增加采用RARC的临床益处。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between surgical modality (RARC vs. ORC) and the risk of 30-day complications.
    METHODS: We utilized the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Cystectomy-Targeted database from 2019 to 2021. The primary outcome was a composite of major complications including 30-day mortality, reoperation, cardiac events, and stroke. Secondary outcomes included individual major and cystectomy-specific complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize inherent differences within our cohort. We performed logistic regression to assess the association between outcomes of interest and operative modality.
    RESULTS: We found no difference between operative modality and the primary outcome, however, RARC was associated with a 70% lower risk of 30-day mortality (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.70) and had favorable outcomes with respect to respiratory, deep venous thrombosis, wound complications, and length of stay. Limitations are related to residual confounding given the observational methodology.
    CONCLUSIONS: RARC was associated with reduced risk of multiple 30-day complications, including mortality, as well as organ system and cystectomy-specific outcomes. These data support the clinical benefit of increased adoption of RARC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:院内心肌梗塞(AMI)较少采用侵入性干预治疗,与院外AMI相比。我们旨在确定院内AMI患者的侵入性干预的决定因素,并评估其与死亡率的关系。与保守治疗相比。方法:这是萨克森州-安哈尔特州区域性心肌梗死登记处医院内AMI的横断面研究。根据治疗策略(侵入性干预与保守治疗)。进行Logistic回归评估侵入性干预的决定因素(与保守治疗)及其与30天死亡率的关系。结果:近67%的患者(259/386)接受了侵入性干预,其余的都是保守的。接受侵入性干预治疗的人比保守治疗的人更年轻,慢性心力衰竭的比例更低。与年轻患者相比,年龄>75岁,预先存在的心力衰竭,出现时心率较高与接受侵入性干预的几率较低相关.高血压(OR=2.86,95%CI[1.45-5.62])和STEMI与NSTEMI(1.96,[1.10-3.68])与较高的侵入性干预几率相关。与保守治疗相比,侵入性干预治疗30天死亡率的校正几率较低(0.25,[0.10-0.67])。结论:三分之一的住院AMI患者接受保守治疗。年龄更小,没有心力衰竭,降低心率,高血压,和STEMI是侵入性干预使用的决定因素。侵入性干预的30天死亡率较低,但仍需要纵向研究来评估保守与保守的疗效。医院AMI的侵入性策略。
    Background/Objectives: In-hospital myocardial infarctions (AMIs) are less often treated with invasive intervention, compared to out-of-hospital AMIs. We aimed to identify the determinants of invasive intervention in patients with in-hospital AMIs and assess its association with mortality, compared to conservative treatment. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of in-hospital AMIs in The Regional Myocardial Infarction Registry of Saxony-Anhalt. Patients\' characteristics and outcomes were compared based on the treatment strategy (invasive intervention vs. conservative treatment). Logistic regression was performed to assess the determinants of invasive intervention (vs. conservative treatment) and its association with 30-day mortality. Results: Nearly 67% of the patients (259/386) received invasive intervention, and the rest were treated conservatively. Those who were treated with an invasive intervention were younger and had a lower proportion of chronic heart failure than those treated conservatively. Age > 75 years compared to younger patients, pre-existing heart failure, and higher heart rate upon presentation were associated with lower odds of receiving invasive intervention. Hypertension (OR = 2.86, 95% CI [1.45-5.62]) and STEMI vs. NSTEMI (1.96, [1.10-3.68]) were associated with higher odds of invasive intervention. The adjusted odds of 30-day mortality were lower with invasive intervention compared to conservative treatment (0.25, [0.10-0.67]). Conclusions: One-third of the patients with in-hospital AMIs received conservative treatment. Younger age, absence of heart failure, lower heart rate, hypertension, and STEMI were determinants of invasive intervention usage. Invasive intervention had lower odds of 30-day mortality, but longitudinal studies are still needed to assess the efficacy of conservative vs. invasive strategies in in-hospital AMIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前的指南推荐广谱抗生素用于高严重社区获得性肺炎(CAP),可能导致抗菌素耐药性(AMR)。我们的目的是比较接受阿莫西林(窄谱)和联合阿莫昔克拉夫(广谱)治疗的CAP患者的结局,了解窄谱抗生素是否可以更广泛地使用。
    方法:我们分析了2016年1月1日至2023年9月30日在牛津郡住院的主要诊断为肺炎的成年人(≥16y)的电子健康记录,联合王国。患者接受基线([-12h,+24h]从入院起)包括阿莫西林或co-amoxiclav。使用倾向评分(PS)匹配和逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)检查30天全因死亡率与基线抗生素之间的关联,以解决基线特征和疾病严重程度的混淆。还进行了按疾病严重程度和敏感性分析的亚组分析,并估算了缺失的协变量。
    结果:在16,072例初次诊断为肺炎的患者中,9,685人接受了基线阿莫西林或co-amoxiclav。没有证据表明接受初始联合阿莫昔克拉夫与接受治疗的患者之间的30天死亡率有差异。阿莫西林(PS匹配:边际赔率比0.97[0.76-1.27],p=0.61;IPTW:1.02[0.78-1.33],p=0.87)。在轻度,中度,和严重的肺炎。缺失数据的结果也相似。也没有证据表明30天死亡率与使用额外的大环内酯类药物或额外的多西环素之间存在关联。
    结论:在30天死亡率的人群水平上,没有证据表明阿莫昔卡夫治疗CAP优于阿莫西林,不管疾病的严重程度。应考虑广泛使用窄谱经验治疗中度/重度CAP,以抑制AMR的潜力。
    OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend broad-spectrum antibiotics for high-severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We aim to compare outcomes in CAP patients treated with amoxicillin (narrow-spectrum) versus co-amoxiclav (broad-spectrum), to understand if narrow-spectrum antibiotics could be used more widely.
    METHODS: We analysed electronic health records from adults (≥16 y) admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia between 01-January-2016 and 30-September-2023 in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Patients receiving baseline ([-12 h,+24 h] from admission) amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav were included. The association between 30-day all-cause mortality and baseline antibiotic was examined using propensity score (PS) matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to address confounding by baseline characteristics and disease severity. Subgroup analyses by disease severity and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed were also conducted.
    RESULTS: Among 16,072 admissions with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, 9685 received either baseline amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav. There was no evidence of a difference in 30-day mortality between patients receiving initial co-amoxiclav vs. amoxicillin (PS matching: marginal odds ratio 0.97 [0.76-1.27], p = 0.61; IPTW: 1.02 [0.78-1.33], p = 0.87). Results remained similar across stratified analyses of mild, moderate, and severe pneumonia. Results were also similar with missing data imputed. There was also no evidence of an association between 30-day mortality and use of additional macrolides or additional doxycycline.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of co-amoxiclav being advantageous over amoxicillin for treatment of CAP in 30-day mortality at a population-level, regardless of disease severity. Wider use of narrow-spectrum empirical treatment of moderate/severe CAP should be considered to curb potential for AMR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一种新型病毒,SARS-CoV-2引起了致命的全球大流行,特别影响老年人和合并症患者。髋部骨折影响老年人群,必须入院,并使这一群体面临感染COVID-19的特殊风险。这项研究调查了COVID-19感染对30天髋部骨折死亡率的影响。
    回顾了2020年3月和4月两个单位收治的75例成人髋部骨折的相关数据。平均年龄为83.5岁(范围65-98岁),大多数(53,70.7%)是女性。主要结局指标是与COVID-19感染相关的30天死亡率。
    COVID-19感染率为26.7%(20例),COVID-19阳性组(10/20,50%)与COVID-19阴性组(4/55,7.3%)的30天死亡率有显著差异,平均死亡时间为19.8天(95%置信区间:17.0-22.5)。从入院到手术的平均时间为43.1h和38.3h,在COVID-19阳性和COVID-19阴性组中,分别。所有COVID-19阳性患者均出现发热和咳嗽症状,死亡的10例都是缺氧。7例(35%)病例的放射学肺部检查结果与病毒性肺炎一致,导致死亡(占死亡率的70%)。30%(n=6)在社区感染了COVID-19,70%(n=14)在入院后出现症状。
    与COVID-19感染相关的髋部骨折具有较高的30天死亡率。对髋部骨折患者进行COVID-19检测和胸部X光检查有助于早期规划高风险手术,并允许患者和家属根据实际预后进行咨询。
    UNASSIGNED: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65-98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0-22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% (n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% (n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号