evidence

证据
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:卒中后吞咽困难是一种常见的卒中后吞咽障碍,导致吸入性肺炎和营养不良的风险增加。迫切需要有效和安全的干预措施来康复。这篇综述旨在回答两个关键的科学问题:(1)重复经颅磁刺激在卒中后吞咽困难康复中的功效如何?(2)重复经颅磁刺激是卒中后吞咽困难的安全干预措施吗?
    方法:对四个电子数据库进行了全面搜索:PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和Embase。搜索旨在确定与我们感兴趣的主题有关的相关研究,并于2024年5月28日完成。
    方法:根据PRISMA清单,对四个数据库进行了全面搜索,其中确定了13项相关的系统评价。纳入标准为系统评价重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后吞咽困难的疗效和安全性。排除标准是不关注卒中后吞咽困难或不评估重复经颅磁刺激作为治疗干预的综述。质量,偏见,reporting,使用经过验证的工具评估这些评论的总体证据质量,包括用于评估系统评价方法质量的AMSTAR2工具,用于评估偏差风险的ROBIS工具,和评估证据总体质量的等级方法。这种严格的方法确保我们的审查提供了有关使用重复经颅磁刺激治疗中风后吞咽困难的当前知识状态的全面和可靠的概述。
    结果:纳入系统评价/荟萃分析的个别研究的样本量为66至555。纳入总体分析的所有研究的参与者总数为752。证据受到系统评价的方法论缺陷和异质性的限制。证据的质量从高到低不等,大多数结果质量适中。未来的研究应该采取更严格的,标准化,和全面的设计,以确认重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后吞咽困难的有效性和安全性。降低证据质量的主要原因是主要研究的样本量小和异质性高。
    结论:本综述综合了重复经颅磁刺激治疗吞咽困难的研究,旨在为临床和政策决策提供信息。然而,目前的证据并不能最终确定重复经颅磁刺激用于卒中后吞咽困难康复的安全性和有效性.审查的研究质量各不相同,许多质量很差。因此,虽然一些研究表明重复经颅磁刺激的潜在益处,这些发现应谨慎解释.迫切需要更严格的,高质量的研究,以验证重复经颅磁刺激在卒中后吞咽困难康复中的应用。一旦我们拥有更强大的能力,这些发现对临床实践和政策的影响将更加清晰,基于证据的建议。
    OBJECTIVE: Post-stroke dysphagia is a common swallowing disorder that occurs after a stroke, leading to an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. There is a pressing need for effective and safe interventions for its rehabilitation. This review aims to answer two key scientific questions: (1) What is the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the rehabilitation of post-stroke dysphagia? (2) Is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation a safe intervention for post-stroke dysphagia?
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. The search aimed to identify relevant studies concerning our topic of interest and was completed on 28 May 2024.
    METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA checklist, a comprehensive search of four databases was conducted, which identified 13 relevant systematic reviews. The inclusion criteria were systematic reviews that evaluated the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia. Exclusion criteria were reviews that did not focus on post-stroke dysphagia or did not evaluate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. The quality, bias, reporting, and overall evidence quality of these reviews were assessed using validated tools, including the AMSTAR 2 tool for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews, the ROBIS tool for assessing the risk of bias, and the GRADE approach for evaluating the overall quality of evidence. This rigorous approach ensures that our review provides a comprehensive and reliable overview of the current state of knowledge on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia.
    RESULTS: The sample sizes for the individual studies included in the systematic reviews/meta-analyses ranged from 66 to 555. The total number of participants across all studies included in the overall analyses was 752. The evidence was limited by the methodological flaws and heterogeneity of the systematic reviews. The quality of the evidence varied from high to low, with most outcomes having moderate quality. Future research should adopt more rigorous, standardized, and comprehensive designs to confirm the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia. The main reason for downgrading the evidence quality was the small sample size and high heterogeneity of the primary studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: This overview synthesized research on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia, aiming to inform clinical and policy decisions. However, the current evidence does not conclusively establish the safety and efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia rehabilitation. The studies reviewed varied in quality, and many were of poor quality. Therefore, while some studies suggest potential benefits of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, these findings should be interpreted with caution. There is a pressing need for more rigorous, high-quality research to validate the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia rehabilitation. The implications of these findings for clinical practice and policy will be clearer once we have more robust, evidence-based recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的随机临床试验为基础的系统评价和荟萃分析(SRs/MA)已经进行,以检查针灸治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的有效性。将对SR/MA进行概述,目的是系统地汇编,评估,综合针灸治疗GERD的证据。
    方法:将在八个数据库中搜索针刺GERD的SRs/MA。两名独立审稿人将进行文献检索,数据提取,审查质量评估。利用AMSTAR-2工具,PRISMA检查表,和等级制度,分别,方法学质量,报告质量,并对证据质量进行评估。关于主题和概述的对象,结果将给出。这项研究将有助于确定证据及其临床应用之间的差距,并作为进一步高质量研究的路线图。
    结论:概述的结果将有助于缩小临床证据与其在临床实践中的应用之间的差距。这项研究将发现证据使用中的重大缺陷,指出方法需要改进的领域,为今后高质量的研究提供指导。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022371850.
    背景:不需要道德批准,因为没有收集有关个人的个人信息。同行评审的期刊或相关会议将公布结果,以先到者为准。
    BACKGROUND: Growing numbers of randomized clinical trials-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) have been conducted to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An overview of SRs/MAs will be conducted with the aim of systematically compiling, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence regarding acupuncture for GERD.
    METHODS: SRs/MAs of acupuncture on GERD will be searched in eight databases. Two independent reviewers will conduct the literature search, data extraction, and review quality assessment. Utilizing the AMSTAR-2 tool, PRISMA checklists, and GRADE system, respectively, the methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality will be evaluated. In relation to the subject and the overview\'s objects, the results will be given. This study will aid in identifying gaps between evidence and its clinical application and serve as a roadmap for further high-quality research.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of the overview will aid in closing the gap between clinical evidence and its use in clinical practice. This study will identify significant faults in the use of evidence, point out areas where methodology needs to be improved, and provide guidance for future high-quality research.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022371850.
    BACKGROUND: Ethics approval is not necessary because no personal information about individuals is collected. A peer-reviewed journal or pertinent conferences will publish the results, whichever comes first.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的评价富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗静脉性溃疡(VU)的临床证据。通过Cochrane图书馆进行了电子搜索,WebofScience,Embase和PubMed。AMSTAR-2用于评估方法学质量。使用GRADE系统评估证据质量。根据AMSTAR-2,由于条目2、4和7的限制,纳入的审查的方法质量普遍不足。由于偏差风险和不精确,结果测量的证据质量不足.总之,PRP可能对VU具有治疗作用。然而,由于纳入的系统评价和荟萃分析存在方法学缺陷,因此必须谨慎对待这一结论.
    To evaluate the clinical evidence of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of venous ulcers (VUs). Electronic searches were conducted through the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed. AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the methodological quality. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. According to AMSTAR-2, the methodological quality of the included reviews was generally inadequate owing to the limitations of entries 2, 4 and 7. Due to bias risk and imprecision, the evidence quality of the outcome measures was inadequate. In conclusion, PRP may have a therapeutic effect on VUs. However, this conclusion must be treated with caution due to methodological flaws of the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估方法学质量,报告质量,和证据质量的荟萃分析(MA)和系统评价(SR)的益生菌治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效。
    数据库用于识别合格的SR/MA,直到2024年2月12日。使用AMSTAR-2工具评估研究的方法学质量,使用PRISMA检查表对文献报告的质量进行评分,并使用分级系统对证据质量进行分级。
    包括21项结果在内的7条评论。纳入综述的方法学质量普遍较低,得分差的条目分别为2、4和7。根据PRISMA清单,有一些报告缺陷,质量问题主要反映在报告登记和协议上,全面的搜索策略和额外的分析。评分结果提高了证据的质量,总体上是低的或非常低的。
    益生菌可能对RA有治疗作用,基于本概述中SRs/MA提供的证据。然而,由于纳入研究的方法学限制,目前仍缺乏确凿的证据.为了对益生菌治疗RA的疗效做出值得信赖的判断,更大规模,仍需要高质量的随机对照试验.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the methodological quality, report quality, and evidence quality of meta-analysis (MA) and systematic review (SR) on the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
    UNASSIGNED: Databases were used to identify eligible SRs/MAs until February 12, 2024. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using AMSTAR-2 tool, the quality of the literature reports was scored using PRISMA checklists, and the quality of the evidence was graded using GRADE system.
    UNASSIGNED: Seven reviews including 21 outcomes were included. Methodological quality of the included reviews was of general low, and the entries with poor scores were 2, 4, and 7. By PRISMA checklists, there were some reporting deficiencies, and quality problems were mainly reflected in the reporting registration and protocol, comprehensive search strategy and additional analysis. GRADE results elevated the quality of evidence to be low or very low overall.
    UNASSIGNED: Probiotics may have a therapeutic effect on RA, based on the evidence provided by the SRs/MAs in this overview. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of conclusive evidence due to methodological limitations in the included research. To make trustworthy judgments regarding the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of RA, more large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are still required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管代谢危险因素在心血管和代谢疾病的发展中起着至关重要的作用。基础代谢率(BMR)是影响能量消耗的基本生理参数,并可能导致这些危险因素的变化。然而,BMR与心脏代谢危险因素之间的确切关系尚不清楚.
    我们采用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来探索BMR(N:534,045)与各种心脏代谢危险因素之间的关联,包括体重指数(BMI,N:681,275),空腹血糖(N:200,622),高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇(N=403,943),低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇(N=431,167),总胆固醇(N:344,278),和甘油三酯(N:441,016),C反应蛋白(N:436,939),腰围(N:232,101),收缩压(N:810,865),舒张压(N:810,865),糖化血红蛋白(N:389,889),和N-末端激素原脑钠肽(N:21,758)。我们利用与BMR密切相关的遗传变异作为工具变量来研究潜在的因果关系,主要分析使用逆方差加权(IVW)方法。
    我们的MR分析揭示了BMR与特定心脏代谢危险因素之间存在因果关系的令人信服的证据。具体来说,遗传决定的较高BMR与BMI增加相关(β=0.7538,95%置信区间[CI]:0.6418至0.8659,p<0.001),HDL胆固醇水平较低(β=-0.3293,95%CI:0.4474至-0.2111,p<0.001),甘油三酯水平较高(β=0.1472,95%CI:0.0370至0.2574,p=0.0088),腰围(β=0.4416,95%CI:0.2949至0.5883,p<0.001),和糖化血红蛋白(β=0.1037,95%CI:0.0080至0.1995,p=0.0377)。然而,我们没有观察到BMR和空腹血糖之间的任何显著关联,LDL胆固醇,总胆固醇,C反应蛋白,收缩压,舒张压,或N末端激素原脑钠肽(所有p值>0.05)。
    这项MR研究为BMR与心脏代谢危险因素之间的关系提供了有价值的见解。了解BMR与这些因素之间的因果关系可能对制定有针对性的干预措施和疗法具有重要意义。
    UNASSIGNED: Cardio-metabolic risk factors play a crucial role in the development of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) is a fundamental physiological parameter that affects energy expenditure and might contribute to variations in these risk factors. However, the exact relationship between BMR and cardio-metabolic risk factors has remained unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: We employed Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to explore the association between BMR (N: 534,045) and various cardio-metabolic risk factors, including body mass index (BMI, N: 681,275), fasting glucose (N: 200,622), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (N = 403,943), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (N = 431,167), total cholesterol (N: 344,278), and triglycerides (N: 441,016), C-reactive protein (N: 436,939), waist circumference (N: 232,101), systolic blood pressure (N: 810,865), diastolic blood pressure (N: 810,865), glycated haemoglobin (N: 389,889), and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (N: 21,758). We leveraged genetic variants strongly associated with BMR as instrumental variables to investigate potential causal relationships, with the primary analysis using the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method.
    UNASSIGNED: Our MR analysis revealed compelling evidence of a causal link between BMR and specific cardio-metabolic risk factors. Specifically, genetically determined higher BMR was associated with an increased BMI (β = 0.7538, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6418 to 0.8659, p < 0.001), lower levels of HDL cholesterol (β = -0.3293, 95% CI: 0.4474 to -0.2111, p < 0.001), higher levels of triglycerides (β = 0.1472, 95% CI: 0.0370 to 0.2574, p = 0.0088), waist circumference (β = 0.4416, 95% CI: 0.2949 to 0.5883, p < 0.001), and glycated haemoglobin (β = 0.1037, 95% CI: 0.0080 to 0.1995, p = 0.0377). However, we did not observe any significant association between BMR and fasting glucose, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (all p-values>0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: This MR study provides valuable insights into the relationship between BMR and cardio-metabolic risk factors. Understanding the causal links between BMR and these factors could have important implications for the development of targeted interventions and therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是一种慢性复发性炎症性肠病。尽管我们对UC的理解不断进步,其发病机制尚未阐明,强调UC患者迫切需要新的治疗策略。外泌体是纳米级的膜颗粒,通过携带各种生物活性分子来介导细胞间的通讯,如蛋白质,RNA,DNA,和代谢物。含3(NLRP3)炎症小体的NOD样受体家族pyrin结构域是一种胞质三联蛋白复合物,其激活可诱导促炎细胞因子白介素1β(IL-1β)和IL-18的成熟和分泌,从而引发对病原体或损伤的炎症反应。越来越多的证据表明,外泌体是NLRP3炎性体的新调节剂,在UC的病理过程中具有重要作用。这里,综述了外泌体和NLRP3炎性体在UC中的作用的最新证据.首先,总结了外泌体对NLRP3炎性体的双重作用以及NLRP3炎性体对外泌体分泌的影响。最后,提出了在UC背景下外泌体-NLRP3炎性体串扰研究的方向,并强调了该主题的进一步研究领域。
    Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic recurrent inflammatory bowel disease. Despite ongoing advances in our understanding of UC, its pathogenesis is yet unelucidated, underscoring the urgent need for novel treatment strategies for patients with UC. Exosomes are nanoscale membrane particles that mediate intercellular communication by carrying various bioactive molecules, such as proteins, RNAs, DNA, and metabolites. The NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a cytosolic tripartite protein complex whose activation induces the maturation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18, triggering the inflammatory response to a pathogenic agent or injury. Growing evidence suggests that exosomes are new modulators of the NLRP3 inflammasome, with vital roles in the pathological process of UC. Here, recent evidence is reviewed on the role of exosomes and NLRP3 inflammasome in UC. First, the dual role of exosomes on NLRP3 inflammasome and the effect of NLRP3 inflammasome on exosome secretion are summarized. Finally, an outlook on the directions of exosome-NLRP3 inflammasome crosstalk research in the context of UC is proposed and areas of further research on this topic are highlighted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    益生菌已被用作预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的辅助疗法。本研究旨在系统地编制,评估,并综合以往关于益生菌预防VAP的系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析(MAs)。
    方法学质量,报告质量,注册研究的证据质量是,分别由多个系统评价评估2(AMSTAR-2)工具进行评估,系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)清单的首选报告项目,和建议的分级,评估,发展,和评估(等级)系统。
    本概述分析了13种符合条件的出版物。由于缺乏注册方案或排除标准列表,纳入的研究通常被评为方法学质量较低。报告的质量不足表现在缺乏关于登记协议的报告,缺乏关于搜索策略的报告,以及缺乏对额外分析的报告。对于等级,有36.17%(17/47)的结果被评为中等质量,42.55%(20/47)属于低质量,21.28%(10/47)的质量非常低。
    益生菌可能与降低VAP的发生率有关。然而,由于当前证据的质量差,在推荐益生菌预防VAP时应谨慎行事。
    UNASSIGNED: Probiotics has been used as an adjuvant therapy for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This study aimed to systematically compile, evaluate, and synthesize previous systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on the prevention of VAP with probiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of enrolled studies were, respectively evaluated by Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklists, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen eligible publications were analyzed in this overview. The included studies were rated as generally low methodological quality owing to the lack of a registered protocol or a list of exclusion criteria. The inadequate quality of the reports was demonstrated by the lack of reporting on the registration protocols, the lack of reporting on the search strategy, and the lack of reporting on the additional analyses. For GRADE, there were 36.17% (17/47) outcomes graded to be of moderate quality, 42.55% (20/47) to be of low quality, and 21.28% (10/47) to be of very low quality.
    UNASSIGNED: Probiotics may be associated with reduced incidence of VAP. However, caution should be exercised when recommending probiotics for the prevention of VAP owing to the poor quality of the current evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号