Visual Analog Scale

视觉模拟量表
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:越来越多的研究探讨针灸治疗痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)的疗效,但是这些研究的发现产生了相互矛盾的结果。因此,本研究旨在评估针灸治疗PDPN的疗效,从而提供更有说服力的结果。
    方法:系统搜索了7个数据库中直到2023年12月1日发表的研究。纳入所有针刺治疗PDPN的随机对照试验(RCT),疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)。研究选择,数据提取,和评估由研究人员独立进行。采用偏倚风险2(RoB2)工具评估偏倚风险。从这个样本中,平均差(MD),95%置信区间(CI),出版偏见,然后计算异质性。
    结果:与常规护理组相比,手动针刺组的疼痛VAS评分显着降低(p<0.0001;MD=-1.45[95%CI,-1.97至-0.93],I2=84%)。与假针刺组相比,真实针刺组的VAS评分降低更大(p=0.004;MD=-0.97[95%CI,-1.63至-0.31],I2=65%)。此外,针刺组感觉神经传导速度改善(SNCV,p<0.0001;MD=2.29[95%CI,1.79至2.78],I2=14%)以及运动神经传导速度(MNCV,p<0.0001;MD=2.87[95%CI,2.46至3.27],I2=0)。不同持续时间的针灸治疗,包括6-10周和3-4周,与常规护理组相比,VAS评分显着降低。
    结论:这项荟萃分析为针灸有可能缓解PDPN症状并改善SNCV和MNCV提供了初步证据。然而,需要高质量的随机对照试验来提供进一步的证据,从而更好地证实这一论点.
    OBJECTIVE: A growing number of studies have investigated the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), but the findings of these studies have generated conflicting results. This study therefore aimed to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for treating PDPN so as to offer more conclusive results.
    METHODS: Seven databases were systematically searched for studies published up until December 1, 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for PDPN with visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score were included. Study selection, data extraction, and evaluation were conducted independently by researchers. The Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was employed to assess the risk of bias. From this sample, the mean difference (MD), 95 % confidence intervals (CI), publication bias, and heterogeneity were then computed.
    RESULTS: The manual acupuncture group exhibited a significant decrease in the VAS for pain score compared with the routine care group (p < 0.0001; MD = -1.45 [95 % CI, -1.97 to -0.93], I2 = 84 %). The real acupuncture group demonstrated a greater reduction in VAS scores than the sham acupuncture group (p = 0.004; MD = -0.97 [95 % CI, -1.63 to -0.31], I2 = 65 %). Additionally, the acupuncture group showed improvements in sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV, p < 0.0001; MD = 2.29 [95 % CI, 1.79 to 2.78], I2 = 14 %) as well as motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV, p < 0.0001; MD = 2.87 [95 % CI, 2.46 to 3.27], I2 = 0). Different durations of acupuncture treatment, including 6-10 weeks and 3-4 weeks, demonstrated a significant reduction in VAS scores compared with the routine care group.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence for the claim that acupuncture has the potential to alleviate PDPN symptoms and improve SNCV and MNCV. However, high-quality RCTs are needed to offer further evidence and thus better substantiate such a contention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分比较基于案例的学习(CBL)和基于讲座的学习(LBL)对牙科学生关于DF严重程度的临床决策的影响。
    方法:将80名牙科一年级研究生随机分配到CBL(n=38)或LBL(n=42)组。两组均接受DF诊断指导,CBL涉及小组会议,分析真实案例,LBL涉及传统讲座。通过向两组进行VAS评估的幻灯片演示,对32例氟牙症患者的Thylstrup-Fejerskov指数(TSIF)评分从0到7进行评估,从而评估了有效性。随机选择的每组的五名评估者被要求在2周后重复评级。统计分析包括群体和性别差异的双向方差分析,可靠性的类内相关系数(ICC),和斯皮尔曼相关系数的有效性。
    结果:在CBL组和LBL组之间观察到VAS评分的差异,没有显著的性别影响。在两组的VAS评分中,评估者之间和评估者之间的一致性都很好,说明其可靠性。对已建立的指数(如DI和TSIF)的验证证明了很强的相关性,与CBL学生表现出更高的相关性。
    结论:CBL提高了学生的临床决策能力和DF诊断能力,与LBL相比,VAS评分更加一致和准确。这些发现突出了创新教育策略在牙科课程中的重要性,对提高培训质量和临床结果具有重要意义。
    背景:该研究在临床研究中心注册,口腔医院,武汉大学(注册码:HGGC-036)。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the impact of case-based learning (CBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) on dental students\' clinical decision-making regarding DF severity using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring.
    METHODS: Eighty first-year graduate dental students were randomly assigned to either the CBL (n = 38) or LBL (n = 42) groups. Both groups received instruction on DF diagnosis, with CBL involving small group sessions analyzing real cases and LBL involving traditional lectures. Effectiveness was assessed by presenting 32 dental fluorosis cases with Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index (TSIF) scores ranging from 0 to 7 through slide presentations to both groups for VAS assessment. Five evaluators of each group randomly selected were asked to repeat the rating 2 weeks later. Statistical analysis included two-way ANOVA for group and gender differences, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for reliability, and Spearman correlation coefficients for validity.
    RESULTS: Variations in VAS scores were observed between CBL and LBL groups, with no significant gender impact. Excellent inter- and intra-evaluator agreement was found for VAS scoring in both groups, indicating its reliability. Validation against established indices (such as DI and TSIF) demonstrated strong correlations, with CBL students exhibiting higher correlations.
    CONCLUSIONS: CBL enhances students\' clinical decision-making and proficiency in DF diagnosis, as evidenced by more consistent and accurate VAS scoring compared to LBL. These findings highlight the importance of innovative educational strategies in dental curricula, with implications for improving training quality and clinical outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: The study was registered at the Clinical Research Center, Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University (Registration code: HGGC-036).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)通常发生在脊柱手术期间;LDH在年轻患者中呈上升趋势,并被归类为“瘫痪”和“背痛”。“SanhanchushiTongbi(SPST)是一个定制的处方。它分散了寒冷,缓解疼痛,从经络和内脏中去除寒冷,治疗神经性疼痛。然而,很少有研究探讨其缓解疼痛的机制。
    目的:观察自拟SPST治疗LDH的临床疗效。
    方法:将211例LDH综合征患者分为两组,对照组107例采用常规推拿结合牵引治疗,观察组104例患者采用对照方案和自拟口服SPST联合治疗。患者治疗4周。测定中医证候积分指标及血清炎症因子水平。
    结果:治疗后,观察组中医证候积分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。主要症状,临床体征,日常活动,观察组治疗后日本骨科协会评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。肿瘤坏死因子-α的水平,观察组白细胞介素-6、C反应蛋白水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。在观察组中,超氧化物歧化酶水平明显更高,而丙二醛水平明显较低,与对照组比较(P<0.05)。观察组的总有效率为96.15%,显著高于对照组的88.79%(P<0.05)。
    结论:自拟SPST可降低LDH患者的炎症和疼痛因子水平以及腰痛。
    BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) commonly occurs during spinal surgery; LDH is on the increase in younger patients and is classified as \"paralysis\" and \"back pain.\" Sanhanchushi Tongbi (SPST) is a customized prescription. It disperses cold, relieves pain, removes cold from the meridians and viscera, and treats neuropathic pain. However, few studies have investigated its mechanism of pain relief.
    OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical therapeutic effects on LDH treated with self-prescribed SPST.
    METHODS: A total of 211 patients with LDH syndrome were divided into two groups: 107 patients in the control group were treated with conventional massage combined with traction, and 104 patients in the observation group were treated with a combination of the control regimen and self-prescribed oral SPST. The patients were treated for 4 wk. Indices of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score and serum inflammatory factor levels were measured.
    RESULTS: After therapy, the TCM syndrome score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The main symptoms, clinical signs, daily activities, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group after therapy (P < 0.05). The levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). In the observation group, superoxide dismutase levels were significantly higher, whereas malondialdehyde levels were significantly lower, compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The overall efficacy rate in the observation group was 96.15%, which was substantially higher than that in the control group (88.79%; P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Self-prescribed SPST can reduce the levels of inflammatory and pain-causing factors as well as lumbar pain in patients with LDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较EUS引导的腹腔神经丛神经松解术(CPN)和腹腔神经丛照射与碘125(125I)种子和无水乙醇缓解晚期胰腺癌患者疼痛的疗效。
    我们回顾性分析了在2017年1月至2020年12月期间接受EUS-CPN或EUS-125I植入的81例晚期胰腺癌患者的数据。术后疼痛采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行评定,比较两组患者生活质量自评和中位生存时间。
    在43和38例患者中进行了EUS-CPN和125I植入,分别。两组术后VAS评分均显著低于术前水平。手术一周后,EUS-CPN组的26例患者(60.5%)实现了部分疼痛缓解,而EUS-125I种子组中没有患者疼痛缓解。然而,术后4周,VAS评分有所下降,EUS-125I种子的部分疼痛缓解率高于EUS-CPN。手术后的前1个月,两组的生活质量自我评估相似。
    EUS-CPN和EUS-125I种子均可安全有效地缓解晚期胰腺癌患者的疼痛。虽然EUS-125I种子需要额外的时间来显示效果,与CPN相比,疼痛缓解的程度和持续时间更好,有趣的是,中位生存时间不同.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac plexus irradiation with iodine-125 (125I) seeds with absolute ethanol for relieving pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed data of 81 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-CPN or EUS-125I implantation between January 2017 and December 2020. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores; self-assessments of quality of life and the median survival time were compared between the 2 groups.
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-CPN and 125I implantation were performed in 43 and 38 patients, respectively. Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower than the preoperative levels in both groups. One week after the operation, 26 patients (60.5%) in the EUS-CPN group achieved partial pain relief, whereas no patients in the EUS-125I seed group experienced pain relief. However, after 4 weeks postoperatively, VAS scores had decreased, and the rate of partial pain relief was higher for EUS-125I seeds than for EUS-CPN. Self-assessments of quality of life were similar in both groups during the first 1 month after the procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: Both EUS-CPN and EUS-125I seeds can safely and effectively relieve pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although EUS-125I seeds take additional time to show effects, the extent and duration of pain relief are better compared with CPN, and interestingly, the median survival time was different.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在评估子宫输卵管造影(HSG)期间疼痛对患者的影响。
    PubMed,在PMC和其他期刊上搜索HSG的随机对照试验(RCTS)。根据关键词选择适当的文章进行纳入和合理排除。在对相关文献进行全面回顾之后,按照上述标准进行文献筛选.使用CochraneCollaboration开发的偏倚风险评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。采用RevMan5.4.1软件进行Meta分析。
    纳入了12项研究,其中实验组1530例,对照组1545例。文献总结了HSG期间患者的基本信息,并对视觉模拟量表(VAS)和疼痛感知的差异进行了统计。HSG检查结果显示,患者疼痛感觉与年龄和BMI之间缺乏显著关联。然而,HSG治疗后患者的妊娠持续时间减少(95CI(-18.84至-3.58),P=0.004)。与常规测试相比,HSG能有效减少患者的妊娠时间(95CI(-18.84,-3.58),P=0.004),降低患者的VAS(95CI(-4.73,-1.51),P=0.0001),并增加无疼痛的患者人数(95CI(1.80,10.43),P=0.001)。
    在HSG检查期间,产生可接受的避免疼痛,并且可以随着时间的推移而缓解。目前,没有有效的替代方法,所以病人应该配合医生完成检查,减轻疼痛。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the impact of pain on patients during Hysterosalpingography (HSG).
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, PMC and other journals were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTS) on HSG. Appropriate articles were selected for inclusion and reasonable exclusion according to keywords. Following a thorough review of the relevant literature, the process of literature screening was conducted in accordance with the aforementioned criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies were included, including 1530 cases in the experimental group and 1545 cases in the control group. The literature summarizes the basic information of patients during HSG and makes statistics on the differences in visual analog scale (VAS) and pain perception. The findings from the HSG examination revealed a lack of significant association between patients\' pain sensation and their age and BMI. However, the duration of pregnancy in patients decreased following HSG treatment (95%CI (-18.84 to -3.58), P=0.004).Compared with conventional testing, HSG could effectively reduce the pregnancy time of patients (95%CI (-18.84, -3.58), P=0.004), reduce the VAS of patients (95%CI (-4.73, -1.51), P=0.0001), and increase the number of patients without pain (95%CI (1.80, 10.43), P=0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: During the HSG examination, acceptable pain avoidance is generated and can be relieved over time. At present, there is no effective alternative method, so the patient should cooperate with the doctor to complete the examination, to relieve the pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肾小管微盘切除术(tMD)是治疗腰椎间盘突出症最常用的方法之一。然而,仍有患者抱怨持续的术后残余下腰痛(rLBP)。这项研究试图开发一个列线图来预测tMD后rLBP的风险。
    方法:将患者分为非rLBP(LBPVAS评分<2)组和rLBP(LBPVAS评分≥2)组。采用多因素logistic回归分析rLBP与这些因素的相关性。然后,基于多变量分析筛选的危险因素,建立了rLBP的列线图预测模型.模型中的样本以7:3的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估结果,模型的校准和临床价值,分别。
    结果:总共14.3%(47/329)的患者有持续性rLBP。多因素分析提示术前LBP视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分较高,下刻面取向(FO),2-3级小关节变性(FJD)和中重度多裂脂肪萎缩(MFA)是术后rLBP的危险因素.在训练集和验证集中,ROC曲线,校正曲线,和DCA建议了良好的数据处理,预测概率和实际概率之间的预测准确性,以及该模型的临床价值,分别。
    结论:此列线图包括术前LBPVAS评分,FO,FJD和MFA可以服务于一个有前途的预测模型,这将为临床医生预测tMD后的rLBP提供参考。
    OBJECTIVE: Tubular microdiskectomy (tMD) is one of the most commonly used for treating lumbar disk herniation. However, there still patients still complain of persistent postoperative residual low back pain (rLBP) postoperatively. This study attempts to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of rLBP after tMD.
    METHODS: The patients were divided into non-rLBP (LBP VAS score < 2) and rLBP (LBP VAS score ≥ 2) group. The correlation between rLBP and these factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic analysis. Then, a nomogram prediction model of rLBP was developed based on the risk factors screened by multivariate analysis. The samples in the model are randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diskrimination, calibration and clinical value of the model, respectively.
    RESULTS: A total of 14.3% (47/329) of patients have persistent rLBP. The multivariate analysis suggests that higher preoperative LBP visual analog scale (VAS) score, lower facet orientation (FO), grade 2-3 facet joint degeneration (FJD) and moderate-severe multifidus fat atrophy (MFA) are risk factors for postoperative rLBP. In the training and validation sets, the ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCAs suggested the good diskrimination, predictive accuracy between the predicted probability and actual probability, and clinical value of the model, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram including preoperative LBP VAS score, FO, FJD and MFA can serve a promising prediction model, which will provide a reference for clinicians to predict the rLBP after tMD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)和单室膝关节置换术(UKA)治疗前内侧骨关节炎(AMOA)的临床效果,并通过年龄分层提供手术建议。
    方法:在2019年5月至2021年5月之间,对68例交叉指征AMOA患者进行了分析。将患者分为HTO组和UKA组,并进一步分为55-60岁和60-65岁的两个年龄组。此外,一般数据,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,并对特殊外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)进行分析。
    结果:所有患者均获随访18个月。膝关节HSS明显改善,两组VAS评分均降低(P<0.05)。在55-60岁年龄段,HTO在1个月和3个月时显示膝关节上HSS(P<0.05)。在6、12和18个月时无显著差异。HTO在一个月时的VAS评分明显较低,两组患者的VAS评分逐渐降低,差异无统计学意义。在60-65岁年龄段,UKA组在1个月时表现为上膝关节HSS,在3、6、12和18个月时无显著差异。UKA组在1个月时的VAS评分明显较低,两组VAS评分均逐渐下降,差异无统计学意义。
    结论:两种方法都对AMOA交叉适应症产生了令人满意的结果,改善膝关节功能。观察到的恢复趋势对个性化手术建议有影响,指导基于年龄特定考虑因素的干预措施,以实现前内侧骨关节炎病例的最佳结局。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for anterior medial osteoarthritis (AMOA) as well as offer surgical recommendations through age stratification.
    METHODS: Between May 2019 and May 2021, 68 cross-indicated AMOA patients were analyzed. The patients were divided into HTO and UKA groups and further into two age groups of 55-60 and 60-65 years. Additionally, general data, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS) were analyzed.
    RESULTS: All the patients were followed up for 18 months. Knee joint HSS significantly improved, and VAS score decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). In the 55-60 age group, HTO showed superior knee HSS at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.05), with no significant difference at 6, 12, and 18 months. HTO had a significantly lower VAS score at one month, and the VAS scores of the two groups decreased gradually with no significant difference. In the 60-65 age group, the UKA group showed superior knee joint HSS at one month, with no significant difference at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The UKA group had a significantly lower VAS score at one month, and both groups\' VAS scores decreased gradually with no significant difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both methods yield satisfactory results for AMOA cross-indications, improving knee joint function. The observed recovery trends have implications for personalized surgical recommendations, guiding interventions based on age-specific considerations for optimal outcomes in anterior medial osteoarthritis cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    需要一个准确而客观的标准来确定适合股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)患者进行髋关节镜检查的候选人。
    确定标准化检查期间超声(US)引导关节内髋关节注射后疼痛的改善是否可用于预测FAI患者髋关节镜检查的结果。
    队列研究;证据水平,3.
    我们纳入了119例FAI患者,这些患者在标准化检查期间接受了US引导的关节腔内髋关节注射局部麻醉,于2018年5月至2020年2月进行(髋关节镜检查前2周内)。所有患者都接受了至少6个月的非手术治疗,但没有缓解,并且有2年的随访数据。记录7种不同体格检查测试的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(0-10),并获得总分(0[最佳]至70[最差])。此外,在髋关节镜检查前和最后随访时记录国际髋关节结果工具-12(iHOT-12)和改良的Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)评分。根据患者是否在iHOT-12上获得了实质性的临床益处(SCB),他们被分为SCB和非SCB组,比较两组注射前至注射后VAS疼痛评分的改善情况(ΔVAS疼痛)。Logistic回归分析用于预测SCB的成就,接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)用于估计预测的准确性。
    iHOT-12(31.6分;P<.001)和mHHS(20.0分;P<.001)评分在术后前后显着增加,84例(70.6%)患者达到SCB。SCB组的ΔVAS疼痛评分明显高于非SCB组(分别为16.0和7.0分;P<.001)。Logistic回归分析显示ΔVAS疼痛的最佳临界值为8.5分(AUC,0.772;95%CI,0.687-0.858)。对于症状更严重的患者(总注射前VAS疼痛评分>70分之10),ΔVAS疼痛预测的准确性具有更好的评估价值(AUC,0.834;95%CI,0.676-0.992)。
    在本研究中,超声引导下关节腔内髋关节注射后疼痛的改善预测了FAI患者髋关节镜检查的结果,特别是对于疼痛更严重的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: An accurate and objective criterion is needed to determine candidates who are suitable for hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
    UNASSIGNED: To determine whether improvement in pain after ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular hip injection during standardized examinations can be used to predict the outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI.
    UNASSIGNED: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
    UNASSIGNED: We enrolled 119 patients with FAI who underwent US-guided intra-articular hip injection of local anesthesia during standardized examinations, carried out from May 2018 to February 2020 (within 2 weeks before hip arthroscopy). All patients had undergone a minimum of 6 months of nonoperative treatment without remission and had 2-year follow-up data. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores (0-10) were recorded for 7 different physical examination tests, and a total score (0 [best] to 70 [worst]) was obtained. In addition, International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) scores were recorded before hip arthroscopy and at final follow-up. According to whether patients achieved the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) on the iHOT-12, they were divided into SCB and non-SCB groups, and the improvement in VAS pain scores from preinjection to postinjection (ΔVAS pain) was compared between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the achievement of SCB, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to estimate the accuracy of the prediction.
    UNASSIGNED: There was a significant pre- to postoperative increase in iHOT-12 (31.6 points; P < .001) and mHHS (20.0 points; P < .001) scores, and 84 (70.6%) patients achieved the SCB. The ΔVAS pain score was significantly greater in the SCB versus the non-SCB group (16.0 vs 7.0 points; respectively; P < .001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated an optimal cutoff value of 8.5 points for ΔVAS pain (AUC, 0.772; 95% CI, 0.687-0.858). For patients with more severe symptoms (total preinjection VAS pain score of >10 out of 70), the accuracy of the prediction for ΔVAS pain had a better evaluation value (AUC, 0.834; 95% CI, 0.676-0.992).
    UNASSIGNED: Improvement in pain after US-guided intra-articular hip injection predicted the outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI in this study, especially for patients with more severe pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:泛发性脓疱型银屑病(3GPP)是一种罕见的,慢性,炎症性皮肤病与相当大的患者负担相关。银屑病症状量表(PSS),慢性疾病治疗-疲劳的功能评估(FACIT-疲劳)和疼痛-视觉模拟量表(疼痛-VAS)是患者报告的结果(PRO),尚未在GMP患者中得到验证。
    目的:为了评估PSS的心理测量学特性,FACIT-疲劳和疼痛-VAS使用来自Effisayil1的数据,该数据是spesolimab在中度至重度GMP患者中的随机试验。
    方法:使用第1周数据进行项目间相关性和验证性因素分析(CFA)。使用基线和第1周数据用Cronbach'sα系数评估内部一致性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估了重测可靠性;使用了GMP医师全球评估总分和脓疱子得分的变化数据来定义稳定的人群。使用Spearman的等级顺序相关性在基线和第1周评估收敛有效性。通过使用第1周数据的方差分析来测量已知组的有效性。通过协方差分析评估检测从基线到第1周的变化的能力。
    结果:对于大多数PSS和FACIT-疲劳项目,项目间和项目与总的相关性是中等或强的。CFA证明了PSS和FACIT-疲劳的一维性,对于大多数项目具有高因子载荷(PSS范围,0.75-0.94;FACIT-疲劳范围,0.11-0.93)和可接受的拟合统计数据。两个分数都表现出内部一致性(Cronbach'sα,分别为0.71和0.95)。PSS,FACIT-疲劳和疼痛-VAS表现出重测可靠性(ICC≥0.70)和收敛有效性的良好证据。此外,PRO可以区分不同症状严重程度的已知组(范围,p<0.0001-0.0225),并检测症状严重程度从基线到第1周的变化(范围,p<0.0001-0.0002)。
    结论:总体而言,这些结果支持可靠性,检测PSS变化的有效性和能力,FACIT-疲劳和疼痛-VAS作为GMP患者的PRO。
    BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, inflammatory skin disease associated with considerable patient burden. The Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) and pain-Visual Analogue Scale (pain-VAS) are patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that have not yet been validated in patients with GPP.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS using data from Effisayil 1, a randomised trial of spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe GPP.
    METHODS: Inter-item correlations and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed using Week 1 data. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach\'s α coefficient using baseline and Week 1 data. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs); change data for the GPP Physician Global Assessment total score and pustulation subscore were used to define a stable population. Convergent validity was assessed at baseline and Week 1 using Spearman\'s rank-order correlations. Known-groups validity was measured by analysis of variance using Week 1 data. Ability to detect change from baseline to Week 1 was evaluated by analysis of covariance.
    RESULTS: Inter-item and item-to-total correlations were moderate or strong for most PSS and FACIT-Fatigue items. CFA demonstrated the unidimensionality of the PSS and FACIT-Fatigue, with high factor loadings for most items (PSS range, 0.75-0.94; FACIT-Fatigue range, 0.11-0.93) and acceptable fit statistics. Both scores demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach\'s α, 0.71 and 0.95, respectively). The PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS demonstrated test-retest reliability (ICCs ≥0.70) and good evidence of convergent validity. Furthermore, the PROs could differentiate between known groups of varying symptom severity (range, p < 0.0001-0.0225) and detect changes in symptom severity from baseline to Week 1 (range, p < 0.0001-0.0002).
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results support the reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS as PROs in patients with GPP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合微波消融(MWA)是晚期胃癌和肝转移患者的有效治疗策略。然而,它可能导致严重的术后疼痛和炎症反应。椎旁阻滞(PVB)是一种局部麻醉技术,可为胸部和腹部区域提供镇痛作用。
    目的:评价PVB对TACE联合MWA治疗进展期胃癌肝转移患者术后镇痛及炎性反应的影响。
    方法:将60例患者随机分为PVB组和对照组。PVB组术前接受超声引导下使用0.375%罗哌卡因的PVB,对照组给予舒芬太尼静脉镇痛。主要结果是6小时疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,12h,24h,和48小时后的程序。次要结果是使用的舒芬太尼剂量,不良事件的发生率,和炎症标志物水平(白细胞计数,中性粒细胞百分比,C反应蛋白,和降钙素原)在手术前后。
    结果:PVB组在6h时VAS评分明显降低,12h,24h,术后48h与对照组比较(P<0.05)。PVB组的舒芬太尼消耗量也显著降低,恶心发生率也较低,呕吐,呼吸抑制优于对照组(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,术后24h和48h,PVB组炎症标志物水平明显降低(P<0.05)。
    结论:PVB能有效减轻晚期胃癌肝转移患者TACE联合MWA治疗术后疼痛和炎性反应,提高患者术后舒适度和恢复。
    BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) is an effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis. However, it may cause severe postoperative pain and inflammatory responses. The paravertebral block (PVB) is a regional anesthetic technique that provides analgesia to the thoracic and abdominal regions.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of PVB on postoperative analgesia and inflammatory response in patients undergoing TACE combined with MWA for advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis.
    METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly divided into PVB and control groups. The PVB group received ultrasound-guided PVB with 0.375% ropivacaine preoperatively, whereas the control group received intravenous analgesia with sufentanil. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the dose of sufentanil used, incidence of adverse events, and levels of inflammatory markers (white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin) before and after the procedure.
    RESULTS: The PVB group had significantly lower VAS scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the procedure compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The PVB group also had a significantly lower consumption of sufentanil and a lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression than did the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the PVB group had significantly lower levels of inflammatory markers 24 h and 48 h after the procedure (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: PVB can effectively reduce postoperative pain and inflammatory responses and improve postoperative comfort and recovery in patients with advanced gastric cancer and liver metastasis treated with TACE combined with MWA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号