Visual Analog Scale

视觉模拟量表
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是确定如何将视觉模拟量表(VAS)症状评分转化为二进制,用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)疾病控制的鼻-鼻窦炎和鼻息肉(EPOS)标准的欧洲立场文件中的描述性症状量表。
    方法:招募了309名CRS患者。所有患者都评估了他们的5种症状负担(鼻塞,鼻漏/鼻后滴漏,面部疼痛/压力,气味损失,睡眠障碍或疲劳)使用二元EPOS描述性症状量表和VAS(0至10的量表)。此外,参与者完成了22项鼻窦结果测试(SNOT-22),并将他们的CRS疾病总体控制评分为“控制”,\"部分受控\"或\"不受控\"。
    结果:通过VAS测量的症状负担,二元描述性EPOS量表和SNOT-22与参与者报告的CRS疾病控制恶化相关.每种症状都有不同的VAS评分截止值,可以在相应的二元描述性EPOS症状量表上强烈预测不受控制的选择。然而,VAS对鼻漏/鼻后滴漏的预测能力远不如其他4种症状。当同时考虑所有症状数据时,VAS评分>3.5在所有5种症状的相应二元描述性EPOS症状量表上强烈预测了不受控制的选择。
    结论:>3.5的VAS症状评分转化为二元模型中的不受控制选项,EPOS控制标准的描述性症状量表。鼻漏/鼻后滴注描述性症状量表对VAS评分的翻译程度不同,可能会考虑在将来的标准中进行修订。
    BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine how to translate visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom scores to the binary, descriptive symptom scales used in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control.
    METHODS: 309 CRS patients were recruited. All patients rated their burden of 5 symptoms (nasal blockage, rhinorrhea/postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, smell loss, sleep disturbance or fatigue) using the binary EPOS descriptive symptom scales and a VAS (on a scale of 0 to 10). In addition, participants completed a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and rated their overall CRS disease control as \"controlled\", \"partly controlled\" or \"uncontrolled\" Results: Symptom burdens measured by VAS, binary descriptive EPOS scale and SNOT-22 were associated with worsening CRS disease control reported by participants. Each symptom had a distinct VAS score cut-off that strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale. However, the predictive ability of VAS for rhinorrhea/ postnasal drip was disparately worse than the other 4 symptoms. When considering all symptom data simultaneously, a VAS score higher than 3.5 strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale for all 5 symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: A VAS symptom score of higher than 3.5 translates to the uncontrolled option in the binary, descriptive symptom scale of the EPOS control criteria. The rhinorrhea/postnasal drip descriptive symptom scale translates disparately worse to VAS scores and may be considered for revision in future criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视觉模拟量表广泛用于测量主观反应。Norris\'16视觉模拟量表(N_VAS)测量警觉性和情绪的主观感觉。到目前为止,不同的科学家将N_VAS的项目聚集成不同的方式,而Bond和Lader的方式是临床研究中最常用的方式。然而,人们担心这种聚类在不同受试者样本和不同药物类别上的稳定性。这项研究的目的是测试Bond和Lader的聚类在受试者样本和药物作用方面是否稳定。测试了N_VAS的替代聚类。来自3种药物的研究数据:大麻素受体激动剂(δ-9-四氢大麻酚[THC]),毒蕈碱拮抗剂(东pol碱),和苯二氮卓类药物(咪达唑仑和劳拉西泮),2005年至2012年收集的数据用于本分析。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)对Bond和Lader的聚类算法进行检验。进行一致性聚类以测试样本和不同药物类型的聚类结果的稳定性。使用三簇假设进行稳定性分析,然后是其他替代假设。共识矩阵(CM)的热图和密度图显示了三簇假设的不稳定性,并暗示了3种药物类别的不稳定性。还测试了二簇和四簇假设。CM和密度图的热图表明,两个集群的假设是更好的。总之,根据所使用的数据,二组假设可证明样本和3种药物类型的结果稳定.
    UNASSIGNED: Visual analogue scales are widely used to measure subjective responses. Norris\' 16 visual analogue scales (N_VAS) measure subjective feelings of alertness and mood. Up to now, different scientists have clustered items of N_VAS into different ways and Bond and Lader\'s way has been the most frequently used in clinical research. However, there are concerns about the stability of this clustering over different subject samples and different drug classes. The aim of this study was to test whether Bond and Lader\'s clustering was stable in terms of subject samples and drug effects. Alternative clustering of N_VAS was tested.Data from studies with 3 types of drugs: cannabinoid receptor agonist (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]), muscarinic antagonist (scopolamine), and benzodiazepines (midazolam and lorazepam), collected between 2005 and 2012, were used for this analysis. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to test the clustering algorithm of Bond and Lader. Consensus clustering was performed to test the stability of clustering results over samples and over different drug types. Stability analysis was performed using a three-cluster assumption, and then on other alternative assumptions.Heat maps of the consensus matrix (CM) and density plots showed instability of the three-cluster hypothesis and suggested instability over the 3 drug classes. Two- and four-cluster hypothesis were also tested. Heat maps of the CM and density plots suggested that the two-cluster assumption was superior.In summary, the two-cluster assumption leads to a provably stable outcome over samples and the 3 drug types based on the data used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of the standardized nasal provocation test (NPT) protocol recently published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and compared the utility of several parameters for diagnosing allergic rhinitis (AR) caused by house dust mites (HDM). Subjective parameters were nasal and ocular symptoms measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and objective parameters were peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), minimal cross-sectional area (MCA), and total nasal volume (TNV).
    METHODS: Before and after spraying Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) allergen (1,000 AU/mL, 100 μL) into both nostrils of 13 patients with AR (AR group) and 22 patients with non-AR (NAR group), we used VAS scores to measure nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching) and ocular symptoms and assessed PNIF, MCA, and TNV.
    RESULTS: The AR group had significantly worse symptoms than the NAR group 15 minutes after DP challenge (P<0.001). After 30 minutes, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea remained worse in the AR group (P<0.001); a similar but less marked difference was seen for sneezing (P=0.012) and itching (P=0.039). Ocular symptoms, PNIF, MCA, and TNV differed between groups after both 15 and 30 minutes (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for nasal obstruction (0.977), rhinorrhea (0.906), and TNV (0.979) than for sneezing (0.755), itching (0.673), and MCA (0.836).
    CONCLUSIONS: NPT performed according to the EAACI guidelines could help diagnose AR caused by HDM. TNV and VAS changes in nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea had higher diagnostic accuracy than other parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Energy intake and food ingesta are central in nutritional screening and assessment. Cancer patients are at nutritional risk of losing weight, and clinicians need quick and easy tools to identify patients for nutritional support. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and the accuracy of a Visual/Verbal Analogue Scale of food ingesta (ingesta-VVAS) to assess energy food intake and nutritional risk in medical oncology patients.
    Dieticians administered prospectively the ingesta-VVAS in 1762 medical oncology patients. The external validity of the ingesta-VVAS was determined against daily energy intake based on a 24-h dietary recall. Patients had to estimate how they currently ate on a scale from 0 \"nothing at all\" to 10 \"as usual\". Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve served as determine the optimal cut-off and provide the discriminative power of the tool to detect patients who ingested less or more than 25 kcal kg-1 day-1.
    The feasibility of the ingesta-VVAS was 97.7%. The scores were significantly correlated with energy intake (ρ = .67, p < .05), whatever the specific situation (i.e. malnutrition or not). With a cut-off of ≤7, the ingesta-VVAS exhibited a good power discrimination (AUC = .804) to detect patients who ingested less or more than 25 kcal kg-1 day-1, with a sensitivity of 80.8%, a positive predictive value of 83.6%, a specificity of 67.5%, and a negative predictive value of 63.3%. Patients with a score ≤7 on the ingesta-VVAS score were at 12-fold higher probability of nutritional risk [OR 12.3; 95% CI (8.7-17.4); p < .001]. Sensitivity to detect patients with a significant weight loss was 71%, and a positive predictive value of 75.9%.
    This easy-to-use ingesta-VVAS is well-correlated with energy intake and may be useful in clinical practice. An ingesta-VVAS score is ≤ 7 could be used to detect patients with nutritional risk of weight loss in medical oncology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们评估了不带植骨的锁定钢板的四角腕间融合术对II期和III期舟骨晚期塌陷和舟骨骨不连患者日常活动和疼痛的影响。对21例接受四角融合的患者进行了评估,这些患者没有进行骨移植,手术前和手术后16个月的肩手(QuickDASH)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。我们还比较了手术和健康侧的术后握力。使用主成分分析来建立功能效益与功能效益之间的关系,固定期和物理治疗次数。我们将我们的结果与发表的数据进行了比较。VAS和QuickDASH得分显著提高。术后观察到力量丧失。QuickDASH分数在较短的固定时间内提高最大。随访时间相对于文献没有发现显著差异,运动范围,握力和QuickDASH得分。所有患者均在1年后进行骨融合。带有锁定板的四角融合是一种减轻疼痛并改善功能评分的方法。我们的结果与文献中报道的骨移植结果相同。尽管没有植骨,但愈合率似乎很高,但只能通过X射线进行评估。这项研究使我们能够建立治疗指南:较短的固定导致更好的恢复。
    We assessed the effect of four-corner intercarpal fusion with locking plate without bone graft on daily activities and pain in patients with stage II and III scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion. Twenty-one patients who underwent four-corner fusion with scaphoidectomy without bone graft were evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores before and 16 months after surgery. We also compared postoperative grip strength between the operated and the healthy side. A principal component analysis was used to establish the relationship between functional benefit, immobilization period and number of physiotherapy sessions. We compared our results with published data. VAS and QuickDASH scores improved significantly. Loss of strength was observed postoperatively. QuickDASH score improved the most with a short immobilization period. No significant difference was found relative to the literature for follow-up time, range of motion, grip strength and QuickDASH score. All patients had bone fusion after 1 year. Four-corner fusion with locking plate is a procedure that reduces pain and improves functional scores. Our results are equal to those reported in the literature with bone graft. The union rate seemed high despite the absence of bone graft but was only assessed by x rays. This study allowed us to establish a treatment guideline: a shorter immobilization leads to better recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The manuscript presents the International Guidelines developed by the Working Group on Personal Injury and Damage under the patronage of the International Academy of Legal Medicine (IALM) regarding the Methods of Ascertainment of any suspected Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD).The document includes a detailed description of the logical and methodological steps of the ascertainment process as well as a synoptic diagram in the form of Flow Chart.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2006年美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)咳嗽指南发布以来,已经开发或进一步完善了各种工具来评估咳嗽。本委员会的目的是评估进行慢性咳嗽临床研究的研究者使用的仪器。具体目的是(1)评估旨在测量咳嗽频率的工具的性能,严重程度,以及对成年人的影响,青少年,和患有慢性咳嗽的儿童,(2)提出与这些发现相关的建议或建议。
    方法:按照CHEST方法指南,CHEST专家咳嗽小组的建议和建议基于美国医疗保健研究和质量机构最近发布的比较有效性审查,发表在CHEST上的相应摘要,以及截至2013年11月的最新系统审查。讨论了基于这些数据的建议或建议,分级,并在专家咳嗽小组会议上进行了投票。
    结果:我们建议成人,青少年(≥14岁),和儿童抱怨慢性咳嗽,验证和可靠的健康相关的生活质量(QoL)问卷被用作衡量选择,以评估咳嗽的影响,例如成人和青少年患者的莱斯特咳嗽问卷和咳嗽特异性生活质量问卷,以及儿童的父母咳嗽特异性生活质量问卷。我们建议声学咳嗽计数来评估咳嗽频率,但不评估咳嗽严重程度。关于视觉模拟量表的性能的数据有限,数字评级量表,和过敏挑战。
    结论:推荐使用经过验证和可靠的咳嗽特异性健康相关QoL问卷作为评估咳嗽对患者影响的选择。如何比较尚待确定。使用时,通过视觉模拟或数字评定量表报告咳嗽严重程度应标准化.先前验证的QoL问卷或其他咳嗽评估不应修改,除非新版本已被证明是可靠和有效的。最后,在研究环境中,致咳性挑战在了解咳嗽机制中发挥作用。
    BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the 2006 American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) cough guidelines, a variety of tools has been developed or further refined for assessing cough. The purpose of the present committee was to evaluate instruments used by investigators performing clinical research on chronic cough. The specific aims were to (1) assess the performance of tools designed to measure cough frequency, severity, and impact in adults, adolescents, and children with chronic cough and (2) make recommendations or suggestions related to these findings.
    METHODS: By following the CHEST methodologic guidelines, the CHEST Expert Cough Panel based its recommendations and suggestions on a recently published comparative effectiveness review commissioned by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, a corresponding summary published in CHEST, and an updated systematic review through November 2013. Recommendations or suggestions based on these data were discussed, graded, and voted on during a meeting of the Expert Cough Panel.
    RESULTS: We recommend for adults, adolescents (≥ 14 years of age), and children complaining of chronic cough that validated and reliable health-related quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires be used as the measurement of choice to assess the impact of cough, such as the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and the Cough-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in adult and adolescent patients and the Parent Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in children. We recommend acoustic cough counting to assess cough frequency but not cough severity. Limited data exist regarding the performance of visual analog scales, numeric rating scales, and tussigenic challenges.
    CONCLUSIONS: Validated and reliable cough-specific health-related QoL questionnaires are recommended as the measurement of choice to assess the impact of cough on patients. How they compare is yet to be determined. When used, the reporting of cough severity by visual analog or numeric rating scales should be standardized. Previously validated QoL questionnaires or other cough assessments should not be modified unless the new version has been shown to be reliable and valid. Finally, in research settings, tussigenic challenges play a role in understanding mechanisms of cough.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    OBJECTIVE: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is common in asthmatic patients and may impair asthma control. However, this comorbidity is frequently missed. A simple test is needed to enable physicians to diagnose and evaluate the severity of both diseases. The Self Assessment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma (SACRA) questionnaire, which GINA and ARIA Japan committees developed in 2011, consist of questionnaires based on GINA and ARIA guidelines for the diagnosis and severity of AR and asthma, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to evaluate the severity of both diseases. Our objective was to investigate the clinical usefulness of SACRA as a patient-based screening tool for identifying asthmatic patients with AR.
    METHODS: SACRA, ACT (Asthma Control Test) and serum IgE RAST were performed in asthmatic patients. The correlation between SACRA and other parameters were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Four hundred twenty asthmatic patients were enrolled. Among 168 subjects who self-reported no concomitant AR, 76 asthmatics scored one or more symptoms on SACRA. Eventually, 32 of these 76 subjects were diagnosed with AR by physicians based on laboratory data or physical examinations by ear, nose and throat specialists. The sensitivity and specificity of SACRA for the diagnosis of AR were 92% and 66%, respectively. The estimated prevalence of AR among asthmatics was 66%, almost identical to that of the previous nationwide study in Japan. The level of asthma control assessed by the VAS on SACRA and the ACT score showed a strong correlation (r = -0.700, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: SACRA may be a clinically useful tool for identifying bronchial asthma patients with AR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号