OBJECTIVE: Adductor canal block (ACB) is widely performed for postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-assisted and anesthesiologist-assisted (ultrasound-guided) adductor blocks in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy.
METHODS: This study was designed as a double-blind, prospective and randomized trial. A total of 240 participants were randomly allocated to three groups: one where the surgeon performed the adductor canal block (ACBs), another where it was conducted by an anesthetist with ultrasound guidance (ACBa), and a third group without the adductor block. The follow-up management after the Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure occurred on the first, third, and tenth days, as well as the twelfth week. Outcome measures comprised pain assessment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and monitoring opioid analgesic consumption.
RESULTS: No significant differences in demographic profiles were observed between the groups. Groups ACBa and ACBs exhibited significantly lower VAS scores compared to the control group at both 3 and 12 h after surgery, with group ACBa showing the lowest VAS scores among all groups. However, at 1 day, 3 days, 10 days and 12 weeks after surgery, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the ACBa and ACBs groups. On the first three days, the ACBa group had the lowest opioid consumption and the lowest total opioid consumption. The differences in VAS scores between the groups began to decrease on the first day after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The adductor canal block (ACB) has been demonstrated to be an effective method of reducing pain in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) in the postoperative period. Nevertheless, despite the pronounced impact that ACB performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance has on VAS scores according to intraoperative ACB by surgeons, its effect on clinical outcomes has not been demonstrated.
BACKGROUND: This study was retrospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry Platform on July 31, 2024 (NCT06533085).

Background/Objectives: Anterior spinal fusion for primary thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, AIS, has advantages over posterior fusion, particularly in saving motion segments below the fusion construct. Traditionally, the approach is anterolaterally from the convexity. In adult degenerative scoliosis, the lateral or anterolateral approach may be performed from the traditional or from the concave approach which is less invasive and gives comparable outcomes. The purpose of the present pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the less invasive concave approach for younger AIS patients and compare it to the traditional convex approach over a 5-year follow-up period. Methods: The two cohorts were assessed by comparing pre- to postoperative radiographs, and clinical outcomes for pain, function, self-perception of appearance, and opinion of surgical success were prospectively obtained. Results: Radiographs found that primary TL/L scoliosis significantly improved from 53° to 18° (65%) for both the concave and convex cohorts. Sagittal alignments remained stable and there was no difference between cohorts. Coronal balance improved in both cohorts and sagittal balance was stable for both. Clinically, VAS back pain improved significantly for both cohorts initially and remained improved in the concave group. Leg pain, pain drawing, ODI disability, and VAS appearance scores improved and there was no difference between cohorts. The self-rating of success of the procedure was 100% at early and late follow-up periods. There were no neurological/surgical complications. Conclusions: The concave approach for anterior fusion for TL/L AIS is feasible with comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes to the traditional approach.

UNASSIGNED: Boswellin® Super is a standardized extract of Boswellia serrata Roxb gum resin, standardized to contain 30% 3-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid along with other β-boswellic acids (BSE). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at two doses of BSE to understand its safety and efficacy in supporting joint health and improving mobility and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 105 newly diagnosed participants with degenerative hypertrophy OA were recruited and randomized into Placebo, BSE-150 mg or BSE-300 mg (n = 35 in each group) to receive either 150 mg or 300 mg BSE or a placebo tablet twice a day for 90 days. All the participants were evaluated for pain and physical function using the standard tools including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne Functional Index (LFI), EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) quality of life, 6-min walk test at day 0, days 5, 30, 60 and 90 of treatment. Additionally, the circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated. Safety was evaluated by blood biochemical, hematological analysis, urinary analyses and by monitoring adverse events throughout the study.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety-eight subjects completed the study. Improvements in pain scores were observed as early as 5 days after the start of the supplement in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups. By 90 days, the VAS pain score reduced by 45.3% and 61.9%, WOMAC- total score improved by 68.5% and 73.6% in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups respectively. WOMAC pain (70.2%, 73.9%, WOMAC stiffness (65.6%,68.9%), WOMAC function (68.8%,74.2%), LFI severity (50%,53.3%), decreased and EQ5D (56.9%, 62.9%) and distance walked in 6 minutes (21.2%, 21.9%) improved in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups in 90 days. Further, the levels of TNFα, hs-CRP, and IL-6 were found to decrease in the serum in BSE-supplemented participants. No significant adverse events were recorded during the study.
UNASSIGNED: The study confirms that Boswellin® Super can be used as a safe and effective supplement to support joint health and mobility in the management of osteoarthritis.
UNASSIGNED: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NzU2Nzc=&Enc=&userName=CTRI, identifier CTRI/2022/11/047397.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, pharyngeal anesthesia such as nebulizer or lidocaine pump spray is the risk of droplet transmission to health care workers from coughing due to spraying anesthesia. Absence of pharyngeal anesthesia may induce coughing and reduce patient and operator satisfaction, but the efficacy of pharyngeal anesthesia under sedation is still limited. Therefore we evaluated a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial to evaluate efficacy of pharyngeal anesthesia in patients receiving sedation.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized comparison of pharyngeal anesthesia with or without bronchoalveolar lavage in patients undergoing bronchoscopy at our hospital between March and October 2022. Pharyngeal anesthesia was performed using 8％ lidocaine spray and the operators were blinded to eliminate bias. Two hundred patients were entered into the study and divided into two groups: those who received pharyngeal anesthesia(control group) and did not receive pharyngeal anesthesia(test group). The primary endpoint was the operator\'s satisfaction with the procedure. The secondary endpoints were the patient\'s cough during the examination as perceived by the operator, cough and discomfort experienced by the patient and the dose of analgesic/sedative/lidocaine administered. These scales were scored from 0 to 100.
RESULTS: In primary endpoint, there was no significant difference in the operator-rated procedure satisfaction between the 2 groups. The median for the discomfort score for patients in the control group was tendency higher than in the test group. There were no significant differences in other secondary endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal anesthesia may not be recommended for flexible bronchoscopy performed under combined sedation and analgesia.
BACKGROUND: Registration number: UMIN000046975Date of registration: 2022/03/07.

Longer-term pecan consumption has shown appetite-regulating effects as a part of a free-living diet, yet the physiologic appetite responses to a single pecan-containing meal are unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the acute physiologic, subjective, and direct appetite responses of a pecan-containing meal to an energy- and macronutrient-matched control meal. This was an acute meal challenge study utilizing a double-blinded randomized crossover design with two periods. Participants were young, healthy adults (BMI: 22.9 ± 3.3 kg/m2, age: 22 ± 3 y) who consumed a meal containing either 68 g of pecans (PEC; 795 kcal) or an energy- and macronutrient-matched control meal (CON; 794 kcal) on separate testing days. At both testing visits, five postprandial blood draws, and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires (in-lab) were used to determine differences in peptide YY (PYY), ghrelin, and subjective appetite over a 4-h postprandial period. Participants also completed VAS questionnaires (at-home) and food records for the rest of the day after leaving the testing visits. Thirty-one out of thirty-two randomized participants completed the study. There was a greater overall postprandial PYY response (p < 0.001), and a greater suppression of postprandial ghrelin after time point 120 min (p < 0.001), with the PEC vs. CON meal. Further, there was a greater increase in subjective fullness (p = 0.001), and suppression of at-home overall appetite (p = 0.02), from time 240-780 min post-meal with PEC vs. CON meals. There were no differences in self-reported EI between meals or any other VAS measure. In conclusion, a pecan-containing breakfast shake produced more favorable physiologic and subjective improvements in appetite compared to an energy- and macronutrient-matched control meal. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05230212).

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac plexus irradiation with iodine-125 (125I) seeds with absolute ethanol for relieving pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed data of 81 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-CPN or EUS-125I implantation between January 2017 and December 2020. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores; self-assessments of quality of life and the median survival time were compared between the 2 groups.
UNASSIGNED: EUS-CPN and 125I implantation were performed in 43 and 38 patients, respectively. Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower than the preoperative levels in both groups. One week after the operation, 26 patients (60.5%) in the EUS-CPN group achieved partial pain relief, whereas no patients in the EUS-125I seed group experienced pain relief. However, after 4 weeks postoperatively, VAS scores had decreased, and the rate of partial pain relief was higher for EUS-125I seeds than for EUS-CPN. Self-assessments of quality of life were similar in both groups during the first 1 month after the procedure.
UNASSIGNED: Both EUS-CPN and EUS-125I seeds can safely and effectively relieve pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although EUS-125I seeds take additional time to show effects, the extent and duration of pain relief are better compared with CPN, and interestingly, the median survival time was different.

Background/Objectives: Dystonia is a neurological movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions that lead to abnormal movements and postures; it has a major impact on patients\' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to examine the HRQoL of Romanian patients with dystonia using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Methods: Responses to the EQ-5D-5L and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected alongside demographic and clinical characteristics. Health profiles were analyzed via the metrics of the EQ-5D-5L, severity levels, and age groups. Using Shannon\'s indexes, we calculated informativity both for patients\' health profile as a whole and each individual dimension. Level sum scores (LSS) of the EQ-5D-5L were calculated and compared with scores from the EQ-5D-5L index and VAS. The HRQoL measures were analyzed through demographic and clinical characteristics. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U or Kruskall-Wallis H) were used. The level of agreement between HRQoL measures was assessed using their intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Results: A sample of 90 patients was used, around 75.6% of whom were female patients, and the mean age at the beginning of the survey was 58.7 years. The proportion of patients reporting \"no problems\" in all five dimensions was 10%. The highest frequency reported was \"no problems\" in self-care (66%), followed by \"no problems\" in mobility (41%). Shannon index and Shannon evenness index values showed higher informativity for pain/discomfort (2.07 and 0.89, respectively) and minimal informativity for self-care (1.59 and 0.68, respectively). The mean EQ-5D-5L index, LSS, and VAS scores were 0.74 (SD = 0.26), 0.70 (SD = 0.24), and 0.61 (SD = 0.21), respectively. The Spearman correlations between HRQoL measures were higher than 0.60. The agreement between the EQ-5D-5L index and LSS values was excellent (ICC = 0.970, 95% CI = 0.934-0.984); the agreement was poor-to-good between the EQ-5D-5L index and VAS scores (ICC = 683, 95% CI = 0.388-0.820), and moderate-to-good between the LSS and VAS scores (ICC = 0.789, 95% CI = 0.593-0.862). Conclusions: Our results support the utilization of the EQ-5D-5L instrument in assessing the HRQoL of dystonia patients, and empirical results suggest that the EQ-5D-5L index and LSS measure may be used interchangeably. The findings from this study highlight that HRQoL is complex in patients with dystonia, particularly across different age groups.

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Japan has not been adequately investigated. Furthermore, the relationship between stimulation-site pain and the antidepressant effects of rTMS has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify (1) the real-world efficacy and safety of rTMS for TRD in Japan and (2) the relationship between stimulation-site pain and clinical improvement of depressive symptoms.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study involving 50 right-handed patients with TRD. All patients received high-frequency rTMS for up to 6 weeks. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS). Pain at the stimulation site was reported by the patients using a visual analog scale (VAS) after each session. Remission and response rates at 3 and 6 weeks were calculated based on the MADRS scores. The correlation between changes in the MADRS and VAS scores was examined.
RESULTS: Remission and response rates were 36% and 46%, respectively, at the end of 3 weeks, and 60% and 70%, respectively, at 6 weeks. At the end of the treatment, there was significant correlation between the reduction of MADRS and VAS scores (r = 0.42, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of rTMS in Japan and the correlation between its antidepressant effects and stimulation-site pain.

This study aimed to conduct a human study to determine the incidence of postobturation pain using different parameters. In this cross-sectional study, 240 patients were included, which were equally allocated into two groups: single visit and multiple visit, 120 in each. Patients in both the single and multiple visits were further categorized into two subgroups, subgroup 1-no occlusal reduction and subgroup 2-occlusion reduction each having 60 patients. Corresponding to the type of visit, patients were followed by the role of medication into two groups, subgroup 1-both analgesics and antibiotics, subgroup 2-only analgesics, and subgroup 3-no medication. Following this approach and the criteria of the study, patients\' performa was made, and based on this performa, the intensity of subjective symptoms, particularly postobturation pain, was determined using the visual analog scale (VAS). The data were then analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results were such that a single visit, no occlusal reduction, and only analgesics will be better for patients with irreversible pulpitis as chosen in the present study. Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that single-sitting root canal treatment should be preferred over multiple sitting where there is no periapical inflammation; also, the occlusal reduction could be exempted from the same. To relieve the patient from postoperative pain where complete debridement is possible, antibiotics can be excluded from the regimen and only analgesics could be prescribed.

UNASSIGNED: Newer concept of root canal therapy is single-visit one rather than conventional multivisit therapy. Major complaint of patients after root canal therapy is mild or severe pain.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to assess the prevalence of postoperative discomfort after root canal treatment conducted in both single and multiple visits.
UNASSIGNED: An experiment using a randomized controlled trial design was conducted, including a total of 80 participants. These individuals were then separated into two groups, with each group consisting of 40 participants. Group A had single-visit root canal therapy, whereas Group B received multivisit root canal treatment. The incidence of pain after therapy was evaluated and compared at four time points: 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after obturation.
UNASSIGNED: The level of pain experienced by patients in Group B was notably greater in comparison with individuals in Group A. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the level of pain reported by the patients 48 hours after treatment in either of the groups.
UNASSIGNED: There is no significant difference in the occurrence of discomfort after endodontic treatment conducted in either a single visit or many visits, as seen during a 48-hour period after obturation.