目标:本范围审查将现有文献绘制成学生和毕业生在大学到工作过渡期间的心理健康经历。本综述调查了这些研究的方法学特征,主要发现,以及这些研究用来概念化心理健康和转型的理论。
方法:该项目使用了由Peters及其同事和JoannaBriggs研究所创建和开发的范围审查方法。该综述搜索了学术数据库,并筛选了符合预定纳入标准的现有研究。
方法:使用一组搜索词搜索了七个学术数据库和GoogleScholar。
■纳入的研究检查了那些在3年内是大学最后一年的学生或大学毕业的参与者。包括自2000年以来以英语发表的任何国家的研究。该综述包括研究心理健康的负面维度。该评论排除了针对医学生和毕业生的研究。
方法:检索了有关研究的基本信息及其在心理健康和大学工作过渡方面的发现。调查结果在表格和定性专题摘要中列出。
结果:范围审查包括12项研究。心理健康通常没有明确定义,其理论基础也没有明确阐明。审查确定了因素,包括缺乏社会支持和经济不稳定,作为不良心理健康的来源。这些研究中的其他保护因素-预防心理健康问题的变量-被确定,比如职业准备和有一份好工作。
结论:尽管方法学关注心理健康的消极方面,在大学到工作的过渡期间,人们的心理健康经历并不是一致的负面的。在未来的研究中明确的心理健康概念将有助于开发资源以改善福祉。
背景:此范围审查遵循了以前在本期刊上发布的协议,并在OpenScienceFramework网站(https://osf.io/gw86x)上注册。
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review maps the extant literature on students\' and graduates\' mental health experiences throughout their university-to-work transitions. The current review investigates the methodological features of the studies, the main findings, and the theories that the studies draw on to conceptualise mental health and transitions.
METHODS: This project used a scoping review methodology created and developed by Peters and colleagues and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review searched academic databases and screened existing studies that met predetermined inclusion criteria.
METHODS: Seven academic databases and Google Scholar were searched with sets of search terms.
UNASSIGNED: The included studies examined participants who were final-year university students or those who had graduated from university within a 3-year period. Studies published in English since 2000 and from any country were included. The review included studies examining the negative dimensions of mental health. The review excluded studies focusing on medical students and graduates.
METHODS: Basic information about the studies and their findings on mental health and university-to-work transitions was retrieved. The findings are presented in tables and in a qualitative thematic summary.
RESULTS: The scoping review included 12 studies. Mental health was often not explicitly defined and it\'s theoretical foundations were not clearly articulated. The review identified factors, including a lack of social support and economic precarity, as sources of adverse mental health. Other protective factors in these studies-variables that guard against mental health problems-were identified, such as career preparedness and having a good job.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the methodological focus on the negative aspects of mental health, people\'s mental health experiences during university-to-work transitions are not uniformly negative. Clear conceptualisations of mental health in future studies will aid in developing resources to improve well-being.
BACKGROUND: This scoping review adhered to a protocol previously published in this journal and that is registered on the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/gw86x).