UNASSIGNED: The Lewis (Le) blood group system, unlike most other blood groups, is not defined by antigens produced internally to the erythrocytes and their precursors but rather by glycan antigens adsorbed on to the erythrocyte membrane from the plasma. These oligosaccharides are synthesized by the two fucosyltransferases FUT2 and FUT3 mainly in epithelial cells of the digestive tract and transferred to the plasma. At their place of synthesis, some Lewis blood group carbohydrate antigen variants also seem to be involved in various gastrointestinal malignancies. However, relatively little is known about the transcriptional regulation of FUT2 and FUT3.
UNASSIGNED: To address this question, we screened existing literature and additionally used in silico prediction tools to identify novel candidate regulators for FUT2 and FUT3 and combine these findings with already known data on their regulation. With this approach, we were able to describe a variety of transcription factors, RNA binding proteins and microRNAs, which increase FUT2 and FUT3 transcription and translation upon interaction.
UNASSIGNED: Understanding the regulation of FUT2 and FUT3 is crucial to fully understand the blood group system Lewis (ISBT 007 LE) phenotypes, to shed light on the role of the different Lewis antigens in various pathologies, and to identify potential new diagnostic targets for these diseases.
The Lewis (Le) blood group system, in contrast to the majority of blood groups, is not able to synthesize its antigens itself. It depends on the attachment of different oligosaccharides to the erythrocyte membrane, which are adsorbed from the plasma. These glycans are modified by the fucosyltransferases 2 and 3 enzymes (FUT2/3). Beside their role in defining the Lewis blood group, FUT2 and FUT3 are also known to be involved in the susceptibility and progression of various gastrointestinal pathologies, like inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). Even though different expression levels of FUT2 and FUT3 have been described in these malignancies, relatively little is known about the mechanisms behind their transcriptional regulation. In this review, we aim to shed light on transcription factors (TFs) responsible for FUT2 and FUT3 expression as well as on post-transcriptional regulators by the means of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). To achieve our goal, we combined previous knowledge on FUT2 and FUT3 expression regulation with a computational analysis to predict additional novel regulators. On this way, we are able to broaden our knowledge on FUT2 and FUT3 expression regulation and consequently might be able to transfer our findings into diagnostics or therapeutics in the future.

BACKGROUND: The Cut Homeobox 1 (CUX1) gene has been implicated in a number of developmental processes and has recently emerged as an important cause of developmental delay and impaired intellectual development. Individuals with variants in CUX1 have been described with a variety of co-morbidities including variations in sex development (VSD) although these features have not been closely documented.
METHODS: The proband is a 14-year-old male who presented with congenital complex hypospadias, neurodevelopmental differences, and subtle dysmorphism. A family history of neurodevelopmental differences and VSD was noted. Microarray testing and whole exome sequencing found the 46,XY proband had a large heterozygous in-frame deletion of exons 4-10 of the CUX1 gene.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review of the literature has revealed that variants in CUX1 are associated with a range of VSD and suggest this gene should be considered in cases where a VSD is noted at birth, especially if there is a familial history of VSD and/or neurodevelopmental differences. Further work is required to fully investigate the role and regulation of CUX1 in sex development.

The Hippo signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in regulating cell growth and organ size. Its regulatory effects on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) encompass diverse aspects, including cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis, tumor drug resistance, metabolic reprogramming, immunomodulatory effects and autophagy. Yes‑associated protein 1 (YAP1), a potent transcriptional coactivator and a major downstream target tightly controlled by the Hippo pathway, is influenced by various molecules and pathways. The expression of YAP1 in different cell types within the liver tumor microenvironment exerts varying effects on tumor outcomes, warranting careful consideration. Therefore, research on YAP1‑targeted therapies merits attention. This review discusses the composition and regulation mechanism of the Hippo/YAP1 signaling pathway and its relationship with HCC, offering insights for future research and cancer prevention strategies.

Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) are rare but lethal solid neoplasms that overwhelmingly affect infants and young children. While the central nervous system is the most common site of occurrence, tumors can develop at other sites, including the kidneys and soft tissues throughout the body. The anatomic site of involvement dictates tumor nomenclature and nosology. While the clinical and imaging manifestations of MRTs and other more common entities may overlap, there are some site-specific distinctive imaging characteristics. Irrespective of the site of occurrence, somatic and germline mutations in SMARCB1, and rarely in SMARCA4, underlie the entire spectrum of rhabdoid tumors. MRTs have a simple and remarkably stable genome but can demonstrate considerable molecular and biologic heterogeneity. Related neoplasms encompass an expanding category of phenotypically dissimilar (nonrhabdoid tumors driven by SMARC-related alterations) entities. US, CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT or PET/MRI facilitate diagnosis, initial staging, and follow-up, thus informing therapeutic decision making. Multifocal synchronous or metachronous rhabdoid tumors occur predominantly in the context of underlying rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndromes (RTPSs). These autosomal dominant disorders are driven in most cases by pathogenic variants in SMARCB1 (RTPS type 1) and rarely by pathogenic variants in SMARCA4 (RTPS type 2). Genetic testing and counseling are imperative in RTPS. Guidelines for imaging surveillance in cases of RTPS are based on age at diagnosis. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

The BET (bromodomain and extraterminal domain) family of proteins, particularly BRD4 (bromodomain-containing protein 4), plays a crucial role in transcription regulation and epigenetic mechanisms, impacting key cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and the DNA damage response. BRD4, the most studied member of this family, binds to acetylated lysines on both histones and non-histone proteins, thereby regulating gene expression and influencing diverse cellular functions such as the cell cycle, tumorigenesis, and immune responses to viral infections. Given BRD4\'s involvement in these fundamental processes, it is implicated in various diseases, including cancer and inflammation, making it a promising target for therapeutic development. This review comprehensively explores the roles of the BET family in gene transcription, DNA damage response, and viral infection, discussing the potential of targeted small-molecule compounds and highlighting BET proteins as promising candidates for anticancer therapy.

PURA syndrome is a congenital developmental disorder caused by de novo mutations in the PURA gene, which encodes a DNA/RNA-binding protein essential for transcriptional and translational regulation. We present the case of an 11-year-old patient with a de novo frameshift variant in the PURA gene, identified through whole exome sequencing (WES). In addition to the classical PURA deficiency phenotype, our patient exhibited pronounced sialorrhea and seizures, which were effectively treated with the ketogenic diet (KD). Our integrative approach, combining a literature review and bioinformatics data, has led to the first documented clinical case showing improvement in both sialorrhea and seizures with KD treatment, a phenomenon not previously reported. Although a direct relationship between the de novo PURA mutation and the KD was not established, we identified a novel frameshift deletion associated with a new clinical phenotype.

FBRSL1, together with FBRS and AUTS2 (Activator of Transcription and Developmental Regulator; OMIM 607270), constitutes a tripartite AUTS2 gene family. AUTS2 and FBRSL1 are evolutionarily more closely related to each other than to FBRS (Fibrosin 1; OMIM 608601). Despite its paralogous relation to AUTS2, FBRSL1\'s precise role remains unclear, though it likely shares functions in neurogenesis and transcriptional regulation. Herein, we report the clinical presentation with therapeutic approaches and the molecular etiology of a patient harboring a de novo truncating variant (c.371dupC) in FBRSL1, leading to a premature stop codon (p.Cys125Leufs*7). Our study extends previous knowledge by highlighting potential interactions and implications of this variant, alongside maternal and paternal duplications, for the patient\'s phenotype. Using sequence conservation data and in silico analysis of the truncated protein, we generated a predicted domain structure. Furthermore, our in silico analysis was extended by taking into account SNP array results. The extension of in silico analysis was performed due to the possibility that the coexistence of FBRSL1 truncating variant contemporary with maternal and paternal duplication could be a modifier of proband\'s phenotype and/or influence the novel syndrome clinical characteristics. FBRSL1 protein may be involved in neurodevelopment due to its homology with AUTS2, together with distinctive neuronal expression profiles, and thus should be considered as a potential modulation of clinical characteristics in a novel syndrome. Finally, considering that FBRSL1 is apparently involved in neurogenesis and in transcriptional regulatory networks that orchestrate gene expression, together with the observation that different genetic syndromes are associated with distinct genomic DNA methylation patterns, the specific episignature has been explored.

The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN (LBD) protein, named for its LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES (LOB) domain, is a member of a class of specific transcription factors commonly found in plants and is absent from all other groups of organisms. LBD TFs have been systematically identified in about 35 plant species and are involved in regulating various aspects of plant growth and development. However, research on the signaling network and regulatory functions of LBD TFs is insufficient, and only a few members have been studied. Moreover, a comprehensive review of these existing studies is lacking. In this review, the structure, regulatory mechanism and function of LBD TFs in recent years were reviewed in order to better understand the role of LBD TFs in plant growth and development, and to provide a new perspective for the follow-up study of LBD TFs.

Cancer constitutes a multifaceted ailment characterized by the dysregulation of numerous genes and pathways. Among these, LIM domain only 7 (LMO7) has emerged as a significant player in various cancer types, garnering substantial attention for its involvement in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. This review endeavors to furnish a comprehensive discourse on the functional intricacies and mechanisms of LMO7 in cancer, with a particular emphasis on its potential as both a therapeutic target and prognostic indicator. It delves into the molecular attributes of LMO7, its implications in cancer etiology and the underlying mechanisms propelling its oncogenic properties. Furthermore, it underscores the extant challenges and forthcoming prospects in targeting LMO7 for combating cancer.

The 5th WHO classification of thoracic tumours includes thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour (SMARCA4-UT) among the \"other epithelial tumours of the lung\" chapter. Herein, we present a case of undifferentiated thoracic neoplasm with retention of SMARCA4 expression, lack of NUT fusion protein and loss of SMARCB1/INI1 expression. After presenting the clinical and pathological features of the tumour, we carried out a review of the literature on the same topic. Albeit very rare, we believe this entity should be included in the heterogeneous group of undifferentiated neoplasms of the thorax.