society

Society
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经过一段时间的基于机构的精神卫生保健,庇护制度是治疗精神病人的方式,非机构化带来了一系列重大的变化和转变的概念,通过延伸,最需要帮助的人得到援助的传统治疗环境。然而,精神病学领域的这种转变不仅伴随着有价值的成就,还有困难和挑战,正如今天所证明的那样。
    因此,本文的目的是研究收容所封闭的利弊,以及随后在精神病学领域60年左右的这种重要转变中实施非制度化。
    在考虑这个问题时,我根据学术知识详细研究了最近的文学作品。此外,我确定了涉及的各种问题,以及面对这些问题的方法,以试图克服它们带来的困难。
    正如我在这里展示的,庇护和非机构化之后,精神病患者的治疗和护理的变化为患者及其家人带来了新的希望,但也有不良影响。本文还考虑了当今的心理健康专业人员如何代表患者和整个社会解决这些影响。
    UNASSIGNED: After a period of institution-based mental health care, in which the asylum system was the way in which the mental patients were treated, deinstitutionalization brought a set of significant changes and transformations in the conceptualization of mental illness and, by extension, the traditional therapeutic settings in which those in most need were assisted. However, this shift in the psychiatric domain was not only accompanied by valued achievements, but also by difficulties and challenges, as has been evidenced today.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this paper is thus to examine the pros and cons of the closure of asylums, and the subsequent implementation of deinstitutionalization over the 60 years or so of such important transformations in the field of psychiatry.
    UNASSIGNED: In considering this question, I examine in detail recent works of literature based on scholarly knowledge. In addition, I identify various issues involved, as well as ways of confronting these so as to attempt to overcome the difficulties they present.
    UNASSIGNED: As I show here, the changes in the treatment and care of the mentally ill after asylum and deinstitutionalization brought a new air of hope to patients and their families, but also had undesirable effects. The paper also considers how mental health professionals today try to solve these effects on behalf of patients and society as a whole.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2010年,沙特阿拉伯成为海湾合作委员会成员国中第一个加入世界心理健康调查倡议的国家,它与哈佛大学合作,并在33个国家开展了合作。沙特国家心理健康调查显示,80%患有严重心理健康障碍的沙特人不寻求治疗。考虑到沙特国家研究中提出的有力证据以及对未来研究的建议,这项系统的文献综述旨在研究沙特阿拉伯王国报道的研究最多的神经发育障碍,以探索公众知识,态度,和行为。研究结果表明,自2010年以来,注意力缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍一直是沙特阿拉伯研究最多的神经发育障碍。然而,沙特社会的各个团体,包括医疗保健专业人员,医学生,和公众,缺乏对这些健康状况的了解,通常导致对注意力缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍患者的污名化态度和行为。然而,人口统计数据显示,大多数研究是在中西部省份进行的。需要在沙特阿拉伯王国的所有地区开展更多研究,以帮助了解注意力缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍儿童及其父母的精神健康状况,以增加对沙特阿拉伯王国的神经发育障碍和心理健康障碍的知识,从而使人们能够重新思考他们的态度和行为。
    UNASSIGNED: In 2010, Saudi Arabia became the first country from the Gulf Cooperation Council states to join the World Mental Health Survey Initiative, which collaborates with Harvard University and has undertaken over 33 countries. The Saudi National Mental Health Survey revealed that 80% of Saudis with severe mental health disorders do not seek treatment. Considering the strong evidence set out in Saudi national study and the recommendations for future research, this systematic literature review was initiated to examine the most studied neurodevelopmental disorders reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to explore public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Findings have shown that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder have been the most studied neurodevelopmental disorders in Saudi Arabia since 2010. However, various groups in Saudi society, including healthcare professionals, medical students, and the general public, lacked knowledge about these health conditions, often leading to stigmatized attitudes and behaviors toward people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. However, demographic data showed that most of the studies were carried out in the Central and Western provinces. More research is needed in all regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to contribute to the knowledge about mental health conditions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder children and their parents to increase knowledge about neurodevelopmental disorders and mental health disorders in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, thereby enabling people to rethink their attitudes and behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要更明确地整合社会对畜牧业的期望,这使得本文的作者认为必须重新设计畜牧业系统,将健康和福利置于其目标的核心。本文提出了对不同规模的知识进步的看法,以促进这种转变。在定义了动物的健康和福利之后,这篇文章强调需要从更广泛的角度考虑健康,为了加深关于福利的积极情绪体验的问题,并提出了如何评估农场的这两个要素的问题。提出了健康与福利之间的积极互动。还讨论了它们之间可能存在的一些紧张关系,特别是当通过提供更刺激和更丰富的环境来改善福利时,例如进入户外,会增加传染病的风险。共同改善动物的健康和福利提出了许多不同规模的问题,从动物层面到生产链。在动物层面,作者强调需要探索:更好的福利和生理平衡之间的长期联系,微生物群的作用,将积极的精神状态和健康联系起来的心理-神经-内分泌机制,以及生产的生理功能之间的权衡,繁殖和免疫。在农场一级,除了在团体层面研究福利之间的关系,健康和生产,本文支持与畜牧业农民共同构建创新系统的想法,以及分析成本,改进系统对其工作条件和福祉的可接受性和影响。在生产链或地区层面,提出了各种问题。这些措施包括研究改善动物健康和福利的最佳策略,同时保持经济可行性。产品的标签和消费者的支付意愿,动物性状的异质性对动物产品加工的影响,以及畜牧业的空间分布以及生产和价值链的组织。在公民和消费者层面,挑战之一是一方面更好地相互关联的卫生和健康观点,另一方面,福利问题。还需要提高公民对畜牧业的知识,发展畜牧业农民之间更激烈和建设性的交流,畜牧业和公民。这些棘手的问题恳求跨学科和跨学科研究涉及各种科学学科和不同的利益相关者,包括通过参与式研究的公共政策制定者。
    The need to integrate more clearly societal expectations on livestock farming has led the authors of this article to consider that livestock farming systems must be redesigned to position health and welfare at the heart of their objectives. This article proposes a vision of the advances in knowledge required at different scales to contribute to this transformation. After defining health and welfare of animals, the article emphasises the need to consider health in a broader perspective, to deepen the question of positive emotional experiences regarding welfare, and raises the question of how to assess these two elements on farms. The positive interactions between health and welfare are presented. Some possible tensions between them are also discussed, in particular when improving welfare by providing a more stimulating and richer environment such as access to outdoor increases the risk of infectious diseases. Jointly improving health and welfare of animals poses a number of questions at various scales, from the animal level to the production chain. At the animal level, the authors highlight the need to explore: the long-term links between better welfare and physiological balance, the role of microbiota, the psycho-neuro-endocrine mechanisms linking positive mental state and health, and the trade-off between the physiological functions of production, reproduction and immunity. At the farm level, in addition to studying the relationships at the group level between welfare, health and production, the paper supports the idea of co-constructing innovative systems with livestock farmers, as well as analysing the cost, acceptability and impact of improved systems on their working conditions and well-being. At the production chain or territory levels, various questions are raised. These include studying the best strategies to improve animal health and welfare while preserving economic viability, the labelling of products and the consumers\' willingness to pay, the consequences of heterogeneity in animal traits on the processing of animal products, and the spatial distribution of livestock farming and the organisation of the production and value chain. At the level of the citizen and consumer, one of the challenges is to better inter-relate sanitary and health perspectives on the one hand, and welfare concerns on the other hand. There is also a need to improve citizens\' knowledge on livestock farming, and to develop more intense and constructive exchanges between livestock farmers, the livestock industry and citizens. These difficult issues plead for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research involving various scientific disciplines and the different stakeholders, including public policy makers through participatory research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    EsperançaBielsa于2023年撰写的翻译社会学-跨学科政治与社会引起了我们的极大兴趣,正如标题从跨学科政治和社会的角度明确表明了翻译社会学的进一步实现和发展。最近十年见证了翻译社会学在中国的受欢迎程度,翻译和社会的进一步探索,翻译与政治,本书的翻译和经验使更多的老师,研究人员,和研究生在翻译研究中要充分意识到多样性,复杂性,翻译作为一种社会实践的现代性。此外,通过加强翻译在社会生活各个方面调解语言差异的核心作用,质疑文化同质化的简单化观点,探索身份和转变,政治与民主,以及现代翻译经验的本质,这本书从翻译研究的角度更新了我们对当代社会全球特征的理解。
    A Translational Sociology-Interdisciplinary Politics and Society by Esperança Bielsa in 2023 has aroused our great interest, as the title has explicitly indicated a further fulfillment and development of Translational Sociology from the perspective of interdisciplinary politics and society. The recent decade witnesses how Translational Sociology is well-received in China, the further exploration of translation and society, translation and politics, translation and experience in this book enables more teachers, researchers, and postgraduates in translation study to be fully aware of the diversity, complexity, and modernity of translation as a social practice. Moreover, by reinforcing the core role of translation in mediating language differences in all aspects of social life, questioning simplistic views of cultural homogenization, probing into the identity and transformation, politics and democracy, and the nature of modern experience in translating, this book updates our comprehension of the global characteristics of contemporary society from the perspective of translation study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    考虑环境,社会,和治理(ESG)因素可以在投资和可持续性方面促进组织的环境和经济绩效。本文彻底回顾了影响企业关于ESG政策决策的以下因素:经济表现,环境可持续性,污染和废物,企业社会责任,性别,和治理结构。此外,我们回顾了考虑ESG披露的这些因素的影响,全球大流行,宗教,管理委员会和大小,国家利益,和技术进步。文献报道,ESG对环境的披露,经济,和社会可持续性绩效可以加强业务可持续性和绩效。基于宗教的企业表现出更好的社会环境绩效,但治理却没有。独立的管理委员会会产生积极的影响;然而,双性别委员会对ESG披露产生负面影响。在COVID-19大流行期间,ESG投资具有显著的多元化潜力。采用ESG政策增强了创新能力,创新活动,价值创造,和企业的财务业绩。总的来说,社会和环境绩效与业务可持续性呈显著正相关,表明商业经济和为社会创造价值是相互依存的。这篇综述中提出的文献总结将有助于未来对影响商业投资和可持续性的ESG因素的研究。
    Consideration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors can contribute to the environmental and economic performance of organizations in terms of investment and sustainability. This article thoroughly reviews the following factors influencing decisions regarding ESG policy by businesses: economic performance, environmental sustainability, pollution and waste, corporate social responsibility, gender, and governance structure. Moreover, we review the impact of these factors considering ESG disclosure, the global pandemic, religion, governing board and size, national interest, and technological advancements. The literature reports that ESG disclosures of environmental, economic, and social sustainability performance can strengthen business sustainability and performance. Religion-based businesses demonstrated better socio-environmental performance but not governance. An independent governing board has a positive impact; however, dual-gender boards negatively impact ESG disclosure. Significant diversification potential in ESG investments was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adopting an ESG policy enhances the innovation capacity, innovative activities, value creation, and financial performance of businesses. Overall, the social and environmental performance demonstrated a significantly positive relationship with business sustainability, indicating that business economy and creating value for society are mutually dependent. The literature summary presented in this review will help future research on ESG factors that influence business investments and sustainability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行在美国导致了显著的死亡率和发病率。大流行期间的心理健康影响巨大,并影响到所有年龄组和人口类型。我们回顾了现有文献,以了解美国人口中不同弱势群体记录的心理挑战和不同应对策略的当前趋势。这项快速审查是为了调查心理影响的趋势,应对方式,以及在美国COVID-19大流行危机期间的公众支持。
    我们对美国COVID-19大流行后的文献进行了快速回顾。我们搜索了PubMed,因为它是一个广泛可用的观察和实验研究数据库,报告了心理影响,应对方式,以及在COVID-19大流行期间对不同年龄组和医护人员(HCWs)的公众支持。
    我们在审查中纳入了35项研究,报告的数据主要来自美国弱势人群。我们的审查结果表明,COVID-19对不同年龄段的心理健康有不同的影响,尤其是在老年人群中。综述结果表明,像孩子这样的因素,老年人口,女性性别,过度关心家庭,害怕感染,个性,低灵性,在本次大流行期间,心理弹性水平较低的患者出现不良心理健康结局的风险较高.系统性支持,更高的弹性水平,并确定了足够的知识作为保护和预防因素。一般人群中缺乏类似的研究,我们的审查仅限于人口中的弱势群体。我们评论中所有纳入的研究都调查并调查了心理影响,应对技巧,和COVID-19大流行期间的公共支持系统。
    迄今为止的证据表明,女性性别,儿童和老年人,种族因素受到缺乏对心理健康支持的影响。Further,使用我们假设的框架进行的研究可能有助于任何人群应对大流行相关的心理健康危机,在这方面,建议分析更广泛的社会结构因素。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant mortality and morbidity in the United States. The mental health impact during the pandemic was huge and affected all age groups and population types. We reviewed the existing literature to understand the present trends of psychological challenges and different coping strategies documented across different vulnerable sections of the United States population. This rapid review was carried out to investigate the trends in psychological impacts, coping ways, and public support during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis in the United States.
    UNASSIGNED: We undertook a rapid review of the literature following the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. We searched PubMed as it is a widely available database for observational and experimental studies that reported the psychological effects, coping ways, and public support on different age groups and healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: We included thirty-five studies in our review and reported data predominantly from the vulnerable United States population. Our review findings indicate that COVID-19 has a considerable impact on the psychological wellbeing of various age groups differently, especially in the elderly population and HCWs. Review findings suggest that factors like children, elderly population, female gender, overconcern about family, fear of getting an infection, personality, low spirituality, and lower resilience levels were at a higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during this pandemic. Systemic support, higher resilience levels, and adequate knowledge were identified as protecting and preventing factors. There is a paucity of similar studies among the general population, and we restricted our review specifically to vulnerable subgroups of the population. All the included studies in our review investigated and surveyed the psychological impacts, coping skills, and public support system during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: The evidence to date suggests that female gender, child and elderly population, and racial factors have been affected by a lack of support for psychological wellbeing. Further, research using our hypothesized framework might help any population group to deal with a pandemic-associated mental health crisis, and in that regard, analysis of wider societal structural factors is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    非正式护理是社会护理供给的主体。照顾和继续提供照顾的动机对于理解照顾者经历的性质及其与他们支持的人/人的关系至关重要。对定性证据的系统回顾研究了提供非正式护理的动机和意愿的决定因素。确定了2019年8月之前发表的105项符合纳入标准的定性研究,其中84个与护理的文化和社会动机有关。以理论为基础,进行了专题综合。文化和社会因素强烈支持非正式护理的动机和意愿。照顾的主要文化动机是文化价值观和信念,包括照顾角色的民族文化背景,特定文化规范,文化和精神信仰,疾病信念和社会化。社会规范和感知期望,如性别角色,护理的规范和期望,以及对健康和社会护理服务的看法进一步影响了护理人员提供护理的动机和意愿。这些综合研究结果有助于对文化和社会方面形成非正式护理提供的新颖理解。这些发现对理论具有重要意义,研究,政策和实践;所有这些都有助于从“宏观”的角度解决非正式护理的可持续性问题。
    ABSTRACTInformal caregiving constitutes the mainstay of a society\'s care supply. Motivations for caring and continuing to provide care are crucial to understanding the nature of caregiver experiences and their relationship with the person/people they support. This systematic review of qualitative evidence examines determinants of motivations and willingness to provide informal care. One hundred and five qualitative studies published before August 2019 and fitting the inclusion criteria were identified, 84 of them pertaining to cultural and societal motivations for caregiving. Grounded theory-based, thematic synthesis was conducted. Cultural and societal factors strongly underpinned motivations and willingness for informal caregiving. The main cultural motives for caregiving were cultural values and beliefs encompassing the ethnocultural context of the caregiving role, culture-specific norms, cultural and spiritual beliefs, illness beliefs and socialisation. Societal norms and perceived expectations, such as gendered roles, norms and expectations of caregiving, and perceptions of health and social care services further shaped caregiver motivations and willingness to provide care. These meta-synthesis findings contribute towards novel understandings about the cultural and societal aspects shaping informal care provision. These findings bear important implications for theory, research, policy and practice; all of which contributing to the issue of the sustainability of informal care from a \'macro\' perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    MeirKryger博士的《艺术中的睡眠:艺术家如何在过去的7000年中描绘睡眠和梦想》2019年出版的一本书可能会吸引睡眠医学领域的兴趣。这本书有数百幅画,雕塑,和各种艺术家的绘画。拉斐尔的艺术品,亨利·卢梭,巴勃罗·毕加索,文森特·梵高,诺曼·罗克韦尔就是这本书中的许多人。科学世界之间的交集,宗教,和艺术都被探索,因为每个艺术家都熟练地描绘了人类对睡眠的迷恋。
    JohalA,StahlSM.《艺术中的睡眠:艺术家如何在过去的7000年里描绘睡眠和梦想》JClinSleepMed.2021年;17(12):2577。
    Dr. Meir Kryger\'s Sleep in Art: How Artists Portrayed Sleep and Dreams in the Last 7000 Years, published in 2019, is a book likely to captivate the interests of those in sleep medicine. This book features hundreds of paintings, sculptures, and drawings by various artists. Artwork by Raphael, Henri Rousseau, Pablo Picasso, Vincent van Gogh, and Norman Rockwell are among the many found in this book. The intersection between the worlds of science, religion, and art are all explored as each artist expertly depicts the human enthrallment with sleep throughout time.
    UNASSIGNED: Johal A, Stahl SM. Media Review: Sleep in Art: How Artists Portrayed Sleep and Dreams in the Last 7000 Years. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2577.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Little is understood of the social and cultural effects of coronaviruses such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV). This systematic review aims to synthesize existing findings (both qualitative and quantitative) that focus on the social and cultural impacts of coronaviruses in order to gain a better understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing a predetermined search strategy, we searched CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify existing (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods) studies pertaining to the coronavirus infections and their intersection with societies and cultures. A narrative synthesis approach was applied to summarize and interpret findings of the study. Stemming from SARS outbreak in 2003, qualitative and quantitative findings (twelve adopted quantitative methods and eight exclusively used qualitative methods) were organized under five topical domains: governance, crisis communication and public knowledge, stigma and discrimination, social compliance of preventive measures, and the social experience of health workers. The selected studies suggest that current societies are not equipped for effective coronavirus response and control. This mixed-methods systematic review demonstrates that the effects of coronaviruses on a society can be debilitating.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号