social context

社会背景
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会等级是社会组织的典型特征。快速识别社会等级信息的能力对于适应社会环境至关重要。这里,我们采用快速周期性视觉刺激(FPVS)和脑电图(EEG)来评估在社会竞争和合作过程中对社会等级的神经反应,分别。参与者首先从竞争性游戏与合作游戏中学习了分层面孔。然后,我们在一组面部中以特定频率顺序呈现学习的分层面部。结果表明,与竞争环境相比,参与者在合作环境中对劣等参与者的社会等级评价较低,表明社会环境会影响他人的排名判断。此外,观察到对高层和低层面部的神经反应较高,而对中层面部的神经反应较高,表明从面孔上迅速区分社会等级制度。有趣的是,等级特异性神经反应在竞争环境中比在合作环境中更明显,表明在社会竞争与社会合作期间,对社会等级制度的敏感性增加。这项研究提供了行为和神经证据,自动处理社会等级信息,并在竞争和合作的社会环境中提高对此类信息的敏感性。
    Social hierarchy is a typical feature of social organization. The ability to quickly recognize social hierarchy information is crucial for adapting to social contexts. Here, we adopted fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) with electroencephalography (EEG) to assess the neural responses to social hierarchy during social competition and cooperation, respectively. Participants first learned hierarchical faces from a competitive game versus a cooperative game. We then sequentially presented the learned hierarchical faces with a specific frequency in a set of faces. Results showed that participants rated the inferior player as lower in the social hierarchy in the cooperative context compared to the competitive context, indicating that social context affects the judgment of others\' rank. Moreover, higher neural responses to high and low-hierarchy faces versus medium-hierarchy faces were observed, suggesting rapid discrimination of social hierarchy from faces. Interestingly, rank-specific neural responses were more pronounced in the competitive context than in the cooperative context, indicating increased sensitivity to social hierarchy during social competition versus social cooperation. This study provides behavioral and neural evidence for rapid, automatic processing of social hierarchy information and for an increased sensitivity to such information in competitive versus cooperative social contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了影响SAD患者使用安全行为的环境因素以及使用安全行为时的积极情绪。88名参与者参与了这项研究,一半(n=44)符合SAD诊断标准,一半(n=44)不符合SAD诊断标准.参与者完成了21天的经验抽样方法(ESM)测量,他们报告了日常的社交互动,安全行为使用,和情感。使用多级线性建模,我们发现有和没有SAD的个体在与遥远的他人互动时使用了更多的安全行为,但与没有SAD的个体相比,SAD个体的这种影响更大。我们还发现,社交焦虑显着调节了社交互动中安全行为与积极情绪之间的关系。具体来说,我们的研究结果表明,社交焦虑水平较高的个体在使用安全行为时报告的积极情绪水平较低.讨论了我们的发现对精神病理学模型和SAD治疗的影响。
    The present study examined contextual factors that affect safety behavior use as well as positive emotions when using safety behaviors among individuals with SAD. Eighty-eight participants took part in the study, half (n = 44) met diagnostic criteria for SAD and half (n = 44) did not meet criteria for SAD. Participants completed a 21-day experience sampling methodology (ESM) measurement in which they reported on daily social interactions, safety behavior use, and emotions. Using multilevel linear modeling we found that both individuals with and without SAD used more safety behaviors when interacting with distant others compared to close others, but this effect was greater for individuals with SAD compared to individuals without SAD. We also found that social anxiety significantly moderated the relationship between safety behaviors in social interactions and positive emotions. Specifically, our findings indicated that individuals with higher levels of social anxiety reported lower levels of positive emotions when using safety behaviors. Implications of our findings for models of psychopathology and for treatment of SAD are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年里,没有其他临床药理学分支像精神药理学那样受到对创新失败和效果不令人满意的批评.进化精神病学可以为复杂的药理学研究提供原始见解。考虑到无效的表型是药物开发的主要障碍,进化论的观点表明,靶向与进化行为系统相关的临床表型,因为与基于预定诊断标准的构建体相比,它们更有可能映射到基础生物学上.因为他们强调症状缓解,精神病学人群的药理学研究很少将功能能力作为主要结果指标,而忽略了社会背景对精神药物效果的影响。进化精神病学解释了为什么用功能能力代替症状作为精神病治疗的主要目标是合适的,以及为什么社会背景应该是评估当前使用的药物和正在开发的新药有效性的研究的主要焦点。当研究的重点转移到那些超出“基于疾病”的药物作用概念的问题时,进化精神病学显然成为评估药物有效性和优化临床医生处方决策的参考框架,开药,和非处方。
    In the last decade, no other branch of clinical pharmacology has been subject to as much criticism of failed innovation and unsatisfactory effectiveness as psychopharmacology. Evolutionary psychiatry can offer original insights on the problems that complicate pharmacological research. Considering that invalid phenotyping is a major obstacle to drug development, an evolutionary perspective suggests targeting clinical phenotypes related to evolved behavior systems because they are more likely to map onto the underlying biology than constructs based on predetermined diagnostic criteria. Because of their emphasis on symptom remission, pharmacological studies of psychiatric populations rarely include functional capacities as the primary outcome measure and neglect the impact of social context on the effects of psychiatric drugs. Evolutionary psychiatry explains why it is appropriate to replace symptoms with functional capacities as the primary target of psychiatric therapies and why social context should be a major focus of studies assessing the effectiveness of drugs currently used and new drugs under development. When the focus of research shifts to those questions that go beyond the \"disease-based\" concept of drug action, evolutionary psychiatry clearly emerges as a reference framework to assess drug effectiveness and to optimize clinicians\' decisions about prescribing, deprescribing, and non-prescribing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妄想症是精神病的一个关键特征,可以高度衰弱。偏执狂的理论主要与短尺度或横截面数据模型有关,使偏执狂的纵向过程未指定。
    方法:我们在20年以上的精神病患者中,对偏执狂的两个方面-迫害妄想和参照妄想进行了实证表征。我们通过将图形向量自回归模型应用于从芝加哥随访研究中收集的数据来检查妄想动力学(n=135,具有一系列精神病频谱诊断)。我们调整了年龄,性别,IQ,和抗精神病药的使用。
    结果:我们发现指称和迫害妄想是中心主题,在其他主要妄想的支持下,并且具有强烈的自回归性-指称和迫害妄想的存在可以预测其未来的发生。在第二个分析中,我们证明了社会因素影响参照的严重程度,但不是迫害,妄想.
    结论:我们建议迫害妄想代表中心,认知景观中的抵抗状态,而参照信仰更灵活,为干预提供了一个重要的机会窗口。我们的数据模型可以与以前的生物,计算,和社会工作有助于建立更完整的偏执狂理论,并为最佳治疗目标提供更多时间依赖性证据。
    BACKGROUND: Paranoia is a key feature of psychosis that can be highly debilitating. Theories of paranoia mostly interface with short-scale or cross-sectional data models, leaving the longitudinal course of paranoia underspecified.
    METHODS: We develop an empirical characterisation of two aspects of paranoia - persecutory and referential delusions - in individuals with psychosis over 20 years. We examine delusional dynamics by applying a Graphical Vector Autoregression Model to data collected from the Chicago Follow-up Study (n = 135 with a range of psychosis-spectrum diagnoses). We adjusted for age, sex, IQ, and antipsychotic use.
    RESULTS: We found that referential and persecutory delusions are central themes, supported by other primary delusions, and are strongly autoregressive - the presence of referential and persecutory delusions is predictive of their future occurrence. In a second analysis we demonstrate that social factors influence the severity of referential, but not persecutory, delusions.
    CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that persecutory delusions represent central, resistant states in the cognitive landscape, whereas referential beliefs are more flexible, offering an important window of opportunity for intervention. Our data models can be collated with prior biological, computational, and social work to contribute toward a more complete theory of paranoia and provide more time-dependent evidence for optimal treatment targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在认知科学的不同分支中引入互动主义和并行性方法的必要性是对经典的基于阶段的顺序模型的反应。强调和解释不同成分如何相互作用的功能心理模型,动态产生认知和感知状态,影响了多个学科。其中主要是实验心理语言学和许多应用领域,涉及人类在不同环境中处理不同类型信息的能力。了解双语者如何表示和处理口头和视觉输入,他们的神经和心理状态如何促进这种互动,以及语言和非语言处理如何重叠,现已成为多学科研究的重要领域。在这篇文章中,我们将审查来自印度不同语言双语群体的现有证据,重点是情境背景。在讨论中,我们将在认知心理学方法中解决双语者的语言处理模型,重点是现有的抑制性控制模型。本文的既定目标是表明并行体系结构框架可以作为研究双语语言处理及其与社会环境等外部因素的接口的理论基础。
    The necessity for introducing interactionist and parallelism approaches in different branches of cognitive science emerged as a reaction to classical sequential stage-based models. Functional psychological models that emphasized and explained how different components interact, dynamically producing cognitive and perceptual states, influenced multiple disciplines. Chiefly among them were experimental psycholinguistics and the many applied areas that dealt with humans\' ability to process different types of information in different contexts. Understanding how bilinguals represent and process verbal and visual input, how their neural and psychological states facilitate such interactions, and how linguistic and nonlinguistic processing overlap, has now emerged as an important area of multidisciplinary research. In this article, we will review available evidence from different language-speaking groups of bilinguals in India with a focus on situational context. In the discussion, we will address models of language processing in bilinguals within a cognitive psychological approach with a focus on existent models of inhibitory control. The paper\'s stated goal will be to show that the parallel architecture framework can serve as a theoretical foundation for examining bilingual language processing and its interface with external factors such as social context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在社交或孤独环境中发生的酒精消费通常会在人类受试者中产生不同的行为反应。例如,社交饮酒与积极影响相关,而单独饮酒与负面影响相关。然而,饮酒期间社会环境对行为反应的神经生物学机制仍然知之甚少。我们调查了不同的社会环境是否会影响果蝇果蝇对乙醇的行为反应以及多巴胺系统在这种现象中的作用。在一组环境中暴露于乙醇时,野生型Canton-S(CS)果蝇表现出比单独环境更高的运动反应,女性和男性没有差异。多巴胺信号传导对于乙醇的运动刺激作用至关重要。当单独暴露于乙醇时,多巴胺转运突变体果蝇fumin(fmn)与高多巴胺表现出类似于CS的运动反应。当在一组环境中接受乙醇时,然而,与CS相比,fmn对运动刺激作用的反应显着增强,表明多巴胺信号和社会环境的协同相互作用。为了识别对社会效应重要的多巴胺信号通路,我们检查了果蝇的单个多巴胺受体缺陷,发现D1受体dDA1/Dop1R1是介导社会效应的主要受体。一起来看,这项研究强调了社会环境对乙醇的神经和行为反应的影响。
    Alcohol consumption occurring in a social or solitary setting often yields different behavioural responses in human subjects. For example, social drinking is associated with positive effects while solitary drinking is linked to negative effects. However, the neurobiological mechanism by which the social environment during alcohol intake impacts on behavioural responses remains poorly understood. We investigated whether distinct social environments affect behavioural responses to ethanol and the role of the dopamine system in this phenomenon in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The wild-type Canton-S (CS) flies showed higher locomotor response when exposed to ethanol in a group setting than a solitary setting, and there was no difference in females and males. Dopamine signalling is crucial for the locomotor stimulating effect of ethanol. When subjected to ethanol exposure alone, the dopamine transport mutant flies fumin (fmn) with hyper dopamine displayed the locomotor response similar to CS. When subjected to ethanol in a group setting, however, the fmn\'s response to the locomotor stimulating effect was substantially augmented compared with CS, indicating synergistic interaction of dopamine signalling and social setting. To identify the dopamine signalling pathway important for the social effect, we examined the flies defective in individual dopamine receptors and found that the D1 receptor dDA1/Dop1R1 is the major receptor mediating the social effect. Taken together, this study underscores the influence of social context on the neural and behavioural responses to ethanol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于自闭症儿童的大脑如何在现实世界的社会环境中处理语言,人们知之甚少。“尽管语言的挑战,通信,和社交互动是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的核心特征。方法:我们调查了N=20个自闭症患者和N=20个神经典型(NT)学龄前儿童样本中社会和非社会环境中语言处理的神经基础,3到6岁。功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)用于测量儿童在现场社交环境中对现场实验者所说的“现场语言”的大脑反应(即,书籍阅读),以及在非社交环境中通过录音播放的“录音语言”(即,屏幕时间)。我们检查了组内和组间对现场语言和记录语言的大脑反应的强度和定位差异,以及通过学龄前语言量表测量的儿童大脑反应与语言技能之间的相关性。结果:NT组,在右颞顶叶交界处(TPJ),大脑对实时语言的反应大于对记录语言的反应。在ASD组中,不同条件下的大脑反应强度没有差异。在右下额中回(IMFG)中,ASD组对记录语言的大脑反应比NT组强。跨群体,儿童的语言技能与大脑对右侧IMFG记录语言的反应呈负相关,这表明,对于语言技能较低的儿童,处理记录的语言需要更多的认知努力。在正确的TPJ中,儿童的语言技能也与大脑反应的差异呈正相关,表明,与记录语言相比,大脑对现场语言的反应差异更大的儿童具有更高的语言技能。局限性:研究结果应被认为是初步的,直到它们在更大的样本中被复制。结论:研究结果表明,NT儿童的大脑,但不是自闭症儿童,在社会和非社会环境中不同地处理语言。在社会和非社会环境中大脑如何处理语言的个体差异可能有助于解释为什么有和没有自闭症的儿童的语言技能如此多变。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about how the brains of autistic children process language during real-world \"social contexts,\" despite the fact that challenges with language, communication, and social interaction are core features of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
    UNASSIGNED: We investigated the neural bases of language processing during social and non-social contexts in a sample of N=20 autistic and N=20 neurotypical (NT) preschool-aged children, 3 to 6 years old. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure children\'s brain response to \"live language\" spoken by a live experimenter during an in-person social context (i.e., book reading), and \"recorded language\" played via an audio recording during a non-social context (i.e., screen time). We examined within-group and between-group differences in the strength and localization of brain response to live language and recorded language, as well as correlations between children\'s brain response and language skills measured by the Preschool Language Scales.
    UNASSIGNED: In the NT group, brain response to live language was greater than brain response to recorded language in the right temporal parietal junction (TPJ). In the ASD group, the strength of brain response did not differ between conditions. The ASD group showed greater brain response to recorded language than the NT group in the right inferior and middle frontal gyrus (IMFG). Across groups, children\'s language skills were negatively associated with brain response to recorded language in the right IMFG, suggesting that processing recorded language required more cognitive effort for children with lower language skills. Children\'s language skills were also positively associated with the difference in brain response between conditions in the right TPJ, demonstrating that children who showed a greater difference in brain response to live language versus recorded language had higher language skills.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings should be considered preliminary until they are replicated in a larger sample.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings suggest that the brains of NT children, but not autistic children, process language differently during social and non-social contexts. Individual differences in how the brain processes language during social and non-social contexts may help to explain why language skills are so variable across children with and without autism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大麻于2018年在加拿大合法化。从那以后,呼吁进行研究以评估合法化对青年的影响一直是公共和学术讨论的最前沿。针对这些呼吁的研究主要集中在风险和伤害问题上,对社会背景在塑造青年大麻使用方面的作用关注有限。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究将年轻人的观点集中在健康和社会不平等的背景下使用大麻。
    方法:在2021年至2022年之间,我们对来自加拿大各地的56名使用大麻并报告健康或社会斗争经历的青年进行了探索性和批判性的定性访谈研究。广泛的自我定义。我们的分析遵循了反身性的主题方法,并利用了关键药物研究的理论观点来询问青少年大麻使用风险和风险环境,同时促进调查他们与重叠形式的困难和不平等的接口。
    结果:我们制定了三个相互关联的主题:(i)根据具体情况使用大麻的风险;(ii)将大麻用作护理实践;(iii)将大麻用作与创伤和暴力有关的生存工具。这些主题内和跨主题的调查结果集中在使用大麻的青年叙事中的意图和代理关系,并将他们的大麻使用与,作为回应,健康和社会不平等交织在一起。
    结论:这项研究强调了在青少年使用大麻的背景下重新考虑或重新概念化风险的机会,因此,支持使用大麻的年轻人的方法与那些经历健康和社会不平等的人更加共鸣和可信。调查结果为青年大麻政策和规划提供了指导,包括降低个体病理学,支持减少伤害的目标,并进一步考虑大麻使用与环境之间的关系,边缘化,和压迫。
    BACKGROUND: Cannabis became legal in Canada in 2018. Since then, calls for research to evaluate the impact of legalization on youth have been at the forefront of public and academic discussions. Research addressing these calls has largely focused on issues of risk and harm, with limited attention to the role of social context in shaping youth cannabis use. This paper presents the findings of a study that centered youth perspectives on cannabis use in the context of health and social inequities.
    METHODS: Between 2021 and 2022, we undertook an exploratory and critical qualitative interview study with 56 youth from across Canada who use cannabis and who reported experiences with health or social struggles, broadly self-defined. Our analysis followed a reflexive thematic approach and leveraged theoretical perspectives from critical drug studies to interrogate youths\' variegated cannabis use risks and risk environments, whilst facilitating inquiry into their interface with overlapping forms of hardship and inequity.
    RESULTS: We developed three interconnected themes: (i) cannabis use risks as contextually situated; (ii) cannabis use as a practice of care; and (iii) cannabis use as a survival tool in connection with trauma and violence. Findings within and across these themes centre on the nexus of intentionality and agency in youth narratives of using cannabis and situates their cannabis use in connection with, and in response to, intersecting health and social inequities.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores opportunities for a reconsideration or reconceptualization of risks in the context of youth cannabis use, so that approaches to supporting youth who use cannabis are more resonant and credible with those who experience health and social inequities. Findings offer direction for youth cannabis policy and programming, including to decenter individual pathology, support harm reduction goals, and further consider relationships between cannabis use and context, marginalization, and oppression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    道德判断通常被视为情感和审议过程的结果,可能会受到社会因素和个人特征的影响。这项研究的目的是研究性别与社会背景对道德判断的相互作用。参与者包括315名本科生(67.3%为女性)。参与者完成了道德决策任务,同时坐在面对房间前面的排桌或面对其他参与者的圆桌上。结果表明,无论座位安排如何,男性在道德非个人(MI)和道德个人(MP)困境方面的反应都比女性更实用(伤害一救五)。当坐在圆桌旁时,所有参与者都更有可能对道德非人格困境做出道义上的回应(不会造成伤害)。此外,我们计算了每个参与者的道德推理差异得分,作为MI和MP得分之间的差异,以表示由于采取直接行动的想法而产生的额外反应性.女性的道德推理差异得分是一致的,但表明在圆桌会议上男性的道义反应更多,而在排表上男性的功利主义反应更多。这些结果表明,男性比女性更功利主义,并且在应对道德困境时更容易受到社会环境的影响。更广泛地说,当前的结果表明,道德判断受到社会背景的影响,尤其是在男性中,其方式尚未纳入许多道德决策模型。
    Moral judgments are often viewed as the outcome of affective and deliberative processes that could be impacted by social factors and individual characteristics. The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction between gender and social context on moral judgment. Participants included 315 undergraduate students (67.3% female). The participants completed the Moral Decision-Making Task while seated at row tables facing the front of the room or round tables facing other participants. The results indicated that males responded in a more utilitarian manner (harm one to save five) than females for moral impersonal (MI) and moral personal (MP) dilemmas regardless of seating arrangements. When seated at round tables, all participants were more likely to respond deontologically (cause no harm) to the moral impersonal dilemmas. In addition, we calculated a moral reasoning difference score for each participant as the difference between the MI and MP scores to represent additional reactivity due to the idea of taking direct action. The moral reasoning difference score was consistent for females but indicated a more deontological response from males at round tables and a more utilitarian response from males at row tables. These results suggest that males are more utilitarian than females and are more likely to be influenced by social context when responding to moral dilemmas. More broadly, the current results indicate that moral judgments are affected by social context particularly in males in ways that have not been incorporated in many models of moral decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究强调了自杀中的种族和族裔差异,但是亚裔美国人自杀在文献中很少受到关注。这是第一个全面的,大规模,美国亚裔美国人完成自杀的全国代表性研究。描述性和多级回归技术比较了227,786名亚裔美国人完成自杀的危险因素,白色,非洲裔美国人,西班牙裔,和2003年至2019年的美洲印第安人自杀死者。结果表明,亚裔美国人的自杀死者比他们的同龄人有多种自杀危险因素的可能性要小得多。亚裔美国人不太可能是男性,没有受过教育,未婚。亚裔美国人不太可能使用酒精和毒品,有心理健康问题,死于枪支,相对于其他自杀方法。亚裔美国人不太可能有自杀企图的历史,有亲密伴侣的问题,还有刑事法律问题。相反,亚裔美国人更有可能居住在集中劣势水平较高的地方,住宅不稳定,种族和民族异质性,和人口密度。结果强调了针对特定种族的自杀预防策略的必要性,特别是对亚裔美国人来说,考虑到文化价值观和求助行为的障碍。
    Research highlights racial and ethnic disparities in suicide, but Asian American suicide receives very little attention in the literature. This is the first comprehensive, large-scale, nationally representative study of completed suicide among Asian Americans in the United States. Descriptive and multilevel regression techniques compared the risk factors for completed suicide across 227,786 Asian American, White, African American, Hispanic, and American Indian suicide decedents from 2003 to 2019. Results indicated that Asian American suicide decedents were significantly less likely than their counterparts to have several risk factors for suicide. Asian Americans were less likely to be male, uneducated, and unmarried. Asian Americans were less likely to use alcohol and drugs, to have mental health problems, and to die by firearm, relative to other suicide methods. Asian Americans were less likely to have a history of prior suicide attempts, to have intimate partner problems, and to have criminal legal problems. Conversely, Asian Americans were more likely to reside in places with higher levels of concentrated disadvantage, residential instability, racial and ethnic heterogeneity, and population density. The results underscore the need for race-specific suicide prevention strategies that, for Asian Americans in particular, take into account cultural values and barriers to help-seeking behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号