International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1 (GG 1) prostate cancer (PCa) is generally considered insignificant, with recent suggestions that it should even be considered as \"noncancerous\". We evaluated outcomes for patients with GG 1 PCa on biopsy (bGG 1) and high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/ml and/or cT3-4 stage) to challenge the hypothesis that every case of bGG 1 PCa has a benign disease course. We used the multi-institutional EMPaCT database, which includes data for 9508 patients with high-risk PCa undergoing surgery. We included patients with bGG 1 PCa (n = 848) in our analysis and divided them into three groups according to PSA >20 ng/ml, cT3-4 stage, or both. The estimated 10-yr cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 96% in the overall population, 88% in the group with both PSA >20 ng/ml and cT3-4 stage, 97% in the group with PSA >20 ng/ml alone, and 98% in the group with cT3-4 stage alone. Similar CSS outcomes were found in subgroups with GG 1 PCa on pathology (n = 502) and with GG 1 on biopsy diagnosed after 2005 (n = 253). Study limitations include the lack of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and MRI-targeted biopsies. In conclusion, patients with GG 1 and either PSA >20 ng/ml or cT3-4 stage have a low risk of dying from their cancer after surgery. However, patients with GG 1 PCa and both PSA >20 ng/ml and cT3-4 stage are at higher risk of cancer-specific mortality and active treatment should be discussed for this subgroup.
UNASSIGNED: We assessed outcomes for patients diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer on biopsy who also had one or two factors associated with high risk disease. Men with both of those risk factors had a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer. Active treatment should be discussed for this subgroup of patients.

OBJECTIVE: While the impact of treatment with 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors (5-ARI) on the risk of cancer-related mortality in men with prostate cancer (PC) has been extensively studied, little is known about the impact of preoperative 5-ARI use on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: Within our prospectively maintained institutional database of 5899 patients treated with RP for PC (2008- 2021), 99 patients with preoperative 5-ARI therapy were identified. A 1:4 propensity-score matched analysis of 442 men (n = 90 5-ARI, n = 352 no 5-ARI) was conducted. Primary endpoint was continence recovery using daily pad usage and ICIQ-SF. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and PR25 questionnaires. Multivariable Cox-regression-models tested the effect of preoperative 5-ARI treatment on continence-recovery (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Patients were followed up perioperatively, followed by annual assessments up to 60mo postoperatively. Preoperative mean ICIQ-SF score (2.2 vs. 0.9) was significantly higher in the 5-ARI cohort (p = 0.006). 24mo postoperatively, 68.6% (no 5-ARI) vs. 55.7% (5-ARI) had full continence recovery (p = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analysis, revealed preoperative 5-ARI treatment as an independent predictor for impaired continence recovery (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.94, p = 0.03) In line, general HRQOL was significantly higher for patients without 5-ARI only up to 24mo postoperatively (70.6 vs. 61.2, p = 0.045). There was no significant impact of preoperative 5-ARI treatment on erectile function, biochemical recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-RP 5-ARI treatment was associated with impaired continence outcomes starting 24mo postoperatively, suggesting that preoperative 5-ARI treatment can impair the long-term urinary function recovery following RP.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of two randomized STAMPEDE platform trials revealed that 3 yr of abiraterone acetate in addition to androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy significantly improved metastasis-free and overall survival (OS) in high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and should be considered a new standard of care. The aim of our study was to assess long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS for surgically treated patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic node-negative PCa meeting the STAMPEDE criteria for high risk.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with European Association of Urology (EAU) high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. CSS was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. We used a Fine and Gray model to evaluate the prognostic value of STAMPEDE high-risk factors (SHRFs) for CSS, and a Cox proportional-hazards model to assess the association of SHRFs with OS.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2994 patients with EAU high-risk PCa were divided into groups with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SHRFs. The 10-yr survival estimates for patients with 0-1 versus 2-3 SHRFs were 95% versus 82% for CSS and 81% versus 64% for OS (both p < 0.0001). In comparison to patients with 0 SHRFs, hazard ratios were 1.2 (p = 0.5), 3.9 (p < 0.0001), and 5.5 (p < 0.0001) for CSS, and 1.1 (p = 0.4), 2.2 (p < 0.0001), and 2.5 (p = 0.0004) for OS for patients with 1, 2, and 3 SHRFs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the STAMPEDE high-risk criteria identify a subgroup of patients with highly aggressive PCa features and adverse long-term oncological outcomes. This population is likely to benefit most from aggressive multimodal treatment. Nevertheless, we have shown for the first time that surgery remains a viable treatment option for patients with STAMPEDE high-risk PCa.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer that meets the high-risk definitions from the STAMPEDE trial is an aggressive type of cancer. Our results for long-term cancer control outcomes indicate that surgery is a viable option for the subgroup of patients with this type of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques have demonstrated several advantages over the open approach. In the field of prostate cancer, the LAP-01 trial demonstrated the superiority of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) when comparing continence at 3-month after surgery, with no statistically significant differences at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: Externally validate the LAP-01 study and compare functional outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches.
METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted by a single surgeon (MRB), utilized data from a prospectively collected database, which included patients who underwent both RARP or LRP. Data regarding baseline characteristics, continence (assessed through the 24-h Pad test and ICIQ questionnaire) and potency were collected at multiple time points: 1 and 6 weeks after catheter removal, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.
RESULTS: The study encompasses 601 patients, 455 who underwent LRP and 146 RARP. The median age at diagnosis was 64 for LRP and 62 for RARP, while the median PSA levels at diagnosis were 6.7 ng/mL for LRP and 6.5 ng/mL for RARP. Bilateral nerve-sparing procedures were performed in 34.07 % of LRP cases and 51.37 % of RARP cases. RARP exhibited a significant advantage over LRP both in continence and potency. Continence rates at 3-, 6- and 9-month after radical prostatectomy (RP) were 36.43 %, 61.86 % and 79.87 % for LRP, compared to 50.98 %, 69.87 % and 91.69 % for RARP. Potency rates at the same intervals were 0.90 %, 3.16 % and 6.39 % for LRP, and 6.19 %, 9.16 % and 18.96 % for RARP. These rates were more pronounced in patients with bilateral nerve-sparing.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that RARP results in significantly better continence recovery and superior potency outcomes throughout the entire follow-up period compared to LRP, even at the beginning of the robotic approach learning curve.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy via bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients with radical prostatectomy admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively enrolled as observation objects. According to whether there was biochemical recurrence after surgery, the patients were divided into the abnormal group (n = 62) and normal group (n = 138). Clinical data, encapsulation infiltration, seminal vesicle infiltration and prostate imaging report and data system (PI-RADS) were collected and compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline data of the two groups. Student\'s t-test and Chi-square test were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: PSM was performed in a 1:1 ratio, and a total of 72 patients were included in the abnormal and normal groups. The baseline data of the patients in each group were not statistically significant. The incidence of extraperitoneal invasion and seminal vesicle invasion was higher in the abnormal group than in the normal group, and we observed a significant difference in PI-RADS scores between the two groups (p < 0.05). Extracapsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, PI-RADS score and biochemical recurrence were significantly correlated (p < 0.05). The PI-RADS score has a high value for predicting biochemical recurrence, with an area under the curve value of 0.824, sensitivity of 0.667, specificity of 0.861 and Youden index of 0.528.
CONCLUSIONS: Bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging has a high predictive value in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, which can provide reference for early intervention measures.

BACKGROUND: Existing models for predicting that biochemical recurrence (BCR) will occur in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) vary in their predictive results from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to assess the predictive value of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels combined with MRI features in determining BCR following radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort comprising 102 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. On the basis of the outcomes observed during a 4-year follow-up after surgery, the patients were categorised into BCR group (n = 52) and non-BCR group (n = 50). Differences in preoperative PSA levels and MRI characteristics between the two groups were compared, and factors influencing postoperative BCR were analysed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and Youden index were calculated to observe the predictive value of the combination of preoperative PSA level and MRI features for BCR following radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative PSA level, postoperative Gleason score, data system (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)) score and clinical T stage were independent risk factors for BCR in patients following radical prostatectomy, with odds ratio (OR) greater than 1. The AUC value of preoperative PSA level combined with PI-RADS score was 0.921, surpassing the AUC values of 0.783, 0.822, 0.617 and 0.608 predicted by preoperative PSA level, postoperative Gleason score, PI-RADS score and clinical T stage alone, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative BCR in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy is associated with preoperative PSA level, postoperative Gleason score, PI-RADS score and clinical T stage. The combination of preoperative PSA level and MRI features can improve the predictive efficiency for postoperative BCR.

OBJECTIVE: Cytoreductive treatments for patients diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) confer incremental survival benefits over systemic therapy, but these may lead to added toxicity and morbidity. Our objective was to determine patients\' preferences for, and trade-offs between, additional cytoreductive prostate and metastasis-directed interventions.
METHODS: A prospective multicentre discrete choice experiment trial was conducted at 30 hospitals in the UK between December 3, 2020 and January 25, 2023 (NCT04590976). The individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with de novo synchronous mHSPC within 4 mo of commencing androgen deprivation therapy and had performance status 0-2. A discrete choice experiment instrument was developed to elicit patients\' preferences for cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy, prostatectomy, prostate ablation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to metastasis. Patients chose their preferred treatment based on seven attributes. An error-component conditional logit model was used to estimate the preferences for and trade-offs between treatment attributes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 352 patients were enrolled, of whom 303 completed the study. The median age was 70 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 64-76) and prostate-specific antigen was 94 ng/ml (IQR 28-370). Metastatic stages were M1a 10.9% (33/303), M1b 79.9% (242/303), and M1c 7.6% (23/303). Patients preferred treatments with longer survival and progression-free periods. Patients were less likely to favour cytoreductive prostatectomy with systemic therapy (Coef. -0.448; [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.60 to -0.29]; p < 0.001), unless combined with metastasis-directed therapy. Cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy or ablation with systemic therapy, number of hospital visits, use of a \"day-case\" procedure, or addition of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy did not impact treatment choice. Patients were willing to accept an additional cytoreductive treatment with 10 percentage point increases in the risk of urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 mo (95% CI 2.8-4.3) and 2.7 mo (95% CI 2.3-3.1) of overall survival, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients are accepting of additional cytoreductive treatments for survival benefit in mHSPC, prioritising preservation of urinary function and avoidance of fatigue.
RESULTS: We performed a large study to ascertain how patients diagnosed with advanced (metastatic) prostate cancer at their first diagnosis made decisions regarding additional available treatments for their prostate and cancer deposits (metastases). Treatments would not provide cure but may reduce cancer burden (cytoreduction), prolong life, and extend time without cancer progression. We reported that most patients were willing to accept additional treatments for survival benefits, in particular treatments that preserved urinary function and reduced fatigue.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative lymph nodes.
METHODS: PRIORITI (NCT01753297) was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 4 study conducted in China and Russia. Patients with high-risk (Gleason score ≥ 8 and/or pre-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or primary tumor stage 3a) prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases were randomized to receive triptorelin 11.25 mg at baseline (≤ 8 weeks after RP) and at 3 and 6 months, or active surveillance. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), defined as the time from randomization to biochemical relapse (BR; increased PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Patients were monitored every 3 months for at least 36 months; the study ended when 61 BRs were observed.
RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 226 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 65.3 [6.4] years), of whom 109 and 117 were randomized to triptorelin or surveillance, respectively. The median BRFS was not reached. The 25th percentile time to BRFS (95% confidence interval) was 39.1 (29.9-not estimated) months with triptorelin and 30.0 (18.6-42.1) months with surveillance (p = 0.16). There was evidence of a lower risk of BR with triptorelin versus surveillance but this was not statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.10). Chemical castration was maintained at month 9 in 93.9% of patients who had received triptorelin. Overall, triptorelin was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS: BRFS was observed to be longer with triptorelin than surveillance, but the difference was not statistically significant.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to verify the feasibility and short-term prognosis of prostatectomy without biopsy.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with a rising PSA level ranging from 4 to 30 ng/mL were scheduled for multiparametric (mp) MRI and 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET). Forty-seven patients (cT2N0M0) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ≥ 4 and molecular imaging PSMA score ≥ 2 were enrolled. All candidates underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without biopsy. Prostate cancer detection rate, index tumors localization correspondence rate, positive surgical margin, complications, postoperative hospital stay, and PSA level in a 6-week postoperative follow-up visit were collected.
UNASSIGNED: All the patients with positive mpMRI and PSMA PET were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. A total of 80 lesions were verified as cancer by pathology, of which 63 cancer lesions were clinically significant prostate cancer. Fifty-one lesions were simultaneously found by mpMRI and PSMA PET. A total of 23 lesions were invisible on either image, and all lesions were ≤ International Society of Urological Pathology 2 or ≤ 15 mm. Forty-five (95.7%) index tumors found by mpMRI combined with PSMA PET were consistent with pathology. Nine patients reported positive surgical margin.
UNASSIGNED: Biopsy-free prostatectomy is safe and feasible for patients with evaluation strictly by mpMRI combined with 18F-PSMA PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: In previous large-scale studies conducted through 2010, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was the most common initial treatment for prostate cancer patients in Japan. However, recent advancements in treatment technologies have significantly affected the management of prostate cancer in Japan. This study analyzed the trends in initial treatments for prostate cancer based on two nationwide surveys.
METHODS: Two Japan-wide multi-institutional surveys, J-CaP2010 and J-CaP2016, were conducted to enroll patients newly histologically diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2010 and 2016-18, respectively. Both surveys included age at diagnosis, initial PSA level, ISUP Grade Group, TNM classification, and initial treatment for prostate cancer.
RESULTS: J-CaP2010 included data from 8192 patients across 140 institutions, whereas J-CaP2016 included data from 21 841 patients across 186 institutions. In J-CaP2016, the proportion of radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT) in the initial treatment increased (from 32% to 36% and 21% to 26%, respectively), whereas the proportion of ADT decreased (from 40% to 29%) compared with those in J-CaP2010. The increase in RP or RT was noticeable in patients aged 75 years and older (from 20% to 38%) and those with high-risk localized cancer (from 58% to 74%) or locally advanced cancer (from 38% to 56%). The proportion of active surveillance or watchful waiting increased in patients with low-risk localized cancer (from 21% to 41%). The proportion of robot-assisted RP within all RPs and the proportion of intensity-modulated RT within all RTs increased remarkably (from 2.3% to 78% and 20% to 50%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, RP and RT have increased as initial treatments for prostate cancer, whereas ADT has decreased. Consequently, RP has emerged as the most commonly selected initial treatment, replacing ADT.