This case report describes the successful treatment of refractory vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) pain in an 82-year-old man following radical prostatectomy using a combination of non-ablative erbium:YAG and neodymium:YAG laser therapy with Fotona SP Dynamis. Despite various conventional treatments, the patient\'s pain persisted, which significantly impaired his quality of life. The rationale for using laser therapy is based on its potential to promote tissue healing and nerve regeneration and reduce inflammation at the anastomosis site. The patient underwent monthly laser irradiation sessions, with the erbium:YAG laser targeting the area around the urethral anastomosis site via the anus and the neodymium:YAG laser irradiating the base of the penis and scrotum. Urethral pain gradually decreased from a visual analog scale score of 10 to 0 over the course of treatment. This highlights the importance of considering alternative approaches when conventional methods fail to provide relief. The targeted, minimally invasive nature of laser therapy may offer a safer and more effective alternative to systemic medications for managing chronic post-surgical pain. Although further research is needed to establish the generalizability and long-term effectiveness of this approach, this case provides a promising foundation for future investigations of the role of laser therapy in managing refractory VUA pain following radical prostatectomy.

A case in which a urethral catheter could not be indwelled at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is reported. A 64-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for RARP with a diagnosis of prostate cancer cT2aN0M0. At the start of RARP, a pseudo-urethra was formed by inserting a urethral catheter, so surgery was started with a transabdominal posterior approach without indwelling the urethral catheter. The urethra was opened during bladder neck resection, a guide wire was inserted anterogradely, the urethra was dilated retrogradely, and a urethral catheter was indwelled. After that, the procedure was performed as usual, and the operation was completed. When the urethral catheter could not be indwelled at the start of RARP, it was possible to do so using an anterograde approach during the operation.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment options for patients with erectile dysfunction whose medical management has failed include the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Many patients with an IPP require subsequent urologic surgery, during which the reservoir of the IPP can be injured.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to present a summary of current literature related to iatrogenic injuries to the IPP sustained during urologic surgery.
METHODS: Two reviewers independently performed a systematic search on PubMed using standardized search terms to identify pertinent articles. After preliminary review, relevant studies were analyzed to identify the presence of perioperative complications resulting in IPP reservoir injury. Results were categorized by surgical procedures.
RESULTS: Among 13 articles included, all were based on urologic surgery. Four studies identified IPP reservoir injury as a result of surgical injury. Of these, injuries occurred during radical prostatectomy (n = 3) and prostatic urethral lift surgery (UroLift, n = 1). Most radical prostatectomy studies without IPP reservoir injuries also described intentional surgical techniques that were employed to prevent reservoir damage, including modulation of reservoir inflation-deflation (n = 3), temporary reservoir repositioning (n = 1), or reservoir capsule dissection to improve visualization (n = 1). Findings from an additional novel case report on IPP injury during a UroLift procedure are presented in this review.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of studies identified intraoperative IPP reservoir injury as a significant complication of urologic surgery, particularly during radical prostatectomy. Novel case report findings also contribute the only other case of IPP reservoir damage sustained from delivery of UroLift implants. Findings are used to create a standardized surgical checklist that guides perioperative planning measures prior to pursuing surgery in adjacent spaces.

BACKGROUND: In addition to the objectifiable treatment quality, patients\' perspectives are gaining relevance.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize available hospital rating websites (HRW) with regards to patient ratings and to compare them with data from hospital quality reports and quality assurance based on routine data (QSR) for urological departments.
METHODS: After a structured online search for HRWs, websites were compared based on patient ratings from the 10 urologic departments with the largest intervention rates in 2021 using generalized estimated equations. For radical prostatectomy (RPE), quantitative comparison of patient ratings (klinikbewertungen.de) and QSR-based ratings was performed using Spearman\'s rank correlation.
RESULTS: Of 1845 hits, 25 portals were analyzed. The department-wise comparison of HRWs resulted in significantly different patient ratings (p < 0.001). Patient ratings (klinikbewertungen.de) and QSR data (AOK-Gesundheitsnavigator) showed no significant correlation. An internal comparison of QSR data and patient ratings from the AOK-Gesundheitsnavigator on RPE showed a significant negative correlation between the overall rating and unplanned reoperations (r = -0.81) or other complications (r = -0.91). There was no significant correlation with the recommendation rate by patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital rating websites show considerable heterogeneity regarding patient ratings of the same urology department in different portals. Furthermore, based on the selected examples, there seems to be no correlation between subjective and objective evaluations between different websites or within one website.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Die Patientenperspektive gewinnt neben objektivierbarer Behandlungsqualität zunehmend an Relevanz.
UNASSIGNED: Darstellung verfügbarer Krankenhausportale im Hinblick auf Patientenbewertungen (PaBew) und deren Vergleich mit Daten der Qualitätsberichte der Krankenhäuser und der Qualitätssicherung mit Routinedaten (QSR) für urologische Fachabteilungen.
METHODS: Nach einer strukturierten Online-Recherche nach Bewertungsportalen wurden eingeschlossene Portale untereinander verglichen: PaBew der 10 urologischen Fachabteilungen mit den höchsten Eingriffszahlen im Jahr 2021 wurden mittels „generalized estimated equations“ verglichen. Für die radikale Prostatektomie (RPE) wurde ein quantitativer Vergleich von PaBew („klinikbewertungen.de“) und Bewertungen anhand von QSR-Daten durchgeführt.
UNASSIGNED: Die Online-Recherche ergab 1845 Treffer, 25 Portale wurden analysiert. Der Vergleich ergab je nach Portal signifikant unterschiedliche PaBew derselben Fachabteilung (jeweils p < 0,001). PaBew und QSR-Daten des „AOK-Gesundheitsnavigators“ zeigten keine signifikante Korrelation. Ein interner Vergleich von QSR-Daten und PaBew aus dem AOK-Gesundheitsnavigator zur RPE zeigte eine signifikante negative Korrelation zwischen Gesamtbewertung und ungeplanten Folgeoperationen (r = −0,81) bzw. sonstigen Komplikationen (r = −0,91). Keine signifikante Korrelation zeigte sich mit der Weiterempfehlungsrate durch Patienten.
UNASSIGNED: Auf Online-Bewertungsportalen von Krankenhäusern besteht erhebliche Heterogenität bezüglich Patientenbewertungen derselben Fachabteilung je nach verwendetem Portal. Zudem scheint anhand der ausgewählten Beispiele weder eine Korrelation von subjektiven und objektiven Bewertungen zwischen verschiedenen Portalen noch innerhalb eines Portals vorzuliegen.

UNASSIGNED: Bladder calculi after radical prostatectomy is rare and usually associated with migrated clips into the bladder forming a nidus. We present a patient with multiple bladder calculi resulting from bladder neck stenosis after radical prostatectomy causing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms. He had an associated hypertrophic scar.
METHODS: A 60-year-old man of African ancestry presented with recent onset of irritative urinary symptoms three years after radical prostatectomy. Abdomen pelvic ultrasound and pelvic X-ray revealed a urinary bladder calculus. Examination of the previous radical prostatectomy scar found him to have a hypertrophic scar. He had urethroscopy with bladder neck incision for bladder neck stenosis and cystolithotomy with resolution of the symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: The presentation was that of dysuria and frequency three years after radical prostatectomy. The cause of the symptoms was diagnosed after an abdomen pelvic ultrasound and pelvic X-ray as multiple bladder calculi. This is a rare finding with the few reported cases associated with clips that migrated to the urinary bladder forming a nidus for the calculi. This was of consideration in the case presented, however, the findings at urethroscopy revealed bladder neck stenosis suggesting stasis as possible cause of the bladder calculi. The symptoms resolved after bladder neck incision and cystolithotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to clips forming a nidus for calculi in the urinary bladder after radical prostatectomy, bladder neck stenosis being the cause of urinary bladder calculi should be considered in a patient with hypertrophic scar.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic and therapeutic methods of bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy and to improve its diagnosis and treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of four patients with bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to December 2021. Three cases suffered from intermittent gross hematuria, and only one case was found to have an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed in four cases, in which one case also underwent resection of urethral mass. Three cases received endocrine therapy, one of which added intravesical instillation and radiation therapy. Another case received chemotherapy based on comprehensive treatment.
UNASSIGNED: According to the pathological and immunohistochemical results, three cases were acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score of 9, and all cases were PSA positive and negative for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3). One case was small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate and was positive for chromogranin A (CGA), synaptophysin (SYN), and cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56). During the follow-up period of 4 to 13 months, one case was lost to follow-up and three cases were alive.
UNASSIGNED: Bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy is rare, and pathology combined with immunohistochemistry is the gold standard for its diagnosis. Pathological type determines its treatment. Systemic treatment is essential, and local treatment is the most palliative means. Early diagnosis and treatment is significant for better prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Using nationally representative data, we determined the likelihood of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy (RP) to better inform case selection for partial gland ablation (PGA).
METHODS: We identified men with clinically localized GG2 (n = 106,048) and GG3 (n = 55,488) prostate cancer on biopsy from 2010 through 2019 who subsequently underwent RP. Men with GG2 were stratified as unfavorable and favorable per NCCN guidelines. RP adverse pathology was defined as upgrading to GG4-5, pT3-4, or nodal involvement (pN1), respectively. Logistic regression determined factors associated with adverse pathology, and the Cochran-Armitage Test was used to evaluate temporal trends.
RESULTS: Men with biopsy GG3 vs. GG2 experienced significant upgrading (11.3% vs. 3.6%, P < .001), more EPE (26.9% vs. 21.1%), SVI (11.9% vs. 5.3%), and pN1 (4.3% vs. 1.6%), all P < .001. When comparing unfavorable vs. favorable GG2, men experienced more EPE (25.3% vs. 16.5%), SVI (7.2% vs. 3%), and pN1 (2.2% vs. 0.8%), all P < .001. In adjusted analysis, age, Hispanic race, PSA > 10 ng/mL, and ≥ 50% positive biopsy cores were associated with adverse pathology (all P < .001). The likelihood of RP adverse pathology for men with biopsy GG3 increased significantly during the study period from 38.8% in 2010 to 47.3% in 2019 (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of men with GG3 and more than 30% with unfavorable GG2 prostate cancer harbor adverse pathology that may not be curable by PGA. Given MRI often understages prostate cancer, our findings have significant implications for optimizing PGA case selection and cancer control outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Currently, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cause of cancer death, and radical prostatectomy (RP) remains the primary treatment for localized PCa. Although there is no consensus on an optimal strategy, the determination of total serum prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) is the cornerstone for the detection of postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic utility of serial tPSA levels together with other clinicopathological factors and to assess the impact of a commentary algorithm implemented in our laboratory information system.
METHODS: A descriptive and retrospective study of patients with clinically localized PCa who underwent RP. BCR-free survival was calculated over time (Kaplan-Meier analysis), and the ability of different clinicopathological factors to predict BCR was studied (univariate and multivariate analyses) with Cox models.
RESULTS: A total of 203 patients underwent RP, of whom 51 presented with BCR during follow-up. In the multivariate model, doubling of tPSA, the Gleason score, tumour stage and tPSA nadir were detected as independent predictors of BCR.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient with undetectable tPSA after 1959 days of RP is unlikely to develop BCR, regardless of preoperative or pathologic risk factors. Furthermore, doubling of tPSA in the first 2 years of follow-up was the main prognostic factor for BCR in patients undergoing RP. Other prognostic factors included a tPSA nadir detectable after surgery, a Gleason score ≥ 7 and a tumour stage T ≥ 2c.

暂无摘要。

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is traditionally characterized as a technically difficult procedure with a long learning curve but it is successfully performed worldwide. The aim of this paper was to assess the initial learning curve and clinical outcomes for LRP in our center. We performed a retrospective study including 63 LRP cases, in the course of 22 months, performed by 2 urologists, with no previous LRP experience. All patients were previously assessed by a multidisciplinary team and were selected on the basis of low and intermediate risk disease attributes according to the classification of prostate cancer risk groups of the European Association of Urology. The main outcomes of follow-up are procedure duration, estimated blood loss, complications, positive surgical margins, biochemical relapse and urinary continence. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. The median procedure duration was 196.8 minutes and median blood loss 257.1 mL. Significant decrease in both outcomes was observed when comparing first and last cases in the series. There were 5 (7.9%) Clavien Dindo grade II complications. Undetectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) was observed in 59 (93.6%) patients, and fifty-five patients (87.3%) were continent. Following a methodical learning approach, LRP can be safely mastered with favorable outcomes.