patient satisfaction

患者满意度
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估台湾特定行政区的社区支持计划(CSP)的服务质量和用户满意度。采用横截面设计,通过问卷收集了该地区450名CSP用户的数据.统计分析,包括描述性分析,方差分析,和Scheffe的测试,使用SPSS22.0进行。调查结果显示,年龄在70-79岁的初等教育用户,以及那些有长期护理需求或未知需求的人,报告的CSP服务满意度最高(平均值=4.5,SD=0.7,p<0.05)。该研究强调了用户特征及其对服务的理解对满意度水平的影响。这些见解为政策制定者塑造CSP的未来提供了明确的方向,强调解决用户需求、提高认识和利用现有服务的重要性。
    This study aims to assess the service quality and user satisfaction of a community support program (CSP) in a specific administrative region of Taiwan. Employing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 450 CSP users in the region via a questionnaire. Statistical analyses, including descriptive analysis, ANOVA, and Scheffe\'s Test, were conducted using SPSS 22.0. The findings reveal that users aged 70-79 years with primary education, as well as those with demand or unknown demand for long-term care, reported the highest level of satisfaction with CSP services (mean = 4.5, SD = 0.7, p < 0.05). The study underscores the influence of user characteristics and their understanding of the services on satisfaction levels. These insights provide clear direction for policymakers in shaping the future of CSPs, emphasizing the importance of addressing user needs and enhancing awareness and the utilization of available services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者满意度是衡量医疗机构提供的医疗服务质量的关键指标。然而,很少有研究,特别是在埃塞俄比亚,其中包括研究区域,特别检查了使用门诊护理的人之间的这些差异。在这项研究中,比较了在哈迪亚地区公共卫生机构接受门诊服务的参保和未参保患者的满意度和相关因素,埃塞俄比亚南部。
    方法:采用基于设施的比较横断面研究设计,对630名患者进行了多阶段和系统随机抽样。使用预先测试和结构化的面试官问卷收集数据。分析结果以文字形式呈现,tables,和适当的图表。多变量逻辑回归用于预测预测因子和结果变量之间的关联。在p值<0.05时声明有统计学意义。
    结果:总体而言,344名(55.48%)患者对所接受的服务感到满意,其中95%CI[60.7-71.2%]的313人中有206人(65.8%)投保,95%CI[39.4-5.1%]的307人中有138人(44.95%)未投保.在参保患者中,与较高满意度相关的因素包括家庭人数少于五名[AOR=3.3,95%CI;1.5,7.4],感知到的公平等待时间[AOR=2.35,95%CI;1.02,5.5],感知的短等待时间[AOR=8.12,95%CI;1.6,41.3],在设施内提供所有订购的实验室测试[AOR=7.89,95%CI;3.5,17.5],在设施内进行了一些订购的实验室测试[AOR=2.97,95%CI;1.25,7.01],在设施内提供了所有处方药[AOR=16.11,95%CI;6.25,41.5],设施内有一些处方药[AOR=13.11,95%CI;4.7,36.4]。在非保险患者中,与较高满意度相关的因素包括城市居住权,一个公平而短暂的感知时间,在设施内订购了实验室测试,并在设施内处方药物。
    结论:这项研究发现总体满意度较低,特别是在没有保险的患者中。CBHI计划的注册显着影响满意度,两组报告的水平均低于注册期。获得基本服务,等待时间,和社会人口统计学因素被确定为与患者满意度相关的因素,而与保险状况无关。
    BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a critical measure of the quality of healthcare services provided by healthcare facilities. However, very few studies, particularly in Ethiopia, which includes the study area, have specifically examined these discrepancies among people who use outpatient care. In this study, satisfaction levels and associated factors were compared between insured and uninsured patients receiving outpatient services at public health institutions in Hadiya Zone, southern Ethiopia.
    METHODS: A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study design was employed on 630 patients using multistage and systematic random sampling. Data were collected using a pretested and structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Results of the analysis were presented in text, tables, and graphs as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict associations between predictors and the outcome variable. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Overall, 344(55.48%) patients were satisfied with the service they received, of which 206(65.8%) out of 313 with a 95% CI [60.7-71.2%] were insured and 138(44.95%) out of 307 with a 95% CI [39.4-5.1%] were uninsured. Among insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included having a family size less than five members [AOR = 3.3, 95% CI; 1.5, 7.4], perceived fair waiting time to be seen[AOR = 2.35, 95% CI; 1.02, 5.5], perceived short waiting time to be seen[AOR = 8.12, 95% CI; 1.6, 41.3], having all ordered laboratory tests available within the facility[AOR = 7.89, 95% CI; 3.5, 17.5], having some ordered laboratory tests within the facility[AOR = 2.97, 95% CI; 1.25, 7.01] having all prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 16.11, 95% CI; 6.25, 41.5], having some prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 13.11, 95% CI; 4.7, 36.4]. Among non-insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included urban residency, a fair and short perceived time to be seen, having ordered laboratory tests within the facility, and having prescribed drugs within the facility.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified lower overall satisfaction, particularly among uninsured patients. Enrollment in the CBHI program significantly impacted satisfaction, with both groups reporting lower levels compared to enrollment periods. Access to essential services, wait times, and socio-demographic factors identified as associated factors with patient satisfaction regardless of insurance status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在我们的研究中,我们的目标是描述成人儿童癌症幸存者(ACCS),评估他们的健康问题,测量健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)并评估就诊满意度。
    方法:使用来自临床访问和问卷调查的数据进行前瞻性队列研究。
    方法:ACCS跨学科随访计划基于儿童肿瘤学组的长期随访(LTFU)指南,并由瑞士两家医院的内科医生监督。
    方法:在2017年4月至2022年1月期间参加我们的LTFU诊所的ACCS符合资格。
    方法:我们记录了病史,当前健康状况并使用ShortForm-36V.2评估HRQOL,将其与瑞士普通人群(SGP)标准(T均值=50,SD=10;年龄分层)进行比较。3个月后访问,分发了反馈问卷。
    结果:在102个ACCS中(平均年龄:32岁(范围:18-62岁),68%的女性),43人之前没有随访(36ACCS>28年,7ACCS≤28年)。值得注意的94%有健康问题,影响平均6.1(SD=3.3)个器官系统。ACCS>28年的HRQOL低于SGP>28年的HRQOL(身体:44.8(SD=11.65)vs49.3(SD=10.29),p=0.016;心理:44.4(SD=13.78)vs50.53(SD=9.92),p=0.004)。年龄较大的ACCS(>28岁)报告身体较差(44.8vs50.1(SD=9.30),p=0.017)和精神HRQOL(44.4vs50.3(SD=7.20),p=0.009)比年轻的ACCS。大多数受访者表示对咨询的满意度很高,超过90%。
    结论:参加LTFU诊所的ACCS面临影响多器官系统的各种健康问题,与SGP相比,HRQOL较低。因此,内科医生主导的LTFU诊所对于优化后续护理至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: In our study, we aimed to characterise adult childhood cancer survivors (ACCS), assess their health issues, gauge health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and evaluate visit satisfaction.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study using data from clinical visits and questionnaires.
    METHODS: Interdisciplinary follow-up programme for ACCS based on the long-term follow-up (LTFU) guidelines of the Children\'s Oncology Group and overseen by internists in two Swiss hospitals.
    METHODS: ACCS attending our LTFU clinics between April 2017 and January 2022 were eligible.
    METHODS: We documented medical history, current health status and assessed HRQOL using Short Form-36 V.2, comparing it with Swiss general population (SGP) norms (T mean=50, SD=10; age stratified). 3 months post visit, a feedback questionnaire was distributed.
    RESULTS: Among 102 ACCS (mean age: 32 years (range: 18-62 years), 68% women), 43 had no prior follow-up (36 ACCS>28 years, 7 ACCS≤28 years). A notable 94% had health issues, affecting an average of 6.1 (SD=3.3) organ systems. HRQOL was lower in ACCS>28 years than the SGP>28 years (physical: 44.8 (SD=11.65) vs 49.3 (SD=10.29), p=0.016; mental: 44.4 (SD=13.78) vs 50.53 (SD=9.92), p=0.004). Older ACCS (>28 years) reported inferior physical (44.8 vs 50.1 (SD=9.30), p=0.017) and mental HRQOL (44.4 vs 50.3 (SD=7.20), p=0.009) than younger ACCS. The majority of respondents reported high levels of satisfaction with the consultation, exceeding 90%.
    CONCLUSIONS: ACCS attending LTFU clinics face diverse health issues impacting multiple organ systems and exhibit lower HRQOL compared with the SGP. Thus, internist-led LTFU clinics are crucial for optimising follow-up care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索音乐提示运动想象(MCMI)的经验和可接受性,音乐提示步态训练(MCGT),和MCMI和MCGT(MCMI-MCGT)联合治疗多发性硬化症(pwMS)。我们还旨在探索参与者干预后的自我评估健康状况,并为进一步的计划制定收集建议。
    方法:定性研究以及MCMI的双盲随机对照真实和想象步态训练与音乐提示(RIGMUC)多中心试验,MCGT和MCMI-MCGT。
    方法:PwMS从因斯布鲁克和格拉茨医科大学神经科和康复诊所招募RIGMUC试验,奥地利。
    方法:随机纳入试验的所有132例轻度至中度残疾患者均纳入分析。
    方法:参与者练习了基于家庭的MCMI,MCGT或MCMI-MCGT30分钟,4×/周,4周。三名训练有素的研究人员在干预期间每周进行半结构化电话采访,支持坚持,解决问题,分享经验并评估干预的可接受性。干预后4周的后续访谈旨在了解参与者自我评估的步行变化,与他们的研究前状况相比,疲劳和整体健康状况。在研究人员中采用了研究者三角测量,以提高可信性和可信度。
    结果:使用主题分析,我们确定了五个主题:(1)赋权,(2)保持同步,(3)想象和实际行走之间的相互联系,(4)持续关注和(5)现实世界的转移。与会者赞赏并发现了想象和实际的MCGT创新。问题包括浓度问题,晚期残疾的早期疲劳和与音乐线索同步的困难。行走的积极变化,据报道,疲劳和整体健康干预后为计划制定提供了有价值的见解。
    结论:一项共同开发pwMS音乐提示锻炼计划的参与性研究似乎是合适的,因为参与者赞赏想象和实际MCGT的创新和有效性。未来的研究还应该调查pwMS在加强治疗师支持的实践中增强其MCMI能力的潜力和局限性。
    背景:DRKS00023978。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences and acceptability of music-cued motor imagery (MCMI), music-cued gait training (MCGT), and combined MCMI and MCGT (MCMI-MCGT) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). We also aimed to explore participants\' self-rated health status postintervention and gather recommendations for further programme development.
    METHODS: Qualitative study alongside the double-blind randomised controlled real and imagined gait training with music-cueing (RIGMUC) multicentre trial of MCMI, MCGT and MCMI-MCGT.
    METHODS: PwMS recruited for the RIGMUC trial from Departments of Neurology at Medical Universities of Innsbruck and Graz and Clinic for Rehabilitation Muenster, Austria.
    METHODS: All 132 pwMS with mild to moderate disability randomised into the trial were included in the analysis.
    METHODS: Participants practised home-based MCMI, MCGT or MCMI-MCGT for 30 min, 4×/week, for 4 weeks. Three trained researchers conducted weekly semistructured telephone interviews during the intervention period, supporting adherence, addressing problems, sharing experiences and assessing intervention acceptability. Follow-up interviews at 4-week postintervention aimed to understand participants\' self-rated changes in walking, fatigue and overall health compared with their prestudy condition. Investigator triangulation was employed among the researchers to enhance trustworthiness and credibility.
    RESULTS: Using thematic analysis, we identified five themes: (1) empowerment, (2) remaining in sync, (3) interconnection between imagined and actual walking, (4) sustaining focus and (5) real-world transfer. Participants appreciated and found the imagined and actual MCGT innovative. Problems included concentration issues, early fatigue in advanced disability and difficulty synchronising with music cues. Positive changes in walking, fatigue and overall health postinterventions were reported offering valuable insights for programme development.
    CONCLUSIONS: A participatory study to codevelop a music-cued exercise programme for pwMS seems appropriate as participants appreciated the innovation and effectiveness of both imagined and actual MCGT. Future studies should also investigate pwMS\' potential and limitations in enhancing their MCMI abilities with intensive therapist-supported practice.
    BACKGROUND: DRKS00023978.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:交流有关血液透析(HD)的复杂信息并确保其被充分理解仍然是临床医生面临的挑战。知情同意是在HD之前增强患者决策意识和参与度的高影响力检查点。这项研究的目的是(1)开发数字信息接口,以更好地装备患者在决策过程中接受HD;(2)评估共同设计的数字信息接口的有效性,以改善患者的结果;和(3)评估实施策略。
    方法:首先,由消费者和临床医生共同设计,为创新的数字平台开发视听内容。接下来是两臂,开放标签,多中心,随机对照试验将在成人HD患者(n=244)中比较数字界面和目前的知情同意做法.参与者将被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组:参与者将被指导到一个在线平台,该平台在签署电子同意书之前提供简单易懂的动画和知识测试问题。
    方法:参与者将获得临床医生的常规同意,并签署纸质同意书。主要结果是决定后悔,次要结果包括患者报告的经验,理解,焦虑,满意,坚持肾脏护理,透析退出,同意时间和定性反馈。将使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)方法同时评估HD的电子同意实施情况。
    方法:对于随机对照试验,数据将使用意向治疗统计方法进行分析。描述性统计和基于CFIR的分析将为实施评估提供信息。
    背景:人类研究伦理已获得批准(MetroNorthHealth人类研究伦理委员会B,HREC/2022/MNHB/86890),和传播将通过与利益相关者和消费者团体的伙伴关系,科学会议,出版物和社交媒体发布。
    背景:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12622001354774)。
    BACKGROUND: Communicating complex information about haemodialysis (HD) and ensuring it is well understood remains a challenge for clinicians. Informed consent is a high-impact checkpoint in augmenting patients\' decision awareness and engagement prior to HD. The aims of this study are to (1) develop a digital information interface to better equip patients in the decision-making process to undergo HD; (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the co-designed digital information interface to improve patient outcomes; and (3) evaluate an implementation strategy.
    METHODS: First, a co-design process involving consumers and clinicians to develop audio-visual content for an innovative digital platform. Next a two-armed, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial will compare the digital interface to the current informed consent practice among adult HD patients (n=244). Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Intervention group: Participants will be coached to an online platform that delivers a simple-to-understand animation and knowledge test questions prior to signing an electronic consent form.
    METHODS: Participants will be consented conventionally by a clinician and sign a paper consent form. Primary outcome is decision regret, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported experience, comprehension, anxiety, satisfaction, adherence to renal care, dialysis withdrawal, consent time and qualitative feedback. Implementation of eConsent for HD will be evaluated concurrently using the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) methodology.
    METHODS: For the randomised controlled trial, data will be analysed using intention-to-treat statistical methods. Descriptive statistics and CFIR-based analyses will inform implementation evaluation.
    BACKGROUND: Human Research Ethics approval has been secured (Metro North Health Human Research Ethics Committee B, HREC/2022/MNHB/86890), and Dissemination will occur through partnerships with stakeholder and consumer groups, scientific meetings, publications and social media releases.
    BACKGROUND: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001354774).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探索了改善初级保健机构皮肤癌管理的潜在质量措施,以及与实施相关的障碍和促进者。
    方法:与来自一系列医疗机构的皮肤癌专家进行了半结构化访谈和定性形式调查。框架分析被用来识别医疗质量的Donabedian模型领域内的质量测量的关键组(结构,process,结果)。访谈和调查数据进行了三角测量,以确定常见的质量措施组,障碍和促进者。
    方法:我们有目的地招募了来自澳大利亚和国际的皮肤癌专家,这些专家具有皮肤癌管理方面的知识和经验。最终样本由15名具有临床或学术背景的参与者组成。
    结果:参与者明确表示需要采取质量措施来指导皮肤癌护理。确定了十组质量指标:与护理结构要素相关的三组(例如,诊断工具),四个与护理过程有关(例如,诊断过程)和三个与护理结果相关(例如,治疗结果)。实施障碍包括临床医生的抵抗,系统不足和外部因素(例如,患者风险)。促进者包括激励措施,教育,商定的、可行的指标以及支持和指导。
    结论:为了服务澳大利亚不断增长的皮肤癌患者,初级保健的作用需要更明确,及其护理提供者支持并更多地参与质量改进过程。结构,过程和结果质量度量,源自初级保健设置的详细指南,可用于跟踪从业者的表现并促进持续改进。
    OBJECTIVE: This study explored potential quality measures to improve skin cancer management in primary care settings, and the barriers and facilitators associated with their implementation.
    METHODS: Semistructured interviews and qualitative proforma surveys were conducted with skin cancer experts from a range of healthcare settings. Framework analysis was employed to identify key groups of quality measures within the domains of the Donabedian model of healthcare quality (structure, process, outcome). Interview and survey data were triangulated to identify common groups of quality measures, barriers and facilitators.
    METHODS: We purposively recruited skin cancer experts from Australia and internationally with knowledge and experience in skin cancer management. The final sample consisted of 15 participants who had clinical or academic backgrounds.
    RESULTS: Participants unequivocally expressed the need for quality measures to guide skin cancer care. Ten groups of quality measures were identified: three groups related to the structural elements of care (eg, diagnostic tools), four related to the processes of care (eg, diagnostic process) and three related to outcomes of care (eg, treatment outcomes). Implementation barriers included clinician resistance, system inadequacies and external factors (eg, patient risk). Facilitators included incentives, education, agreed and feasible indicators and support and guidance.
    CONCLUSIONS: To service a growing population of skin cancer patients in Australia, the role of primary care needs to be more clearly specified, and its care providers supported and more engaged in quality improvement processes. Structure, process and outcome quality measures, derived from detailed guidance for primary care settings, can be used to track practitioner performance and facilitate ongoing improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Dravet综合征(DS)是一种罕见的难治性癫痫,始于生命的第一年。大约85%的患者有SCN1A基因突变,编码电压门控钠通道。当前工作的主要目标是评估西班牙初级保健(PC)专业人员对DS的了解程度,他们和儿科神经科医生(PNs)之间的交流,以及在寻找诊断和适当治疗时为西班牙患者提供的可用服务和资源。
    方法:对西班牙PC儿科医生(PCP)和西班牙DS患者的护理人员进行了两项关于PC中DS诊断和患者管理的匿名在线调查。
    结果:大多数PCP都知道遗传性癫痫,但缺乏对DS和患者倡导团体(PAG)的全面了解。获得癫痫治疗的机会因地区而异,许多转诊给医院和儿科神经科医生。诊断经常延迟,误诊和频繁的急诊室(ER)就诊。治疗涉及多种药物,使用钠通道阻滞剂,在DS治疗中是禁忌的。改进培训,资源,早期诊断需要沟通。
    结论:为了改善西班牙DS患者的护理和治疗,需要早期诊断,可能,旨在识别成年患者的具体努力,建立整合社会和卫生服务以提供全面护理的社会卫生结构,考虑到疾病的不同特征和合并症。
    结论:Dravet综合征(DS)是一种在生命的第一年内开始的遗传性癫痫。我们提出的一项研究表明,虽然家庭医生知道遗传性癫痫,许多人对DS没有完全的了解。不幸的是,得到正确的诊断需要很长时间,导致不必要的去急诊室。患者通常需要几种药物,有时他们会服用不推荐用于DS的药物。收获是对医生的培训,更多资源,和改善沟通可以帮助创建更好的医疗保健系统,因此更容易获得正确的治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare form of refractory epilepsy that begins in the first year of life. Approximately 85% of patients have a mutation in the SCN1A gene, which encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel. The main objective of the present work was to assess the degree of knowledge of DS among Spanish primary care (PC) professionals, the communication flow between them and the pediatric neurologists (PNs), and the services available and resources offered to patients in Spain when searching for a diagnosis and adequate treatment.
    METHODS: Two anonymized online surveys on DS diagnosis and patient management in PC were conducted with Spanish PC pediatricians (PCPs) and caregivers of DS patients in Spain.
    RESULTS: Most PCPs are aware of genetic epilepsy but lack full knowledge of DS and patient advocacy groups (PAGs). Access to epilepsy treatments varies among regions, with many referrals to hospitals and pediatric neurologists. Diagnosis is often delayed, with misdiagnoses and frequent emergency room (ER) visits. Treatment involves multiple drugs, and sodium channel blockers are used, which are contraindicated in DS treatment. Improved training, resources, and communication are needed for early diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: To improve the care and treatment of DS patients in Spain, early diagnosis is required and, possibly, specific efforts aimed at identifying patients in adulthood, generating socio-sanitary structures that integrate social and health services to provide comprehensive care, taking into account the different features and comorbidities of the disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a form of genetic epilepsy that starts within the first year of life. We present a study showing that, while family doctors are aware of genetic epilepsies, many don\'t have a complete understanding of DS. Unfortunately, getting the right diagnosis can take a long time, leading to unnecessary visits to the emergency room. Patients often need several medications, and sometimes they\'re given drugs that aren\'t recommended for DS. The takeaway is that training for doctors, more resources, and improved communication could help creating better healthcare systems and therefore give easier access to the right therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    原发性腋窝多汗症是一种特发性疾病,由于过度不受控制的出汗而造成严重的心理社会负担。已经描述了各种治疗剂,但每个都有自己的局限性。最近出现了分数微针射频的使用,并取得了有希望的结果。这项研究旨在确定与A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BT-A)相比,局部微针射频在原发性腋窝多汗症患者中的疗效和安全性。在这项随机对照临床试验中,20名患者(40侧)被随机分为部分微针射频(间隔3周进行4次治疗)或BT-A(单次治疗),双方都接受了一种治疗方式。使用Minor's淀粉碘试验在3、6和12个月测量疗效,HDSS评分,Hqol问卷,患者满意度。分数微针射频,虽然显示中等疗效,12个月时纵向疗效不如BT-A,以及患者的满意度。两种治疗方式显示同样安全,但是分数微针射频手术更痛苦。总之,在原发性腋窝多汗症中,分数微针射频不能为BT-A提供更好的替代品。BT-A显示更高的疗效,不那么痛苦,更便宜,并且需要较少的会话。
    Primary axillary hyperhidrosis is an idiopathic disorder that creates severe psycho-social burden due to excessive uncontrolled sweating. Various therapeutic agents have been described, but each has its own limitations. The use of fractional microneedling radiofrequency has emerged lately with promising results. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency in comparison to Botulinum toxin-A (BT-A) in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 20 patients (40 sides) were randomized to either fractional microneedle radiofrequency (4 sessions at 3-week intervals) or BT-A (single session), where each side received one of the treatment modalities. Efficacy was measured at 3, 6 and 12 months using Minor\'s starch iodine test, HDSS score, Hqol questionnaire, and patient satisfaction. Fractional microneedle radiofrequency, although showed moderate efficacy, is inferior to BT-A regarding longitudinal efficacy at 12 months, as well as patients\' satisfaction. Both treatment modalities showed to be equally safe, but fractional microneedle radiofrequency procedure was substantially more painful. In conclusion, fractional microneedle radiofrequency does not offer a better substitute to BT-A in primary axillary hyperhidrosis. BT-A shows higher efficacy, is less painful, less expensive, and needs a smaller number of sessions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中评估家庭满意度的重要性日益得到认可。调查,重症监护中的父母赋权\“EMPATHIC-30\”,旨在评估家庭满意度,并已在多个国家/地区进行了翻译和实施,但尚未在日本实施。
    目的:本研究的目的是翻译,文化适应,并验证日本EMPATHIC-30问卷,并确定以家庭为中心的护理满意度的潜在因素。
    方法:我们通过“良好实践原则”概述的10步过程,对患者报告的结果测量进行了翻译和调整。日本的四个儿科PICU参与了验证研究,父母的入学标准是PICU住院时间>24小时的儿童。可靠性是通过Cronbach'sα测量的,通过相关分析,用总体护理满意度量表检验一致性效度。进行多元线性回归建模以确定与日本EMPATHIC-30的每个域相关的因素。
    结果:共有163名父母参加(平均年龄:31.9±5.4岁;81%为母亲)。日本EMPATHIC-30的五个域具有较高的可靠性(α=0.87至0.97)和一致的效度,显示与护士(r=0.75)和医生(r=0.76)的总体满意度高度相关。多变量建模发现,选修录取,机械通气,和有成人重症监护病房家庭成员经历的父母在所有五个领域的满意度得分均较高(p<0.05)。此外,佛教徒在护理和治疗领域的满意度得分较高(p=0.03)。
    结论:日本EMPATHIC-30问卷已经证明了足够的信度和效度。我们还确定了选修录取,机械通气,和以前有家庭成员的成人重症监护病房的经验是为所有满意度领域分配较高分数的因素。PICU的临床医生需要意识到道德,文化,与危重儿童及其家庭有关的宗教因素。
    BACKGROUND: The importance of assessing family satisfaction in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is becoming increasingly recognised. The survey, EMpowerment of Parents in THe Intensive Care \"EMPATHIC-30\", was designed to assess family satisfaction and has been translated and implemented in several countries but not yet in Japan.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the EMPATHIC-30 questionnaire in Japanese and to identify potential factors for family-centred care satisfaction.
    METHODS: We translated and adapted for patient-reported outcome measures via a 10-step process outlined by the Principles of Good Practice. Four paediatric PICUs in Japan participated in the validation study, and the parental enrolment criterion was a child with a PICU stay of >24 h. Reliability was measured by Cronbach\'s α, and congruent validity was tested with overall satisfaction-with-care scales by correlation analysis. Multivariate linear regression modelling was conducted to identify factors related to each domain of the Japanese EMPATHIC-30.
    RESULTS: A total of 163 parents (mean age: 31.9 ± 5.4 years; 81% were mothers) participated. The five domains of the Japanese EMPATHIC-30 showed high reliability (α = 0.87 to 0.97) and congruent validity, demonstrating high correlations with overall satisfaction in nurses (r = 0.75) and doctors (r = 0.76). Multivariate modelling found that elective admission, mechanical ventilation, and parents who had experience of a family member in an adult intensive care unit had higher satisfaction scores in all five domains (p < 0.05). Moreover, Buddhists assigned higher satisfaction scores in the Care and Treatment domain (p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese EMPATHIC-30 questionnaire has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity measures. We also identified that elective admission, mechanical ventilation, and having previous adult intensive care unit experience of a family member were factors in assigning higher scores for all satisfaction domains. PICU clinicians need to be cognisant of ethical, cultural, and religious factors relating to the critically ill child and their family.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在线预约是多个行业中常用的工具。关于在医疗保健环境中使用在线预约的好处和挑战的证据有限。潜在的好处包括便利和跟踪约会的能力,尽管一些患者群体可能会发现更难参与在线预约。我们试图了解英格兰的患者如何使用和体验在线预约。
    目的:本研究旨在描述和比较患者在一般实践中使用在线预约的特点,并调查患者对在线预约安排的看法。
    方法:这是一项基于英语全科医学的混合方法研究,包括对全科医学患者调查(GPPS)的回顾性分析和对患者的半结构化访谈。回顾性分析中使用的数据包括对2018年和2019年GPPS的反应,使用混合效应逻辑回归分析。对来自英格兰11个一般诊所的有目的地抽样的患者进行半结构化访谈,探讨了在线预约的经验和观点。框架分析用于与回顾性分析的结果进行比较。
    结果:回顾性分析包括1,327,693名GPPS应答者(2018-2019年合并)。我们对具有各种经验和在线预约意识的患者进行了43次访谈;在这43名患者中,6人(14%)来自少数民族。在回顾性分析中,更多的患者知道在线预约可用(581,224/1,288,341,45.11%),而有使用经验的患者(203,184/1,301,694,15.61%).在75岁以上的患者中,意识和使用存在剥夺梯度,意识和使用显着下降。对于面试参与者,年龄和生活阶段是影响经验和观念的因素,工作患者重视便利,老年患者更喜欢使用电话。患有长期疾病的患者更了解(比值比[OR]1.43,95%CI1.41-1.44),并且更有可能使用(OR1.65,95%CI1.63-1.67)在线预约。长期条件的访谈参与者将在线预约预订描述为对常规非紧急预约有用。贫困地区的患者聚集在GPPS受访者中,意识和使用在线预约预约的实践较低(OR为0.65,95%CI0.64-0.67)。其他关键发现包括在线预约的可用性的影响以及访问在线预订的注册过程中的差异。
    结论:患者是否以及如何参与在线预约受注册实践的影响,他们是否长期生活,以及他们的剥夺状态。在设计和实施在线预约时,应考虑这些因素,并对患者参与一般实践中提供的更广泛的在线服务产生影响。
    BACKGROUND: Online appointment booking is a commonly used tool in several industries. There is limited evidence about the benefits and challenges of using online appointment booking in health care settings. Potential benefits include convenience and the ability to track appointments, although some groups of patients may find it harder to engage with online appointment booking. We sought to understand how patients in England used and experienced online appointment booking.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients in relation to their use of online appointment booking in general practice and investigate patients\' views regarding online appointment booking arrangements.
    METHODS: This was a mixed methods study set in English general practice comprising a retrospective analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) and semistructured interviews with patients. Data used in the retrospective analysis comprised responses to the 2018 and 2019 GPPS analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Semistructured interviews with purposively sampled patients from 11 general practices in England explored experiences of and views on online appointment booking. Framework analysis was used to allow for comparison with the findings of the retrospective analysis.
    RESULTS: The retrospective analysis included 1,327,693 GPPS responders (2018-2019 combined). We conducted 43 interviews with patients with a variety of experiences and awareness of online appointment booking; of these 43 patients, 6 (14%) were from ethnic minority groups. In the retrospective analysis, more patients were aware that online appointment booking was available (581,224/1,288,341, 45.11%) than had experience using it (203,184/1,301,694, 15.61%). There were deprivation gradients for awareness and use and a substantial decline in both awareness and use in patients aged >75 years. For interview participants, age and life stage were factors influencing experiences and perceptions, working patients valued convenience, and older patients preferred to use the telephone. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware of (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.41-1.44) and more likely to use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.63-1.67) online appointment booking. Interview participants with long-term conditions described online appointment booking as useful for routine nonurgent appointments. Patients in deprived areas were clustered in practices with low awareness and use of online appointment booking among GPPS respondents (OR for use 0.65, 95% CI 0.64-0.67). Other key findings included the influence of the availability of appointments online and differences in the registration process for accessing online booking.
    CONCLUSIONS: Whether and how patients engage with online appointment booking is influenced by the practice with which they are registered, whether they live with long-term conditions, and their deprivation status. These factors should be considered in designing and implementing online appointment booking and have implications for patient engagement with the wider range of online services offered in general practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号