Narratives are effective tools for evoking emotions, and physiological measurements provide a means of objectively assessing emotional reactions - making them a potentially powerful pair of tools for studying emotional processes. However, extent research combining emotional narratives and physiological measurement varies widely in design and application, making it challenging to identify previous work, consolidate findings, and design effective experiments. Our scoping review explores the use of auditory emotional narratives and physiological measures in research, examining paradigms, study populations, and represented emotions. Following the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, we searched five databases for peer-reviewed experimental studies that used spoken narratives to induce emotion and reported autonomic physiological measures. Among 3466 titles screened and 653 articles reviewed, 110 studies were included. Our exploration revealed a variety of applications and experimental paradigms; emotional narratives paired with physiological measures have been used to study diverse topics and populations, including neurotypical and clinical groups. Although incomparable designs and sometimes contradictory results precluded general recommendations as regards which physiological measures to use when designing new studies, as a whole, the body of work suggests that these tools can be valuable to study emotions. Our review offers an overview of research employing narratives and physiological measures for emotion study, and highlights weaknesses in reporting practices and gaps in our knowledge concerning the robustness and specificity of physiological measures as indices of emotion. We discuss study design considerations and transparent reporting, to facilitate future using emotional narratives and physiological measures in studying emotions.

BACKGROUND: Patients\' stories provide Palliative Care physicians with a glimpse into the former\'s lives and their psycho-emotional, sociocultural, and contextual considerations. Yet, few physicians are trained to interpret and apply patients\' stories in their practice. Inherent variability in how stories are transmitted and interpreted raises questions over their potential effects on care. Amidst a dearth of accounts in Palliative Care, we map current use of patient stories to guide the training, assessment, and oversight of this \'care influencing\' practice in medicine.
METHODS: This systematic scoping review was guided by the Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) to ensure a reproducible and structured approach. The themes and categories identified through the Split Approach\'s concurrent and independent thematic and directed content analyses provided a comprehensive sketch of the included articles. The Jigsaw Perspective combined the themes and categories identified. The last stage of SEBA compared these results with two recent reviews of storytelling to ensure consistency of the domains created that guided the discussion.
RESULTS: Ten thousand two hundred seven articles were reviewed, 963 full text articles were evaluated, and 199 articles were included. The four domains identified were study characteristics, benefits, approaches, and positive effects and concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Stories support patient-centered, personalized, and holistic clinical care. However, variability in the stories, their interpretations and use in care decisions underscore the need for further study on the structuring, teaching, assessing, and delivery of this \'care influencing\' practice.

UNASSIGNED: Globally, persons with disabilities are faced with unemployment and reduced income opportunities. Barriers to employment tend to be severe for women with disabilities who occupy marginalized positions in labor markets. \'Livelihood occupations\' are conceptualized for this review to denote everyday activities that are done for subsistence and survival, and to broaden presentations of activities normally termed \'work\', \'employment\', \'job\' or \'productivity\' that people do to earn money and non-monetary gain.
UNASSIGNED: This scoping review, undertaken as part of a broader interpretive phenomenological analysis of livelihood occupations of women with disabilities, maps research on the subject of livelihood occupations for women with disabilities.
UNASSIGNED: The Arksey and O\'Malley framework and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were utilized to guide the five stage scoping strategy used to screen and select sources. Data from selected sources were synthesized using deductive qualitative content analysis to fit experiential components into equity categories determined a-priori from the Equitable Total Rewards model, to determine if these experiences connote equity or lack thereof.
UNASSIGNED: Nineteen sources, mainly from high income countries, are identified. Aspects of benefit and career inequity were largely evident in the experiences of the women across all sources.
UNASSIGNED: There is considerable lack of research on experiences of livelihood occupations in low and middle income countries contexts justifying further research. Women with disabilities report experiencing inability to realize career goals and occupational choice.

Migraine-a term used to describe a unilateral throbbing headache has shown growing evidence of being linked to different types of strokes-particularly ischemic and hemorrhagic. This study aims to identify and summarize the relationship between migraine and the incidents of stroke in women of child-bearing age. This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was done using PubMed, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases up until March 15, 2022. Studies were chosen based on the listed eligibility criteria: English-language, observational studies, systematic reviews, articles, and meta-analyses, which included stroke patients and migraine patients, and the possible link between these two conditions. In addition, quality assessment was done using assessment tools like Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA), Assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR), and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria. The initial search generated 245 studies. Fourteen studies were included in the final selection - one case-control, four cohort studies, seven systematic reviews with meta-analyses, and two narrative reviews. Strokes-particularly ischemic-were found to be linked to the incidents of migraine in women. The risks of a stroke increased if a woman was a smoker, under 45, and uses oral contraceptives regularly. In addition, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), genetic predisposition, and metabolic dysfunction was linked to increased incidents of hemorrhagic strokes-which proved to be rarer but more fatal due to their serious underlying pathophysiologies.

Although narratives have been found to affect decisions about preventive behaviours, including participation in cancer screening, the underlying mechanisms of narratives remain unclear.
The purpose of this study was to summarize and synthesize existing literature on narrative interventions in the context of colorectal cancer screening. Our main research question was as follows: How, when and for whom do narratives work context of decision making about colorectal cancer screening participation?
We undertook a realist review to collect evidence on narratives in the context of colorectal cancer screening. A search of the literature was performed in Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cinahl and PsycINFO. We included empirical evaluations (qualitative or quantitative) of narrative interventions. In total, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. A content-based taxonomy of patient narrative types in decision aids formed the basis for our initial programme theory.
We identified four mechanisms: (a) process narratives that address perceived barriers towards screening lead to improved affective forecasting, (b) experience narratives that demonstrate the screening procedure lead to increased self-efficacy, (c) experience narratives that depict experiences from similar others lead to more engagement and (d) outcome narratives that focus on outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decision decrease or increase fear of colorectal cancer. The evidence was limited on which narrative type may facilitate or bias informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening.
The findings indicate the importance of more detailed descriptions of narrative interventions in order to understand how mechanisms may facilitate or bias informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the literature regarding how nursing narratives have been used to enhance reflective practice.
METHODS: Theoretical review.
METHODS: A literature search from 1990 - 2017 was conducted in PubMed, CINHAL and PsycINFO databases.
METHODS: After applying the selection criteria, 13 studies were identified. The quality of articles was evaluated.
RESULTS: Three themes were identified as the main components of an ongoing narrative process based on looking back to past clinical experiences, creating spaces for dialogue and bringing the worlds of theory and practice closer together.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a forum for exploring the use of narratives to enhance reflective practice, which may lead to the acquisition of professional competences.
目的: 探讨关于如何采用护理叙事来加强反思实践的文献。 设计: 理论回顾。 资料来源: 在PubMed、CINHAL和PsycINFO数据库中进行了1990至2017年的文献检索。 综述方法: 应用选拔准则后,确定了13项研究。评估了文章质量。 结果: 在回顾过去的临床经验、创造对话空间和拉近理论与实践世界的基础上,将三个主题确定为当前叙事过程的主要组成部分。 结论: 这一综述提供了一个论坛,用于探讨如何使用叙述来加强反思实践,这可能会有助于获得专业能力。.

This review describes the emerging global debate on the role of human rights childbirth. It is also tailored to a UK perspective in view of the Montgomery v. Lanarkshire [2015] legal ruling and it implications to practice. We can never underestimate the power of humane care on health. The compassion and evidence based medicine agenda in healthcare is interconnected with human rights in healthcare, feeding into the principles of decision making and patient centred care. When this has not happened and there is been healthcare conflict, the power of storytelling serves to connect disparate parties to their common humanity. Narratives are an important aspect of restorative justice processes and we suggest that this could be beneficial in the field of human rights in childbirth.

Health information can be presented in different formats, such as a statistically-based or a story-based (e.g. narrative) format; however, there is no consensus on the ideal way to present screening information. This systematic review summarizes the literature pertaining to narrative interventions\' efficacy at changing screening behaviour and its determinants. Five psychology and public health databases were searched; 19 studies, 18 focused on cancer and 1 on sexual health, met eligibility criteria. There is consistent evidence supporting the efficacy of narratives, but mixed evidence supporting an advantage for narratives over statistical interventions for screening behaviour and its determinants. Further investigation is warranted.