Abstract：
Narratives are effective tools for evoking emotions, and physiological measurements provide a means of objectively assessing emotional reactions - making them a potentially powerful pair of tools for studying emotional processes. However, extent research combining emotional narratives and physiological measurement varies widely in design and application, making it challenging to identify previous work, consolidate findings, and design effective experiments. Our scoping review explores the use of auditory emotional narratives and physiological measures in research, examining paradigms, study populations, and represented emotions. Following the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, we searched five databases for peer-reviewed experimental studies that used spoken narratives to induce emotion and reported autonomic physiological measures. Among 3466 titles screened and 653 articles reviewed, 110 studies were included. Our exploration revealed a variety of applications and experimental paradigms; emotional narratives paired with physiological measures have been used to study diverse topics and populations, including neurotypical and clinical groups. Although incomparable designs and sometimes contradictory results precluded general recommendations as regards which physiological measures to use when designing new studies, as a whole, the body of work suggests that these tools can be valuable to study emotions. Our review offers an overview of research employing narratives and physiological measures for emotion study, and highlights weaknesses in reporting practices and gaps in our knowledge concerning the robustness and specificity of physiological measures as indices of emotion. We discuss study design considerations and transparent reporting, to facilitate future using emotional narratives and physiological measures in studying emotions.
摘要：
叙事是唤起情绪的有效工具，和生理测量提供了一种客观评估情绪反应的手段-使它们成为研究情绪过程的潜在强大工具。然而,结合情感叙事和生理测量的程度研究在设计和应用上差异很大，使识别以前的工作变得具有挑战性，巩固调查结果，并设计有效的实验。我们的范围审查探讨了听觉情绪叙事和生理措施在研究中的使用，检查范式，研究人群,并代表情感。按照PRISMA-ScR清单，我们在5个数据库中搜索了同行评审的实验研究,这些研究使用口头叙述来诱导情绪,并报告了自主生理指标.在筛选的3466本书和审查的653篇文章中，共纳入110项研究。我们的探索揭示了各种应用和实验范式;情感叙事与生理措施配对已用于研究不同的主题和人群，包括神经典型和临床组。尽管无与伦比的设计和有时相互矛盾的结果排除了关于设计新研究时使用哪些生理措施的一般性建议，作为一个整体,研究表明，这些工具对于研究情绪是有价值的。我们的评论概述了采用叙述和生理措施进行情绪研究的研究，并强调了报告实践中的弱点和我们关于生理指标作为情绪指标的鲁棒性和特异性的知识差距。我们讨论研究设计考虑因素和透明报告，促进未来在研究情绪时使用情绪叙事和生理措施。
