UNASSIGNED: To determine if a Canadian voice center is meeting the recommended time to laryngoscopy for hoarseness per the clinical practice guideline of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective chart audit.
UNASSIGNED: Tertiary referral Canadian voice center.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 149 adult patients presenting with hoarseness over 6 months were included. Primary outcome measures were the time from onset of symptoms to laryngoscopy and the time from referral to laryngoscopy. Secondary outcome measures included patient- and disease-modifying factors, diagnosis, and clinical management. Analysis was performed to determine what factors were associated with meeting the guideline.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were evaluated by the laryngologist after 21.9 ± 37.6 months (mean ± SD) of symptoms. One-third (34.2%) of patients were seen within 3 months; 10.7% were seen within 4 weeks. Logistic regression showed that patients with neurologic symptoms (odds ratio, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.31-12.43; P = .015) and endotracheal intubation (odds ratio, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.21-15.95; P < .001) were associated with being seen within 3 months. Patients who had recent intubation (odds ratio, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.99-18.34; P = .002) were associated with being seen within 4 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: It is an ongoing challenge for our Canadian voice center to meet the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery\'s clinical practice guideline for recommended time to laryngoscopy. Patients with more severe pathologies were consistently triaged more urgently. It is debatable whether this 4-week time recommendation is generalizable to a socialized health care system.

Procedures putting healthcare workers in close contact with the airway are particularly at risk of contamination by the SARS-Cov-2 virus, especially when exposed to sputum, coughing, or a tracheostomy. In the current pandemic phase, all patients should be considered as potentially infected. Thus, the level of precaution recommended for the caregivers depends more on the type of procedure than on the patient\'s proved or suspected COVID-19 status. Procedures that are particularly at high risk of contamination are clinical and flexible endoscopic pharyngo-laryngological evaluation, and probably also video fluoroscopic swallowing exams. Voice rehabilitation should not be considered urgent at this time. Therefore, recommendations presented here mainly concern the management of swallowing disorders, which can sometimes be dangerous for the patient, and recent dysphonia. In cases where they are considered possible and useful, teleconsultations should be preferred to face-to-face assessments or rehabilitation sessions. The latter must be maintained only in few selected situations, after team discussions or in accordance with the guidelines provided by health authorities.