hyperbaric oxygen therapy

高压氧治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景视网膜中央动脉阻塞(CRAO)导致突然,无痛视力丧失.作为急性缺血性中风的类似情况,CRAO是眼科急症,但是缺乏标准化的治疗方法。尽管报道的结果不一致,但高压氧治疗(HBOT)已被广泛使用。目的报告在三级中心接受非动脉炎性CRAOHBOT的所有患者的视力(VA)结局。方法这项回顾性研究包括2009年3月至2023年2月在葡萄牙一家医院的高压医疗单元中使用HBOT的所有CRAO且症状持续少于24小时的成年患者。患者人口统计信息,病史,眼科评估,转诊医院,时间,直到HBOT,补充治疗,HBOT会话的数量,不利影响,收集患者主观VA增益。所有患者均接受90分钟的HBOT治疗,在2.4ATA下100%氧气。主要结果是治疗前后的VA变化(dif-logMAR)。临床上显着的视力改善定义为dif-logMAR≥0.3。使用IBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows分析数据,版本29(2021年发布;IBMCorp.,Armonk,纽约,美国)(p<0.05被认为是显著的)。结果本研究共纳入114例患者;68%(n=77)为男性,平均年龄为69岁,并接受了7次HBOT会议的中位数。没有报告HBOT的严重不良反应。从症状到治疗的平均时间延迟为12小时,在84%(n=96)的患者中,基线最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为手指计数或更差.46%(n=52)的患者发生dif-logMAR≥0.3,58%(n=66)报告治疗后主观VA改善。观察到HBOT之前的BCVA(2.12±0.74)和HBOT之后的BCVA(1.67±0.74)之间的显着改善。发现VA结果与会议总数有关,年龄,肥胖,补充治疗,和樱桃红点(CRS)在演示。在解释VA结果方面,从症状到治疗的时间延迟没有显着影响。结论HBOT似乎是安全的,对非动脉炎CRAO患者的VA结局有有益的影响,特别是取决于会话的数量。患者因素,如年龄,肥胖,CRS的存在似乎也会影响VA结果。
    Background Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) results in sudden, painless vision loss. As an analogous condition to acute ischemic stroke, CRAO is an ophthalmological emergency, but a standardized treatment is lacking. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been widely used in spite of the inconsistent results reported. Purpose To report the visual acuity (VA) outcomes in all patients submitted to HBOT with non-arteritic CRAO in a tertiary center. Methods This retrospective study included all adult patients with CRAO and symptoms lasting for less than 24 hours who were prescribed HBOT in the Hyperbaric Medicine Unit of a Portuguese hospital from March 2009 to February 2023. Patient demographic information, medical history, ophthalmologic evaluation, hospital of referral, time until HBOT, supplementary treatments, number of HBOT sessions, adverse effects, and patient subjective VA gain were collected. All patients were subjected to 90-minute HBOT sessions with 100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA. The primary outcome was VA change (dif-logMAR) before and after treatment. A clinically significant visual improvement was defined as a dif-logMAR≥0.3. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) (p<0.05 is considered significant). Results A total of 114 patients were included in this study; 68% (n=77) were male, with a mean age of 69 years, and were subjected to a median number of seven HBOT sessions. No serious adverse effects from HBOT were reported. The mean time delay from symptoms to treatment was 12 hours, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was counting fingers or worse in 84% (n=96) of the patients. A dif-logMAR≥0.3 occurred in 46% (n=52) of the patients, and 58% (n=66) reported subjective VA improvement after the treatment. A significant improvement between BCVA before HBOT (2.12±0.74) and after HBOT (1.67±0.74) was observed. The VA outcome was found to be related to the total number of sessions, age, obesity, supplementary treatments, and cherry-red spot (CRS) at presentation. There were no significant effects of the time delay from symptoms to treatment in the explanation of the VA outcome. Conclusions HBOT appears to be safe and has a beneficial effect on VA outcomes in patients with non-arteritic CRAO, particularly depending on the number of sessions. Patient factors such as age, obesity, and the presence of CRSs also appear to influence the VA outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的治疗方案很少。关于高压氧治疗(HBOT)对这种情况的益处和危害的数据有限。
    目的:评估HBOT对COVID-19诱导的ARDS患者的益处和危害。
    方法:在瑞典和德国的三家医院进行的这项开放标签试验中,患有中度至重度ARDS和至少两个不良结局危险因素的患者,被随机分配(1:1)100%医用氧气,2·4绝对大气(ATA),80分钟(HBOT)佐剂到最佳实践或单独到最佳实践(对照)。随机化按性别和部位分层。主要终点是第30天的ICU入院。
    结果:在2020年6月4日至2021年12月1日之间,34名受试者被随机分为HBOT(N=18)或对照组(N=16)。该试验因无效而提前终止。ICU入院无统计学差异,对照组为5例(50%),HBOT为13例(72%)。或2·54[95%CI0·62-10·39],p=0·19。
    结果:记录了102起不良事件(AE)。HBOT组中16名(94%)受试者和对照组中14名(93%)受试者具有至少一个AE。三个严重不良事件(SAE),至少,可能与HBOT有关。所有死亡都不太可能与HBOT有关。
    结论:HBOT并未降低COVID-19诱导的ARDS患者的ICU入院率或死亡率。该试验不能得出明确的益处或危害。用HBOT治疗COVID-19诱导的ARDS是可行的,具有良好的危害特征。
    背景:瑞典研究委员会,授权编号KBF2019-00446。
    BACKGROUND: Few treatment options exist for patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data on the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for this condition is limited.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate benefits and harms of HBOT in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS.
    METHODS: In this open-label trial conducted at three hospitals in Sweden and Germany, patients with moderate to severe ARDS and at least two risk factors for unfavourable outcome, were randomly assigned (1:1) to medical oxygen 100 %, 2·4 Atmospheres absolute (ATA), 80 min (HBOT) adjuvant to best practice or to best practice alone (Control). Randomisation was stratified by sex and site. The primary endpoint was ICU admission by Day 30.
    RESULTS: Between June 4, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021, 34 subjects were randomised to HBOT (N = 18) or Control (N = 16). The trial was prematurely terminated for futility. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU admission, 5 (50 %) in Control vs 13 (72 %) in HBOT. OR 2·54 [95 % CI 0·62-10·39], p = 0·19.
    RESULTS: 102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded. 16 (94 %) subjects in the HBOT group and 14 (93 %) in the control group had at least one AE. Three serious adverse events (SAEs), were at least, possibly related to HBOT. All deaths were unlikely related to HBOT.
    CONCLUSIONS: HBOT did not reduce ICU admission or mortality in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS. The trial cannot conclude definitive benefits or harms. Treating COVID-19-induced ARDS with HBOT is feasible with a favourable harms profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是通过临床数据和先进的分析方法,评估高压氧疗法(HBOT)作为与标准全身性皮质类固醇治疗相结合的方法,与不使用HBOT(非HBOT)的治疗相比,对突发性神经性耳聋(SSNHL)的主要治疗方法的临床疗效。
    病例对照研究。
    在三个日本医疗中心进行,涉及298名在2020年至2023年之间诊断的SSNHL患者。纳入标准包括首次发病和治疗,世卫组织3级或4级初始听力障碍,在症状发作后14天内接受全身性皮质类固醇治疗,并在同一时间段内启动病例组的HBOT。主要结果指标是听力改善的差异(平均听力水平以分贝为单位,dB)在两组之间,在基线和治疗后3个月通过纯音测听法评估,使用针对协变量差异进行调整的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)方法。
    该研究包括HBOT组67例患者和非HBOT组68例患者。HBOT组表现出明显更大的听力改善(IPTW调节差异:7.6dB,95%CI0.4-14.7;p=0.038)。HBOT组没有眩晕的患者表现出显著的听力改善(11.5dB,95%CI2.3-20.6;p=0.014),而那些患有眩晕的患者没有显着改善(-1.8dB,95%CI-11.8-8.3;p=0.729)。HBOT组与完全恢复的相关性也显着较高(IPTW校正比值比:2.57,95%CI1.13-5.85;p=0.025)。
    在SSHNL中,与非HBOT治疗相比,HBOT联合治疗的听力结果略有改善,但显着改善。
    4.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as a primary therapy combined with standard systemic corticosteroid treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) compared to treatment without the use of HBOT (non-HBOT) through clinical data and advanced analytical approaches.
    UNASSIGNED: Case-control study.
    UNASSIGNED: Conducted across three Japanese medical centers involving 298 SSNHL patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed first onset and treatment, WHO grade 3 or 4 initial hearing impairment, receipt of systemic corticosteroid therapy within 14 days of symptom onset, and initiation of HBOT within the same timeframe for the case group. The primary outcome measure was the difference in hearing improvement (mean hearing level in decibels, dB) between the two groups, assessed by pure-tone audiometry at baseline and 3 months post-treatment, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method adjusted for covariate differences.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 67 patients in the HBOT group and 68 in the non-HBOT group. The HBOT group exhibited significantly greater hearing improvement (IPTW-adjusted difference: 7.6 dB, 95% CI 0.4-14.7; p = 0.038). Patients without vertigo in the HBOT group demonstrated substantial hearing improvement (11.5 dB, 95% CI 2.3-20.6; p = 0.014), whereas those with vertigo showed no significant improvement (-1.8 dB, 95% CI -11.8-8.3; p = 0.729). The HBOT group also had a significantly higher association with complete recovery (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio: 2.57, 95% CI 1.13-5.85; p = 0.025).
    UNASSIGNED: In SSHNL, HBOT combination therapy yielded slightly but significantly improved hearing outcomes compared to non-HBOT treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: 4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:衰老与体力活动能力的进行性下降有关。本研究的目的是评估间歇性高压氧治疗(HBOT)方案对久坐的老年人的最大身体机能和心脏灌注的影响。
    方法:一项随机对照临床试验将63名成年人(>64岁)随机分为HBOT组(n=30)或对照组(n=33),为期3个月。主要终点包括最大耗氧量(VO2Max)和VO2Max/Kg,在E100自行车测力计上。次要终点包括心脏灌注,通过磁共振成像和肺功能评估。HBOT方案由每天管理的60个疗程组成,连续12周,在2个绝对大气压(ATA)下呼吸100%氧气90分钟,每20分钟空气中断5分钟。
    结果:在HBOT之后,在VO2Max/kg中观察到改善,净效应大小为0.455(p=0.0034),显着增加1.91±3.29ml/kg/min。此外,在第一通气阈值(VO2VT1)时测得的耗氧量显著增加160.03±155.35ml/min(p<0.001),净效应大小为0.617.此外,与对照组相比,心脏血流量(MBF)和心脏血容量(MBV)均显着增加。MBF的净效应大小为0.797(p=0.008),而MBV的净效应大小甚至更大,为0.896(p=0.009)。
    结论:研究结果表明,HBOT具有改善老年成年人身体机能的潜力。观察到的增强包括关键因素的改进,包括VO2Max,和VO2VT1。有助于这些改善的重要机制是HBOT引起的心脏灌注增强。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT02790541(注册日期2016年6月6日)。
    BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with a progressive decline in the capacity for physical activity. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of an intermittent hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) protocol on maximal physical performance and cardiac perfusion in sedentary older adults.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial randomized 63 adults (> 64yrs) either to HBOT (n = 30) or control arms (n = 33) for three months. Primary endpoint included the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2Max) and VO2Max/Kg, on an E100 cycle ergometer. Secondary endpoints included cardiac perfusion, evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and pulmonary function. The HBOT protocol comprised of 60 sessions administered on a daily basis, for 12 consecutive weeks, breathing 100% oxygen at 2 absolute atmospheres (ATA) for 90 min with 5-minute air breaks every 20 min.
    RESULTS: Following HBOT, improvements were observed in VO2Max/kg, with a significant increase of 1.91 ± 3.29 ml/kg/min indicated by a net effect size of 0.455 (p = 0.0034). Additionally, oxygen consumption measured at the first ventilatory threshold (VO2VT1) showed a significant increase by 160.03 ± 155.35 ml/min (p < 0.001) with a net effect size of 0.617. Furthermore, both cardiac blood flow (MBF) and cardiac blood volume (MBV) exhibited significant increases when compared to the control group. The net effect size for MBF was large at 0.797 (p = 0.008), while the net effect size for MBV was even larger at 0.896 (p = 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study indicate that HBOT has the potential to improve physical performance in aging adults. The enhancements observed encompass improvements in key factors including VO2Max, and VO2VT1. An important mechanism contributing to these improvements is the heightened cardiac perfusion induced by HBOT.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02790541 (registration date 06/06/2016).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高压氧疗法(HBOT)已被证明在伤口愈合方面是成功的。然而,其对前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的潜在影响仍不确定.本研究旨在探讨HBOT对兔ACL重建后移植物愈合的影响。雄性新西兰兔进行ACL重建,随机分为两组:HBOT组和环境空气组。HBOT组在2.5个绝对大气压下每天2小时接受100%氧气,连续5天,从手术后的第一天开始。环境空气组在整个期间保持在正常的室内空气中。手术后12周,动物被安乐死,并收集他们的膝盖进行分析。与环境空气组相比,HBOT组表现出优越的移植物成熟和整合,磁共振成像的移植物信号强度较低,股骨和胫骨隧道尺寸减小,和更高的骨密度值在高分辨率的外周定量计算机断层扫描。此外,生物力学测试表明,HBOT组比环境空气组具有更大的破坏载荷和刚度值。总之,HBOT的佐剂使用改善了ACL移植物的成熟和整合,减少隧道加宽,并增强了移植物的生物力学特性。这些结果可能为HBOT作为治疗干预以增强ACL重建后的移植物愈合的潜在临床应用提供重要见解。为这一领域的进一步研究铺平了道路。
    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has proven successful in wound healing. However, its potential effects on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of HBOT on graft healing following ACL reconstruction in rabbits. Male New Zealand rabbits underwent ACL reconstruction and were randomly divided into two groups: the HBOT group and the ambient air group. The HBOT group received 100% oxygen at 2.5 atmospheres absolute for 2 h daily for 5 consecutive days, starting from the first day after surgery. The ambient air group was maintained in normal room air throughout the entire period. After 12 weeks following the surgery, animals were euthanized, and their knees were harvested for analysis. The HBOT group demonstrated superior graft maturation and integration in comparison to the ambient air group, as evidenced by lower graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging, decreased femoral and tibial tunnel size, and higher bone mineral density values on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans. Additionally, biomechanical testing indicated that the HBOT group had greater load to failure and stiffness values than the ambient air group. In conclusion, the adjuvant use of HBOT improved ACL graft maturation and integration, reduced tunnel widening, and enhanced the biomechanical properties of the graft. These results may provide important insights into the potential clinical application of HBOT as a therapeutic intervention to enhance graft healing after ACL reconstruction, paving the way for further research in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    慢性难治性足部骨髓炎在医疗护理中是一个巨大的挑战,与显著的发病率和不断上升的医疗保健成本有关。传统的治疗方法,包括手术清创和全身抗生素,经常做不到,让患者和临床医生寻找更有效的干预措施。高压氧治疗(HBOT),一种创新的治疗方式,最近成为一种有前途的辅助疗法,在这个治疗难题中提供了希望的灯塔。在这项开创性的观察研究中,我们仔细分析了80例慢性难治性足部骨髓炎患者的经验。手术清创和定制抗生素治疗后,每位患者在2.5个绝对大气压下接受HBOT治疗120分钟,一周五天,平均50天。我们的主要终点集中在完全根除感染,重复度量,以及与HBOT相关的任何不利影响。令人惊讶的是,80例患者中有68例(85%)实现了完全感染清除,通过平均36个月的随访期保持这种状态,所有这些都没有HBOT引起的并发症的单一报告。我们令人信服的发现主张HBOT,与标准手术和抗生素方案协同作用,可以彻底改变足部慢性难治性骨髓炎的治疗环境。鉴于这些有希望的初步结果,迫切需要广泛的研究来描绘长期的优势并微调HBOT协议,可能为新的治疗黄金标准铺平道路。
    Chronic refractory osteomyelitis of the foot stands as a formidable challenge in medical care, associated with significant morbidity and escalating healthcare costs. Traditional therapeutic approaches, including surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics, often fall short, leaving patients and clinicians in search of more efficacious interventions. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), an innovative therapeutic modality, has recently emerged as a promising adjunct therapy, offering a beacon of hope in this therapeutic conundrum. In this groundbreaking observational study, we meticulously analyzed the experiences of 80 patients suffering from chronic refractory osteomyelitis of the foot. Following surgical debridement and tailored antibiotic therapy, each patient was treated with HBOT at 2.5 atmospheres absolute for 120 min, 5 days a week, spanning an average of 50 days. Our primary endpoints focused on complete eradication of infection, recurrence metrics, and any adverse effects linked to HBOT. Astonishingly, 68 of the 80 patients (85%) achieved a total infection clearance, maintaining this status through a mean follow-up period of 36 months, all without a single report of HBOT-induced complications. Our compelling findings advocate that HBOT, synergized with standard surgical and antibiotic regimens, can revolutionize the treatment landscape for chronic refractory osteomyelitis of the foot. Given these promising preliminary results, there\'s an imperative need for extensive research to delineate the long-term advantages and to fine-tune HBOT protocols, potentially paving the way for a new therapeutic gold standard.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们调查了接受高压氧治疗(HBOT)或利培酮对被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童自闭症核心症状的任何可能影响.
    这项研究是一项随机研究,在埃及的Minia和Assiut大学医院进行的对照临床试验,有三个平行组。一百八十名自闭症儿童,5-8岁被分为3组(n=60)。第1组(G1)在两个月内接受了40次HBOT,第2组(G2)接受利培酮(剂量:体重低于20kg的儿童每天0.25mg,体重更多的儿童每天0.5mg)治疗六个月,以第3组(G3)为对照组,服用安慰剂6个月.在研究开始时(基线)和一年后,使用儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)和自闭症治疗评估清单(ATEC)进行评估。
    随访一年后,与基线评分相比,三组平均CARS和ATEC评分均有不同程度的显着下降(改善),但最好的结果分别在G1,G2和G3中发现。
    使用HBOT或利培酮可有效治疗被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童的自闭症核心症状,但是使用HBOT比利培酮治疗效果更好。
    非药物疗法可用于治疗自闭症的核心症状。高压氧疗法和利培酮都可以减轻自闭症的核心症状。高压氧疗法在减轻自闭症的核心症状方面比利培酮效果更好。
    由于自闭症儿童长期使用药物治疗除了难以长期使用药物外,还会导致副作用的发生,已经开始努力使用非传统的替代疗法,如高压氧治疗。本研究评估了高压氧疗法和利培酮对自闭症核心症状的治疗效果。结果显示,高压氧治疗和利培酮都可以减轻自闭症的核心症状,但是高压氧疗法比利培酮治疗效果更好。
    UNASSIGNED: In this research, we investigated any possible effect of receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) or risperidone on the core symptoms of autism in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a randomized, controlled clinical trial in Minia and Assiut University hospitals in Egypt with three parallel groups. One hundred and eighty children with autism, aged 5-8 years were divided into three equal groups (n=60). Group 1 (G1) received 40 sessions of HBOT within two months, group 2 (G2) received risperidone (dose: 0.25 mg per day in children weighing less than 20 kg and 0.5 mg per day in cases weighing more) for six months, and group 3 (G3) as the control group, received a placebo for six months. The assessment was done using childhood autism rating scale (CARS) and autism treatment evaluation checklist (ATEC) at the beginning of the study (baseline) and after one year.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean total CARS and ATEC scores significantly decreased (improved) by varying degrees in the three groups after a year of follow-up compared to the baseline scores, but the best results were found in G1, G2, and G3, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Using HBOT or risperidone is effective in treating the core symptoms of autism in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, but using HBOT gives better results than risperidone therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Non-pharmacologic therapy can be used for the treatment of the core symptoms of autism.Both hyperbaric oxygen therapy and risperidone reduce the core symptoms of autism.Hyperbaric oxygen therapy gives better effects than risperidone in reducing the core symptoms of autism.
    UNASSIGNED: Since the long-term use of drug therapy in children with autism leads to the occurrence of side effects in addition to the difficulty in complying with the drugs for long-term use, efforts have begun to use non-traditional alternative treatments, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The current study assessed the therapeutic effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and risperidone on the core symptoms of autism. The results revealed that both hyperbaric oxygen therapy and risperidone reduced the core symptoms of autism, but hyperbaric oxygen therapy gave better therapeutic results than risperidone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    艰难梭菌(CD)是一种厌氧孢子形成革兰氏阳性棒,是抗生素相关性腹泻的主要原因。高压氧疗法(HBO)是一种成熟的产气荚膜梭菌治疗方法,但是没有报告检查HBO对CD的功效,它也是一种厌氧细菌。
    在这项研究中,我们回顾性研究了HBO治疗是否会影响CD感染(CDI)后的预后.这项研究包括2013年1月至2022年12月在我们医院诊断为CDI的92名住院患者。其中,16例患者接受HBO治疗。HBO治疗的适应症是5例患者中风,四个病人的肠梗阻,两名患者的癌症,两名患者的急性外周循环障碍,和其他三个病人。平均观察期为5.4年。
    在单变量分析中,严重程度没有显着差异,死亡率,住院治疗,或接受和未接受HBO治疗的患者的总生存期.然而,HBO组的复发率明显降低(0%vs.22.4%,p=0.0363)和较短的症状期(6.2vs.13.6天,p=0.0217)。
    HBO可能通过缩短症状期和预防复发而对CDI产生有益作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Clostridioides difficile (CD) is an anaerobic spore-forming Gram-positive rod that is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) is a well-established treatment for Clostridium perfringens, but there are no reports that have examined the efficacy of HBO against CD, which is also an anaerobic bacterium.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we retrospectively examined whether HBO therapy affects the prognosis following CD infections (CDI). This study included 92 inpatients diagnosed with CDI at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2022. Of these, 16 patients received HBO therapy. The indications for HBO therapy were stroke in five patients, ileus in four patients, cancer in two patients, acute peripheral circulatory disturbance in two patients, and others in three patients. The mean observation period was 5.4 years.
    UNASSIGNED: In the univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in severity, mortality, hospitalization, or overall survival between patients who did and did not receive HBO therapy. However, the HBO group had a significantly lower recurrence rate (0% vs. 22.4%, p=0.0363) and a shorter symptomatic period (6.2 vs. 13.6 days, p=0.0217).
    UNASSIGNED: HBO may have beneficial effect on CDI by shortening the symptomatic period and preventing recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了骨形态发生蛋白2(BMP-2)的水平,骨钙蛋白,唇腭裂(CLP)患者接受牙槽骨移植后高压氧治疗(HBOT)和3DCTHounsfield单位,以初步评估HBOT在成骨中的作用。
    这个前景,准实验,干预前后研究评估了7例CLP患者在单阶段重建牙槽骨移植后接受HBOT治疗.结果包括血清BMP-2和骨钙蛋白水平以及手术前后获得的3DCTHounsfield单位,在五次HBOT会议之后,共12次测量。使用干预阶段(手术前,HBOT之前,第一至第五次HBOT会议)作为协变量,并针对几个基线因素进行调整。
    在不同时间的结局指标中发现了显着差异(BMP-2和骨钙蛋白的ANOVAp<0.001,Hounsfield单位p=0.01),一旦HBOT开始,平均值似乎稳步增加。回归分析表明,HBOT在第1次HBOT治疗后的血清骨钙蛋白(调整后的b=1.32;95%CI0.39,2.25)和第3次治疗后的血清BMP-2(调整后的b=6.61;95%CI1.93,11.28)中的作用明显。在第五届会议之后,两种结局的HBOT效应相当显著:与基线相比,BMP-2和骨钙蛋白的校正增加分别为28.06ng/mL和6.27ng/mL.我们的混合效应模型还显示了Hounsfield单位的HBOT后增加。
    我们发现BMP-2,骨钙蛋白,以及HBOT干预后的Hounsfield单位。这些可能表明HBOT对成骨的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the levels of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), osteocalcin, and 3D CT Hounsfield units following hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) undergoing alveolar bone grafts to provide a pilot evaluation of the role of HBOT in osteogenesis.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post-intervention study evaluated seven patients with CLP receiving HBOT after single-stage reconstructions with alveolar bone grafts. The outcomes included the serum levels of BMP-2 and osteocalcin and the 3D CT Hounsfield units obtained before and after the surgery, and after the five HBOT sessions, to a total of 12 measurements. The data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models using the intervention stage (pre-surgery, pre-HBOT, first to fifth HBOT sessions) as covariates and adjusting for several baseline factors.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant difference was found in outcome measures across time (ANOVA p < 0.001 for BMP-2 and osteocalcin, p = 0.01 for Hounsfield units), with mean values appearing to steadily increase once HBOT began. Regression analyses indicated that the effect of HBOT was evident in serum osteocalcin after the 1st HBOT session (adjusted b = 1.32; 95% CI 0.39, 2.25) and in serum BMP-2 after the third session (adjusted b = 6.61; 95% CI 1.93, 11.28). After the fifth session, the HBOT effect was fairly pronounced on the two outcomes: the adjusted increase compared to the baseline was 28.06 ng/mL for BMP-2 and 6.27 ng/mL for osteocalcin. Our mixed-effect models also showed a post-HBOT increase in Hounsfield units.
    UNASSIGNED: We found an increase of BMP-2, osteocalcin, and Hounsfield units following the HBOT intervention. These may suggest an effect of HBOT on osteogenesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管采用了现代放射治疗(RT)技术,放射性直肠炎(RIP)仍然是RT治疗盆腔器官恶性肿瘤的重要并发症。在过去的几十年里,在RIP中考虑了一个巨大的治疗性武器库,包括高压氧治疗(HBOT)。然而,关于HBOT对RIP影响的证据是相互矛盾的。本研究旨在评估HBOT治疗RIP的有效性和安全性。
    10年(2013-2023年)回顾性分析所有在美国医学中心(CMSH)接受HBOT治疗的RIP连续患者(武装部队医院-里斯本,葡萄牙)。患者在2.5ATA下暴露于100%氧气,在多地一级高压舱中,70分钟,每天一次,每周五次。使用SPSS(23.0版)进行Fisher精确检验;p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    在总共151名RIP患者中,88人被纳入最终分析,其中38.6%的人同时出现其他辐射引起的软组织病变。接受RT治疗的最多报告的原发性盆腔肿瘤是前列腺癌(77.3%),其次是宫颈癌(10.2%)。便血是最常见的临床表现(86.4%)。经过60个HBOT会话的中位数(四分位数范围[IQR]:40-87.5),62.5%和31.8%的患者实现了临床完全和部分缓解,分别,便血消退率为93.7%(完全或部分)。虽然部分和完全反应需要少于70个疗程的HBOT在整体RIP症状方面(p=0.069),孤立性便血倾向于至少需要70个疗程(p=0.075)。患有至少两次并发晚期放射组织损伤的个体与对HBOT的完全反应相关(p=0.029)。只有约5.7%的患者对治疗没有反应。18例患者(20.5%)发生了可逆性耳气压伤。HBOT会话的数量是HBOT副作用的预测因子(比值比:1.010;95%置信区间,1.000-1.020;p=0.047)。
    HBOT被证明是对医学和/或内窥镜治疗难治性RIP的有效且安全的治疗方法。这项真实世界的证据研究为使用HBOT管理RIP的已发布数据增加了价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques, radiation-induced proctitis (RIP) remains a significant complication of RT for pelvic organ malignancies. Over the last decades, an enormous therapeutic armamentarium has been considered in RIP, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). However, the evidence regarding the impact of HBOT on RIP is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in the treatment of RIP.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten-year (2013-2023) retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with RIP treated with HBOT at Centro de Medicina Subaquática e Hiperbárica (CMSH) (Armed Forces Hospital - Lisbon, Portugal). Patients were exposed to 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA, in a multiplace first-class hyperbaric chamber, for 70-min periods, once daily, five times per week. Fisher\'s exact test was performed using SPSS (version 23.0); p<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Of a total of 151 patients with RIP, 88 were included in the final analysis, of whom 38.6% evidenced other concurrent radiation-induced soft tissue lesions. The most reported primary pelvic tumor treated with RT was prostate cancer (77.3%), followed by cervical cancer (10.2%). Hematochezia was the most observed clinical manifestation (86.4%). After a median of 60 HBOT sessions (interquartile range [IQR]: 40-87.5), 62.5% and 31.8% of patients achieved a clinical complete and partial response, respectively, with a hematochezia resolution rate of 93.7% (complete or partial). While partial and complete responses require fewer than 70 sessions of HBOT in terms of overall RIP symptoms (p=0.069), isolated hematochezia tends to require at least 70 sessions (p=0.075). Individuals with at least two concurrent late radiation tissue injuries were associated with a complete response to HBOT (p=0.029). Only about 5.7% of patients did not respond to the treatment. Eighteen patients (20.5%) developed reversible ear barotrauma. The number of HBOT sessions was a predictor of HBOT side effects (odds ratio: 1.010; 95% confidence interval, 1.000-1.020; p=0.047).
    UNASSIGNED: The HBOT proved to be an effective and safe treatment for RIP refractory to medical and/or endoscopic treatments. This real-world evidence study adds value to published data on the management of RIP with HBOT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号