背景:本文旨在确立波兰法律体系中准则的法律性质以及引入此类准则的可能形式后果(诉讼,专业责任)以及关于治疗患者方法的实际意义。
方法:分析正在澄清在很大程度上决定研究内容的基本问题。基本假设是从公法的角度分析编制的准则的法律性质,即从国家之间发生的关系的角度来看,作为主要的公法实体,和个人,私人实体,例如自然人,法人,或没有法人资格的组织单位,即,更准确地说,例如,国家当局与执业医疗专业人员之间的关系结论:治疗指南不属于普遍适用的法律子系统的范围。因此,它们不构成具有普遍约束力的法律的来源。2.此外,这些准则不构成国内法的渊源,因为发行机构没有法律权力发行它们,也没有法律权力塑造其收件人的法律状况。3.在形成医疗行业规则的法规中,法定和公司(医疗道德准则),该指南可能构成裁定医师专业(纪律)责任的基础。4.该指南可能对医学的发展构成障碍,特别是在特设小组发布和缺乏更新导致过时的临床实践巩固并抑制自下而上产生的研究潜力的情况下。
BACKGROUND: The paper aims to establish the legal nature of the
guidelines in the Polish legal system and the possible formal consequences of introducing such
guidelines (litigation, professional responsibility) as well as practical implications concerning the method of treating patients.
METHODS: Analysis is clarifying fundamental issues that largely determine the content of the study. The basic assumption is to analyze the legal nature of the prepared
guidelines from the point of view of public law, i.e. from the point of view of the relations occurring between the state, as the primary public law entity, and individual, private entities, such as natural persons, legal persons, or organizational units without legal personality, i.e., to be more precise, e.g., the relations between state authorities and persons practicing the medical professionConclusions:Treatment guidelines fall outside the scope of the universally applicable law subsystem. Therefore, they do not constitute sources of universally binding law. 2. Furthermore, the
guidelines do not constitute sources of domestic law, as the issuing bodies have no legal authority to issue them and to mould the legal situation of their addressees. 3. In the regulations shaping the rules of practicing the medical profession, both statutory and corporate (the Medical Ethics Code), the guidelines may constitute the basis for adjudicating on the professional (disciplinary) liability of a physician. 4. The
guidelines may pose a barrier to the development of medicine, especially in cases where their issuance by ad hoc groups and the lack of updates lead to the consolidation of outdated clinical practice and inhibit the research potential generated from the bottom up.