为了深入了解鼻窦炎的医疗保健应用,将数据与临床实践指南建议进行比较,并评估实践差异。
分析了来自医疗保险公司索赔报销登记处的匿名数据,从2016年1月1日至2016年12月31日。
荷兰的二级和三级护理。
诊断代码为“鼻窦炎”的≥18岁患者。\“
医疗保健利用率(患病率,合并症,诊断测试,手术),成本,与指南建议相比,练习变异。
我们确定了56.825名患者,患病率为0.4%.费用为45.979.554欧元,占医院相关护理总费用的0.2%(21.831.3×106欧元)。大多数患者<75岁,有轻微的女性优势。29%有合并症(通常为COPD/哮喘)。9%接受了皮肤点刺测试,61%的鼻内镜检查,2%X线和51%CT。手术率为16%,主要是在日托。几乎,所有外科手术均经鼻内进行,并涉及上颌窦和/或筛窦.七项建议(25%)可以(部分)与索赔数据的分布进行比较。除了内窥镜检查,医疗保健利用模式符合指南建议.我们比较了三个地理区域的结果,发现诊断测试和手术的总体比率相对应。
患病率低于以前报道的。在准则建议的范围内,我们在荷兰医院的医疗保健利用率方面遇到了可接受的变化。健康报销索赔数据可以提供对医疗保健利用率的洞察,但是他们不允许评估护理的质量和结果,因此,结果应谨慎解释。
To provide insight into healthcare utilisation of rhinosinusitis, compare data with clinical practice
guideline recommendations and assess practice variation.
Anonymised data from claims reimbursement registries of healthcare insurers were analysed, from 1 January 2016 until 31 December 2016.
Secondary and tertiary care in the Netherlands.
Patients ≥18 years with diagnostic code \"sinusitis.\"
Healthcare utilisation (prevalence, co-morbidity, diagnostic testing, surgery), costs, comparison with
guideline recommendation, practice variation.
We identified 56 825 patients, prevalence was 0.4%. Costs were € 45 979 554-that is 0.2% of total hospital-related care costs (€21 831.3 × 106 ). Most patients were <75 years, with a slight female preponderance. 29% had comorbidities (usually COPD/asthma). 9% underwent skin prick testing, 61% nasal endoscopy, 2% X-ray and 51% CT. Surgery rate was 16%, mostly in daycare. Nearly, all surgical procedures were performed endonasally and concerned the maxillary and/or ethmoid sinus. Seven recommendations (25%) could be (partially) compared to the distribution of claims data. Except for endoscopy, healthcare utilisation patterns were in line with
guideline recommendations. We compared results for three geographical regions and found generally corresponding rates of diagnostic testing and surgery.
Prevalence was lower than reported previously. Within the boundaries of
guideline recommendations, we encountered acceptable variation in healthcare utilisation in Dutch hospitals. Health reimbursement claims data can provide insight into healthcare utilisation, but they do not allow evaluation of the quality and outcomes of care, and therefore, results should be interpreted with caution.