Radiation protection

辐射防护
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于其程序的复杂性和可变性,建立诊断参考水平(DRL)对介入神经放射学(INR)是一项挑战。
    目的:本系统综述的主要目的是分析和比较INR透视引导下的DRL。
    方法:一项观察性研究报告了INR程序中的DRL,特别是脑动脉造影,脑动脉瘤栓塞术,脑血栓切除术,动静脉畸形(AVM)栓塞,动静脉瘘(AVF),视网膜母细胞瘤栓塞,脊髓动脉造影.使用Scopus对2017年至2023年发表的相关研究进行了全面的文献检索,PubMed,和WebofScience数据库。
    结果:通过广泛的文献检索,共发现了303篇文章,由于重复而删除了159。如果不符合纳入标准,则对144项研究的标题和摘要进行评估并排除。在144篇文章中,有31篇被选中进行全面的全文筛选。在完整的文本筛选后,审查中包含了21篇文章。
    结论:接受INR手术的患者的不同状况对DRL的标准化构成了障碍;尽管如此,它们对于监测和优化放射性实践极其重要。
    BACKGROUND: The establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) is challenge for interventional neuroradiology (INR) due to the complexity and variability of its procedures.
    OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this systematic review is to analyse and compare DRLs in fluoroscopy-guided procedures in INR.
    METHODS: An observational study reporting DRLs in INR procedures, specifically cerebral arteriography, cerebral aneurysm embolisation, cerebral thrombectomy, embolisation of arteriovenous malformations (AVM), arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), retinoblastoma embolisation, and spinal cord arteriography. Comprehensive literature searches for relevant studies published between 2017 and 2023 were conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases.
    RESULTS: A total of 303 articles were identified through an extensive literature search, with 159 removed due to duplication. The title and abstract of 144 studies were assessed and excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one out of the 144 articles were selected for a thorough full-text screening. Twenty-one articles were included in the review after the complete text screening.
    CONCLUSIONS: The different conditions of patients undergoing INR procedures pose a barrier to the standardization of DRLs; nevertheless, they are extremely important for monitoring and optimising radiological practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗环境中的辐射暴露是人工辐射的主要来源,加上医护人员人数的逐年上升。确保辐射防护对于保护其职业健康至关重要。然而,由于各种因素,现有的辐射防护行为研究表现出相当大的异质性。
    目的:本范围审查旨在探讨辐射防护行为研究的现状,并找出研究空白,旨在指导未来的研究方向。
    方法:范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley框架和JoannaBriggs研究所的方法。将在包括PubMed在内的英语数据库中进行系统搜索,WebofScience,Embase,还有Medline,以及中国知网等中文数据库,万方,VIP,和中国生物医学文献数据库。两名独立的评审员将根据预定义的资格标准筛选研究并提取数据。任何分歧都将通过第三位审稿人的讨论来解决。审查将根据系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展进行报告。
    结论:利益相关者咨询将提供一个机会来验证研究结果并解决文章中的任何潜在差距。在这次范围审查中,将考虑所有类型的研究。纳入研究的方法学质量的有效性将不报告,这可能导致一些质量差的研究被纳入。只有在2010年以后发表的英文或中文的研究才会被纳入这篇综述。可能导致遗漏相关论文。
    BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in medical settings stands as the primary source of artificial radiation, compounded by the yearly rise in healthcare worker numbers. Ensuring radiation protection is crucial for safeguarding their occupational health. Nevertheless, existing studies on radiation protection behavior exhibit considerable heterogeneity due to various factors.
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the current status of research on radiation protection behavior and identify research gaps, intending to guide future research directions.
    METHODS: The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A systematic search will be conducted across English databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline, as well as Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature Database. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and extract the data. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion by a third reviewer. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.
    CONCLUSIONS: A stakeholder consultation will provide an opportunity to validate the findings and address any potential gaps in the article. In this scoping review, all types of studies will be considered. The effectiveness of the methodological quality of the included studies will not be reported, which may lead to some studies of poor quality being included. Only studies published in English or Chinese after 2010 will be considered in this review, potentially leading to the omission of relevant papers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子系统和电信日益普及,导致电磁(EM)辐射污染增加。EM辐射的环境保护要求使用环保产品。使用纳米纤维素(NC)等资源的EM干扰(EMI)屏蔽材料的设计正在获得牵引力。纤维素,由于其生物相容性,生物降解性,以及优异的机械和热性能,开发EMI屏蔽材料引起了极大的兴趣。纤维素基EMI屏蔽材料的最新进展,特别是改性的纤维素复合材料,在这项研究中得到了强调。通过掺入与导电填料混合并用固有导电元素改性的金属涂层,导电性和EMI屏蔽的有效性可以显著提高。这篇综述讨论了EMI屏蔽的引入,纤维素,NC,评估环保EMI屏蔽选项和各种基于NC的复合EMI屏蔽考虑其低反射率。该研究为设计用于EMI屏蔽应用的先进的基于NC的导电复合材料提供了新的见解。
    Electronic systems and telecommunications have grown in popularity, leading to increasing electromagnetic (EM) radiation pollution. Environmental protection from EM radiation demands the use of environmentally friendly products. The design of EM interference (EMI) shielding materials using resources like nanocellulose (NC) is gaining traction. Cellulose, owing to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and excellent mechanical and thermal properties, has attracted significant interest for developing EMI shielding materials. Recent advancements in cellulose-based EMI shielding materials, particularly modified cellulosic composites, are highlighted in this study. By incorporating metallic coatings compounded with conductive fillers and modified with inherently conductive elements, conductivity and effectiveness of EMI shielding can be significantly improved. This review discusses the introduction of EMI shields, cellulose, and NC, assessing environmentally friendly EMI shield options and diverse NC-based composite EMI shields considering their low reflectivity. The study offers new insights into designing advanced NC-based conductive composites for EMI shielding applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年,国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)发布了第138号出版物,强调了放射防护系统的道德价值观。额外的工作,ICRP内外,提出或推荐了与系统在不同领域的应用相关的道德价值观,也许最值得注意的是在医学上,兽医,和环境放射防护。还有一些与放射保护没有具体关系的现有道德框架,但与放射保护的实践相关;例如,当涉及到辐射和放射性的医学用途时,生物医学伦理学的Beauchamp和Childress原则具有特别重要的意义。乍一看,似乎有独特或孤立的道德价值观,需要根据具体情况应用。然而,尽管每个应用领域确实都有其独特的方面和相关的价值判断,这些伦理价值观之间存在着一致和互补的关系。本文回顾了ICRP与伦理学相关的工作,包括简短的历史背景,并强调了一系列以医学为重点的伦理价值观之间的异同,兽医,辐射防护的环境应用。
    In 2018, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) released Publication 138, which highlights the ethical values foundational to the system of radiological protection. Additional work, both within and beyond the ICRP, has proposed or recommended ethical values associated with applications of the system in different areas, perhaps most notably in medical, veterinary, and environmental radiological protection. There are also existing ethical frameworks not specifically related to radiological protection that are nonetheless relevant to its practice; for example, the Beauchamp and Childress principles of biomedical ethics are of particular significance when it comes to medical uses of radiation and radioactivity. At first glance, it may seem as if there are unique or isolated sets of ethical values that need to be applied depending on the circumstance. Yet while each area of application will indeed have its own unique aspects and associated value judgements, there are consistent and complementary relationships between these ethical values. This paper reviews the work of the ICRP related to ethics, including brief historical context, and highlights the similarities and differences between sets of ethical values with emphasis on medical, veterinary, and environmental applications of radiological protection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:科学文献中出现了关于暴露于电离辐射的介入医生的脑肿瘤病例的轶事报道。为了响应这个警报,引线帽的几种设计已经在商业上可用。然而,报告的疗效结果不一致.
    目的:合成,通过对文献的系统回顾,降低辐射水平的能力由辐射衰减设备(RAD)在介入医生的大脑水平。
    方法:进行了系统评价,包括以下数据库:MEDLINE,Scopus,EBSCO,科学直接,Cochrane控制试验登记册(中央),WOS,世卫组织国际临床试验登记册,Scielo和谷歌学者,考虑1990年1月至2022年5月评估RAD在实验或临床环境中疗效的原始研究。数据选择和提取一式三份,与第四作者解决差异。
    结果:从数据库中最初选择的总共373项研究中纳入了20篇文章。从这些,在临床条件下进行了12项研究,包括3801个透视引导程序,在实验条件下使用幻影进行了十项研究,共有88个程序,我们使用数值计算进行了4项研究,共63项手术.本综述中分析的上限提供的衰减和有效性从12.3%到99.9%不等,y分别为4.9%至91%。
    结论:发现RAD可能提供辐射防护,但是在屏蔽中发现了高度的异质性。这表明需要根据实践对上限效率进行本地评估。
    Background.Anecdotal reports are appearing in the scientific literature about cases of brain tumors in interventional physicians who are exposed to ionizing radiation. In response to this alarm, several designs of leaded caps have been made commercially available. However, the results reported on their efficacy are discordant.Objective.To synthesize, by means of a systematic review of the literature, the capacity of decreasing radiation levels conferred by radiation attenuating devices (RADs) at the cerebral level of interventional physicians.Methodology.A systematic review was performed including the following databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Science Direct, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), WOS, WHO International Clinical Trials Register, Scielo and Google Scholar, considering original studies that evaluated the efficacy of RAD in experimental or clinical contexts from January 1990 to May 2023. Data selection and extraction were performed in triplicate, with a fourth author resolving discrepancies.Results.Twenty articles were included in the review from a total of 373 studies initially selected from the databases. From these, twelve studies were performed under clinical conditions encompassing 3801 fluoroscopically guided procedures, ten studies were performed under experimental conditions with phantoms, with a total of 88 procedures, four studies were performed using numerical calculations with a total of 63 procedures. The attenuation and effectiveness of provided by the caps analyzed in the present review varying from 12.3% to 99.9%, and 4.9% to 91% respectively.Conclusion.RAD were found to potentially provide radiation protection, but a high heterogeneity in the shielding afforded was found. This indicates the need for local assessment of cap efficiency according to the practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暴露于建筑物内的氡气体会导致患肺癌的风险增加。为了将健康风险降至最低,室内氡浓度可以使用既定的缓解方法来降低。各种降氡方法的性能,它们的组合以及其他可能影响氡减缓效率的因素,使用从2007年至2017年期间安装了氡缓解技术的约2,800所住宅中收集的数据进行了分析。正如之前所证明的(霍奇森2011),主动方法最有效地将高浓度氡降低到低于行动和目标水平(分别为200Bqm-3和100Bqm-3)。在这项研究中,使用单一活性方法和使用组合活性方法的减少因子高达5.5,减少因子高达8.3。对于大于1,000Bqm-3的室内氡水平,有源池仍然是最有效的技术,主动式地板下通风是第二有效的方法。单独的被动方法或与其他被动方法结合使用可在高氡浓度下提供适度的减少。在被动方法中,发现地板下通风具有最高的性能,缩小系数为1.8。本研究的结论应用于更新包括住户在内的利益相关者的指南,承包商,氡意识运动和UKradon.org网站。
    Exposure to the radon gas within a building can result in an increased risk of lung cancer. To minimise the health risk, indoor radon concentrations can be reduced using well-established mitigation methods. The performance of various radon reduction methods, their combination as well as other factors that can impact the efficiency of radon mitigation, were analysed using data collected from approximately 2800 dwellings that had installed radon mitigation techniques during the period 2007-2017. As demonstrated previously (Hodgson 2011), active methods are the most effective at reducing high concentrations of radon to below the Action and Target Levels (200 Bq m-3and 100 Bq m-3respectively). Reduction factors of up to 5.5 using single active methods and 8.3 using a combination of active methods were estimated in this study. For indoor radon levels greater than 1 000 Bq m-3, the Active Sump remained the most efficient technique, with the Active Underfloor Ventilation being the second most effective method. Passive methods alone or in combination with other passive methods offered moderate reductions at high radon concentration. Of the passive methods, Underfloor Ventilation was found to have the highest performance with a reduction factor of 1.8. The conclusions of this study should be used to update guidance for stakeholders including householders, contractors, radon awareness campaigns and the UKradon.org website.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查孕妇牙齿成像对胎儿健康的安全性。
    对PubMed进行了搜索,Scopus,和2023年5月的WebofScience数据库。纳入标准包括横断面和纵向研究,重点是分析孕妇的诊断性牙科影像学。以及利用幻影模拟成像检查的研究。排除标准包括审查,给编辑的信,书籍章节,以及科学会议和研讨会的摘要。
    共鉴定出3913篇文章。根据对标题和摘要的回顾,3892篇文章被排除在外,剩下21篇文章供全文审查。其中,18被排除在外,以及另外4篇文章作为交叉引用。最终,7篇文献进行了定量-定性分析。三项回顾性研究的重点是接受牙科成像程序的孕妇。其余4项研究利用女性体模来模拟成像检查,并代表子宫或甲状腺吸收的辐射剂量。
    很少进行牙科放射学研究来确定孕妇的安全辐射阈值。此外,审查的文章没有提供牙科检查的数量,按类型,对应于这个剂量。如果有临床指征,孕妇的牙科影像学检查不应受到限制。最终,从业者必须能够证明检查的合理性,并应坚持“尽可能低的诊断可接受,以适应症为导向和针对患者的辐射防护原则(ALADAIP)。
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted to investigate the safety of dental imaging in pregnant women with respect to fetal health.
    UNASSIGNED: Searches were conducted of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in May 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that focused on the analysis of diagnostic dental imaging in pregnant women, as well as studies utilizing phantoms to simulate imaging examinations. The exclusion criteria consisted of reviews, letters to the editor, book chapters, and abstracts from scientific conferences and seminars.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 3,913 articles were identified. Based on a review of the titles and abstracts, 3,892 articles were excluded, leaving 21 articles remaining for full-text review. Of these, 18 were excluded, and 4 additional articles were included as cross-references. Ultimately, 7 articles underwent quantitative-qualitative analysis. Three retrospective studies were focused on pregnant women who underwent dental imaging procedures. The remaining 4 studies utilized female phantoms to simulate imaging examinations and represent the radiation doses absorbed by the uterus or thyroid.
    UNASSIGNED: Few dental radiology studies have been conducted to determine the safe radiation threshold for pregnant women. Additionally, the reviewed articles did not provide numbers of dental examinations, by type, corresponding to this dose. Dental imaging examinations of pregnant women should not be restricted if clinically indicated. Ultimately, practitioners must be able to justify the examination and should adhere to the \"as low as diagnostically acceptable, being indication-oriented and patient-specific\" (ALADAIP) principle of radioprotection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    线性无阈值(LNT)模型几十年来一直是监管的“土地法”。尽管LNT的长期使用,关于LNT对低剂量辐射风险的适用性存在重大的科学分歧.对过去10年低剂量风险文献的回顾并没有提供明确的答案,而是文学的主体似乎被分割在LNT之间,非线性风险函数(例如,超线性或次线性),和狼吞虎咽的模型。此外,最近的研究已经开始探索辐射是否可以在几种非癌症效应的发展中发挥作用,比如心脏病,帕金森病,糖尿病,其机制仍在探索中。基于这篇综述,没有足够的证据来取代LNT作为监管模式,尽管它有助于公共放射恐惧症,在辐射应急响应中毫无准备,辐射或核事故后以及核电厂常规退役的极端清理成本。相反,需要更多的研究来进一步了解低剂量辐射的影响.作者提出了一种方法,可以为低剂量研究的科学做出有意义的贡献,该方法将机器学习和爱迪生方法结合到数据分析中。
    UNASSIGNED: The linear no-threshold (LNT) model has been the regulatory \"law of the land\" for decades. Despite the long-standing use of LNT, there is significant ongoing scientific disagreement on the applicability of LNT to low-dose radiation risk. A review of the low-dose risk literature of the last 10 y does not provide a clear answer, but rather the body of literature seems to be split between LNT, non-linear risk functions (e.g., supra- or sub-linear), and hormetic models. Furthermore, recent studies have started to explore whether radiation can play a role in the development of several non-cancer effects, such as heart disease, Parkinson\'s disease, and diabetes, the mechanisms of which are still being explored. Based on this review, there is insufficient evidence to replace LNT as the regulatory model despite the fact that it contributes to public radiophobia, unpreparedness in radiation emergency response, and extreme cleanup costs both following radiological or nuclear incidents and for routine decommissioning of nuclear power plants. Rather, additional research is needed to further understand the implications of low doses of radiation. The authors present an approach to meaningfully contribute to the science of low-dose research that incorporates machine learning and Edisonian approaches to data analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This integrative review analyzed scientific production on musculoskeletal disorders related to personal protective equipment used by interventional radiology teams. The PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases were searched using a strategy developed with the help of a librarian. The double-blind selection process involved the Rayyan online tool. A total of 12 articles were included, which were organized according to year of publication, country research subjects, study type, and main outcomes. Five thematic categories emerged from the analysis: \"personal protective equipment\"; \"ergonomics in the interventional radiology environment\"; \"the composition of personal protective equipment\"; \"radiation protection for interventional teams\" and \"the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in interventional teams\". Outcomes associated with musculoskeletal disorders among interventional teams predominated in the studies, and advances in radiological protection were reported, especially in shielding technologies, as well as continuing efforts toward more ergonomic protective equipment to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders.
    O presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar a produção científica acerca dos distúrbios musculoesqueléticos relacionados ao uso de equipamentos de proteção individual por profissionais da equipe de radiologia intervencionista. Tratou-se de uma revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase e SciELO. A estratégia de busca foi definida com o auxílio de uma bibliotecária. Os artigos que compuseram a amostra foram selecionados por meio de seleção duplo-cega, utilizando a ferramenta on-line Rayyan. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão determinados, 12 artigos foram selecionados para o desenvolvimento da presente revisão. Os artigos foram organizados por ano e país de origem, sujeitos da pesquisa, tipo de estudo e principais desfechos. Da análise dos estudos selecionados, emergiram cinco categorias temáticas: “dispositivos de proteção radiológica”; “ergonomia no ambiente de radiologia intervencionista”; “composição dos dispositivos de proteção radiológica”; “proteção radiológica da equipe intervencionista”; e “prevalência de sintomas musculoesqueléticos na equipe intervencionista”. A partir da presente revisão integrativa, foi possível identificar um predomínio de desfechos relacionando o trabalho na área intervencionista com o desenvolvimento de distúrbios musculoesqueléticos, bem como de avanços no campo da proteção radiológica, principalmente em tecnologias de blindagem, tornando-as antropometricamente adequadas para diminuir o risco de distúrbios musculoesqueléticos.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    进行了全面的搜索,以检查有关约旦常规进行的计算机断层扫描(CT)和放射线检查的诊断参考水平(DRL)的文献。EBSCO,Scopus,和WebofScience被用于搜索。首字母缩写词“DRL”和附加短语“剂量参考水平”用于搜索文献中的文章。确定了7篇报告约旦射线照相和CT扫描DRL值的论文。一项研究报告了用于常规射线照相的DRL,两项研究报道了儿科的CTDRL,其余4项研究提供了成人CT扫描的DRL值.确定DRL的最流行技术是入口表面剂量,容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol),和剂量长度乘积(DLP)值。在两种模式中都注意到约旦DRL值的变化。通过教育和培训放射技师以更好地了解剂量减少策略,可以实现较低的辐射剂量和较少的DRL值变化。为了限制剂量差异并进行剂量比较,CTDRL必须根据国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)的准则进行标准化。
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was performed to examine the literature on diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and radiography examinations that are performed routinely in Jordan. EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for the search. The acronym \"DRL\" and the additional phrase \"dose reference levels\" were used to search for articles in literature. Seven papers that reported DRL values for radiography and CT scans in Jordan were identified. One study reported DRLs for conventional radiography, two studies reported CT DRLs in pediatrics, and the remaining four studies provided DRL values for adult CT scans. The most popular techniques for determining the DRLs were the entrance surface dose, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) values. Variations in Jordanian DRL values were noted across both modalities. Lower radiation doses and less variation in DRL values may be achieved by educating and training radiographers to better understand dose reduction strategies. To limit dose variance and enable dosage comparison, CT DRLs must be standardized in accordance with the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号