PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in medical settings stands as the primary source of artificial radiation, compounded by the yearly rise in healthcare worker numbers. Ensuring radiation protection is crucial for safeguarding their occupational health. Nevertheless, existing studies on radiation protection behavior exhibit considerable heterogeneity due to various factors.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the current status of research on radiation protection behavior and identify research gaps, intending to guide future research directions.
METHODS: The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A systematic search will be conducted across English databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline, as well as Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature Database. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and extract the data. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion by a third reviewer. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: A stakeholder consultation will provide an opportunity to validate the findings and address any potential gaps in the article. In this scoping review, all types of studies will be considered. The effectiveness of the methodological quality of the included studies will not be reported, which may lead to some studies of poor quality being included. Only studies published in English or Chinese after 2010 will be considered in this review, potentially leading to the omission of relevant papers.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the current status of research on radiation protection behavior and identify research gaps, intending to guide future research directions.
METHODS: The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A systematic search will be conducted across English databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline, as well as Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature Database. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and extract the data. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion by a third reviewer. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: A stakeholder consultation will provide an opportunity to validate the findings and address any potential gaps in the article. In this scoping review, all types of studies will be considered. The effectiveness of the methodological quality of the included studies will not be reported, which may lead to some studies of poor quality being included. Only studies published in English or Chinese after 2010 will be considered in this review, potentially leading to the omission of relevant papers.
摘要：
背景：医疗环境中的辐射暴露是人工辐射的主要来源，加上医护人员人数的逐年上升。确保辐射防护对于保护其职业健康至关重要。然而，由于各种因素，现有的辐射防护行为研究表现出相当大的异质性。
目的：本范围审查旨在探讨辐射防护行为研究的现状，并找出研究空白，旨在指导未来的研究方向。
方法：范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley框架和JoannaBriggs研究所的方法。将在包括PubMed在内的英语数据库中进行系统搜索，WebofScience,Embase,还有Medline,以及中国知网等中文数据库，万方,VIP,和中国生物医学文献数据库。两名独立的评审员将根据预定义的资格标准筛选研究并提取数据。任何分歧都将通过第三位审稿人的讨论来解决。审查将根据系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展进行报告。
结论：利益相关者咨询将提供一个机会来验证研究结果并解决文章中的任何潜在差距。在这次范围审查中，将考虑所有类型的研究。纳入研究的方法学质量的有效性将不报告，这可能导致一些质量差的研究被纳入。只有在2010年以后发表的英文或中文的研究才会被纳入这篇综述。可能导致遗漏相关论文。
目的：本范围审查旨在探讨辐射防护行为研究的现状，并找出研究空白，旨在指导未来的研究方向。
方法：范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley框架和JoannaBriggs研究所的方法。将在包括PubMed在内的英语数据库中进行系统搜索，WebofScience,Embase,还有Medline,以及中国知网等中文数据库，万方,VIP,和中国生物医学文献数据库。两名独立的评审员将根据预定义的资格标准筛选研究并提取数据。任何分歧都将通过第三位审稿人的讨论来解决。审查将根据系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展进行报告。
结论：利益相关者咨询将提供一个机会来验证研究结果并解决文章中的任何潜在差距。在这次范围审查中，将考虑所有类型的研究。纳入研究的方法学质量的有效性将不报告，这可能导致一些质量差的研究被纳入。只有在2010年以后发表的英文或中文的研究才会被纳入这篇综述。可能导致遗漏相关论文。
