Post-pandemic

大流行后
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行导致行为发生了前所未有的变化。为了估计这些是否持续存在,CoMix社会接触调查的最后一轮是在四个国家进行的,当时所有社会限制都已经取消了几个月。我们对英国的全国代表性样本进行了调查,荷兰(NL),比利时(BE),瑞士(CH)。参与者被问及他们在前一天的接触和行为。我们计算了接触矩阵,并将接触水平与大流行前基线进行了比较,以估计R0。数据收集时间为2022年11月17日至12月7日。招募了7477名参与者。有些人被要求代表他们的孩子进行调查。只有14.4%的参与者报告在前一天戴着口罩。每个国家的成年人自我报告的疫苗接种率相似,约为86%。平均记录的接触者在NL中最高,每人每天9.9(95%置信区间[CI]9.0-10.8),在CH中最低,为6.0(95%CI5.4-6.6)。工作中的联系人在英国最低(每人每天1.4个联系人),在荷兰最高,每人每天2.8个联系人。英国的其他接触也较低,为每人每天1.6(95%CI1.4-1.9),NL最高,为每人每天3.4(95%CI43.0-4.0)。下一代方法表明,密切接触疾病的R0在英国大约是大流行前水平的一半,80%在NL和中间在其他两个国度。大流行似乎导致了接触模式的持久变化,预计将对许多不同病原体的流行病学产生影响。大流行后的进一步调查对于证实这一发现是必要的。
    The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented changes in behaviour. To estimate if these persisted, a final round of the CoMix social contact survey was conducted in four countries at a time when all societal restrictions had been lifted for several months. We conducted a survey on a nationally representative sample in the UK, Netherlands (NL), Belgium (BE), and Switzerland (CH). Participants were asked about their contacts and behaviours on the previous day. We calculated contact matrices and compared the contact levels to a pre-pandemic baseline to estimate R0. Data collection occurred from 17 November to 7 December 2022. 7477 participants were recruited. Some were asked to undertake the survey on behalf of their children. Only 14.4 % of all participants reported wearing a facemask on the previous day. Self-reported vaccination rates in adults were similar for each country at around 86 %. Trimmed mean recorded contacts were highest in NL with 9.9 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 9.0-10.8) contacts per person per day and lowest in CH at 6.0 (95 % CI 5.4-6.6). Contacts at work were lowest in the UK (1.4 contacts per person per day) and highest in NL at 2.8 contacts per person per day. Other contacts were also lower in the UK at 1.6 per person per day (95 % CI 1.4-1.9) and highest in NL at 3.4 recorded per person per day (95 % CI 43.0-4.0). The next-generation approach suggests that R0 for a close-contact disease would be roughly half pre-pandemic levels in the UK, 80 % in NL and intermediate in the other two countries. The pandemic appears to have resulted in lasting changes in contact patterns expected to have an impact on the epidemiology of many different pathogens. Further post-pandemic surveys are necessary to confirm this finding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是全球死亡和住院的主要原因。细菌或社区获得性病毒(CARV)引起CAP。COVID-19相关的限制有效地减少了CARV的流通。
    目的:这项研究的目的是分析2020年中期至2023年中期成人CAP患者中CARV的比例。具体来说,我们的目的是比较流感病毒的发病率,18-59岁和≥60岁患者的SARS-CoV-2和RSV检测。
    方法:我们分析了21种社区获得性呼吸道病毒(CARV)和三种非典型细菌(百日咳博德特氏菌,嗜肺军团菌,和肺炎支原体)在鼻咽拭子样本中使用分子多重方法,多中心,德国研究小组CAPNETZ的跨国研究。我们在整个研究中使用了严格的纳入标准。
    结果:我们在364/1,388(26.2%)患者中确定了CARV。详细来说,我们在210/1,388(15.1%)中检测到SARS-CoV-2,鼻-/肠道病毒在64/1,388(4.6%),所有患者中有23/1,388(1.6%)的流感病毒和17/1,388(1.2%)的RSV。我们在≥60岁的患者中更频繁地检测到RSV和流感,特别是在22/23与上一个赛季相比。没有检测到非典型细菌。
    结论:从2023年开始,我们证明了CARV在CAP患者中的重新出现。目前可获得超过三分之二的检测到的病毒感染的有效疫苗或特异性抗病毒疗法。老年人群中疫苗可预防病毒的高检出率支持有针对性的疫苗接种运动。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major global cause of death and hospitalization. Bacteria or community-acquired viruses (CARVs) cause CAP. COVID-19 associated restrictions effectively reduced the circulation of CARVs.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the proportion of CARVs in adult patients with CAP from mid-2020 to mid-2023. Specifically, we aimed to compare the rate of influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV detections in patients aged 18-59 years and ≥60 years.
    METHODS: We analyze the proportion of 21 community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs) and three atypical bacteria (Bordetella pertussis, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae) in nasopharyngeal swab samples using molecular multiplex methods within the prospective, multicentre, multinational study of the German study Group CAPNETZ. We used stringent inclusion criteria throughout the study.
    RESULTS: We identified CARVs in 364/1,388 (26.2 %) patients. In detail, we detected SARS-CoV-2 in 210/1,388 (15.1 %), rhino-/enterovirus in 64/1,388 (4.6 %), influenza virus in 23/1,388 (1.6 %) and RSV in 17/1,388 (1.2 %) of all patients. We detected RSV and influenza more frequently in patients ≥60 years, especially in 22/23 compared to the previous season. None of the atypical bacteria were detected.
    CONCLUSIONS: Beginning in 2023, we demonstrate a re-emergence of CARVs in CAP patients. Effective vaccines or specific antiviral therapies for more than two thirds of the detected viral infections are currently available. High detection rates of vaccine-preventable viruses in older age groups support targeted vaccination campaigns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行对世界各地城市的旅行方式选择产生了重大影响。在对风险的认知和对感染的恐惧的驱使下,大流行导致对私人车辆和主动模式的偏好增加,对公共交通和乘车采购的偏好降低。随着旅行行为和模态偏好的发展,一个关键问题是,大流行是否会导致旅行方式选择的长期变化。本研究使用基于网络的调查数据来研究大流行后时代影响非通勤旅行方式选择的因素。具体来说,它使用陈述偏好数据来开发随机参数混合logit模型,用于比较不同收入和年龄组的关键变量的弹性。研究结果强调了社会人口统计学属性和大流行前的旅行习惯对预期的大流行后模式选择的影响。此外,结果表明,频繁使用私家车,公共交通,积极模式可能会在大流行后继续使用这些模式。此外,结果强调了对共享模式的感知可能会影响大流行后的模式选择决策.研究结果提供了有关政策措施的见解,这些措施可用于解决大流行期间私人车辆的使用增加和过境的使用减少,同时还强调需要确保人口的某些部分能够保持足够的流动性和获得运输的机会。
    The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on travel mode choices in cities across the world. Driven by perceptions of risk and the fear of infection, the pandemic resulted in an increased preference for private vehicles and active modes and a reduced preference for public transit and ride-sourcing. As travel behavior and modal preferences evolve, a key question is whether the pandemic will result in long-term changes to travel mode choices. This study uses data from a web-based survey to examine the factors influencing mode choices for non-commuting trips in the post-pandemic era. Specifically, it uses stated preference data to develop a random parameter mixed logit model, which is used to compare the elasticity of key variables across different income and age groups. The results of the study highlight the influence of sociodemographic attributes and pre-pandemic travel habits on anticipated post-pandemic mode choices. Additionally, the results suggest that frequent users of private vehicles, public transit, and active modes are likely to continue to use these modes post-pandemic. Furthermore, the results highlight the potential for the perception of shared modes to influence post-pandemic mode choice decisions. The results of the study offer insights into policy measures that could be applied to address the increased use of private vehicles and reduced use of transit during the pandemic, while also emphasizing the need to ensure that certain segments of the population can maintain a sufficient level of mobility and access to transport.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:COVID-19大流行显著增加了一线护士职业倦怠的风险。然而,大流行后时期职业倦怠的患病率及其相关因素尚不清楚.本研究旨在调查大流行后一线护士的职业倦怠患病率,并确定中国的相关决定因素。
    方法:从2023年4月至7月,跨多个中心进行了横断面研究,重点关注积极参与COVID-19大流行的一线护士。数据收集是通过在线平台完成的。Maslach职业倦怠清单-人类服务调查用于评估职业倦怠的症状。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与职业倦怠相关的因素。
    结果:在参加的2210名前线护士中,75.38%的人得分超过了倦怠的界限。多变量logistic回归分析显示,女性[比值比(OR)=0.41,95CI=0.29-0.58]和每周锻炼1-2次[OR=0.53,95CI=0.42-0.67]是预防职业倦怠的保护因素。相反,每月有10个或更多的夜班[OR=1.99,95CI=1.39-2.84],持有硕士或更高学位[OR=2.86,95%CI=1.59-5.15],健康状况不佳[OR=2.43,95%CI=1.93-3.08]和[OR=2.82,95CI=1.80-4.43],在病毒感染下[OR=7.12,95CI=2.10-24.17],与工作相关的压力升高[OR=1.53,95%CI=1.17-2.00]均与倦怠风险升高相关。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,一线护士的大流行后倦怠受几个因素的影响,包括性别,每月夜班频率,学历,每周锻炼频率,健康状况,和病毒感染史。这些见解可以为旨在保护大流行后一线护士心理健康的干预措施提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the risk of burnout among frontline nurses. However, the prevalence of burnout and its associated factors in the post-pandemic era remain unclear. This research aims to investigate burnout prevalence among frontline nurses in the post-pandemic period and pinpoint associated determinants in China.
    METHODS: From April to July 2023, a cross-sectional study was carried out across multiple centers, focusing on frontline nurses who had been actively involved in the COVID-19 pandemic. The data collection was done via an online platform. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey was utilized to evaluate symptoms of burnout. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to pinpoint factors associated with burnout.
    RESULTS: Of the 2210 frontline nurses who participated, 75.38% scored over the cut-off for burnout. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that factors like being female [odds ratio (OR) = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.29-0.58] and exercising 1-2 times weekly[OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.42-0.67] were protective factors against burnout. Conversely, having 10 or more night shifts per month[OR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.39-2.84], holding a master\'s degree or higher[OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.59-5.15], poor health status[OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.93-3.08] and [OR = 2.82, 95%CI = 1.80-4.43], under virus infection[OR = 7.12, 95%CI = 2.10-24.17], and elevated work-related stress[OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.17-2.00] were all associated with an elevated risk of burnout.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that post-pandemic burnout among frontline nurses is influenced by several factors, including gender, monthly night shift frequency, academic qualifications, weekly exercise frequency, health condition, and viral infection history. These insights can inform interventions aimed at safeguarding the mental well-being of frontline nurses in the post-pandemic period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多研究表明,短期暴露于小于10μm的颗粒物(PM10)与COVID-19的发病率呈正相关。然而,没有研究调查这种关联的时空模式,这在确定高易感区域和流行阶段中起着重要作用。在这项工作中,以美国的49个州为例,我们使用了先进的策略来调查这个问题。首先,我们独立构建了时间序列广义加性模型(GAM),以获得2020年4月1日至2021年12月31日PM10短期暴露与每日COVID-19病例之间的状态特异性关联.然后,使用基于Leroux先验的条件自回归(LCAR)对关联进行空间平滑。第三,通过将时变GAM纳入LCAR,研究了关联的时间变化和时空异质性的原因.结果显示,在所有州,PM10与COVID-19的发病率呈负相关。平均而言,PM10增加10μg/m3与COVID-19病例增加7.38%(95%CI5.20-9.64%)相关。观察到很大的空间异质性,中部和东北部地区协会强,西部地区协会弱。关联的时间趋势呈现U形,与2021年底最强的关联。将疫苗接种率作为显著的效应调节剂进行检查。我们的研究提供了有关PM10-COVID-19关联的时空模式的第一个证据,并表明在大流行后时代以及美国中部和东北地区的空气污染值得更多关注,以控制和预防COVID-19。
    Numerous studies have demonstrated that short-term exposure to particulate matter less than 10 μm (PM10) is positively associated with the COVID-19 incidence. However, no study has investigated the spatiotemporal pattern in this association, which plays important roles in identifying high-susceptibility regions and stages of epidemic. In this work, taking the 49 native states in America as an example, we used an advanced strategy to investigate this issue. First, time-series generalized additive model (GAM) were independently constructed to obtain the state-specific associations between short-term exposure to PM10 and the daily COVID-19 cases from 1 April 2020 to 31 December 2021. Then, a Leroux-prior-based conditional autoregression (LCAR) was used to spatially smoothen the associations. Third, the temporal variation of association and the reasons underlying the spatiotemporal heterogeneity were investigated by incorporating the time-varying GAM into LCAR. Results showed that PM10 was adversely associated with COVID-19 incidence in all the states. On average, a 10 μg/m3 increase of PM10 was associated with a 7.38% (95% CI 5.20-9.64%) increase in COVID-19 cases. A substantial spatial heterogeneity was observed, with strong associations in the middle and northeastern regions and weak associations in the western regions. The temporal trend of association presented a U shape, with the strongest association in the end of 2021. The vaccination rate was examined as a significant effect modifier. Our study provided the first evidence about the spatiotemporal pattern in PM10-COVID-19 associations and suggested that air pollution deserves more attention in the post-pandemic era and in the middle and northeastern regions in America for COVID-19 control and prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引发了医疗保健服务的中断,导致各种卫生服务的取消和推迟,包括手术。许多国家关闭了边境,并制定了法律,强制使用口罩和社交距离,并强制实行封锁。各种活动受到限制。巴西,拉丁美洲人口最多的国家,感染和死亡人数也迅速持续激增。巴西是拉丁美洲受影响最严重的国家。大流行对巴西外科服务的影响尚未得到充分研究,因为大多数研究仅涵盖大流行的早期阶段。因此,本研究旨在评估COVID-19大流行对整个期间手术服务的影响.方法采用回顾性横断面设计对2019年至2022年的手术病例进行检查,比较以下指标:(1)住院人数、(2)住院时间(LOS)(天),和(3)紧急和选择性程序的数量。数据分为四个时间段,大流行前(2019年3月至12月),大流行(2020年3月至12月),恢复(2021年3月至12月),和大流行后(2022年3月至12月),并根据按地区分层进行的外科手术分析入院人数和LOS,性别,年龄,和手术类型(紧急与选择性)。结果2019年外科手术的入院人数在859,646和4,015,624之间,2020年为686,616和3,419,234之间,2021年为787,791和3,829,019之间,2022年为760,512和3,857,817地区类别;2019年为4,260,900和5,991,594,117,2020年为3,894,可变年龄表现出可比的趋势,尽管在0-19岁的年龄范围内手术的表达下降。外科手术的LOS(天)在2019年为110,157和910,846,在2020年为58,562和897,734,在2021年为67,926和904,137,在2022年为100,467和823,545。胸外科手术显示入院人数和LOS无统计学差异。选择性手术的入院人数和LOS人数有所下降,2019年至2020年期间分别下降13%和9.3%。紧急手术的入院率和LOS略有下降,2019年至2020年期间分别下降2.4%和2.8%。结论人口特征,比如年龄,性别,和区域,在大流行期间显示住院人数减少,随后恢复到大流行前的水平。在大流行期间,手术入院人数和住院时间有所减少,但在恢复和大流行后阶段逐渐恢复到大流行前的水平。值得注意的是,胸外科手术在所有时期都保持统计一致,表明其与其他手术相比的紧急性质。因此,我们得出的结论是,大流行对胸外科病例的影响很小,有助于稳定的趋势。
    Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provoked disruptions in healthcare delivery, leading to the cancellation and postponement of various health services, including surgery. Numerous countries closed their borders and established laws mandating the use of face masks and social distancing and enforced lockdowns, and various activities were constrained. Brazil, the largest and most populous country in Latin America, also experienced a rapid and sustained surge in infections and deaths. Brazil was the most severely impacted nation in Latin America. The impact of the pandemic on surgical services in Brazil has not been adequately studied since most studies only cover the early phases of the pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical services throughout the entire period. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional design was used to examine surgical cases from 2019 to 2022 and compared the following indicators: (1) number of hospital admissions, (2) length of hospital stay (LOS) (in days), and (3) volume of urgent and elective procedures. Data was divided into four time periods, pre-pandemic (March-December 2019), pandemic (March-December 2020), recovery (March-December 2021), and post-pandemic (March-December 2022), and was analyzed for the number of admissions and LOS based on surgical procedures performed by stratifying according to region, sex, age, and type of surgery (urgent versus elective). Results The number of admissions for surgical procedures ranged between 859,646 and 4,015,624 for 2019, 686,616 and 3,419,234 for 2020, 787,791 and 3,829,019 for 2021, and 760,512 and 3,857,817 for 2022 for the category of region; 4,260,900 and 5,991,775 for 2019, 3,594,117 and 4,984,710 for 2020, 4,182,640 and 5,590,808 for 2021, and 4,077,651 and 5,561,928 for 2022 for the category of sex; and 2,170,288 and 3,186,117 for 2019, 1,516,830 and 2,825,189 for 2020, 1,748,202 and 3,030,272 for 2021, and 1,900,023 and 2,859,179 for 2022 for the category of age. The variable age showed a comparable trend, albeit with an expressive decline for surgeries in the age range of 0-19 years. The LOS (in days) for surgical procedures ranged between 110,157 and 910,846 for 2019, 58,562 and 897,734 for 2020, 67,926 and 904,137 for 2021, and 100,467 and 823,545 for 2022. Thoracic surgery indicated no statistically significant difference in the number of admissions and LOS. Elective surgeries had a decline in the number of admissions and LOS, a 13% and 9.3% decline between 2019 and 2020, respectively. Urgent surgeries experienced a slight decrease in admissions and LOS, with a decline of 2.4% and 2.8% between 2019 and 2020, respectively. Conclusions Population characteristics, such as age, sex, and region, showed decreased hospital admissions during the pandemic, followed by a recovery toward pre-pandemic levels afterward. The number of surgical admissions and the length of hospital stays decreased during the pandemic but gradually returned to pre-pandemic levels in the recovery and post-pandemic phases. Notably, thoracic surgery remained statistically consistent across all periods, indicating its emergency nature compared to other surgeries. Thus, we conclude that the pandemic had minimal impact on thoracic surgery cases, contributing to a stable trend.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症,焦虑和压力是多因素的情感障碍,可以通过一系列症状表现出来,生理和心理,这影响了患有这些疾病的人的生活质量和表现。在这个意义上,本研究的目的是评估抑郁症,秘鲁公立大学工程学院学生在返回面对面课程时的焦虑和压力。该研究是在定量方法下开发的,属于描述性横截面类型的非实验设计。样本包括244名对抑郁症有反应的学生,焦虑和压力量表,具有足够心理测量特性的工具。根据结果,学生们表现出低水平的抑郁和焦虑。然而,他们表现出中等程度的压力。另一方面,发现这三个变量直接且显著相关。以同样的方式,研究发现,抑郁症的水平有统计学上的显著差异,与性别有关的焦虑和压力,年龄组,家庭责任和职业生涯。最后,结论是有抑郁症的症状,秘鲁公立大学工程学院学生在返回面对面课程时的焦虑和压力。
    Depression, anxiety and stress are multifactorial affective disorders that could manifest through a set of symptoms, both physical and psychological, that affect the quality of life and performance of people who suffer from them. In this sense, the present research had the objective of evaluating depression, anxiety and stress in students of the Faculty of Engineering of a Peruvian public university when returning to face-to-face classes. The research was developed under a quantitative approach and is of a non-experimental design of the descriptive cross-sectional type. The sample consisted of 244 students who responded to the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, an instrument with adequate psychometric properties. According to the results, the students presented low levels of depression and anxiety. However, they showed moderate levels of stress. On the other hand, it was found out that the three variables were directly and significantly related. In the same way, it was found that there were statistically significant differences regarding the levels of depression, anxiety and stress related to gender, age group, family responsibilities and professional career. Finally, it was concluded that there were symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress in students of the Faculty of Engineering of a Peruvian public university when returning to face-to-face classes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19病毒已经无法想象地破坏了运输系统及其整体功能。大流行引起的用户警惕的安全问题以及随之而来的长期过境避让行为可能会对他们的过境偏好产生持久影响,让过境机构寻找有效的大流行后过境复原力政策。这项研究考察了大流行后的潜在干预措施和大流行引起的心理属性,这些属性会影响大流行的非过境用户的未来过境选择行为。它利用了大多伦多地区交通需求和选择适应调查的数据,加拿大。制定了一个两阶段模型,以共同捕获大流行期间未进行过境旅行的人的大流行前过境使用选择以及这些用户组的大流行后过境选择。模型显示,大流行后的过境选择受到大流行担忧的反向影响。相比之下,这些选择受到受访者对大流行后过境使用和保持所采用安全政策的看法的积极影响。关于传统级别的服务属性,付费停车和乘车设施使偶尔使用的人在大流行后选择过境的可能性提高了近15%。相比之下,对于大流行前的用户,由于可靠的服务而产生的变化从10%到11%不等。类似的倾向出现在票价计划中,该计划提供跨境之间的免费接送以及基本票价的25%或更多的非高峰折扣。此外,大流行后,更直接的过境路线和车辆模式增加的停车成本鼓励旅行者重新过境。
    The COVID-19 virus has unimaginably disrupted the transit system and its overall functions. Users\' vigilant safety concerns posed by the pandemic and the consequent transit avoidance behaviour for a prolonged period could have lasting impacts on their transit preferences, leaving transit agencies to search for effective post-pandemic transit resilience policies. This study examines potential post-pandemic interventions and pandemic-induced psychological attributes impacting the future transit choice behaviour of non-transit users of the pandemic. It utilised data from a transit demand and choice adaptation survey in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. A two-stage model was formulated to jointly capture the pre-pandemic transit usage choices of those who did not make transit trips during the pandemic and the respective post-pandemic transit choices for these user groups. The models depicted that the post-pandemic transit choices were inversely affected by one\'s pandemic concerns. In contrast, the choices were positively influenced by respondents\' views on post-pandemic transit usage and keeping the adopted safety policies in place. Regarding the conventional level of service attributes, paid park and ride facilities enhanced the probability of post-pandemic transit choice almost by 15% for occasional users. In comparison, the changes due to reliable service ranged from 10 to 11% for pre-pandemic users. Analogous propensity was seen for fare schemes offering free transfers between cross borders and 25% or more off-peak discounts on base fares. Moreover, more direct transit routes and increased parking costs by vehicular modes post the pandemic encourage travellers to retake transit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    城市地区的形成和人口稠密地区的吸引力反映了一种空间平衡,即工人迁移到城市活力更强但环境质量下降的地方。然而,大流行和相关的健康问题加速了远程和混合工作模式,改变了人们的位置感和对城市密度的欣赏,并改变了人们对理想生活和工作场所的看法。本研究提供了一种系统的方法,用于通过分析大流行后的城市居住偏好来评估感知的城市环境质量与城市便利设施之间的权衡。通过评估邻里街景图像(SVI)和城市舒适度数据,比如公园的大小,该研究从对两种工作条件(办公室工作或在家工作)的调查中收集主观意见。在此基础上,训练了几个机器学习(ML)模型来预测两种工作模式的偏好得分。鉴于在家工作偏好的复杂性,结果表明,该方法预测办公室工作分数具有更高的精度。在后大流行时代,这项研究旨在阐明开发一种有价值的工具,用于根据指定社区工作生活模式和社会概况的潜在自我组织来驱动和评估城市设计策略。
    The formation of urban districts and the appeal of densely populated areas reflect a spatial equilibrium in which workers migrate to locations with greater urban vitality but diminished environmental qualities. However, the pandemic and associated health concerns have accelerated remote and hybrid work modes, altered people\'s sense of place and appreciation of urban density, and transformed perceptions of desirable places to live and work. This study presents a systematic method for evaluating the trade-offs between perceived urban environmental qualities and urban amenities by analysing post-pandemic urban residence preferences. By evaluating neighbourhood Street View Imagery (SVI) and urban amenity data, such as park sizes, the study collects subjective opinions from surveys on two working conditions (work-from-office or from-home). On this basis, several Machine Learning (ML) models were trained to predict the preference scores for both work modes. In light of the complexity of work-from-home preferences, the results demonstrate that the method predicts work-from-office scores with greater precision. In the post-pandemic era, the research aims to shed light on the development of a valuable instrument for driving and evaluating urban design strategies based on the potential self-organisation of work-life patterns and social profiles in designated neighbourhoods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号