背景:Duramesh是一种新的缝合概念,将网格原理与精度相结合,缝合线的灵活性和多功能性,也适用于腹直肌吻合矫正。
目的:这项前瞻性研究旨在从安全性(感染,血清肿,血肿,手术伤口裂开和瘘发生率和住院时间),有效性(通过超声检查证明ARD复发,肌肉缝合线的可触及性,手术时间和术后疼痛评估)和基于PROMs(BODY-Q)的患者满意度。
方法:最初70例患者中的65例,接受直肌舒张修复,有6个月的FU,随机分为两组:1组,由33例接受Duramesh治疗的患者和32例接受标准聚丙烯0缝合折叠治疗的患者中的2例。有关感染的数据,血清肿,血肿,手术伤口裂开和瘘发生率,住院,ARD复发,肌肉缝合线的可触及性,手术时间,术后疼痛评估(VAS)和PROMs(BODY-Q)通过Prism9进行分析。
结果:两组之间在感染方面没有显着差异,血清肿,血肿,手术伤口裂开和瘘发生率以及住院时间。与标准聚丙烯分离缝线缝线相比,网状物的使用减少了执行折叠所需的时间。关于VAS和BODY-Q数据没有发现统计学上的显着差异。
结论:Duramesh0应用于直肌吻合术是安全有效的,不会影响美学改善,与标准聚丙烯0折叠相比。
BACKGROUND: Duramesh (Mesh Suture Inc., Chicago, IL) is a new suturing concept, combining the principles of mesh with the precision, flexibility, and versatility of a suture, suitable also for abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD) correction.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective research aimed to compare mesh with the standard polypropylene suture plication for rectus diastasis repair with regard to safety (infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates and hospital stay); effectiveness (ARD recurrence by ultrasound sonography, palpability of the muscular suture, surgical time, and postoperative pain evaluation); and satisfaction of the patients based on the BODY-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure.
METHODS: Sixty-five of the initial 70 patients who underwent rectus diastasis repair with a 6-month follow-up were randomly divided into 2 groups, comprising 33 patients treated with Duramesh and 32 patients treated with standard 0 polypropylene suture plication. Data regarding infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates; hospital stay; ARD recurrence; palpability of the muscular suture; surgical time; postoperative pain evaluation (measured by visual analog scale, or VAS); and the BODY-Q were analyzed by Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).
RESULTS: No significant differences were reported between the 2 groups with regard to infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence, and fistula rates and hospital stay. The mesh decreased the time required to perform plication compared with standard polypropylene detached sutures. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the VAS and BODY-Q data.
CONCLUSIONS: Duramesh 0 application for rectus diastasis repair is safe and effective without compromising aesthetic improvement when compared with standard 0 polypropylene plication.
METHODS: