MCI

MCI
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,越来越多的研究已经检查了认知训练程序在正常衰老和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中的潜在功效.
    这项研究的目的是(i)评估认知虚拟现实康复系统(VRRS)结合经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)应用于左背外侧前额叶皮层的疗效与安慰剂tDCS刺激结合VRRS相比,以及(ii)确定如何延长治疗的有益效果。在随机对照试验设计中,共有109名MCI受试者被分配到5个研究组中的1个:(a)在阳极tDCS期间进行面对面(FTF)VRRS,然后进行认知远程康复(TR)(临床-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS);(b)安慰剂tDCS期间的FTFVRRS,然后是常规的TR(临床-FTVRS)
    在临床-atDCS-VRRS结束后观察到情景记忆的改善(p<0.001)。我们发现,在临床ptDCS-VRRS或临床TAU后,情景记忆没有增强。此外,联合治疗导致延长的有益效果(临床-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS与临床-ptDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS:p=0.047;临床-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS与临床VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS:p=0.06)。
    本研究提供了初步证据,支持将个体化VRRS联合节点tDCS和认知远程康复用于认知康复。
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03486704?term=NCT03486704&rank=1,NCT03486704。
    UNASSIGNED: In recent years, an increasing number of studies have examined the potential efficacy of cognitive training procedures in individuals with normal ageing and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
    UNASSIGNED: The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the efficacy of the cognitive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS) combined with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared to placebo tDCS stimulation combined with VRRS and (ii) to determine how to prolong the beneficial effects of the treatment. A total of 109 subjects with MCI were assigned to 1 of 5 study groups in a randomized controlled trial design: (a) face-to-face (FTF) VRRS during anodal tDCS followed by cognitive telerehabilitation (TR) (clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (b) FTF VRRS during placebo tDCS followed by TR (clinic-ptDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (c) FTF VRRS followed by cognitive TR (clinic-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS); (d) FTF VRRS followed by at-home unstructured cognitive stimulation (clinic-VRRS+@H-UCS); and (e) FTF cognitive treatment as usual (clinic-TAU).
    UNASSIGNED: An improvement in episodic memory was observed after the end of clinic-atDCS-VRRS (p < 0.001). We found no enhancement in episodic memory after clinic-ptDCS-VRRS or after clinic-TAU.Moreover, the combined treatment led to prolonged beneficial effects (clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS vs. clinic-ptDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS: p = 0.047; clinic-atDCS-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS vs. clinic-VRRS+Tele@H-VRRS: p = 0.06).
    UNASSIGNED: The present study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of individualized VRRS combined with anodal tDCS and cognitive telerehabilitation for cognitive rehabilitation.
    UNASSIGNED: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03486704?term=NCT03486704&rank=1, NCT03486704.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究探讨了老年认知障碍患者跌倒的相关因素,与一般老年人群相比,提供不同的证据来预防有认知障碍的老年人跌倒。
    这项研究基于横断面调查,包括124,124名老年人口。数据来源于上海市长期护理保险老年护理统一需求评估。对跌倒的相关因素依次进行二元和多变量logistic回归分析。对有意义的变量进行多变量逻辑回归,按认知功能水平分层。
    在本研究中,过去90天内跌倒的发生率为17.67%。具体变量,如性别(男性),高龄(≥80岁),带电梯(或电梯)的住宅,轻度或中度残疾,睡眠质量(可接受/较差)与跌倒呈负相关,虽然教育水平较高,独自生活,住宅与室内步骤,不整洁的生活环境,MCI或痴呆症,慢性疾病,限制接头,视力受损,尿布的使用是跌倒的正相关因素。与认知功能正常的老年人相比,由于住宅中的无障碍障碍,老年痴呆症患者面临更高的跌倒风险。对于一般老年人来说,外出频率较低和社会交往不良与跌倒呈正相关,而对于有认知障碍的老年人,适度(有时)外出与跌倒呈正相关。患有认知障碍的老年人与慢性病相关的跌倒风险增加,限制接头,和尿布的使用。随着慢性疾病的增加,下降的风险也在上升。
    对于有认知障碍的老年人,和别人一起生活是明智的。此外,创造无障碍的生活环境,保持整洁,可以有效降低跌倒的风险,特别是对于患有MCI或痴呆症的人。最佳户外活动计划应根据老年人的认知功能单独制定。与一般的老年人群相比,有合并症的老年痴呆症患者在预防跌倒时应特别注意。
    UNASSIGNED: This study explored the correlative factors of falls among the older adult with cognitive impairment, to provide distinct evidence for preventing falls in the older adult with cognitive impairment compared with the general older adult population.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was based on a cross-sectional survey, with an older adult population of 124,124 was included. The data was sourced from the Elderly Care Unified Needs Assessment for Long-Term Care Insurance in Shanghai. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted sequentially on the correlative factors of falls. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on variables that were significant, stratified by cognitive function levels.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of fall in the past 90 days was 17.67% in this study. Specific variables such as gender (male), advanced age (≥80), residence with a elevator (or lift), mild or moderate disability, quality of sleep (acceptable/poor) were negatively correlated with falls, while higher education level, living alone, residence with indoor steps, unclean and untidy living environment, MCI or dementia, chronic diseases, restricted joints, impaired vision, and the use of diaper were positively correlative factors of falls. Comparing with older adult with normal cognitive functions, older adult with dementia faced a higher risk of falling due to accessibility barrier in the residence. For general older adults, less frequency of going outside and poor social interactions were positively correlated with falls, while for older adult with cognitive impairments, going outside moderately (sometimes) was found positively correlated with falls. Older adults with cognitive impairments have increased fall risks associated with chronic diseases, restricted joints, and the use of diaper. The risk of falling escalated with the greater number of chronic diseases.
    UNASSIGNED: For older adult with cognitive impairments, it is advisable to live with others. Additionally, creating an accessible living environment and maintaining the cleanness and tidiness can effectively reduce the risk of falls, particularly for those with MCI or dementia. Optimal outdoor activity plans should be developed separately based on the cognitive function of older adults. Older adult with dementia who have comorbidities should be paid special attention in fall prevention compared to the general older adult population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    轻度认知障碍(MCI)可能会发展为严重的痴呆症,所以需要治疗来维持认知能力。用于动眼控制的神经回路与控制认知行为的神经回路密切相关。在这项研究中,我们测试了使用凝视控制视频游戏训练动眼系统是否可以改善MCI患者的认知行为.患者玩一个简单的游戏2-3周,而对照组使用鼠标玩相同的游戏。使用MoCA筛查测试和CANTAB评估认知改善。我们还测量了奇数球范例中的眼睛瞳孔和聚散度响应。结果表明,在MoCA测试中,特别是在视觉空间域和CANTAB电池的快速视觉信息处理测试中,得分增加。瞳孔对目标刺激的反应也增加。对照组患者没有显着改善。这项初步研究为MCI患者凝视控制游戏的潜在认知益处提供了证据。
    Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) may progress to severe forms of dementia, so therapy is needed to maintain cognitive abilities. The neural circuitry for oculomotor control is closely linked to that which controls cognitive behavior. In this study, we tested whether training the oculomotor system with gaze-controlled video games could improve cognitive behavior in MCI patients. Patients played a simple game for 2-3 weeks while a control group played the same game using a mouse. Cognitive improvement was assessed using the MoCA screening test and CANTAB. We also measured eye pupil and vergence responses in an oddball paradigm. The results showed an increased score on the MoCA test specifically for the visuospatial domain and on the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of the CANTAB battery. Pupil responses also increased to target stimuli. Patients in the control group did not show significant improvements. This pilot study provides evidence for the potential cognitive benefits of gaze-controlled gaming in MCI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中国认知障碍的社会负担促使研究人员开发临床预测模型,旨在进行风险评估,以实现预防性干预。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种类型的危险因素最能预测未来的认知障碍,如果已知的风险因素在不同的社会经济群体中做出同样准确的预测,以及现有的预测模型在不同的亚群中是否同样准确。
    本文旨在确定哪个健康信息领域最能预测中国老年人未来的认知障碍,并研究不同人群子集的预测能力是否存在差异。
    使用中国纵向健康长寿调查的数据,我们量化了人口统计学的能力,日常生活的工具活动,日常生活活动,认知测试,社会因素和爱好,心理因素,饮食,锻炼和睡眠,慢性疾病,以及最近发表的3种基于逻辑回归的预测模型,用于预测一般中国人群和男性认知功能障碍的3年风险,女性,农村住宅,城市住宅,受过教育,也没有受过正规教育的老年人。通过20次重复的10倍交叉验证,使用接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)和灵敏度-特异性曲线下面积来量化预测能力。
    总共4047名参与者被纳入研究,其中337人(8.3%)在基线数据收集3年后出现认知障碍.一般人群中预测能力最好的危险因素组是人口统计学(AUC0.78,95%CI0.77-0.78),认知测试(AUC0.72,95%CI0.72-0.73),和日常生活的工具性活动(AUC0.71,95%CI0.70-0.71)。人口统计,认知测试,日常生活的工具活动,在女性老年人与男性老年人之间进行预测时,以及在未受过正规教育的老年人与受过一定教育的老年人之间进行预测时,所有3种重新创建的预测模型的AUC均显著较高.
    这项研究表明,人口统计学,认知测试,日常生活和工具性活动是预测中国老年人未来认知障碍的最有用的危险因素。然而,最具预测性的风险因素和现有模型在男性中的预测能力较低,城市住宅,受过教育的老年人。需要做出更多努力,以确保能够在中国不同的社会经济群体中进行同样准确的风险评估。
    UNASSIGNED: The societal burden of cognitive impairment in China has prompted researchers to develop clinical prediction models aimed at making risk assessments that enable preventative interventions. However, it is unclear what types of risk factors best predict future cognitive impairment, if known risk factors make equally accurate predictions across different socioeconomic groups, and if existing prediction models are equally accurate across different subpopulations.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper aimed to identify which domain of health information best predicts future cognitive impairment among Chinese older adults and to examine if discrepancies exist in predictive ability across different population subsets.
    UNASSIGNED: Using data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, we quantified the ability of demographics, instrumental activities of daily living, activities of daily living, cognitive tests, social factors and hobbies, psychological factors, diet, exercise and sleep, chronic diseases, and 3 recently published logistic regression-based prediction models to predict 3-year risk of cognitive impairment in the general Chinese population and among male, female, rural-dwelling, urban-dwelling, educated, and not formally educated older adults. Predictive ability was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity-specificity curves through 20 repeats of 10-fold cross-validation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4047 participants were included in the study, of which 337 (8.3%) developed cognitive impairment 3 years after baseline data collection. The risk factor groups with the best predictive ability in the general population were demographics (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.77-0.78), cognitive tests (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.72-0.73), and instrumental activities of daily living (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.70-0.71). Demographics, cognitive tests, instrumental activities of daily living, and all 3 recreated prediction models had significantly higher AUCs when making predictions among female older adults compared to male older adults and among older adults with no formal education compared to those with some education.
    UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that demographics, cognitive tests, and instrumental activities of daily living are the most useful risk factors for predicting future cognitive impairment among Chinese older adults. However, the most predictive risk factors and existing models have lower predictive power among male, urban-dwelling, and educated older adults. More efforts are needed to ensure that equally accurate risk assessments can be conducted across different socioeconomic groups in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用于诊断老年人群神经退行性疾病的数字神经心理学工具由于其诊断能力而变得越来越重要并被广泛采用。在这种情况下,主要检查显式记忆。内隐记忆的评估发生在较小的程度上。此评估的常用措施是串行反应时间任务(SRTT)。
    目的:本研究旨在开发并实证检验在患有认知障碍(CoI)和健康控制(HC)的老年参与者中的基于数字平板电脑的SRTT。根据响应精度的参数,反应时间,和学习曲线,我们测量内隐学习并比较HC和CoI组。
    方法:共有45名个体(n=27,60%的HCs和n=18,40%的参与者被跨学科团队诊断为CoI)完成了基于片剂的SRTT。他们被依次呈现4个刺激块,第五个块由随机出现的刺激组成。使用统计和机器学习建模方法来研究健康个体和具有CoI的个体在任务表现和内隐学习方面的差异。
    结果:线性混合效应模型表明,患有CoI的个体的错误率明显较高(b=-3.64,SE0.86;z=-4.25;P<.001);反应时间较高(F1,41=22.32;P<.001);内隐学习较低,通过序列块和随机块之间的响应增加来测量(β=-0.34;SE0.12;t=-2.81;P=.007)。此外,基于这些发现的机器学习模型能够可靠和准确地预测一个人是在HC组还是CoI组,平均预测准确率为77.13%(95%CI为74.67%-81.33%)。
    结论:我们的结果表明,HC和CoI组在SRTT中的表现差异很大。这凸显了内隐学习范式在检测CoI方面的潜力。基于这些结果的短测试范例易于在临床实践中使用。
    BACKGROUND: Digital neuropsychological tools for diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases in the older population are becoming more relevant and widely adopted because of their diagnostic capabilities. In this context, explicit memory is mainly examined. The assessment of implicit memory occurs to a lesser extent. A common measure for this assessment is the serial reaction time task (SRTT).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and empirically test a digital tablet-based SRTT in older participants with cognitive impairment (CoI) and healthy control (HC) participants. On the basis of the parameters of response accuracy, reaction time, and learning curve, we measure implicit learning and compare the HC and CoI groups.
    METHODS: A total of 45 individuals (n=27, 60% HCs and n=18, 40% participants with CoI-diagnosed by an interdisciplinary team) completed a tablet-based SRTT. They were presented with 4 blocks of stimuli in sequence and a fifth block that consisted of stimuli appearing in random order. Statistical and machine learning modeling approaches were used to investigate how healthy individuals and individuals with CoI differed in their task performance and implicit learning.
    RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects models showed that individuals with CoI had significantly higher error rates (b=-3.64, SE 0.86; z=-4.25; P<.001); higher reaction times (F1,41=22.32; P<.001); and lower implicit learning, measured via the response increase between sequence blocks and the random block (β=-0.34; SE 0.12; t=-2.81; P=.007). Furthermore, machine learning models based on these findings were able to reliably and accurately predict whether an individual was in the HC or CoI group, with an average prediction accuracy of 77.13% (95% CI 74.67%-81.33%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the HC and CoI groups differed substantially in their performance in the SRTT. This highlights the promising potential of implicit learning paradigms in the detection of CoI. The short testing paradigm based on these results is easy to use in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    决策是一个复杂的过程,大多数研究表明,轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者比健康人做出更糟糕的决定。
    本研究旨在使用剑桥神经心理学测试自动电池(CANTAB)测试评估卡巴拉汀对MCI患者决策的影响。
    这项研究是在Roozbeh医院神经科诊所进行的,30例年龄超过40岁的轻度认知障碍患者被随机招募接受卡巴拉汀或安慰剂,每天两次,持续12周。卡巴拉汀或安慰剂的初始剂量为1.5mg,每天2次,增加至3mg,每天2次。在干预前后进行CANTAB测试。
    利伐斯的明组患者的平均年龄为58.93±10.88,安慰剂组为59.33±10.34。两组的MMSE(简易精神状态检查)中位数为26(IQR=25-26)。利伐斯的明组的患者在CGT的所有亚组测试中显示出显著差异,IST,和SST,除了CGT测试中的风险调整之外,IST测试中的歧视,以及在进行试验中的中位正确RT和SST检验中的SSRT。最常见的不良反应是胃肠道并发症。
    根据结果,与安慰剂相比,利伐斯的明显著改善了主要决策结果.
    UNASSIGNED: Decision-making is a complex process, and most studies showed that patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) make worse decisions than healthy people.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to evaluate the effect of rivastigmine on the decision-making of MCI patients using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) tests.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was conducted at the Roozbeh Hospital neurology clinic, and 30 patients with mild cognitive impairment over 40 years old were randomly recruited to receive rivastigmine or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The initial dose of rivastigmine or placebo was 1.5 mg twice daily and was increased to 3 mg twice daily per patient compliance. A CANTAB test was conducted before and following the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age of patients in the rivastigmine group was 58.93 ± 10.88, and in the placebo group was 59.33 ± 10.34. The median MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) was 26 (IQR = 25 - 26) in both groups. Patients in the rivastigmine group showed significant differences in all subgroup tests of CGT, IST, and SST except in risk adjustment in the CGT test, discrimination in the IST test, and median correct RT on the go trial and SSRT in the SST test. The most commonly reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal complications.
    UNASSIGNED: According to the results, rivastigmine significantly improved the primary decision-making outcomes in comparison with placebo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在比较轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人在单任务和双任务下的前额叶皮质(PFC)的平衡能力和功能性脑氧合,并调查他们的关系。在平衡控制条件下,MCI中大脑的神经调节机制得到了阐明。
    方法:以21名MCI老年人(女性=12,年龄:71.19±3.36岁)为实验组,19名健康老年人(女性=9,年龄:70.16±4.54岁)为对照组。参与者分别完成单任务和双任务的平衡控制。在平衡任务期间,使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)和测力平台收集PFC的血液动力学信号和压力中心(COP)数据。分别。
    结果:在COP在内侧-外侧(ML)方向(D-ml)的最大位移中发现了显着的组*任务相互作用效应,95%置信椭圆面积(95%面积),均方根(RMS),ML方向的RMS(RMS-ml),前-后(AP)方向的RMS(RMS-AP),摇摆路径(SP),ML方向的摇摆路径(SP-ml),以及AP方向的摇摆路径(SP-ap)。对五个感兴趣区域(ROI)检测到显著的群体效应,即左布罗德曼区(BA)45(L45),右BA45(R45),右BA10(R10),左侧BA46(L46),和右BA11(R11)。在单一任务下,COP在AP方向(D-AP)上的最大位移,RMS,和RMS-ap分别与R45、L45和R11呈显著负相关。在双重任务下,RMS和95%AREA与L45呈正相关,L10和R10与RMS-ap呈正相关。
    结论:与健康老年人相比,MCI表现出更差的平衡控制能力。在MCI的双重任务下,PFC的更大激活可能被认为是维持站立平衡的补偿策略。在单一任务下,大脑激活与平衡能力呈负相关,在双重任务下积极。
    背景:ChiCTR2100044221,12/03/2021。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the balance ability and functional brain oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) under single and dual tasks, and also investigate their relationship. Neural regulatory mechanisms of the brain in the MCI were shed light on in balance control conditions.
    METHODS: 21 older adults with MCI (female = 12, age: 71.19 ± 3.36 years) were recruited as the experimental group and 19 healthy older adults (female = 9, age: 70.16 ± 4.54 years) as the control group. Participants completed balance control of single task and dual task respectively. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and force measuring platform are used to collect hemodynamic signals of the PFC and center of pressure (COP) data during the balance task, respectively.
    RESULTS: The significant Group*Task interaction effect was found in maximal displacement of the COP in the medial-lateral (ML) direction (D-ml), 95% confidence ellipse area (95%AREA), root mean square (RMS), the RMS in the ML direction (RMS-ml), the RMS in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction (RMS-ap), sway path (SP), the sway path in the ML direction (SP-ml), and the sway path in the AP direction (SP-ap). The significant group effect was detected for five regions of interest (ROI), namely the left Brodmann area (BA) 45 (L45), the right BA45 (R45), the right BA10 (R10), the left BA46 (L46), and the right BA11 (R11). Under single task, maximal displacement of the COP in the AP direction (D-ap), RMS, and RMS-ap were significantly negatively correlated with R45, L45, and R11 respectively. Under dual task, both RMS and 95%AREA were correlated positively with L45, and both L10 and R10 were positively correlated with RMS-ap.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MCI demonstrated worse balance control ability as compared to healthy older adults. The greater activation of PFC under dual tasks in MCI may be considered a compensatory strategy for maintaining the standing balance. The brain activation was negatively correlated with balance ability under single task, and positively under dual task.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2100044221 , 12/03/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:识字是预测认知表现的重要因素。现有的认知筛查工具仅在受过教育的人群中得到验证,不适用于受过很少或没有受过教育的老年人,导致这些测试表现不佳,最终导致误诊。临床医生面临的这一挑战需要一种适用于文盲或低文化程度老年人的筛查工具。
    目的:目的是适应和验证Addenbrooke的认知检查-III(ACE-III),以筛查印度文盲和低识字老年人群的一般认知功能。三种语言。
    方法:通过修改印度文学ACE-III的原始项目来系统地调整印度文盲ACE-III,以评估文盲和低文化人的认知功能,并与在痴呆症和相关疾病领域工作的专家小组达成共识。共有180名文盲或低文化程度的参与者(84名健康对照,50患有痴呆症,和46名轻度认知障碍[MCI])从三个讲孟加拉语的不同中心招募,印地语,和卡纳达语来验证改编版本。
    结果:在所有3种语言中,文盲ACE-III区分对照和痴呆的最佳截止分数为75。区分对照和MCI的最佳截止分数为79至82,灵敏度为93%至99%,特异性为72%至99%。
    结论:该测试被发现具有良好的心理测量特性,并且是在印度背景下识别低教育背景老年人的痴呆和MCI的可靠认知筛查工具。
    BACKGROUND: Literacy is an important factor that predicts cognitive performance. Existing cognitive screening tools are validated only in educated populations and are not appropriate for older adults with little or no education leading to poor performance on these tests and eventually leading to misdiagnosis. This challenge for clinicians necessitates a screening tool suitable for illiterate or low-literate older individuals.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to adapt and validate Addenbrooke\'s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) for screening general cognitive functions in illiterate and low-literate older populations in the Indian context in three languages.
    METHODS: The Indian illiterate ACE-III was systematically adapted by modifying the original items of the Indian literate ACE-III to assess the cognitive functions of illiterates and low-literates with the consensus of an expert panel of professionals working in the area of dementia and related disorders. A total of 180 illiterate or low-literate participants (84 healthy-controls, 50 with dementia, and 46 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) were recruited from three different centers speaking Bengali, Hindi, and Kannada to validate the adapted version.
    RESULTS: The optimal cut-off score for illiterate ACE-III to distinguish controls from dementia in all 3 languages was 75. The optimal cut-off scores in distinguishing between controls and MCI ranged from 79 to 82, with a sensitivity ranging from 93% to 99% and a specificity ranging from 72% to 99%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The test is found to have good psychometric properties and is a reliable cognitive screening tool for identifying dementia and MCI in older adults with low educational backgrounds in the Indian context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:以社区为基础的社会参与已显示出在延缓患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)且有患痴呆症风险的老年人的认知能力下降方面的前景。尽管集体讲故事干预已被证明是有效的,需要熟练的劳动力来支持MCI的人可能会限制更广泛的社区实施。基于技术的干预措施可以通过复制治疗师的能力来解决这一限制。
    目的:本研究旨在共同设计数字讲故事干预措施并评估其可用性。
    方法:这个共同设计过程包括三个阶段,参与MCI的人(n=12),他们的照顾者(n=4),和北京的治疗师(n=5),中国。在第一阶段,我们使用卡片分类和投票方法来确定社会参与的潜在诱因,并针对MCI患者希望增强的特定能力.在第二阶段,我们进行了头脑风暴会议与人与MCI和他们的照顾者,以确定数字讲故事应用程序的潜在功能名为惠优(“会见新朋友”)。最后,我们评估了汇友与MCI和治疗师的可用性,导致基于可用性发现的迭代改进。
    结果:我们发现了提高MCI患者的自信心与他们应对社会参与挑战的能力之间的关键联系。值得注意的是,我们认为记忆改善和语言表达增强是与孙辈有效沟通的关键因素。随后,参与者建议了应对这些挑战的功能和接口,导致汇友的发展,基于组的数字讲故事应用程序,具有生成故事材料等功能,进行记忆检索活动,分享故事。它在用户体验问卷基准中获得了“优秀”评级,显示出高水平的吸引力,可靠性,刺激,和新奇。MCI患者在22项任务中的平均任务完成率为87%(n=19;SD0.13)。然而,MCI患者和治疗师的反馈强调了导航中的可用性问题,活动管理,用户界面,和功能优化,表明需要提高可访问性和效率。
    结论:共同设计方法有助于开发汇友原型,支持以社区为基础的社会参与。用户反馈强调了汇友在维持重要的现有关系的同时,增强福祉并促进有意义的社交互动的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Community-based social participation has shown promise in delaying cognitive decline in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are at risk of developing dementia. Although group storytelling interventions have proven effective, the need for a skilled workforce to support people with MCI can limit broader community implementation. Technology-based interventions may offer a solution to this limitation by replicating the abilities of therapists.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to co-design a digital storytelling intervention and evaluate its usability.
    METHODS: This co-design process involved 3 stages, engaging people with MCI (n=12), their caregivers (n=4), and therapists (n=5) in Beijing, China. In the first stage, we used card sorting and voting methods to identify potential incentives for social participation and target the specific abilities that people with MCI wanted to enhance. In the second stage, we conducted brainstorming sessions with people with MCI and their caregivers to identify the potential features of a digital storytelling application named Huiyou (\"meeting new friends\" in Chinese). Finally, we assessed Huiyou\'s usability with people with MCI and therapists, leading to iterative improvements based on the usability findings.
    RESULTS: We uncovered a crucial link between boosting the self-confidence of people with MCI and their ability to address social participation challenges. Notably, we identified memory improvement and enhanced language expression as key factors for effective communication with grandchildren. Subsequently, participants suggested features and interfaces to address these challenges, leading to the development of Huiyou, a group-based digital storytelling application featuring functions such as generating story materials, conducting memory retrieval activities, and sharing stories. It received an \"excellent\" rating in the User Experience Questionnaire benchmark, displaying high levels of attractiveness, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. People with MCI achieved an average task completion rate of 87% (n=19; SD 0.13) of the 22 tasks. However, feedback from people with MCI and therapists highlighted usability issues in navigation, activity management, user interface, and feature optimization, indicating a need for improved accessibility and efficiency.
    CONCLUSIONS: The co-design approach contributed to developing the Huiyou prototype, supporting community-based social participation. User feedback highlighted the potential of Huiyou to enhance well-being and facilitate meaningful social interactions while maintaining crucial existing relationships.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在有和没有认知障碍的双语者中,双语对神经心理学测试表现的影响还没有得到很好的理解,并且受到拉丁美洲人的小样本量的相对限制。
    方法:使用协方差分析(ANCOVA),我们调查了在HABS-HD中登记的有(n=180)和无(n=643)轻度认知障碍(MCI)的社区居住的双语和单语拉丁裔老年人群的认知表现和损害模式.
    结果:双语者在跟踪测试和数字符号替换测试中表现出明显更好的认知弹性,在认知未受损组和MCI组中观察到。相比之下,双语者在MCI阶段表现出明显较差的表现和较高的音素流畅性受损率的认知脆弱性,only.后续分析显示,不平衡的双语者在这项措施上表现较差,损害率较高,由较低水平的血浆Aβ42/40支持。
    结论:认知表现和损害的模式作为双语的功能而不同。在评估拉丁裔老年人的认知和生物标志物结果时,必须考虑双语。
    拉丁裔双语者在处理速度和编码方面的表现更好。具有MCI的拉丁裔双语者在言语流畅性方面表现出认知脆弱性。较不平衡的双语者表现出最大的脆弱性,以Aβ42/40为基础。
    BACKGROUND: The effects of bilingualism on neuropsychological test performance in bilinguals with and without cognitive impairment are not well-understood and are relatively limited by small sample sizes of Latinos.
    METHODS: Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), we explored patterns of cognitive performance and impairment across a large sample of community-dwelling bilingual and monolingual Latino older adults with (n = 180) and without (n = 643) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) enrolled in HABS-HD.
    RESULTS: Bilinguals demonstrated cognitive resiliency in the form of significantly better performance on the Trail Making Test and Digit Symbol Substitution Test, observed across the cognitively unimpaired and MCI groups. In contrast, bilinguals demonstrated cognitive vulnerability in the form of significantly poorer performance and higher impairment rates on phonemic fluency in the MCI phase, only. Follow-up analyses revealed less balanced bilinguals demonstrated poorer performance and higher impairment rates on this measure, supported by lower levels of plasma Aβ 42/40.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of cognitive performance and impairment differ as a function of bilingualism. Bilingualism must be considered when evaluating cognitive and biomarker outcomes in Latino older adults.
    UNASSIGNED: Latino bilinguals perform better on measures of processing speed and coding.Latino bilinguals with MCI demonstrate cognitive vulnerability in verbal fluency.Less balanced bilinguals demonstrate greatest vulnerability anchored by Aβ 42/40.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号