Low-level laser therapy

低水平激光治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:进行了一项临床试验,以测量660nm和808nm组合波长的低水平激光治疗(LLLT)在减轻部分和完全无牙颌患者术后疼痛中的有效性。
    方法:该研究包括20个盲症个体,以随机分口方式进行分组;实验组为一个半叶,对照组为另一个半叶。实验组在手术后立即接受总共22.5焦耳(J)的LLLT,每个植入物分为5点。对照组接受安慰剂治疗。24小时后,72小时,7天,盲法测量师使用数字评定量表(NRS)结合言语评定量表(VRS)进行疼痛问卷,以评估手术后的疼痛发作,第一次疼痛发作的持续时间,和痛苦进化。用ANOVA检验对重复测量进行分析,并在定义的时间间隔进行配对t检验。
    结果:对于完全无牙颌患者,实验组在24小时和72小时的术后疼痛显着减轻。第一次疼痛发作的持续时间没有显着差异。实验和对照治疗的平均疼痛水平随着时间的推移而下降,但仅在24-72小时和24小时至7天间隔的实验组具有统计学意义。当比较24和72小时以及24小时和1周之间时,对照组也是如此。72小时至1周之间的时间范围没有统计学上的显着差异。
    结论:在本研究的局限性内,对于部分缺牙患者,每个种植体单剂量22.5JLLLT有助于减少牙种植体手术24小时和完全缺牙患者24小时和72小时的术后疼痛.
    BACKGROUND: A clinical trial was conducted to measure the effectiveness of a combined wavelength of 660 nm and 808 nm Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in reducing postoperative pain in partially and totally edentulous patients who underwent dental implant surgery.
    METHODS: The study included 20 blinded individuals divided in a randomized split-mouth fashion; the experimental group in one hemiarch and the control group in the other hemiarch. The experimental group received a total of 22.5 Joules (J) of LLLT divided into 5 points per implant immediately after surgery. The control group received a placebo treatment. At 24 h, 72 h, and 7 days, a blinded surveyor administered a pain questionnaire using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) combined with a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) to assess pain onset after surgery, duration of the first pain episode, and pain evolution. Group data were analyzed with an ANOVA test for repeated measures and a paired t-test at defined time intervals.
    RESULTS: The experimental group showed a significant decrease in postoperative pain at 24 h and at 72 h for fully edentulous patients. There was a non-significant difference in the duration of the first pain episode. The mean pain levels decreased over time for both the experimental and control treatments, but only statistically significantly for the experimental group in the 24-72 h and 24 h to 7 days intervals. The same was true for the control group when comparing 24 and 72 h and between 24 h and 1 week. The time range between 72 h and 1 week showed no statistically significant differences.
    CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, a single dose of 22.5 J LLLT per implant helps to decrease postoperative pain in dental implant surgery at 24 h for partially edentulous patients and at 24 and 72 h for fully edentulous patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定光生物调节疗法(PBMT)治疗复发性唇疱疹(RHL)的效果,一种最常见的单纯疱疹病毒1型感染。
    方法:在这项随机双盲对照试验中,纳入22例有症状的RHL患者。将患者随机分为一组(5%阿昔洛韦乳膏,波长为940±10nm,能量密度为4J/cm2,输出功率为100mW)和另一组(5%阿昔洛韦5次/5天和假激光)。病变大小,和疼痛强度被认为是基线时的结果,术后第2天和第3天。
    结果:在干预后2天和3天,PBM+阿昔洛韦组的疼痛强度明显低于无PBM的阿昔洛韦组(p<0.001)。病例组病灶大小在第7天和第10天显著减小(p<0.05)。治疗组患者对其治疗过程的满意度明显更高(p=0.008)。
    结论:PBMT可用作阿昔洛韦乳膏的辅助工具,由于减少术后疼痛的潜力更大,病变大小和患者满意度。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis (RHL), one of the most common herpes simplex virus type 1 infections.
    METHODS: In this randomized double blind controlled trial, Twenty-two symptomatic patients with RHL were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into one group (5 % acyclovir cream with 940±10 nm wavelength and 4 J/cm2 energy density and 100 mW output power) and another group (5 % Acyclovir 5 times/5 days and sham laser). Lesion size, and pain intensity were considered as the outcome at baseline, 1st 2nd and 3rd days postoperatively.
    RESULTS: Pain intensity in PBM + Acyclovir group was significantly lower than Acyclovir without PBM group in both two and three days after intervention (p < 0.001). The lesion size in case group was significantly lower on 7 and 10 days (p < 0.05). Patients in the treatment group were significantly more satisfied with their treatment process (p = 0.008).
    CONCLUSIONS: PBMT can be used as an adjuvant tool to acyclovir cream, due to higher potential in reducing postoperative pain, lesion size and also patients satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正畸治疗通常跨越数月甚至数年,这对患者来说可能是沉重的负担。生物调节技术已成为加速正畸牙齿移动的潜在策略。
    对60名正畸患者进行了一项随机临床试验,12-30岁,需要固定矫治器治疗。患者被随机分配到生物调节组(n=30)或对照组(n=30)。生物调节组接受低水平激光治疗(LLLT)以及传统的正畸治疗,对照组接受常规正畸治疗,不使用LLLT。治疗持续时间,疼痛感知,和正畸牙齿移动在研究期间进行评估。
    结果表明,与对照组相比,生物调节组的治疗持续时间显着减少。生物调节组显示总治疗时间减少30%,平均治疗时间为8.4个月,对照组平均需要12个月(P<0.001)。在生物调节组中,正畸调整过程中的疼痛感知较低。此外,生物调节与牙齿移动速度的统计学显着增加有关,所需的牙齿对齐时间减少了20%(P<0.01)。
    通过低水平激光治疗的生物调节代表了传统正畸治疗的有希望的辅助手段,显着加速牙齿移动和减少治疗持续时间。
    UNASSIGNED: Orthodontic treatment often spans several months or even years, which can be burdensome for patients. Biomodulation techniques have emerged as potential strategies to expedite orthodontic tooth movement.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a sample of 60 orthodontic patients, aged 12-30 years, requiring fixed appliance therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either the biomodulation group (n = 30) or the control group (n = 30). The biomodulation group received low-level laser therapy (LLLT) along with traditional orthodontic treatment, while the control group received conventional orthodontic treatment without LLLT. Treatment duration, pain perception, and orthodontic tooth movement were assessed during the study period.
    UNASSIGNED: The results demonstrated a significant reduction in treatment duration in the biomodulation group compared to the control group. The biomodulation group exhibited a 30% reduction in overall treatment time, with an average treatment duration of 8.4 months, while the control group required an average of 12 months (P < 0.001). Pain perception during orthodontic adjustments was lower in the biomodulation group. Additionally, biomodulation was associated with a statistically significant increase in the rate of tooth movement, as evidenced by a 20% reduction in the time required to achieve desired tooth alignment (P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Biomodulation through low-level laser therapy represents a promising adjunct to traditional orthodontic treatment, significantly accelerating tooth movement and reducing treatment duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颞下颌关节(TMJ)的内部椎间盘位移通过髁-椎间盘组件之间的异常来识别,which,在许多情况下,可能导致不适和咀嚼功能故障。该研究的目的是评估四种不同的治疗方法对颞下颌关节紊乱病病例的影响,这些病例具有前盘位移,重点是它们的咀嚼效率。
    选择了100名患有可减少的TMJ椎间盘移位的参与者进行研究。将受试者平均分为四组:I组患者采用行为疗法治疗;II组患者采用低水平激光治疗(LLLT);III组患者采用前路复位夹板治疗;IV组患者采用平面夹板治疗。使用分级筛分方法评估咀嚼效率,并使用硅印模材料创建合成食品替代品。统计分析包括各组之间以及每组内基线和治疗后的咀嚼效率比较。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和配对t检验,分别。
    使用配对t检验,在所有组的基线值和6个月值之间观察到由中值粒径表示的咀嚼效率值的显着差异(P<0.05),除了I组外,在6个月内没有发现显着变化(P>0.05)。单因素方差分析检验显示治疗后各组间有统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。事后Tukey检验用于成对比较,并在95%的置信水平下显示所有组之间咀嚼效率的主要值的统计学差异(P<0.05)。
    研究结果表明,咬合板和LLLT在提高咀嚼效率方面比行为干预更有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Internal disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is identified by an anomaly between the condylar-disc assembly, which, in many cases, may lead to discomfort and malfunction of the chewing function. The study\'s objective was to assess the effects of four distinct treatment approaches on temporomandibular disorder cases with anterior disc displacements focusing on their chewing efficiency.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred participants suffering from reducible TMJ disc displacement were selected for enrollment in the study. Subjects were divided equally into four groups: group I patients were treated with behavioral therapy; group II patients were treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT); group III patients were treated with anterior repositioning splints; and group IV patients were treated with flat plane splints. Chewing efficiency was assessed utilizing the fractional sieving method and a synthetic food substitute was created using silicon impression material. The statistical analysis encompassed comparisons of chewing efficiency between groups and between baseline and posttreatment within each group, employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t tests, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the paired t test, a significant difference in chewing efficiency values as expressed by the median particle size was observed between the baseline and 6-month values in all groups (P < 0.05), except for group I where no significant change was noted over the 6 months (P > 0.05). The one-way ANOVA test revealed a statistically significant difference among groups following therapies (P ˂ 0.05). The post hoc Tukey test was employed for pairwise comparisons and revealed statistically significant variances in the main values of chewing efficiency among all groups at a 95% confidence level (P ˂ 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The study\'s results suggest that occlusal splints and LLLT are more effective in improving chewing efficiency than behavioral interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的低水平激光治疗(LLLT)被认为是骨关节炎(OA)的一种有希望的非侵入性治疗选择。本研究旨在评估LLLT对拇指第一腕掌关节(CMC1)OA患者的有效性。方法一个开放的水平,prospective,在物理医学和康复科进行了随机对照试验,BangabandhuSheikhMujib医科大学(BSMMU),达卡,一年。最初,该研究接触了120名患者。其中,112例符合条件的患者随机分为两组:干预组在保守治疗的基础上接受LLLT,对照组仅接受保守治疗4周。通过使用各种参数,例如视觉模拟量表(VAS),在每周随访的基础上评估疼痛和功能能力(运动)的改善。Ritchie关节指数(压痛量表),握力,按键夹紧强度,德莱塞功能指数,和CMC1Palmer绑架。最终,90例患者完成随访并纳入分析。结果确诊为CMC1联合OA的患者以50多岁居多。在基线,干预组和对照组的患者在人口统计学方面表现不同,疼痛强度,运动反应,痛苦的持续时间。经过四周的治疗,结果表明两组均有总体改善.然而,疼痛减轻和功能能力增强无统计学意义(p值:≥0.5).结论常规治疗与常规治疗相比,LLLT疗效并不明显。但需要更精心设计、样本量更大的临床试验才能得出明确的结论.
    Background and aim Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is considered a promising non-invasive treatment option for osteoarthritis (OA). The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LLLT on patients with OA of the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC1) of the thumb. Methods An open-level, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, for one year. Initially, 120 patients were approached for the study. Among them, 112 eligible patients were randomly divided into two groups: the intervention group received LLLT in addition to conservative treatment, while the control group received conservative treatment alone for four weeks. Pain and functional capability (motor) improvement were assessed on a weekly follow-up basis by using various parameters such as the visual analogue scale (VAS), Ritchie articular index (tenderness scale), grip strength, key pinch strength, Dreiser functional index, and CMC1 palmer abduction. Eventually, 90 patients completed the follow-ups and were included in the analysis. Results The majority of patients diagnosed with CMC1 joint OA were in their fifties. At baseline, patients of both intervention and control groups were indifferent in terms of demography, pain intensity, motor responses, and duration of suffering. After four weeks of treatment, results indicated an overall improvement in both groups. However, the reduction of pain and increase in functional capability were not found statistically significant (p-value: ≥0.5). Conclusion LLLT with conventional treatment was not found significantly more effective enough than conventional treatment alone, but more well-designed clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病是21世纪增长最快的健康挑战之一,具有多因素影响,包括高发病率和死亡率以及增加的医疗保健成本。它与肌肉骨骼并发症有关,肩周炎常被报道。虽然低水平激光治疗(LLLT)和肌肉能量技术(MET)通常用于治疗这种情况,对于最有效的方法仍然缺乏共识,关于它们的比较功效的研究有限。
    目的:评估LLLT与MET在糖尿病肩周炎患者中的比较效果。
    方法:这是一个单中心,prospective,单盲,在AhmaduBello大学教学医院进行三个平行组的随机对照试验,扎里亚,卡杜纳州,尼日利亚。将60名患有肩周炎的糖尿病患者随机分为LLLT组,MET组,或对照组,比例为1:1:1。所有组将接受每周三次的治疗,持续8周。主要结果将是肩关节功能,次要结果将包括疼痛强度,肩部ROM,白细胞介素-6(IL-6),抑郁症,焦虑,和生活质量(QoL)。所有结果将在基线时进行评估,在8周的干预后,并在3个月的随访。
    结论:这将是第一个评估LLLT与MET在冻结肩糖尿病患者的临床和心理参数方面的比较有效性的随机对照试验。这项研究的结果可能为这些干预措施的有效性提供证据,与糖尿病相关的冻结肩的最佳治疗方法,可以指导临床实践。
    背景:泛非临床试验注册(PACTR202208562111554)。2022年8月10日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is one of the fastest-growing health challenges of the twenty-first century with multifactorial impact including high rates of morbidity and mortality as well as increased healthcare costs. It is associated with musculoskeletal complications, with frozen shoulder being commonly reported. While low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and muscle energy technique (MET) are commonly used to manage  this condition, there remains a lack of agreement on the most effective approach, with limited research available on their comparative efficacy.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of LLLT versus MET among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder.
    METHODS: This is a single-centre, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with three parallel groups to be conducted at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Sixty diabetic patients with frozen shoulder will be randomly assigned into LLLT group, MET group, or control group in a 1:1:1 ratio. All the groups will receive treatment three times weekly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be shoulder function and the secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, shoulder ROM, interleukin-6 (IL-6), depression, anxiety, and quality of life (QoL). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, at post 8-week intervention, and at 3 months follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of LLLT versus MET on both clinical and psychological parameters among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder. The findings of the study may provide evidence on the efficacy of these interventions and most likely, the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes, which may guide clinical practice.
    BACKGROUND: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202208562111554). Registered on August 10, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估血管内激光照射血液(ILIB)对原始颈动脉(PCA)血流动力学变量的影响。特别是血压(BP)和心率(HR),在接受激素阻滞剂治疗的乳房切除患者中。材料和方法:本研究是一项对照研究,实验性的,和随机临床试验。将患者分为两组:实验组(G1)-使用针对PCA的660nm激光接受ILIB治疗的患者,和对照组(G2)-未接受ILIB治疗的患者。临床研究每周进行一次,测量收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),和HR。使用独立样本的Mann-WhitneyU检验,显著性水平为α=0.05。结果:PCA的全身光生物调节与SBP和DBP没有统计学上的显着差异。然而,HR,p值<0.05,表明G1和G2之间存在显著差异。初始平均值p>在G1中从142.3降至116.4mmHg,在G2中从130.4降至119.8mmHg。G1的DBP从78.8到72.8mmHg不等,G2的DBP从79.1到74.2mmHg不等。在HR方面观察到统计学上的显着差异,G1从81.3bpm降至62.06bpm,G2从74.1bpm降至75.1bpm。在应用时间上存在相当大的减少。结论:应用于PCA的ILIB治疗可降低BP,更值得注意的是,使用他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂的乳房切除妇女的HR。
    Objective: To assess the impact of intravascular laser irradiation of blood (ILIB) on the primitive carotid artery (PCA) hemodynamic variables, specifically blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), in mastectomized patients undergoing hormone blocker treatments. Materials and methods: This study is a controlled, experimental, and randomized clinical trial. Patients were allocated into two groups: the experimental group (G1)-patients who received ILIB therapy using a 660 nm laser targeted at the PCA, and the control group (G2)-patients who did not receive ILIB therapy. Clinical research was conducted weekly, with measurements of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR. The Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples was used, with a significance level of α = 0.05. Results: Systemic photobiomodulation on the PCA did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in relation to SBP and DBP. However, for HR, the p-value was <0.05, indicating a significant difference between G1 and G2. The initial mean p > decreased from 142.3 to 116.4 mmHg in G1, and from 130.4 to 119.8 mmHg in G2. The DBP varied from 78.8 to 72.8 mmHg in G1, and from 79.1 to 74.2 mmHg in G2. A statistically significant difference was observed in HR, decreasing from 81.3 to 62.06 bpm in G1, and changing minimally from 74.1 to 75.1 bpm in G2. A considerable reduction was present in the timing of application. Conclusions: ILIB therapy applied to the PCA induces a reduction in BP and, more notably, HR in mastectomized women using the tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究旨在比较和评估单独使用生物牙本质(BD)的效果,BD连同冻干冻干富血小板浓缩液(LPC+BD),在患有不可逆牙髓炎的成熟恒磨牙中,进行牙髓切除术后的BD和低水平激光治疗(BDLLLT)。
    这项研究是随机设计的,务实,平行,在印度临床试验注册中心注册的双盲临床试验(CTRI/2020/02/023245)。在进行牙髓切除术后,将符合纳入和排除标准的具有不可逆牙髓炎症状的120颗永久性磨牙随机分为三个牙髓覆盖组:第1组,BD;第2组,冻干的冻干富血小板浓缩物BD(LPCBD);第3组,低水平激光治疗BD第3组,LLLTBD。使用单向方差分析进行组间比较,然后进行Bonferroni检验。显著性水平和置信区间分别为5%和95%,分别。观察者间的可靠性使用科恩的卡帕分析进行测量。
    在1周,三组间的平均术后疼痛水平有显著差异(P<0.005),其中第1组(BD)术后疼痛最高,其次是第2组(LPC+BD),第3组(LLLT+BD)术后疼痛最低.在第1组(BD)和第3组(LLLT+BD)中观察到关于最大频率的镇痛剂摄取的类似模式。各组间成功率无显著差异。
    牙髓切除术作为下颌磨牙不可逆牙髓炎的治疗选择,具有可接受的临床成功率;然而,长期总体成功率仍然值得怀疑。将辅助模式与BD结合的结果是显着的,并显示出持续开发和研究的巨大潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to compare and evaluate the effect of biodentine (BD) alone, BD along with Lyophilised freeze dried platelet rich concentrate (LPC + BD), and BD along with low-level laser therapy (BD + LLLT) after pulpotomy in mature permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was designed as a randomized, pragmatic, parallel, double-blinded clinical trial registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI/2020/02/023245). 120 permanent molars fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis were randomized after performing pulpotomy into three pulp capping groups: Group 1, BD; Group 2, lyophilized freeze-dried platelet-rich concentrate + BD (LPC + BD); and Group 3, Low level laser therapy + BD Group 3, LLLT + BD. The intergroup comparison was done using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni test. The level of significance and confidence interval were 5% and 95%, respectively. Interobserver reliability was measured using Cohen\'s kappa analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: At 1 week, there was a significant difference (P < 0.005) observed in the mean postoperative pain levels between the three groups with Group 1 (BD) exhibiting the highest postoperative pain followed by Group 2 (LPC + BD) and least pain was exhibited by Group 3 (LLLT + BD). A similar pattern was observed regarding the analgesic intake with maximum frequency in Group 1 (BD) and least with Group 3 (LLLT + BD). No significant difference in success rates was reported among the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulpotomy as a treatment option for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis has an acceptable clinical success rate; however, long-term overall success rate remains questionable. The outcomes of incorporating adjunctive modalities with BD are remarkable and show tremendous potential for continued development and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:探讨光生物调节对无症状成人股四头肌力量和耐力扭矩的影响。
    方法:28名无症状成年人被随机分为两种干预措施之一:光生物调节(n=14)或假(n=14)。股四头肌强度通过最大自愿性等距收缩测试(60°)进行评估,耐力通过使用牵引测力计进行多套膝盖伸展/屈曲重复的弹性阻力进行评估。在三个时间点测量结果:基线前;基线和最终评估。光生物调节应用于每个参与者的优势下肢的股四头肌和肱三头肌。使用具有1个红外激光二极管和3个170mW的led琥珀色的集群,连续四天使用240s。假小组也经历了同样的程序,但是设备关闭了,患者和评估人员对干预措施不知情.从基线前和基线时间点获得测量的可靠性和最小可检测变化。通过协方差分析检验干预措施之间的差异。
    结论:与假手术相比,光生物调节在最大等距扭矩(平均差异(95%CI)=0.008(-0.29至0.31)和耐力扭矩(平均差异(95%CI)=0.04(-0.03至0.12)方面没有差异。平均差低于最大等距扭矩(1.02Nm。kg-1)和耐久扭矩(0.49Nm。kg-1)。
    结论:光生物调节不能改善无症状成人股四头肌力量和耐力的结果。
    To explore the effect of photobiomodulation on quadriceps strength and endurance torques in asymptomatic adults.
    Twenty-eight asymptomatic adults were randomized to one of two interventions: photobiomodulation (n = 14) or sham (n = 14). Quadriceps strength was evaluated by maximum voluntary isometric contraction test (60°) and endurance by an elastic resistance in multiple-set knee extension/flexion repetitions using a traction dynamometer. The outcomes were measured at three time points: pre-baseline; baseline and; final assessment. The photobiomodulation was applied to the quadriceps and triceps surae muscles of each participant\'s dominant lower limb, using a cluster with 1 infrared laser diode and 3 led amber of 170 mW for 240 s over four consecutive days. The sham group went through the same procedures, but the equipment was off, and patients and assessors were blinded to the intervention. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the measures were obtained from the pre-baseline and baseline time points. Differences between interventions were tested by an analysis of covariance.
    There was no difference between photobiomodulation compared to sham in maximum isometric torque (mean difference (95% CI) = 0.008 (-0.29 to 0.31) and endurance torques (mean difference (95% CI) = 0.04 (-0.03 to 0.12). The mean difference was lower than the minimal detectable change for the maximum isometric torque (1.02 Nm.kg-1) and endurance torque (0.49 Nm.kg-1).
    Photobiomodulation does not improve quadriceps strength and endurance outcomes in asymptomatic adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间充质干细胞(MSC)注射已成为膝骨关节炎(OA)的一种新型治疗方法。此外,据报道,低水平激光治疗(LLLT)可延缓OA的进展.因此,目前对OA动物模型的研究调查了这些方法在独立给药和联合给药时的有效性。
    方法:将25个OA豚鼠模型随机分为5个研究组。试验组接受关节内MSC,LLLT,和这些疗法的组合8周。治疗完成后,对测试组和对照组进行放射学和组织病理学评估。
    结果:与对照组相比,MSC治疗组在所有放射学和组织学指标方面显示出更好的结果,软骨下骨除外(P<0.05)。同样,但在不同程度上,LLLT治疗组的结果优于对照组(P<0.05)。MSC治疗和LLLT的组合改善了软骨,表面,矩阵,空间宽度,骨赘,和放射学OA评分比单独使用这些方法更有效(P<0.05)。
    结论:根据我们的结果,关节内MSC和LLLT联合应用可有效改善动物模型的OA。建议进一步的临床前和临床研究来评估这些治疗剂单独和组合的有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection has emerged as a novel treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been reported to delay the progression of OA. Thus, the current study on animal models of OA investigated the effectiveness of these methods when administered independently and combined.
    METHODS: Twenty-five guinea pig models of OA were randomly sorted into five study groups. The test groups received intra-articular MSC, LLLT, and a combination of these therapeutics for 8 weeks. Radiological and histopathologic evaluations were carried out for the test groups and the control after the completion of treatments.
    RESULTS: The MSC-treated groups showed better outcomes in terms of all radiological and histological indexes compared with the control, apart from subchondral bone (P < 0.05). Similarly, but to a different extent, the LLLT-treated group showed better results than the controls (P < 0.05). The combination of MSC therapy and LLLT improved the cartilage, surface, matrix, space width, osteophytes, and radiologic OA scores more effectively than each of these methods alone (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the combination of intra-articular MSC and LLLT can effectively improve OA in animal models. Further preclinical and clinical studies are recommended to assess the effectiveness of these therapeutics alone and in combination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号