背景:近年来,学者们越来越认识到让卫生服务用户和社区利益相关者作为卫生研究的积极伙伴的重要性。然而,老年人的参与,最大的卫生服务用户群体,由于研究伙伴仍然有限,可能是由于年龄歧视的态度贬低了老年人的贡献。在我们觉醒加拿大人对老龄问题研究的三年中,我们召集了一个由老年人和老年学专家组成的咨询小组,讨论与年龄歧视有关的问题,帮助解释研究结果,并制定一系列知识动员策略来消除年龄歧视。
方法:为了了解咨询小组成员的经验,并征求改进未来小组的建议,我们进行了一项定性描述性研究,并采访了8名老年人和6名老年学专家.对数据进行了内容分析。
结果:为解释参与者的经验和对未来咨询小组的建议而开发的四个类别包括:组织和管理,团体经验,为未来的咨询小组和前进提出建议。一个关键的发现是,老年人和老年学专家将有关年龄歧视的普遍性以及他们希望在其个人团体和专业网络中继续进行这些类型的对话的对话归因于价值。为未来的咨询小组确定了许多有用的战略,例如加强社会多样性,在种族/族裔/文化代表性和性别方面。老年人希望在会议中更多地“了解你的时间”,老年学专家希望了解更多关于研究过程及其作用的细节。
结论:这项研究的伙伴关系方法可以指导研究人员寻求让主要的卫生服务使用者和社区利益相关者参与卫生研究,并帮助制定积极的社会变革。
在2022年,我们成立了一个由老年人和老年学专家组成的咨询小组,以审查我们研究的第一阶段的发现,《觉醒加拿大人向老龄问题》,并就知识动员和下一步行动提供指导。我们采访了我们咨询小组的12名老年人和6名老年学专家,以了解他们在该小组的经验,并为未来的小组提供建议。参与者提供了关于团体组织的反馈,管理和流程,除了他们的经验和未来咨询小组的战略。两个团体都建议加强团体的社会多样性,在种族/族裔/文化代表性和性别方面。老年人希望有更多的会议时间来了解其他小组成员,老年学专家希望了解有关研究过程及其作用的更多详细信息。
BACKGROUND: In recent years, academics have increasingly acknowledged the importance of involving health service users and community stakeholders as active partners in health research. Yet, the involvement of older adults, the largest group of health service users, as research partners remains limited, possibly due to ageist attitudes that devalue older adults\' contributions. During the three years of our Awakening Canadians to Ageism
study, we convened an advisory group consisting of older adults and gerontological experts to discuss issues related to ageism, help interpret the
study findings, and develop a range of knowledge mobilization strategies to dispel ageism.
METHODS: To understand the experiences of members of the advisory group and solicit recommendations for improving future groups, we conducted a qualitative descriptive
study and interviewed 8 older adults and 6 gerontological experts. Data were content analyzed.
RESULTS: Four categories that were developed to explain participants\' experiences and suggestions for future advisory groups included: organization and management, group experience, suggestions for future advisory groups and moving forward. A key finding was the value that the older adults and gerontological experts ascribed to conversations about the prevalence of ageism and their desire to continue these types of conversations in their personal groups and professional networks. Numerous helpful strategies for future advisory groups were identified, such as enhancing social diversity, both in terms of racial/ethnic/cultural representation and gender. Older adults wanted more \"getting to know you time\" in meetings and gerontological experts wanted more details about the research process and their role.
CONCLUSIONS: This
study\'s partnership approach can guide researchers seeking to involve key health service users and community stakeholders in health research and help enact positive social change.
In 2022 we developed an advisory group consisting of older adults and gerontological experts to review the findings of the first stage of our
study Awakening Canadians to Ageism and provide guidance on knowledge mobilization and next steps. We interviewed 12 older adults and 6 gerontological experts from our advisory group to learn about their experiences with the group and provide suggestions for future groups. Participants provided feedback on group organization, management and processes, in addition to their experiences and strategies for future advisory groups. Both groups suggested enhancing the social diversity of the group, both in terms of racial/ethnic/cultural representation and gender. Older adults wanted more meeting time dedicated to getting to know the other groups members and gerontological experts wanted more details about the research process and their role.