Family carers

家庭照顾者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者可能会受益于非药物干预措施,包括身心(MB-)实践,它可以通过诱导放松来改善身心健康。本系统审查概述了MB做法的可用性和效果。
    背景:作者在PubMed中进行了系统的搜索,Embase,Emcare,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,PsycINFO,中国国家知识基础设施和学术搜索总理,2024年2月1日。关于痴呆症患者和/或其家庭护理人员的MB实践的研究论文,中文,日本人,德语,如果有全文,则包括法文和荷兰文。选择包含的文章,数据提取和方法学质量评估由两名研究人员进行.
    结论:在纳入的130项研究中,100(77%)是高质量的。中医(TCM)和对痴呆症患者的触摸干预,家庭照顾者的冥想分别改善了认知和神经精神症状,和心理健康。缺乏其他甲基溴做法的证据与少量研究有关,分散使用结果测量和混合结果。
    结论:MB实践显示出可喜的结果。我们建议对痴呆症患者实施和进一步研究TCM和触摸干预措施,并对家庭护理人员进行冥想。我们建议对一组的有希望的结果进行交叉研究,以在另一组中进行研究。
    BACKGROUND: People with dementia and their family carers may benefit from non-pharmacological interventions, including mind-body (MB-) practices, which can improve physical and mental health by inducing relaxation. This systematic review provides an overview of availability and effects of MB-practices.
    BACKGROUND: The authors performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Academic Search Premier on February 1, 2024. Research papers on MB-practices for people with dementia and/or their family carers in English, Chinese, Japanese, German, French and Dutch were included if a full text was available. Selection of included articles, data extraction and methodological quality assessments were conducted by two researchers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Of the 130 included studies, 100 (77 %) were of high quality. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and touch interventions for people with dementia, and meditations for family carers resulted in improvements in respectively cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and mental health. Lack of evidence for other MB-practices is related to small numbers of studies, fragmented use of outcome measures and mixed findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: MB-practices showed promising results. We recommend implementation and further research of TCM- and touch interventions for people with dementia as well as meditations for family carers. We suggest a cross-over of the promising results of one group to be studied in the other group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统的文献综述研究了有关在线计划对智障人士的家庭照顾者的心理健康和福祉的有效性的证据。数据库(ERIC,Medline,搜索PsycINFO和CINAHL)的干预研究,这些研究考虑了针对智障人士的家庭护理人员的在线干预措施。使用标准化数据提取工具提取数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具对随机试验(RoB2)进行偏倚评估。筛选,偏见的提取和评估由研究小组的两名成员独立完成.鉴于纳入研究的数量较少,并且其中评估的结果不同,不可能进行荟萃分析;因此,数据以叙述方式呈现。两项研究符合纳入审查的标准。两项研究均采用可行性随机对照试验方法。一项研究发现父母的压力显着下降,而另一个发现心理健康显着增加。在得出坚定的结论时必须谨慎,鉴于两项研究的样本量小,保留率低。在线计划似乎为智障人士的家庭照顾者提供了潜在的好处。然而,需要进一步调查以检查这些计划,采取与家庭照顾者合作的方式。
    This systematic literature review examines the evidence base on the effectiveness of online programmes on the mental health and well-being of family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Databases (ERIC, Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched for intervention studies that considered online interventions for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Data were extracted using standardised data extraction tools. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Screening, extraction and assessment of bias were completed independently by two members of the research team. Given the low number of included studies and different outcomes assessed within them, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis; therefore, data are presented narratively. Two studies met the criteria to be included in the review. Both studies utilised a feasibility randomised controlled trial methodology. One study found a significant decrease in parental stress, while the other found a significant increase in psychological well-being. Caution must be taken in drawing firm conclusions, given the small sample sizes and low retention rates in both studies. Online programmes seem to offer potential benefits to family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. However, further investigation is needed to examine these programmes, adopting a collaborative approach with family carers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人护理是全球政策议程上的重中之重。老年人及其非正式照顾者积极参与决策,可导致具有成本效益的健康和长期护理干预措施。然而,他们参与卫生政策制定的方法尚未得到广泛探索。这篇综述绘制了有关老年人(65岁以上)和非正式护理人员参与卫生政策制定的策略的文献。
    方法:作为欧盟TRANS-SENIOR计划的一部分,使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法进行了范围审查。搜索了已出版和灰色文献,筛选合格的研究。从纳入的研究中提取数据,并使用患者和家庭参与健康和医疗保健的多维框架进行分析。
    结果:从11份符合入选标准的出版物中确定了总共13种参与策略。他们被归类为“传统”,“审议”和“其他”,采用世界银行对参与方式的分类。经常与老年人和非正式护理人员协商,以征求意见并确定优先事项。然而,他们参与政策制定,从现有文献中不清楚实施和评估。调查结果表明,老年人及其非正式照顾者在决策中往往没有平等的影响力和共同的领导能力。
    结论:尽管从文献中综合了涉及老年人及其非正式照顾者的方法,我们几乎没有发现有关他们参与政策制定的信息,实施和评估。研究结果将指导未来的研究,以解决已发现的差距,并指导决策者确定和纳入参与战略,以支持循证决策过程,以改善老年人/非正式护理人员的健康结果。
    BACKGROUND: Care for older adults is high on the global policy agenda. Active involvement of older adults and their informal caregivers in policy-making can lead to cost-effective health and long-term care interventions. Yet, approaches for their involvement in health policy development have yet to be extensively explored. This review maps the literature on strategies for older adults (65+ years) and informal caregivers\' involvement in health policy development.
    METHODS: As part of the European Union TRANS-SENIOR program, a scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s methodology. Published and grey literature was searched, and eligible studies were screened. Data were extracted from included studies and analysed using the Multidimensional Framework for Patient and Family Engagement in Health and Healthcare.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 engagement strategies were identified from 11 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. They were categorized as \"traditional\", \"deliberative\" and \"others\", adopting the World Bank\'s categorization of engagement methods. Older adults and informal caregivers are often consulted to elicit opinions and identify priorities. However, their involvement in policy formulation, implementation and evaluation is unclear from the available literature. Findings indicate that older adults and their informal caregivers do not often have equal influence and shared leadership in policy-making.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although approaches for involving older adults and their informal caregivers\' involvement were synthesized from literature, we found next to no information about their involvement in policy formulation, implementation and evaluation. Findings will guide future research in addressing identified gaps and guide policy-makers in identifying and incorporating engagement strategies to support evidence-informed policy-making processes that can improve health outcomes for older adults/informal caregivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查探讨了移民非正式照顾者在东道国从事专业服务的经验和看法。
    背景:非正式护理人员的数量正在增加,更多的人提供家庭护理。护士和其他保健服务对于支持非正式护理人员至关重要。研究需要更多地关注移民,不仅仅是其他看护人。
    方法:这是一个范围审查。
    方法:搜索了五个数据库(2017年1月至2022年12月),这次调查包括了16篇文章。
    方法:此范围审查使用了JoannaBriggsInstitute范围审查方法。这项调查提出了一个问题:在从事主流专业服务时,关于移民非正式护理人员的经验和看法的当前知识是什么?使用主题分析方法确定了主题。
    结果:评论中出现了三个主题:\'寻找文化桥梁:在文化上与服务联系\';\'建立文化桥梁:解决\“他们和我们\”和\“文化适应敏感服务\”。
    结论:专业服务提供者目前无法满足移民照顾者的需求。新知识呈现,护士和卫生专业服务必须提供适应敏感的护理,从评估个人的文化适应状况开始。通过了解文化适应状态,护士更有可能定制以人为本的护理。文化适应状态是指个人在保留一些传统文化信仰和习俗的同时适应新文化的程度。对文化适应敏感的护理更有可能提供真正的整体护理,从而优化幸福感。
    OBJECTIVE: The inquiry explored immigrant informal caregivers\' experiences and perceptions about engaging with professional services in the host country.
    BACKGROUND: The number of informal caregivers is rising, with more people providing home caring. Nurses and other health services are crucial in supporting informal caregivers. Research needs to focus more on immigrants, not just other caregivers.
    METHODS: This was a scoping review.
    METHODS: Five databases (January 2017-December 2022) were searched, and 16 articles were included in this inquiry.
    METHODS: This scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology. This inquiry asked one question: What is the current knowledge about immigrant informal caregivers\' experiences and perceptions when engaging mainstream professional services? Themes were identified using a thematic analysis approach.
    RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the review: \'finding cultural bridges: culturally connecting with services\'; \'building cultural bridges: addressing \"them and us\" and \"acculturation-sensitive services\"\'.
    CONCLUSIONS: Professional service providers are currently not meeting immigrant caregivers\' needs. New knowledge is presented, that nurses and health professional services must provide acculturation-sensitive care, commencing with an assessment of the individual\'s acculturation status. By understanding acculturation status, nurses are more likely to customize person-centred care. Acculturation status refers to the degree that the individual has adapted to the new culture while retaining some traditional cultural beliefs and practices. Acculturation-sensitive care is more likely to provide authentic holistic care that optimizes well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:个性化的目标设定结果测量可以反映痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者在疾病高度异质性症状学中关于生活质量领域的不同优先事项。评估目标设定措施具有挑战性,他们的心理测量特性的证据有限。
    目的:(1)描述在该人群中使用了哪些目标设定结果;(2)评估其有效性,可靠性,在随机对照试验中的可行性。
    方法:我们系统地回顾了针对痴呆症患者或其家庭照顾者使用目标设定结果指标的研究。我们根据COSMIN指南调整了偏差风险和质量评级系统,以评估在RCT中使用时的结果测量属性。
    结果:满足纳入标准的30项研究使用了四种不同的目标设定结果衡量标准:目标达成规模(GAS),班戈目标设定面试(BGSI),加拿大职业绩效评估(COPM)和个人优先问题评估(IPPA);其他论文报告了针对研究的目标设定实现系统。在超过9个月(长达一年)的时间内,只有GAS被用作结果。在随机对照试验中,有中等质量的证据证明GAS有足够的内容效度和结构效度,COPM和BGSI。仅在一个RCT中评估了可靠性(使用BGSI);其中两名评估者审查了访谈记录,以评估者之间的可靠性为目标进行评估。据报告,所有措施的可行性都很好,缺失数据水平较低。
    结论:我们发现了中等质量的证据,证明了GAS的内容和结构的有效性和可行性,BGSI和COPM。虽然需要更多证据证明这些措施的可靠性,我们建议未来的试验考虑使用个性化的目标设定措施,报告干预措施对对痴呆症患者及其家人最有意义的结局的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Individualised goal-setting outcome measures can be a useful way of reflecting people living with dementia and family carers\' differing priorities regarding quality-of-life domains in the highly heterogeneous symptomatology of the disease. Evaluating goal-setting measures is challenging, and there is limited evidence for their psychometric properties.
    OBJECTIVE: (1) To describe what goal-setting outcomes have been used in this population; (2) To evaluate their validity, reliability, and feasibility in RCTs.
    METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that utilised goal-setting outcome measures for people living dementia or their family carers. We adapted a risk of bias and quality rating system based on the COSMIN guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties of outcomes when used within RCTs.
    RESULTS: Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria used four different goal-setting outcome measures: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Individually Prioritized Problems Assessment (IPPA); other papers have reported study-specific goal-setting attainment systems. Only GAS has been used as an outcome over periods greater than 9 months (up to a year). Within RCTs there was moderate quality evidence for sufficient content validity and construct validity for GAS, COPM and the BGSI. Reliability was only assessed in one RCT (using BGSI); in which two raters reviewed interview transcripts to rate goals with excellent inter-rater reliability. Feasibility was reported as good across the measures with a low level of missing data.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate quality evidence for good content and construct validity and feasibility of GAS, BGSI and COPM. While more evidence of reliability of these measures is needed, we recommend that future trials consider using individualised goal setting measures, to report the effect of interventions on outcomes that are most meaningful to people living with dementia and their families.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    收容所被视为终末期护理的黄金标准提供者。临终关怀一词,然而,被广泛使用,并且可以描述各种医疗保健服务(例如疗养院)提供的一种类型的护理。因此,家庭在服务之间做出决定变得很复杂。我们的目的是审查有关痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员访问临终关怀医院以进行临终关怀的经验的证据。
    我们在PROSPERO上注册了审查协议。我们使用PerSPE(C)TiF系统地组织我们的搜索策略。证据在六个数据库中进行了审查:PubMed,EMBASE,PsycINFO,ASSIA,ISIWeb,和CINAHL。我们根据eMERGe指南使用了元人种学来进行数据解释。
    纳入四项研究。通过元人种学生成了两个三阶结构:对护理的期望和护理质量的障碍。我们发现护理人员对护理有期望,这些可能会随着时间的推移而改变。如果早期没有与临终关怀人员进行讨论,由于无与伦比的期望,护理人员可能会经历护理质量下降。无与伦比的期望成为护理的障碍,这些障碍是由于护理人员没有得到充分的支持,和/或让该人从临终关怀医院出院,这将增加护理人员的护理责任。
    鉴于随着时间的推移,新的痴呆症病例增加,并且临终关怀服务面临压力,将姑息治疗服务纳入基于社区的护理模式是降低痴呆症患者服务不足和资源不足的风险的关键。
    Hospices are regarded as gold standard providers of end-of-life care. The term hospice, however, is broadly used, and can describe a type of care offered in a variety of health care services (e.g. nursing homes). It thus becomes complex for families to decide between services. We aimed to review the evidence around the experience of family carers of people with dementia accessing in-patient hospice settings for end-of-life care.
    We registered the review protocol on PROSPERO. We used PerSPE(C)TiF to systematically organise our search strategy. The evidence was reviewed across six databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ISI Web, and CINAHL. We used meta-ethnography as per the eMERGe guidance for data interpretation.
    Four studies were included. Two third-order constructs were generated through meta-ethnography: expectations of care and barriers to quality of care. We found that carers had expectations of care, and these could change over time. If discussion was not held with hospice staff early on, the carers could experience reduced care quality due to unmatched expectations. Unmatched expectations acted as barriers to care and these were found in terms of carers not feeling adequately supported, and/or having the person discharged from hospice, which would entail increased care responsibility for carers.
    In view of an increase in new dementia cases over time and with hospice services being under pressure, integrating palliative care services within community-based models of care is key to reducing the risk of having inadequate and under resourced services for people with dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多晚期癌症患者认为家是他们首选的死亡地点。实现家庭死亡的一个关键组成部分是家庭成员的支持,他们经常承担他们觉得准备不足的责任,随后对他们的健康和福祉产生影响。
    目的:本研究旨在回顾现有的关于家庭护理者为晚期癌症患者提供居家临终关怀的经验的定性文献。重点是探索影响他们为自己的角色做好准备的因素。
    方法:选择叙述性综述来提供定性发现的概述和分析。MEDLINE,PubMed,心理信息,和EMBASE数据库使用以下搜索词进行搜索:“癌症,\"\"照顾者,\"\"生命结束护理,\"\"家,“和”定性。“纳入标准如下:英语,实证研究,成人看护者,以及2011年至2021年之间发表的文章。数据被抽象,和研究质量评估使用关键评估技能计划清单进行定性研究。
    结果:共纳入14篇相关文章。确定了三个总体主题,这些主题反映了影响家庭对其角色的准备程度的因素:“提供护理的动机,与医疗保健专业人员的互动,“和”在关怀过程中的变化。
    结论:家庭护理人员在为晚期癌症患者提供居家临终关怀方面的作用是显而易见的。卫生保健工作者需要更有效地查明家庭的信息和支助需求,并利用已经出现的基于证据的策略来满足这些需求。
    BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced cancer identify home as being their preferred place of death. A critical component in achieving a home death is the support of family members, who often take on responsibilities for which they feel insufficiently prepared with subsequent impacts upon their health and well-being.
    OBJECTIVE: This study sought to review existing qualitative literature on family carers\' experiences in providing end-of-life care at home for patients with advanced cancer, with an emphasis on exploring factors that influence how prepared they feel for their role.
    METHODS: A narrative review was chosen to provide an overview and analysis of qualitative findings. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychINFO, and EMBASE databases were searched with the following search terms: \"Cancer,\" \"Caregiver,\" \"End of Life Care,\" \"Home,\" and \"Qualitative.\" Inclusion criteria were as follows: English language, empirical studies, adult carers, and articles published between 2011 and 2021. Data were abstracted, and study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research.
    RESULTS: Fourteen relevant articles were included. Three overarching themes reflecting the factors influencing family preparedness for their role were identified: \"motivations for providing care,\" \"interactions with health-care professionals,\" and \"changes during the caring process.\"
    CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate preparation of family carers is apparent with regard to their role in providing end-of-life care at home for patients with advanced cancer. There is a need for health-care workers to more effectively identify the information and support needs of families, and utilize evidence-based strategies that have emerged to address these needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    为痴呆症患者提供帮助的非正式护理人员的日常生活在一天和一周中变化很大。作为一个答案,越来越多的研究人员使用密集的纵向方法(ILM),如日记研究,经验抽样方法,或生态瞬时评估。
    本范围审查旨在综合非正式痴呆症护理人员中ILM的使用,以阐明目前正在做什么以及如何做,以及尚未解决的问题。
    筛选过程从22个不同的数据集中确定了48项研究。这些研究的综合显示了非正式护理中ILM的设备和用途的多样性,包括探索变量之间的关联或伴随干预。ILM显示了护理现象的重要变异性,以及瞬时压力和幸福感的重要关联。尽管如此,还是发现了差距,例如工具构造的透明度或缺乏对情绪和二元组合的关注。
    目前,这一研究领域仍处于起步阶段,似乎没有像其他领域那样充分发挥其潜力。然而,看来,ILM是非正式痴呆症护理人员的有希望的工具,因为它们有助于理解他们日常生活的复杂性,不断变化的资源和挑战。未来的方向包括更多地关注(情绪)调节,时间滞后,以及ILM在介入设计中的使用。
    本审查在OSF(osf.io/b2qr4)上注册。
    The daily life of informal caregivers assisting individuals with dementia widely varies throughout the day and week. As an answer, an increasing number of researchers have used intensive longitudinal methods (ILMs) such as diary studies, experience sampling methods, or ecological momentary assessment.
    The present scoping review aims at synthesizing the use of ILMs in informal dementia caregivers to clarify what is currently done and how, as well as what remains unaddressed.
    The screening process identified 48 studies from 22 different datasets. Synthesis of these studies showed the diversity of devices and uses of ILMs in informal care, including the exploration of associations between variables or accompanying an intervention. ILMs showed the important variability of caregiving phenomena, as well as the important association of momentary stress and well-being. Gaps were nevertheless identified, such as transparency in the construction of the tool or the absence of focus on emotions and dyads.
    For now, this field of research remains in its infancy and does not seem to have reached its full potential as it has in other fields. Nevertheless, it appears that ILMs are promising tools for informal dementia caregivers as they contribute to understanding the complexity of their daily life, with changing resources and challenges. Future directions include focusing more on (emotion) regulation, temporal lags, and the use of ILMs in interventional designs.
    The present review was registered on OSF (osf.io/b2qr4).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年家庭成员过渡到老年护理机构(RACF)通常对被录取的人和他们的家庭照顾者都具有挑战性。这项审查旨在确定在决定将家庭成员转移到RACF后,家庭护理人员对不良心理健康结果的保护和影响因素。
    搜索CINAHL,PubMed和PsycINFO在2004年至2019年之间以英语发表的实证论文进行了研究,探讨了最近入院的家庭照顾者的心理健康或生活质量(QoL)。或者考虑录取,到RACF。两位作者对文章进行了审查。
    23项研究符合纳入标准。先前存在的抑郁症状和不良的主观健康状况与入院后不良的心理健康结果有关。来自设施的信息,支持改变角色,以及与照顾者的健康和人口统计学相关的因素,与护理人员在其亲属向RACF过渡期间的心理健康结果变化有关。照顾者的精神健康结果的关键保护因素在他们的相对过渡后的RACF是流动和透明度的照顾者和设施工作人员之间的信息,和工作人员努力让护理人员为他们的亲戚提供情感支持,在监测护理中,并倡导他们的生活质量。
    有证据表明,护理人员和设施工作人员之间缺乏信息的流动和透明度等因素可能会使护理人员在亲戚过渡到RACF后容易导致心理健康和QoL不良。照顾者入院后心理健康的关键保护因素是工作人员努力让照顾者为其亲属提供情感支持,在监测护理中,并倡导他们的生活质量。这项审查还表明,在整个过渡时期,使家庭照顾者更容易面临心理健康不良和生活质量低下的风险。政策和做法应遵循建议,这些建议在满足老年人进入RACF之前和之后家庭照顾者的需求时考虑上述因素的组合。
    The transition of an older family member into a residential aged care facility (RACF) is often challenging for both the person being admitted and their family carer. This review aimed to identify the protective and contributing factors to adverse mental health outcomes among family carers following the decision to move a family member to a RACF.
    A search of CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO was conducted for empirical papers published in English between 2004 and 2019, exploring the mental health or quality of life (QoL) of family carers of those recently admitted, or considering admission, to a RACF. Articles were reviewed by two authors for inclusion.
    Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Pre-existing depressive symptoms and poor subjective health were related to adverse mental health outcomes following admission. Information from the facility, support to change roles, and factors related to carer\'s health and demographics, were associated with changes in the mental health outcomes of carers during the transition of their relative to a RACF. Key protective factors of carer\'s mental health outcomes following the transition of their relative to a RACF are flow and transparency of information between carer and the facility staff, and staff efforts to involve carers in providing emotional support to their relative, in monitoring care, and advocating for their quality of life.
    There is evidence to suggest factors such lack of flow and transparency of information between carer and the facility staff may predispose carers to poor mental health and QoL following the transition of a relative to a RACF. Key protective factors of carer\'s mental health following admission are staff efforts to involve carers in providing emotional support to their relative, in monitoring care, and advocating for their quality of life. This review also indicates that the combination of factors that puts family carers more at risk of poor mental health and lower quality of life throughout the transition period. Policy and practice should follow recommendations that consider a combination of the above factors when addressing the needs of family carers before and after admission of an older person to RACF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:成人心理健康住院患者的无偿照顾者往往缺乏对他们的健康的支持,并感到被排除在病人护理的决定之外。
    UNASSIGNED:本范围审查旨在:综合同行评审的文献,评估对成人心理健康住院患者的无偿护理者进行简短干预的结果,确定可转移的经验教训,以证明知情的做法,并确定未来的研究重点。
    UNASSIGNED:遵循PRISMA范围审查指南,使用预定义的搜索词搜索12个数据库。两名评审员独立筛选论文并应用排除/纳入标准。如果评估干预措施的影响或结果,则纳入研究。两名评审员提取数据并评估研究质量。对数据进行了综合,以对干预措施的类型及其结果的证据进行分类。
    未经批准:16篇论文符合入选标准,并确定了五种干预措施:旨在(1)增加护理人员对住院护理的参与;(2)促进组织变革以增加护理人员的支持和参与;(3)为护理人员提供支持;(4)提供心理教育并提供支持;(5)减轻护理人员压力并提高应对技能。
    未经评估:虽然干预效果的证据是有希望的,研究质量普遍较弱.需要更多的研究来开发一种循证方法来支持住院期间的护理人员。
    UNASSIGNED: Unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients often lack support for their well-being and feel excluded from decisions about patient care.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review aimed to: synthesise the peer-reviewed literature evaluating the outcomes of brief interventions for unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients, identify transferable lessons for evidenced-informed practice, and establish future research priorities.
    UNASSIGNED: PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed to search 12 databases using predefined search terms. Two reviewers independently screened papers and applied exclusion/inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact or outcomes of interventions. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were synthesised to categorise types of interventions and evidence for their outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: 16 papers met the inclusion criteria, and five types of interventions were identified: those that aimed to (1) increase carer involvement in inpatient care; (2) facilitate organisational change to increase carer support and involvement; (3) provide carers with support; (4) deliver psychoeducation and offer support; and (5) reduce carer stress and improve coping skills.
    UNASSIGNED: Whilst evidence of intervention effectiveness was promising, the quality of studies was generally weak. More research is needed to develop an evidence-informed approach to supporting carers during inpatient stays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号