Evoked Potentials, Auditory

诱发电位,听觉
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着皮层诱发电位技术的日趋成熟,越来越多的研究通过失匹配反应来客观评估婴幼儿听觉中枢系统发育情况,本文综述了失匹配反应的前注意成分正性-失匹配反应和晚期辨别负波的基本特点及其在婴幼儿中的研究进展,为婴幼儿听觉加工机制的深入研究提供思路。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:声学变化复合体(ACC)是一种皮层听觉诱发电位(CAEP),可以通过其他连续声音的变化引起。行政协调会被强调为评估声音和言语歧视能力的一个有前途的工具,特别是对于难以测试的人群,如听力损失的婴儿,由于ACC测量的客观性。的确,迫切需要进一步发展手段,准确、彻底地确定听力损失儿童的听力状况,帮助及时指导听力干预。尽管ACC方法具有潜力,ACC测量在标准临床设置中仍然相对罕见。这项研究的目的是对儿童的ACC测量进行最新的系统评价,为了在可能的方法上提供更大的清晰度和共识,应用程序,和这种技术的性能,并促进其在相关临床环境中的吸收。
    方法:在儿童(<18岁)中进行ACC测量的原始同行评审文章。数据被提取和总结为:(1)参与者特征;(2)ACC方法和听觉刺激;(3)与ACC技术性能相关的信息;(4)ACC测量结果,优势,和挑战。使用PRISMA报告指南进行系统审查,并评估纳入文章的方法学质量。
    结果:共确定了28项研究(9项婴儿研究)。审查结果表明,ACC反应可以测量婴儿(从<3个月),有证据表明年龄依赖性,包括随着儿童年龄的增加,ACC反应的稳健性增加。临床应用包括测量听力损失儿童的言语和非言语声音辨别的神经能力,听觉神经病变谱系障碍(ANSD)和中枢听觉处理障碍(CAPD)。此外,ACCs可以记录在有助听器的儿童身上,听觉脑干植入物,和人工耳蜗,和ACC结果可以指导听力干预/康复策略。审查发现,进行ACC测量所需的时间通常很长;为儿童开发更有效的ACC测试程序将是有益的。客观的ACC测量值与声音辨别的行为测量值之间的比较显示出某些显着的相关性,但不是全部,包括研究。
    结论:ACC测量区分语音和非语音的神经能力在婴儿和儿童中是可行的,并且存在广泛的可能的临床应用,虽然时间更有效的程序将有利于临床摄取。建议考虑年龄和成熟效应,需要进一步研究以调查客观ACC措施与声音和言语感知的行为措施之间的关系,以便有效地进行临床实施。
    OBJECTIVE: The acoustic change complex (ACC) is a cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and can be elicited by a change in an otherwise continuous sound. The ACC has been highlighted as a promising tool in the assessment of sound and speech discrimination capacity, and particularly for difficult-to-test populations such as infants with hearing loss, due to the objective nature of ACC measurements. Indeed, there is a pressing need to develop further means to accurately and thoroughly establish the hearing status of children with hearing loss, to help guide hearing interventions in a timely manner. Despite the potential of the ACC method, ACC measurements remain relatively rare in a standard clinical settings. The objective of this study was to perform an up-to-date systematic review on ACC measurements in children, to provide greater clarity and consensus on the possible methodologies, applications, and performance of this technique, and to facilitate its uptake in relevant clinical settings.
    METHODS: Original peer-reviewed articles conducting ACC measurements in children (< 18 years). Data were extracted and summarised for: (1) participant characteristics; (2) ACC methods and auditory stimuli; (3) information related to the performance of the ACC technique; (4) ACC measurement outcomes, advantages, and challenges. The systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines for reporting and the methodological quality of included articles was assessed.
    RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were identified (9 infant studies). Review results show that ACC responses can be measured in infants (from < 3 months), and there is evidence of age-dependency, including increased robustness of the ACC response with increasing childhood age. Clinical applications include the measurement of the neural capacity for speech and non-speech sound discrimination in children with hearing loss, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Additionally, ACCs can be recorded in children with hearing aids, auditory brainstem implants, and cochlear implants, and ACC results may guide hearing intervention/rehabilitation strategies. The review identified that the time taken to perform ACC measurements was often lengthy; the development of more efficient ACC test procedures for children would be beneficial. Comparisons between objective ACC measurements and behavioural measures of sound discrimination showed significant correlations for some, but not all, included studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: ACC measurements of the neural capacity to discriminate between speech and non-speech sounds are feasible in infants and children, and a wide range of possible clinical applications exist, although more time-efficient procedures would be advantageous for clinical uptake. A consideration of age and maturational effects is recommended, and further research is required to investigate the relationship between objective ACC measures and behavioural measures of sound and speech perception for effective clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    据推测,听神经(AN)功能会随着年龄和噪声暴露而恶化。这里,我们对已发表的研究进行了系统回顾,发现与年龄相关的AN功能缺陷的证据在文献中基本一致,但噪声暴露史的研究结果不一致。Further,来自动物研究的证据表明,在暴露于噪声的老年小鼠中发现了AN响应幅度的最大缺陷,但是尚未在人类中进行年龄和噪声暴露对AN功能的影响之间的相互作用的测试。我们报告了一项我们自己的研究,在大量人类参与者(63名18-30岁的年轻成年人,有和没有自我报告的噪声暴露史的年轻人和老年人之间,复合动作电位N1(CAPN1)的反应幅度的差异,103名50-86岁的老年人)。老年人的CAPN1反应幅度小于年轻人。噪声暴露历史似乎无法预测CAPN1响应幅度,噪声暴露史的影响与年龄也没有交互作用。然后,我们将我们的结果纳入两个已发表的关于年龄和噪声暴露历史对神经典型人类样本中AN响应幅度的影响的研究的荟萃分析。荟萃分析发现,不同研究的年龄效应是稳健的(r=-0.407),但噪声暴露效应较弱(r=-0.152)。我们得出的结论是,噪声暴露效应可能是高度可变的,具体取决于样本特征,研究设计,和统计方法,研究人员在解释结果时应该谨慎。与年龄相关和噪声引起的AN功能变化的潜在病理学在活体人类中很难确定,需要对整个生命周期中AN功能的变化进行纵向研究,并从死后收集的颞骨对AN进行组织学检查。
    Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18-30 years of age, 103 older adults 50-86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (r = -0.407), but noise exposure effects are weak (r = -0.152). We conclude that noise exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    听觉传入通路作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的临床标志物,引起了人们对研究年龄相关性听力损失(ARHL)与AD之间关系的兴趣。考虑到与AD引起的认知障碍相比,ARHL的发作更早,人们越来越重视早期诊断和干预,以延缓或防止ARHL进展为AD.在这种情况下,听觉诱发电位(AEP)由于其非侵入性和可重复的性质,已成为ARHL临床诊断和动物实验中广泛使用的客观听觉电生理技术。本文就AEPs在AD检测中的应用以及AEPs不同潜伏期对应的听觉神经系统作一综述。我们的目标是建立AEP作为一种系统的,非侵入性的辅助方法,以提高AD的诊断准确性。AEP在研究环境中早期发现和预测AD方面的成功强调了进一步临床应用和研究的需要。
    The auditory afferent pathway as a clinical marker of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) has sparked interest in investigating the relationship between age-related hearing loss (ARHL) and AD. Given the earlier onset of ARHL compared to cognitive impairment caused by AD, there is a growing emphasis on early diagnosis and intervention to postpone or prevent the progression from ARHL to AD. In this context, auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) have emerged as a widely used objective auditory electrophysiological technique for both the clinical diagnosis and animal experimentation in ARHL due to their non-invasive and repeatable nature. This review focuses on the application of AEPs in AD detection and the auditory nerve system corresponding to different latencies of AEPs. Our objective was to establish AEPs as a systematic and non-invasive adjunct method for enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of AD. The success of AEPs in the early detection and prediction of AD in research settings underscores the need for further clinical application and study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    OBJECTIVE: To verify the occurrence of abnormal auditory evoked potentials (AEP) tests in adult smokers.
    METHODS: Systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines, to answer the question: \"Are there any changes in the AEP results in adult smokers?\", PECOS strategy. Research carried out on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LIVIVO, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS and Scielo databases. Additional search of gray literature: Google Scholar and ProQuest hand searching of reference lists of the included studies.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional studies were selected, without restriction on the year of publication and language.
    METHODS: First, the titles and abstracts of all the studies were analyzed, followed by the full reading of the eligible studies.
    RESULTS: 898 articles were collected, after the duplicate studies were removed and after blind analysis by three researchers, 8 studies of the observational type were selected. Most studies have found an association between active smoking and changes in electrophysiological tests.
    CONCLUSIONS: Normal hearing adult smokers present alterations in short and long AEP. In the auditory brainstem response, the main altered components were the increase in waves latencies of I and III and in the interpeaks I - III and III - V, as well as a decrease in the amplitude of the waves. In Mismatch Negativity, there was a significant increase in wave amplitude and latency. In the long latency potential, P300, there was an increase in latencies and decreased amplitudes in the components N1 (in Fz) and P3.
    OBJECTIVE: Verificar a ocorrência de alterações nos exames de potencial evocado (PEA) auditivo em adultos fumantes normo-ouvintes.
    UNASSIGNED: Revisão sistemática da literatura de acordo com recomendações do PRISMA, buscando responder à pergunta: “Há alterações nos resultados do exame de PEA em adultos fumantes?”, estratégia PECOS. Pesquisa realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LIVIVO, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS e Scielo. Busca adicional da literatura cinzenta: Google Scholar e ProQuest e busca manual das referências dos estudos incluídos.
    UNASSIGNED: Foram selecionados estudos com delineamento transversal, sem restrição do ano de publicação e idioma.
    UNASSIGNED: Primeiramente foram analisados os títulos e resumos de todos os estudos encontrados, seguido da leitura na íntegra dos estudos elegíveis.
    RESULTS: Foram obtidos 898 artigos, que após remoção dos duplicados e análise cega por três pesquisadores, foram selecionados oito trabalhos. Grande parte dos estudos encontrou uma associação entre tabagismo ativo e alterações nos testes eletrofisiológicos.
    UNASSIGNED: Adultos fumantes normo-ouvintes apresentam alterações nos exames de PEA de curta e longa latência. No potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico, os principais componentes alterados foram o aumento das latências das ondas I e III e nos interpicos I - III e III - V, bem como diminuição da amplitude das ondas. No Mismatch Negativity, houve aumento significativo da amplitude da onda e da latência. No potencial de longa latência, P300, houve aumento das latências e redução das amplitudes nos componentes N1 (em Fz) e P3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:(中枢)听觉处理障碍,(C)APD使用行为测试进行临床鉴定。然而,注意力和动机的变化很容易影响真正的认同。虽然听觉电生理测试,如听觉脑干反应(ABR),独立于大多数混杂的认知因素,由于研究间的异质性,点击和/或言语诱发ABR可用于识别患有(C)APDs或处于(C)APDs风险的儿童尚无共识.
    目的:本研究旨在评估使用点击和/或言语刺激引起的ABR来识别患有或处于(C)APD风险的儿童的可能性。
    方法:PubMed的在线数据库,WebofScience,Medline,Embase,对于2021年4月之前发表的所有英语和法语文章,都使用组合关键词来探索和CINAHL。还包括其他灰色文献,例如会议摘要,论文,以及ProQuest学位论文中的社论。
    结果:13篇论文符合资格标准,被纳入范围审查。14篇论文是横断面研究,2篇是介入性研究。11篇论文使用点击刺激来评估患有/处于(C)APD风险的儿童,和言语刺激在其余研究中使用。尽管结果多种多样,尤其是在点击ABR评估中,大多数研究表明,在患有/处于(C)APD风险的儿童中,点击ABR的波潜伏期增加和/或波幅降低.言语ABR评估的结果更一致,在这些儿童中观察到言语ABR的瞬时成分延长,而持续的成分几乎没有变化。
    结论:尽管点击和语音诱发的ABR均可用于评估患有(C)APD的儿童,语音诱发ABR评估结果似乎更可靠.这些发现,然而,考虑到研究之间的异质性,应谨慎解释。建议使用标准诊断和评估方案对确诊(C)APD的儿童进行精心设计的研究。
    BACKGROUND: (Central) auditory processing disorders, (C)APDs are clinically identified using behavioral tests. However, changes in attention and motivation may easily affect true identification. Although auditory electrophysiological tests, such as Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR), are independent of most confounding cognitive factors, there is no consensus that click and/or speech-evoked ABR can be used to identify children with or at-risk of (C)APDs due to heterogeneity among studies.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the possibility of using ABR evoked by click and/or speech stimuli to identify children with or at risk of (C)APDs.
    METHODS: The online databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were explored using combined keywords for all English and French articles published until April 2021. Additional gray literature was also included such as conference abstracts, dissertations, and editorials in ProQuest Dissertations.
    RESULTS: Thirteen papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the scoping review. Fourteen papers were cross-sectional and two were interventional studies. Eleven papers used click stimuli to assess children with/at risk of (C)APDs, and speech stimuli were utilized in the remaining studies. Despite the diversity of the results, especially in click ABR assessments, most studies indicated increases in the wave latencies and/or decreases in the wave amplitudes of click ABR in children with/at risk of (C)APDs. The results of speech ABR assessments were more consistent, as prolongation of the transient components of speech ABR was observed in these children, while sustained components remained almost unchanged.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although both click and speech-evoked ABRs could be used to assess children with (C)APDs, it appears that speech-evoked ABR assessments yield more reliable findings. These findings, however, should be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity among studies. Well-designed studies on children with confirmed (C)APDs using standard diagnostic and assessment protocols are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    最近的经验发现表明,改变神经同步,假设与兴奋性(E)和抑制性(I)神经元活动的不平衡有关,可能是精神分裂症患者的核心病理生理机制。通过脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)检查的听觉稳态反应(ASSR)已被提出作为评估精神分裂症中神经同步改变的潜在生物标志物。对于这篇评论,我们对1999年至2021年间发表的研究精神分裂症患者ASSR的论文进行了全面的文献检索.几乎所有的EEG-ASSR研究都报告了伽马带ASSR减少,特别是在慢性和首发精神分裂症的功率和/或相位同步的40Hz刺激。此外,类似于EEG-ASSR的发现,已经报道了精神分裂症患者对80Hz刺激(高伽马)的MEG-ASSR缺陷。此外,40HzASSR可能是精神分裂症发病的预测因子.值得注意的是,在ASSR任务期间报告了自发(或持续)宽带(30-100Hz)伽马功率的增加,这类似于在E/I失衡的动物模型中报道的自发γ活性增加。对ASSR以及诱发和自发伽马振荡的进一步研究有望阐明具有翻译意义的精神分裂症的病理生理学。
    Recent empirical findings suggest that altered neural synchronization, which is hypothesized to be associated with an imbalance of excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neuronal activities, may underlie a core pathophysiological mechanism in patients with schizophrenia. The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) examined by electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been proposed as a potential biomarker for evaluating altered neural synchronization in schizophrenia. For this review, we performed a comprehensive literature search for papers published between 1999 and 2021 examining ASSRs in patients with schizophrenia. Almost all EEG-ASSR studies reported gamma-band ASSR reductions, especially to 40-Hz stimuli both in power and/or phase synchronization in chronic and first-episode schizophrenia. In addition, similar to EEG-ASSR findings, MEG-ASSR deficits to 80-Hz stimuli (high gamma) have been reported in patients with schizophrenia. Moreover, the 40-Hz ASSR is likely to be a predictor of the onset of schizophrenia. Notably, increased spontaneous (or ongoing) broadband (30-100 Hz) gamma power has been reported during ASSR tasks, which resembles the increased spontaneous gamma activity reported in animal models of E/I imbalance. Further research on ASSRs and evoked and spontaneous gamma oscillations is expected to elucidate the pathophysiology of schizophrenia with translational implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长潜伏期听觉诱发反应(LLAER),起源于听觉皮层,通常被认为是中枢听觉系统成熟的生物标志物,因此可能有助于评估患有中枢听觉处理障碍(CAPD)的儿童。然而,在这一人群中引起的LLAER的特征尚未得到广泛描述,和临床应用仍不清楚。此范围审查的目的是调查LLAER是否可用于识别CAPD儿童。
    系统搜索策略用于确定分析LLAER的P1、N1、P2和N2波形的延迟和振幅的研究。在线数据库,包括Embase,WebofScience,MEDLINE,PubMed,ProQuest,和CINAHL,以及灰色文献,搜索了1980年1月至2021年5月之间以英语和法语发表的论文。
    17篇论文符合资格标准并被纳入研究。四篇论文有培训前和培训后的研究设计,其余研究为横断面研究.一些研究报告了CAPD儿童和听力正常的同龄人之间LLAER的显着差异,无论考虑LLAER波,结果都倾向于更长的延迟和更小的振幅。N1和/或N2结果最有可能揭示CAPD儿童与正常听力对照组之间的显着差异,并且可能被认为是CAPD的生物标志物。
    看来LLAER评估,尤其是N1和N2波,可能有助于更好地识别CAPD儿童。然而,考虑到纳入研究的方法论上的异质性,结果应谨慎解释.建议使用标准诊断和评估方案对确诊CAPD的儿童进行精心设计的研究。
    The long latency auditory evoked responses (LLAERs), originating in the auditory cortex, are often considered a biomarker for maturity in the central auditory system and may therefore be useful in the evaluation of children with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). However, the characteristics of the LLAERs elicited in this population have not been widely described, and clinical applications remain unclear. The goal of this scoping review was to investigate if LLAERs can be used to identify children with CAPD.
    A systematic search strategy was used to identify studies that analyzed the latencies and amplitudes of P1, N1, P2, and N2 waveforms of the LLAERs. The online databases, including Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, and CINAHL, as well as the gray literature were searched for papers published in English and French between January 1980 and May 2021.
    Seventeen papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Four papers had pre- and posttraining study designs, and the remaining studies were cross-sectional. Several studies reported significant differences in LLAERs between children with CAPD and their normal-hearing peers, and the results tended toward longer latencies and smaller amplitudes regardless of LLAER waves considered. N1 and/or N2 results were most likely to reveal significant differences between children with CAPD and normal-hearing controls and could potentially be considered a biomarker for CAPD.
    It seems that LLAER assessments, especially waves N1 and N2, might assist in better identification of CAPD children. However, considering heterogeneity in the methodology among the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed studies on children with confirmed CAPD using standard diagnostic and assessment protocols are suggested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇叙述性综述汇集了抑郁症患者与非抑郁症对照受试者之间听觉事件相关电位(ERPs)差异的发现。这些研究结果可以告诉我们抑郁症感觉认知过程的可能改变,以及在临床应用中使用这些ERP的潜力。听觉P3,失配负性(MMN)和听觉诱发电位的响度依赖性(LDAEP)是研究的对象。在PubMed中进行的搜索产生了84项研究。审查的研究结果并不高度一致,但是一些模式是可以识别的。对于听觉P3b,在抑郁症患者中,常见的发现是振幅减弱和潜伏期延长.关于听觉MMN,尤其是持续时间偏差MMN的幅度通常被衰减,抑郁症患者频率偏差MMN的幅度增加。在LDAEP研究中,一般来说,抑郁症患者和非抑郁症对照组之间没有差异的报道,尽管发现了一些关于特定抑郁症亚型的群体差异。这篇评论认为,未来的研究应该调查某些刺激条件在分离抑郁和非抑郁参与者群体方面是否特别有效。未来的研究应该对比抑郁症患者不同亚群的反应,以及不同的临床组(例如,抑郁症和焦虑症患者),探讨抑郁症听觉ERP改变的特异性。
    This narrative review brings together the findings regarding the differences in the auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) between patients with depressive disorder and non-depressed control subjects. These studies\' results can inform us of the possible alterations in sensory-cognitive processing in depressive disorders and the potential of using these ERPs in clinical applications. Auditory P3, mismatch negativity (MMN) and loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) were the subjects of the investigation. A search in PubMed yielded 84 studies. The findings of the reviewed studies were not highly consistent, but some patterns could be identified. For auditory P3b, the common findings were attenuated amplitude and prolonged latency among depressed patients. Regarding auditory MMN, especially the amplitude of duration deviance MMN was commonly attenuated, and the amplitude of frequency deviance MMN was increased in depressed patients. In LDAEP studies, generally, no differences between depressed patients and non-depressed controls were reported, although some group differences concerning specific depression subtypes were found. This review posits that future research should investigate whether certain stimulus conditions are particularly efficient at separating depressed and non-depressed participant groups. Future studies should contrast responses in different subpopulations of depressed patients, as well as different clinical groups (e.g., depressive disorder and anxiety disorder patients), to investigate the specificity of the auditory ERP alterations for depressive disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号