UNASSIGNED: Antimicrobial drugs form an essential component of medical treatment in human and animal health. Resistance associated with their use has posed a global public health threat. Multiple efforts have been made at the global level directed by the World Health Organization and associated partners to develop policies aimed at combatting antimicrobial resistance.
UNASSIGNED: Whilst the Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance and people-centered framework aim to guide countries in implementing successful antimicrobial resistance policies, their adoption and success depend on different implementation contexts. Therefore, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for implementing the World Health Organization\'s people-centered approach in sub-Saharan Africa, whilst recognizing antimicrobial resistance as a multifaceted problem rooted in \'complex systems.\'
UNASSIGNED: The people-centered approach provides a solid framework for combating antimicrobial resistance. Countries should build sustainable national action plans, adopt the One Health approach, limit over-the-counter antibiotic consumption, and educate communities on rational antibiotic use. They should also promote inter-country collaborations and innovative solutions, strengthen drug regulatory capacities, invest in infection control, water sanitation, hygiene, diagnostics, and surveillance tools, and promote vaccine uptake to prevent drug-resistant infections.

BACKGROUND: In geriatrics, explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) are useful for optimizing drug use.
OBJECTIVE: To produce an expert consensus on explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs for hospitalized older patients.
METHODS: We conducted a Delphi survey involving French experts on antibiotic stewardship in hospital settings. During the survey\'s rounds, the experts gave their opinion on each explicit definition, and could suggest new definitions. Definitions with a 1-to-9 Likert score of between 7 and 9 from at least 75% of the participants were adopted. The results were discussed during consensus meetings after each round.
RESULTS: Of the 155 invited experts, 128 (82.6%) participated in the whole survey: 59 (46%) infectious diseases specialists, 45 (35%) geriatricians, and 24 (19%) other specialists. In Round 1, 65 explicit definitions were adopted and 21 new definitions were suggested. In Round 2, 35 other explicit definitions were adopted. The results were validated during consensus meetings (with 44 participants after Round 1, and 54 after Round 2).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to have provided a list of explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for hospitalized older patients. It might help to disseminate key messages to prescribers and reduce inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics.

The most common bacterial isolates in dogs with pyothorax include mixed anaerobes, Enterobacteriaceae (especially Escherichia coli), Pasteurella spp., Streptococcus spp., and Staphylococcus spp. A fluoroquinolone with amoxicillin (±clavulanate) or a fluoroquinolone with clindamycin are the most commonly recommended empirical antimicrobials whilst pending bacterial culture of the pleural effusion. The aim of this study is to review and compare the pleural effusion culture and antimicrobial susceptibility results to the PROTECT ME poster and other published antimicrobial use guidelines. The medical records of 53 dogs diagnosed with pyothorax between 2014 and 2020 at two veterinary referral centres were reviewed. Information, including culture and susceptibility results, was assessed. Antimicrobial susceptibility panels varied; susceptibility to a particular antibiotic was calculated as a percentage of isolates tested against the same antibiotic. A total of 30 of 53 dogs (57.7%) had a positive pleural fluid culture. The most common isolates were Pasteurella species (23.3%), Escherichia coli (23.3%), and mixed anaerobes (20%). From the aerobic isolates, 73-83% were susceptible to a fluoroquinolone, 14/19 (74%) to amoxicillin, and 20/22 (91%) to potentiated amoxicillin. Resistance to clindamycin was documented in 9/13 (69%) aerobic isolates, with all Gram-negative bacteria (9/9) being resistant. The combination of potentiated amoxicillin with marbofloxacin would have been appropriate in most of the dogs (75-92.9%). This study shows a high rate of resistance to clindamycin, which is not a suitable option for monotherapy and may be less effective in combination therapy compared to potentiated amoxicillin.

In low- and middle-income countries, where antimicrobial access may be erratic and neonatal sepsis pathogens are frequently multidrug-resistant, empiric antibiotic prescribing practices may diverge from the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. This study examined antibiotic prescribing for neonatal sepsis at a tertiary referral hospital neonatal unit in Gaborone, Botswana, using data from a prospective cohort of 467 neonates. We reviewed antibiotic prescriptions for the first episode of suspected sepsis, categorized as early-onset (EOS, days 0-3) or late-onset (LOS, >3 days). The WHO prescribing guidelines were used to determine whether antibiotics were \"guideline-synchronous\" or \"guideline-divergent\". Logistic regression models examined independent associations between the time of neonatal sepsis onset and estimated gestational age (EGA) with guideline-divergent antibiotic use. The majority (325/470, 69%) were prescribed one or more antibiotics, and 31 (10%) received guideline-divergent antibiotics. Risk factors for guideline-divergent prescribing included neonates with LOS, compared to EOS (aOR [95% CI]: 4.89 (1.81, 12.57)). Prematurity was a risk factor for guideline-divergent prescribing. Every 1-week decrease in EGA resulted in 11% increased odds of guideline-divergent antibiotics (OR [95% CI]: 0.89 (0.81, 0.97)). Premature infants with LOS had higher odds of guideline-divergent prescribing. Studies are needed to define the causes of this differential rate of guideline-divergent prescribing to guide future interventions.

Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are widely regarded as a cornerstone for ameliorating the global health impact of antimicrobial resistance. Within companion animal health, such efforts have largely focused on development and dissemination of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines (ASGs). However, there have been few attempts to understand veterinarian attitudes towards and knowledge of ASGs or to determine how awareness regarding ASGs might best be increased. An online survey regarding ASGs was formulated for veterinarians who treat companion animals. The survey was distributed across 46 European and associated countries between 12 January and 30 June, 2022. In total, 2271 surveys were completed, with 64.9% of respondents (n = 1474) reporting awareness and usage of at least one ASG. Respondents from countries with greater awareness of ASGs tended to report more appropriate use of antimicrobials (Spearman\'s rank coefficient = 0.6084, P ≤ 0.001), with respondents from countries with country-specific ASGs tending to score highest across both awareness and appropriate use domains. Respondents prioritised guidance around antimicrobial choice (82.0%, n = 1863), duration of treatment (66.0%, n = 1499), and dosage (51.9%, n = 1179) for inclusion in future ASGs, with 78.0% (n = 1776) of respondents preferring ASGs to be integrated into their patient management system. Awareness of ASGs and their use in companion animal veterinary practice appears to be greater than previously reported, with respondents tending to report antimicrobial prescription decision making broadly in line with current clinical recommendations. However, further initiatives aimed at maximising accessibility to ASGs both within countries and individual veterinary practices are recommended.

UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are two intersecting public health crises. Antimicrobial overuse in patients with COVID-19 threatens to worsen AMR. Guidelines are fundamental in encouraging antimicrobial stewardship. We sought to assess the quality of antibiotic prescribing guidelines and recommendations in the context of COVID-19, and whether they incorporate principles of antimicrobial stewardship.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic survey which included a search using the concepts \"antibiotic/antimicrobial\" up to November 15, 2022 of the eCOVID-19 living map of recommendations (RecMap) which aggregates guidelines across a range of international sources and all languages. Guidelines providing explicit recommendations regarding antibacterial use in COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Guideline and recommendation quality were assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. We extracted guideline characteristics including panel representation and the presence or absence of explicit statements related to antimicrobial stewardship (i.e., judicious antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance or adverse effects as a consequence of antibiotic use). We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between guideline characteristics including quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. Protocol registration (OSF): https://osf.io/4pgtc.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-eight guidelines with 63 antibiotic prescribing recommendations were included. Recommendations focused on antibiotic initiation (n = 52, 83%) and less commonly antibiotic selection (n = 13, 21%), and duration of therapy (n = 15, 24%). Guideline and recommendation quality varied widely. Twenty (71%) guidelines incorporated at least one concept relating to antimicrobial stewardship. Including infectious diseases expertise on the guideline panel (OR 9.44, 97.5% CI: 1.09-81.59) and AGREE-REX score (OR 3.26, 97.5% CI: 1.14-9.31 per 10% increase in overall score) were associated with a higher odds of guidelines addressing antimicrobial stewardship.
UNASSIGNED: There is an opportunity to improve antibiotic prescribing guidelines in terms of both quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. These findings can help guideline developers better address antibiotic stewardship in future recommendations beyond COVID-19.
UNASSIGNED: This project was funded by Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE centres.

BACKGROUND: It is well documented that inappropriate use of antimicrobials is the major driver of antimicrobial resistance. To combat this, antibiotic stewardship has been demonstrated to reduce antibiotic usage, decrease the prevalence of resistance, lead to significant economic gains and better patients\' outcomes. In Nigeria, antimicrobial guidelines for critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs), with infections are scarce. We set out to develop antimicrobial guidelines for this category of patients.
METHODS: A committee of 12 experts, consisting of Clinical Microbiologists, Intensivists, Infectious Disease Physicians, Surgeons, and Anesthesiologists, collaborated to develop guidelines for managing infections in critically ill patients in Nigerian ICUs. The guidelines were based on evidence from published data and local prospective antibiograms from three ICUs in Lagos, Nigeria. The committee considered the availability of appropriate antimicrobial drugs in hospital formularies. Proposed recommendations were approved by consensus agreement among committee members.
RESULTS: Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common microorganisms isolated from the 3 ICUs, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Escherichia coli. Targeted therapy is recognized as the best approach in patient management. Based on various antibiograms and publications from different hospitals across the country, amikacin is recommended as the most effective empiric antibiotic against Enterobacterales and A. baumannii, while colistin and polymixin B showed high efficacy against all bacteria. Amoxicillin-clavulanate or ceftriaxone was recommended as the first-choice drug for community-acquired (CA) CA-pneumonia while piperacillin-tazobactam + amikacin was recommended as first choice for the treatment of healthcare-associated (HA) HA-pneumonia. For ventilatorassociated pneumonia (VAP), the consensus for the drug of first choice was agreed as meropenem. Amoxycillin-clavulanate +clindamycin was the consensus choice for CAskin and soft tissue infection (SSIS) and piperacillin-tazobactam + metronidazole ±vancomycin for HA-SSIS. Ceftriaxone-tazobactam or piperacillin-tazobactam + gentamicin was consensus for CA-blood stream infections (BSI) with first choice+regimen for HA-BSI being meropenem/piperacillin-tazobactam +amikacin +fluconazole. For community-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI), first choice antibiotic was ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone with a catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) regimen of first choice being meropenem + fluconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Data from a multicenter three ICU surveillance and antibiograms and publications from different hospitals in the country was used to produce this evidence-based Nigerian-specific antimicrobial treatment guidelines of critically ill patients in ICUs by a group of experts from different specialties in Nigeria. The implementation of this guideline will facilitate learning, continuous improvement of stewardship activities and provide a baseline for updating of guidelines to reflect evolving antibiotic needs.
BACKGROUND: Il est bien établi que l’utilisation inappropriée des antimicrobiens est le principal moteur de la résistance aux antimicrobiens. Pour lutter contre ce phénomène, il a été démontré que la bonne gestion des antibiotiques permettait de réduire l’utilisation des antibiotiques, de diminuer la prévalence de la résistance, de réaliser des gains économiques significatifs et d’améliorer les résultats pour les patients. Au Nigéria, les directives antimicrobiennes pour les patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI), souffrant d’infections, sont rares. Nous avons entrepris d’élaborer des lignes directrices sur les antimicrobiens pour cette catégorie de patients.
UNASSIGNED: Un comité de 12 experts, composé de microbiologistes cliniques, d’intensivistes, de médecins spécialistes des maladies infectieuses, de chirurgiens et d’anesthésistes, a collaboré à l’élaboration de lignes directrices pour la prise en charge des infections chez les patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs nigérianes. Les lignes directrices sont basées sur des données publiées et des antibiogrammes prospectifs locaux provenant de trois unités de soins intensifs de Lagos, au Nigeria. Le comité a pris en compte la disponibilité des médicaments antimicrobiens appropriés dans les formulaires des hôpitaux. Les recommandations proposées ont été approuvées par consensus entre les membres du comité.
UNASSIGNED: Candida albicans et Pseudomonas aeruginosa étaient les microorganismes les plus fréquemment isolés dans les trois unités de soins intensifs, suivis par Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii et Escherichia coli. La thérapie ciblée est reconnue comme la meilleure approche pour la prise en charge des patients. Sur la base de divers antibiogrammes et publications provenant de différents hôpitaux du pays, l\'amikacine est recommandée comme l\'antibiotique empirique le plus efficace contre les entérobactéries et A. baumannii, tandis que la colistine et la polymixine B se sont révélées très efficaces contre toutes les bactéries. L\'amoxicilline-clavulanate ou la ceftriaxone ont été recommandées comme médicaments de premier choix pour les pneumonies communautaires, tandis que la pipéracilline-tazobactam + amikacine ont été recommandées comme médicaments de premier choix pour le traitement des pneumonies associées aux soins. Pour les pneumonies acquises sous ventilation mécanique (PAV), le consensus sur le médicament de premier choix est le méropénem. L\'amoxycilline-clavulanate +clindamycine était le choix consensuel pour les infections de la peau et des tissus mous et la pipéracilline-tazobactam + métronidazole ±vancomycine pour les infections de la peau et des tissus mous. HA-SSIS. Ceftriaxone-tazobactam ou pipéracilline-tazobactam + gentamicine a fait l\'objet d\'un consensus pour les infections de la circulation sanguine de l\'AC (BSI), le premier choix de régime pour les HA-BSI étant le méropénem/pipéracilline-tazobactam +amikacine +fluconazole. Pour les infections urinaires communautaires, l\'antibiotique de premier choix était la ciprofloxacine ou la ceftriaxone, le régime de premier choix pour les infections urinaires associées à un cathéter étant le meropenem +fluconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Les données issues d’une surveillance multicentrique de trois unités de soins intensifs, d’antibiogrammes et de publications de différents hôpitaux du pays ont été utilisées par un groupe d’experts de différentes spécialités nigérianes pour élaborer ces lignes directrices sur le traitement antimicrobien des patients gravement malades dans les unités de soins intensifs, fondées sur des données probantes et spécifiques au Nigeria. La mise en œuvre de ces lignes directrices facilitera l’apprentissage, l’amélioration continue des activités de gestion et fournira une base de référence pour la mise à jour des lignes directrices afin de refléter l’évolution des besoins en antibiotiques.
UNASSIGNED: Antimicrobiens, Résistance aux antimicrobiens, Gestion des antibiotiques, Lignes directrices, Soins intensifs, Unité de soins intensifs, Infections associées aux soins de santé.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the use of carbapenems in a pediatric tertiary center and to assess its compliance with national and local guidelines.
METHODS: This retrospective study focused on children who received at least one dose of carbapenems in a tertiary university hospital over a 1-year period (2019). The appropriateness of each prescription was assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 96 prescriptions were collected for 75 patients (median age 3 years [interquartile range, IQR: 0-9]). Most prescriptions were empirical (n = 77, 80%) and mainly concerned nosocomial infections (n = 69, 72%). At least one risk factor for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases was found in 48% (n = 46) of cases. The median duration of treatment with carbapenems was 5 days and it was over 7 days in 38% (n = 36) of cases. The use of carbapenems was considered appropriate in 95% (18/19) and 70% (54/77) of cases when therapy was guided by culture results or was empirical, respectively. De-escalation of carbapenem treatment within 72 h occurred in 31% (n = 30) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of carbapenems can be optimized in the pediatric population, even when the initial prescription for a carbapenem is considered appropriate.

This is the first British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) national guideline for the management of sexually transmitted enteric infections (STEI). This guideline is primarily aimed for level 3 sexual health clinics; however, it may also be applicable to other settings such as primary care or other hospital departments where individuals with STEI may present. This guideline makes recommendations on testing, management, partner notification and public health control of STEI.

Guidelines for the selection of empirical antibiotics have been developed to improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. We assessed the extent of adherence to the national guidelines for the selection of parenteral empirical antibiotics for three selected infections at a tertiary care center.
A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in medical and surgical wards of a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Adult patients with a positive culture for a lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), or urinary tract infection (UTI) and who were prescribed parenteral empirical antibiotic therapy by the attending physician were included. Bacteria were identified and antibiotic susceptibility was determined by standard microbiological methods. Adherence to the guidelines was defined as prescribing the empiric antibiotic concordant with the national guidelines on the empirical use of antibiotics.
A total of 160 bacterial isolates were obtained from 158 patients with positive cultures, the majority were from UTIs (n = 56). The selection of empirical antibiotics was concordant with the national guidelines in 92.4% of patients and 29.5% of the bacterial isolates obtained from these patients were resistant to the prescribed empiric antibiotic. Only 47.5% (76/160) of the bacterial isolates were sensitive to the empiric antibiotic and therefore can be considered an appropriate antibiotic prescription.
Empirical antibiotic guidelines should be updated based on the latest surveillance data and information on prevailing bacterial spectra. Antibiotic prescribing patterns and guideline concordance should be periodically evaluated to ensure whether antimicrobial stewardship programs are moving in the right direction.