Androgenetic alopecia

雄激素性脱发
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    雄激素性脱发(AGA)是最普遍的脱发类型。尽管在受影响的受试者中也观察到黑色素瘤的发病率增加,但其发病率主要是心理上的。目前的基于药物的疗法和物理治疗在长期中是不成功的,或者具有限制其应用的相关副作用。因此,需要一种新的治疗方法来促进再生增强替代方案。这些治疗方案,专注于细胞生态位的恢复,可以解决双氢睾酮对毛囊微环境的影响。在这种情况下,新兴的再生疗法,例如富含血小板的血浆或富含血小板的纤维蛋白以及毛囊干细胞和基于间充质干细胞的疗法及其衍生物(条件培养基CM或外泌体)在头发修复的发展中凸显出来。纳米技术还通过设计生物墨水和纳米材料在AGA治疗中处于领先地位,这些生物墨水和纳米材料的结构正在通过3D生物打印在大量病例中进行配置。由于AGA领域新的先进疗法替代品的数量不断增加和迅速创造,需要对当前的技术水平进行扩展审查。此外,这篇综述提供了对当前和新兴AGA疗法的一般见解,旨在为研究人员提供指导,以突出最近取得进展的尖端治疗方法。
    Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most prevalent type of hair loss. Its morbility is mainly psychological although an increased incidence in melanoma has also been observed in affected subjects. Current drug based therapies and physical treatments are either unsuccessful in the long term or have relevant side effects that limit their application. Therefore, a new therapeutic approach is needed to promote regenerative enhancement alternatives. These treatment options, focused on the cellular niche restoration, could be the solution to the impact of dihydrotestosterone in the hair follicle microenvironment. In this context emerging regenerative therapies such as Platelet-rich plasma or Platelet-rich fibrine as well as hair follicle stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell based therapies and their derivatives (conditioned medium CM or exoxomes) are highlighting in the evolving landscape of hair restoration. Nanotechnology is also leading the way in AGA treatment through the design of bioinks and nanobiomaterials whose structures are being configuring in a huge range of cases by means of 3D bioprinting. Due to the increasing number and the rapid creation of new advanced therapies alternatives in the AGA field, an extended review of the current state of art is needed. In addition this review provides a general insight in current and emerging AGA therapies which is intented to be a guidance for researchers highlighting the cutting edge treatments which are recently gaining ground.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)是一种普遍的脱发形式,影响男性和女性,严重影响患者的生活质量。传统治疗包括口服药物,局部用药,和头发移植,但这些方法都有一定的副作用和局限性。如何安全有效地最大限度地促进毛发生长一直是AGA治疗的关键问题。近年来,分割激光治疗,作为一种非侵入性方法,由于其微创和高效的性质,逐渐受到关注。
    目的:在本文中,我们总结了近15年来有关AGA的点阵激光治疗的研究,并讨论了其治疗机制,临床效果,未来发展方向,以及与传统治疗方法相比在AGA治疗中的优缺点。
    方法:使用PubMed进行了广泛的文献检索,Google,谷歌学者,Embase,还有Scopus.研究AGA的点阵激光治疗的所有可用文章均于2024年3月汇编。然后筛选标题和摘要的相关性,并彻底检查患者的临床结果。前瞻性临床试验,回顾性图表回顾,案例系列,和个别病例报告纳入文献综述。
    结论:点阵激光治疗AGA疗效显著,安全性高。与传统治疗相比,点阵激光具有微创、快速恢复,副作用少,以及广泛的人口适用性,为AGA患者提供有效的治疗选择。进一步的大规模临床研究将有助于优化激光参数和治疗设置,以提高治疗效果。
    BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a prevalent form of hair loss that affects both men and women, severely impacting patients\' quality of life. Traditional treatments include oral medications, topical medications, and hair transplantation, but these methods have certain side effects and limitations. How to safely effectively and maximally promote hair growth has been a key issue in the treatment of AGA. In recent years, fractionated laser therapy, as a noninvasive method, has gradually gained attention due to its minimally invasive and highly effective nature.
    OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we summarized the studies related to fractional laser treatment of AGA in the past 15 years, and discussed its therapeutic mechanism, clinical effect, future development direction, and advantages and disadvantages compared with traditional treatment methods in the treatment of AGA.
    METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus. All available articles studying fractional laser treatment of AGA were compiled in March 2024. Titles and abstracts were then screened for relevance and thoroughly examined for patient clinical outcomes. Prospective clinical trials, retrospective chart reviews, case series, and individual case reports were included in the literature review.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fractional laser treatment of AGA showed remarkable efficacy and high safety. Compared with traditional treatments, fractional laser has the advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, fewer side effects, and a wide range of population applicability, providing an effective treatment option for AGA patients. Further large-scale clinical studies will help optimize the laser parameters and treatment settings to improve the therapeutic effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾研究各种类型的再生医学方法(例如富血小板血浆,基质血管分数,细胞疗法,条件媒体,等。)用于治疗特定的皮肤病。复兴,疤痕,伤口愈合,和其他继发性皮肤损伤情况在这项研究中没有调查。
    方法:主要数据库,包括PubMed,Scopus,和WebofScience,在2024年1月之前,我们精心搜索了RCT,重点是针对特定皮肤病的再生医学干预措施(如雄激素性脱发,白癜风,斑秃,等。).提取的关键数据包括参与者特征和样本量,再生疗法的类型,治疗功效,和不良事件。
    结果:在本系统综述中,共检查了64项研究,涉及2888名患者。女性占研究人群的44.8%,而男性占参与者的55.2%,平均年龄27.64岁。最常见的皮肤病是雄激素性脱发(AGA)(45.3%)和白癜风(31.2%)。研究这些疾病的最常见的再生方法是PRP和自体表皮黑素细胞/角质形成细胞的移植,分别。研究报告AGA改善高达68.4%,白癜风改善高达71%。该综述中包括的其他疾病是斑秃,黄褐斑,硬化性萎缩性苔藓(LSA),炎性寻常痤疮,慢性静止原污水,糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓,营养不良性大疱性表皮松解症。在所有这些研究中,再生医学被发现是一种有效的治疗选择,以及其他方法。这项研究中研究的再生医学技术包括自体表皮黑素细胞/角质形成细胞的移植,分离的黑素细胞移植,毛囊起源的细胞移植,PRP中的黑素细胞-角质形成细胞悬浮液,条件培养基注射,PRP和碱性成纤维细胞生长因子的组合,静脉内注射间充质干细胞,集中生长因子,基质血管分数(SVF),PRP和SVF的组合,并在PRP中保存头发移植物。
    结论:再生医学有望治疗特定的皮肤病。为了验证我们的发现,建议进行许多针对各种皮肤状况的临床试验。在我们的研究中,我们没有探索继发性皮肤损伤,如疤痕或溃疡。因此,评估这种治疗方法解决这些疾病的有效性需要进行单独的研究.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) studying various types of regenerative medicine methods (such as platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction, cell therapy, conditioned media, etc.) in treating specific dermatologic diseases. Rejuvenation, scarring, wound healing, and other secondary conditions of skin damage were not investigated in this study.
    METHODS: Major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were meticulously searched for RCTs up to January 2024, focusing on regenerative medicine interventions for specific dermatologic disorders (such as androgenetic alopecia, vitiligo, alopecia areata, etc.). Key data extracted encompassed participant characteristics and sample sizes, types of regenerative therapy, treatment efficacy, and adverse events.
    RESULTS: In this systematic review, 64 studies involving a total of 2888 patients were examined. Women constituted 44.8% of the study population, while men made up 55.2% of the participants, with an average age of 27.64 years. The most frequently studied skin diseases were androgenetic alopecia (AGA) (45.3%) and vitiligo (31.2%). The most common regenerative methods investigated for these diseases were PRP and the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, respectively. Studies reported up to 68.4% improvement in AGA and up to 71% improvement in vitiligo. Other diseases included in the review were alopecia areata, melasma, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA), inflammatory acne vulgaris, chronic telogen effluvium, erosive oral lichen planus, and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Regenerative medicine was found to be an effective treatment option in all of these studies, along with other methods. The regenerative medicine techniques investigated in this study comprised the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, isolated melanocyte transplantation, cell transplantation from hair follicle origins, melanocyte-keratinocyte suspension in PRP, conditioned media injection, a combination of PRP and basic fibroblast growth factor, intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cells, concentrated growth factor, stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a combination of PRP and SVF, and preserving hair grafts in PRP.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regenerative medicine holds promise as a treatment for specific dermatologic disorders. To validate our findings, it is recommended to conduct numerous clinical trials focusing on various skin conditions. In our study, we did not explore secondary skin lesions like scars or ulcers. Therefore, assessing the effectiveness of this treatment method for addressing these conditions would necessitate a separate study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    图案脱发(PHL)是一种严重的头发状况,影响两性。美速疗法是一种涉及将药物和/或维生素微注射到皮肤中间层的治疗。美速疗法通过将药物直接输送到毛囊来减少全身不良反应,增加局部生物利用度,同时降低全身暴露。局部副作用和反应可能由于美体疗法而发展。这项研究系统地评估了美甲疗法对5%米诺地尔的安全性和有效性,以及解决其局限性,给药,和技术,目的是为临床医生和患者提供有价值的试验和见解,这些临床医生和患者考虑进行中胚层治疗以改善雄激素性脱发(AGA)结局。通过系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)标准的首选报告项目进行的文献检索从最初的18篇文章中获得了11项相关研究。这些研究涵盖了美塑疗法和米诺地尔在AGA中的作用的各个方面,包括技术,并发症,局限性,和结果。总之,现有的试验和研究中的美体疗法和米诺地尔证明了极好的统计意义和较高的患者满意度,除了两个出版物考虑了某些不常见的美体疗法的不良反应.然而,最近的研究表明,一种副作用风险低的治疗脱发的方法是有效的。
    Patterned hair loss (PHL) is a severe hair condition that affects both sexes. Mesotherapy is a treatment that involves microinjecting medications and/or vitamins into the middle layer of the skin. Mesotherapy reduces systemic adverse effects by delivering drugs directly to the hair follicle, increasing local bioavailability while lowering systemic exposure. Local side effects and reactions may develop due to mesotherapy. This study systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of mesotherapy to minoxidil 5%, as well as addressing its limitations, dosing, and technique, with the intent of providing valuable trials and insights for clinicians and patients considering mesotherapy for improved androgenetic alopecia (AGA) outcomes. The literature search carried out by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria yielded 11 relevant studies from an initial pool of 18 articles. These studies covered various aspects of the role of mesotherapy and minoxidil in AGA, including techniques, complications, limitations, and outcomes. In conclusion, available trials and research on mesotherapy and minoxidil demonstrated excellent statistical significance and a high patient satisfaction rate, with the exception of two publications that took into account certain uncommon adverse effects of mesotherapy. However, recent research suggests that a mesotherapy method for alopecia with a low risk of side effects is effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)是由各种基因和激素之间复杂的相互作用引起的脱发的主要原因,其结果是毛囊小型化和毛发周期动力学改变。富血小板血浆(PRP)作为AGA的辅助治疗具有公认的作用,但存在许多局限性。为了克服PRP的缺点,开发了液体富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)。
    目的:本文对PRF的制备方案和临床结果进行了严格的综述。
    方法:回顾了迄今为止以英语发表的关于PRF的准备和临床结果的文章。
    结果:在分析各种离心速度和离心时间的五项研究中,其中三项研究支持低速离心,而两项研究不支持该方法.对于PRF,卧式离心机可能优于固定角度离心机。关于使用PRF的五项临床研究显示对AGA有明显的影响。
    结论:目前,关于PRF的制备没有共识。大多数使用固定角度离心的研究都倾向于低速离心和较少的离心时间。需要更大的研究来确定最佳的离心力和时间。由于血小板产量较高,卧式离心机可能优于固定角度离心机。对细胞的剪切损伤较小。此外,较大,需要精心设计的研究来确认PRF优于PRP的益处.
    BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a major cause of hair loss resulting from a complex interplay between various genes and hormones with the result being follicular miniaturization and altered hair cycle dynamics. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has a well-established role as adjunctive therapy in AGA but there are many limitations of it. In an attempt to overcome the shortcomings of PRP, liquid platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) was developed.
    OBJECTIVE: This article critically reviews the protocol for the preparation and clinical outcomes of PRF.
    METHODS: The articles published so far in the English language regarding the preparation and clinical outcomes of PRF were reviewed.
    RESULTS: Among five studies analyzing various centrifugation speeds and centrifugation times, three of the studies favored low-speed centrifugation, whereas two studies did not support this methodology. A horizontal centrifuge may be preferred over a fixed-angle centrifuge for PRF. Five clinical studies on the use of PRF showed a significant effect on AGA.
    CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is no consensus regarding the preparation of PRF. Most studies used fixed-angle centrifugation favored low centrifuge speed and less centrifugation time. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal centrifugation force and time. A horizontal centrifuge may be preferred over a fixed-angle centrifuge due to the higher yield of platelets, and lesser shear trauma to the cells. In addition, larger, well-designed studies are needed to confirm the benefits of PRF over PRP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脱发,也被称为脱发,是一种非常普遍的疾病,影响着美国和全世界数百万的男性和女性,使其成为患者向皮肤科医生提出的最常见的投诉之一。脱发的症状可能是高度可变的,从头发的弥漫性稀疏,完全没有头发的离散和局部斑块,或注意到刷牙和淋浴时明显脱落。虽然脱发对患者的健康没有直接的负面影响,尽管如此,它仍然是一种使人衰弱的疾病,因为它可以深刻地影响个人的自我形象和社会心理健康。脱发患者有多种治疗选择,它们通常是根据患者的需求和偏好量身定制的。其中最常见的是美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗脱发的药物,米诺地尔,还有非那雄胺.然而,已知这两种方法对所有患者都是部分有效的,所以临床医生经常使用不同的模式来配合他们,特别是基于激光的疗法。本文将对激光和其他光疗进行全面评估,这些光疗可用于治疗两种最常见的脱发类型:雄激素性脱发和斑秃。
    Alopecia, also known as hair loss, is a highly prevalent condition affecting millions of men and women in the United States and worldwide, making it one of the most common complaints by patients presenting to a dermatologist. The symptomology on the presentation of alopecia can be highly variable, ranging from diffuse thinning of hair, discrete and localized patches completely absent of hair, or noticing significant shedding when brushing and showering. Although alopecia does not have a direct negative health impact on patients, it is nonetheless a debilitating disease as it can profoundly impact an individual\'s self-image and psychosocial well-being. There are multiple treatment options available to patients with alopecia, and they are typically tailored to the patient\'s needs and preferences. The most common of these is the Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for alopecia, minoxidil, and finasteride. However, both of these are known to be partially efficacious for all patients, so clinicians often use different modalities in conjunction with them, in particular laser-based therapies. This review article will provide a comprehensive assessment of lasers and other light therapies that may be used to manage the two most common types of alopecia: androgenetic alopecia and alopecia areata.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雄激素性脱发,无疤痕脱发的最常见原因,是毛囊逐渐小型化的结果。在大多数男性雄激素性脱发病例中,患者的病史和临床评估可能足以确定诊断,而对于女性来说,他们应该辅以三镜检查。方法:使用PubMed和Scopus数据库来整理已发表的研究,并分析诊断为雄激素性脱发的患者中最典型的镜检查结果。排除后共检索到34篇文章。结果:最常见的特征,使用毛镜检查包括头发直径变异性(94.07%的患者),毫毛(66.45%)和毛周征(43.27%)。Others,比如蜂窝图案,黄色和白色的圆点,不太相关。结论:我们得出结论,头发直径变异性,毫毛和外周征代表了诊断雄激素性脱发的有价值的指标。
    Background: Androgenetic alopecia, the most common cause of non-scarring hair loss, is a consequence of the gradual miniaturization of the hair follicles. In the majority of male androgenetic alopecia cases, a patient\'s history and clinical evaluation may be sufficient to establish the diagnosis, while for women, they should be supplemented with trichoscopy. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus databases were used to collate published studies and to analyze the most typical trichoscopic findings in patients diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia. A total of 34 articles were retrieved after exclusion. Results: The most common features identified using trichoscopy included hair diameter variability (94.07% of patients), vellus hairs (66.45%) and the peripilar sign (43.27%). Others, such as the honeycomb pattern, yellow and white dots, were less relevant. Conclusions: We concluded that hair diameter variability, vellus hairs and the peripilar sign represented valuable indicators for the diagnosis of androgenetic alopecia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低剂量口服米诺地尔(LDOM)在治疗各种头发疾病方面表现出了有希望的安全性和有效性。包括男性雄激素性脱发(AGA)和女性型脱发(FPHL);然而,缺乏FDA的批准。男性AGA通常的LDOM起始剂量为1-5毫克/天,取决于医生的喜好和病人的情况。对于FPHL,它是0.5-1毫克/天。最大剂量通常为5mg/天。如果患者反应良好,没有重大副作用,剂量可能会逐渐增加,因为LDOM的疗效似乎是剂量依赖性的。如果治疗结果令人满意,患者可长期使用LDOM。LDOM的常见副作用是多毛症和心血管症状。女性比男性更容易患多毛症。LDOM的副作用可分为(a)剂量依赖性A型副作用(多毛症和心血管症状)和(b)特异性B型副作用(心包积液)。米诺地尔通过多种途径起作用。尽管米诺地尔的半衰期相对较短,约为4小时,其降压作用可能持续约72小时。脱发的有效治疗方法有限。因此,LDOM可能是管理某些头发疾病的可用疗法的重要补充,包括AGA。
    Low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) has demonstrated a promising safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of various hair disorders, including male androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and female-pattern hair loss (FPHL); however, it lacks FDA approval. The usual LDOM starting dose for male AGA is 1-5 mg/day, depending on physician preference and the patient\'s condition. For FPHL, it is 0.5-1 mg/day. The maximum dose is generally 5 mg/day. If patients respond well without major side effects, the dose may be gradually increased since the LDOM\'s efficacy appears to be dose-dependent. Patients may use LDOM long term if the treatment outcome is satisfactory. The common side effects of LDOM are hypertrichosis and cardiovascular symptoms. Females are more prone to hypertrichosis than males. The side effects of LDOM can be categorized as (a) dose-dependent type A side effects (hypertrichosis and cardiovascular symptoms) and (b) idiosyncratic type B side effects (pericardial effusion). Minoxidil acts via multiple pathways. Although minoxidil has a relatively short half-life of around 4 h, its hypotensive effect may last approximately 72 h. Effective treatments for alopecia are limited. Therefore, LDOM could be an important addition to the available therapies for managing some hair disorders, including AGA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA),也称为男性或女性模式脱发,是慢性脱发的最常见原因,到70岁时影响多达80%的男性。尽管患病率很高,很少有批准的疗法,显示最小的功效。
    目的:本系统综述旨在评估富血小板血浆(PrP)治疗男性患者AGA的疗效。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,科克伦(中部),CINAHL,clinicaltrials.gov,搜索了GoogleScholar和科学引文索引数据库,以确定符合条件的研究。所有与在AGA中使用PrP相关的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性队列研究均被纳入。主要结果包括毛发密度和毛发数量的变化。使用偏倚评估工具评估方法学质量。
    结果:8项RCT和1项队列研究被纳入评价,共有291名参与者。六项研究报告了PrP组的毛发密度与对照组相比有统计学上的显着增加。五项研究报告了PrP的头发数量的统计学显着增加。七项研究显示中等风险,两项显示低偏倚风险。
    结论:在关于PrP对男性AGA的有效性的方法学上的稳健综述中,PrP显示出一些用于治疗的潜力。然而,证据质量低,适度的偏见风险,纳入研究的高度异质性限制了推论,并要求更可靠的设计来进一步研究这一点。
    BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA), also referred to as male or female pattern hair loss, is the commonest cause of chronic hair loss and affects up to 80% of men by the age of 70. Despite a high prevalence, there are few approved therapies, which show minimal efficacy.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PrP) in the treatment of AGA in male patients.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane (CENTRAL), CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and the Science Citation Index database were searched to identify eligible studies. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies related to PrP use in AGA were included. Primary outcomes included changes in hair density and hair count. Methodological quality was assessed using bias assessment tools.
    RESULTS: Eight RCTs and one cohort study were included in the review with a total of 291 participants. Six studies reported a statistically significant increase in hair density in the PrP group versus the control. Five studies reported a statistically significant increase in hair count with PrP. Seven studies showed moderate risk and two showed low risk of bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a methodologically robust review on the effectiveness of PrP on male AGA, PrP demonstrated some potential to be used therapeutically. However, the low quality of evidence, moderate risk of bias, and high heterogeneity of included studies limit inferences and call for more robust designs to investigate this further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    雄激素性脱发(AGA)是男性和女性脱发的最常见原因。米诺地尔和非那雄胺是唯一FDA批准的AGA治疗方法。包括富血小板血浆(PRP)和微针疗法在内的新疗法已显示出有希望的结果。这篇文献综述的目的是强调最近的研究,研究局部米诺地尔联合PRP对米诺地尔或PRP单一疗法的影响。本文使用的方法包括使用PubMed对2010年至2022年的文献进行系统回顾,EMBASE,和MEDLINE数据库检查评估AGA联合疗法的研究。三项随机对照试验比较了PRP+外用5%米诺地尔与不治疗的组合,5%米诺地尔,或仅PRP。两项研究发现,联合治疗后五个月和六个月的头发生长增加。另一项研究发现,与单一疗法相比,联合疗法的头发密度增加,患者满意度提高。一项前瞻性研究显示,联合使用5%米诺地尔治疗的患者,PRP,与米诺地尔单一疗法相比,微针报告的患者和医师满意度最高。评估局部5%米诺地尔与PRP的观察性研究报告,与米诺地尔单一疗法相比,组合治疗一年后毛发直径增加。与使用米诺地尔以及PRP或米诺地尔单一疗法的PRP相比,在回顾性研究中,与米诺地尔和微针结合的PRP疗法显示出增加毛发生长。总之,多项研究表明,在AGA患者中,PRP和米诺地尔联合治疗具有优异的治疗效果.这项研究的局限性包括不同的PRP制备方案,很少有随机对照研究,和小样本量。
    Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of alopecia in males and females. Minoxidil and finasteride are the only FDA-approved treatments for AGA. New treatments including Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) and microneedling have shown promising results. The purpose of this literature review was to highlight recent studies examining the effects of topical minoxidil combined with PRP to minoxidil or PRP monotherapy. The method used for this paper includes a systematic review of the literature from 2010 to 2022 using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases examining studies evaluating combination therapies for AGA. Three randomized control trials compared combination PRP + topical 5% minoxidil to either no treatment, 5% minoxidil, or PRP only. Two studies found increased hair growth at five months and at six months following combined therapy. Another study found an increase in hair density and improved patient satisfaction with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. A prospective study revealed that patients treated with combined 5% minoxidil, PRP, and microneedling reported the highest patient and physician satisfaction compared to minoxidil monotherapy. An observational study evaluating topical 5% minoxidil with PRP reported an increase in hair diameter after one year of combination treatment compared to minoxidil monotherapy. PRP therapy combined with minoxidil and microneedling in a retrospective study was shown to increase hair growth compared to PRP with minoxidil as well as PRP or minoxidil monotherapy. In conclusion, a variety of studies demonstrated superior treatment response with a combination of PRP and minoxidil therapy in patients with AGA. Limitations to this study include different PRP preparation protocols, few randomized control studies, and small sample sizes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号