越来越多的文献认识到公众参与卫生技术评估的重要性。然而,关于如何记录结果仍然存在不确定性,分析,并由决策者使用。
综合巴西公众的贡献(妇女,卫生专业人员,经理,教育机构,和公司)关于在巴西进行的公众咨询中实施《正常出生国家临床护理指南》的情况。
使用IRaMuTeQ软件根据三种类型的分析来组织和总结语料:描述性统计;降序分级分类;和特异性分析。作为指南制定过程的一部分,2016年由巴西公共卫生系统的国家卫生技术公司委员会(CONITEC)进行了公众咨询。
语料库由303个文本组成,分成1233个文本段,其中1081被使用,相当于保留率的87.67%。我们的分析中出现了五个类别:在医院环境中分娩和分娩期间强制要求产科医生;指南实施的障碍和促进者;卫生专业人员使用循证实践;劳动和分娩以及妇女权利的进步;以及动员以促进指南的每个类别,出现了最频繁的单词和句子,具有最高的卡方分数。障碍与缺乏财政资源有关,培训和职业激励,和促进者接受培训,以改变卫生专业人员的做法。产科护士成为监督正常分娩以及在医院分娩期间强制要求产科医生的替代方法。
我们的研究结果总结了巴西公众的贡献,并阐明了正常分娩中临床护理指南的障碍和促进因素。这些主题通常不会通过定量研究进行探讨。将这些信息纳入决策过程不仅会增加公众参与,但为在全国范围内实施临床指南提供了更大的证据。
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of public engagement in health technology assessment. However, there is still uncertainty regarding how the results should be recorded, analyzed, and used by decision makers.
Synthesize the contributions of the Brazilian public (women, health professionals, managers, educational institutions, and companies) about the implementation of the National Clinical Guidelines for Care in Normal Birth from the public consultation carried out in Brazil.
IRaMuTeQ software was used to organize and summarize the corpus based on three types of analysis: descriptive statistics; descending hierarchical classification; and specificities analysis. The public consultation was conducted in 2016 by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in the Brazilian public health system as part of the guideline development process.
The corpus consisted of 303 texts, separated into 1233 text segments, 1081 of which were used, corresponding to retention of 87.67%. Five classes emerged from our analyses: mandatory presence of an obstetrician during labor and delivery in hospital settings; barriers and facilitators for guideline implementation; use of evidence-based practices by health professionals; progression of labor and delivery and women\'s rights; and mobilization to promote the guideline For each class, the most frequent words and sentences with the highest chi-squared scores were presented. Barriers were associated with lack of financial resources, training and professional motivation, and facilitators with training to change the practices of health professionals. Obstetric nurses emerged as an alternative for supervising normal births as well as the mandatory presence of an obstetrician during childbirth in hospital settings.
Our findings summarize the contributions provided by the Brazilian public and shed some light on the barriers and facilitators of clinical guidelines for care in normal birth. These topics are not typically explored by quantitative studies. Including this information in the decision-making process would not only increase public engagement, but provide greater evidence for implementing the clinical guidelines nationwide.