关键词: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists American Fertility Society Analytical Approach Biomedical and Behavioral Research Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh : Advisory Committees Cloning, Organism Community Participation Conflict of Interest Cryopreservation Democracy Economics Embryo Research Embryo, Mammalian Ethics Committees Federal Government Fees and Charges Freedom Government Government Regulation Guidelines as Topic Humans International Cooperation Internationality Literature Organizational Policy Physicians Policy Making Public Policy Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Research Research Personnel Social Control, Formal Social Control, Informal Societies Terminology as Topic United States

来  源:   DOI:10.1353/ken.0.0039   PDF(Sci-hub)

Abstract:
Both experimental and therapeutic uses of the new reproductive technologies have been governed not by the medical ideology of the best interests of patients and their children, but by the market ideology of profit maximization under the guise of \"reproductive liberty.\" Government in our constitutional, democratic society has the authority and obligation to make and enforce reasonable regulations to manage the new reproductive market in order to protect the interests of the public, prospective parents, and their future children. The \"cloning\" debate provides a useful opportunity to compare and contrast the competing regulatory models of the free market, professional guidelines, and government restrictions.
摘要:
暂无翻译
公众号