UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic approach, focused particularly on the issues addressed, subject positions, relations and rhetoric. Seventeen opinion articles published in Swedish national newspapers December 2019 - February 2022 were analysed.
UNASSIGNED: The main contents were threats to democracy, threats to the freedom and rights of specific groups, and threats to the debate itself. Contents were expressed through three discourse dichotomies: contribution vs interjection, documented vs alarmistic, and active on the stage vs commenting from the balcony.
UNASSIGNED: Striking about the results is the absence of dialogue, the one-way communication, and the absent politicians. It seems that the analysed debate on the challenges of the Swedish COVID-19 pandemic strategy, based on its impact on overall freedoms and rights, has not been the focus of decision-makers during the pandemic. They have neither addressed the threats highlighted in the articles, nor contributed to the discourse. This is worrying for the long-term maintenance and development of a healthy democracy.

In February 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany issued a landmark judgement on assisted suicide. It rejected as unconstitutional a law from 2015 that prohibited \"assisted suicide services\". It emphasized the freedom of people to shape their own lives and deaths and to seek help in doing so. In contrast, other practical problems arise when a doctor is confronted with a request for assisted suicide at the bedside in the current situation. The different perspectives and their tensions are contrasted.
Im Februar 2020 hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht ein wegweisendes Urteil zum assistierten Suizid gefällt. Es verwarf ein Gesetz aus dem Jahr 2015 als verfassungswidrig, das die „geschäftsmäßige Förderung der Selbsttötung“ verbot. Es betonte die Freiheit des Menschen, sein Leben und sein Sterben selbst zu gestalten und dabei Hilfe in Anspruch zu nehmen. Demgegenüber drängen sich andere, praktische Probleme auf, wenn sich ein Arzt in der gegenwärtigen Situation am Krankenbett mit der Bitte um Hilfe zum Suizid konfrontiert sieht. Die unterschiedlichen Perspektiven und ihre Spannungen werden gegenübergestellt.Schlüsselwörter: Ärztlich assistierter Suizid, Bundesverfassungsgericht, Arzt- Patient-Verhältnis, Freiheit, BerufsethosEingereicht am 30. April 2024 -akzeptiert am 17. Mai 2024.

Growing concerns about the level of CO2 emissions have made identifying the key drivers of the emission issue a critical agenda item. These developments have turned identifying drivers of CO2 emissions into a popular research area. Researchers have been attempting to determine the root causes of CO2 emissions for quite some time. While many economic factors have been associated with the emission levels, researchers\' interest in undiscovered factors has brought political factors to the forefront. Although some institutional/political factors have been linked to CO2 emissions in the relevant literature, the specific impact of freedom of expression and belief (FEB) has yet to be examined. Notably, as democracies\' provision of economic freedoms motivates production and consumption, exerting pressure on the environment, FEB can balance it. This study is a pioneering attempt to seek answers to this question. By assigning a specific role to FEB, the research seeks to determine the key factors influencing CO2 emissions in the Group of Seven (G7) between 2006 and 2022. Results suggest that FEB might be crucial in lowering CO2 emissions, whereas economic expansion and energy use tend to increase CO2 emissions. However, the impact of trade openness has yet to be found to be significant. Thus, securing and enhancing FEB could lead to significant environmental gains in G7 countries and globally.

With the growing numbers of people living in old age, a system that sustains autonomy, dignity and freedom of movement for people living with dementia (PwD) needs to be installed. However, due to the cognitive constraints in the cohort of PwD, traditional qualitative methods of inquiry, such as interviews, are often not a good match. This study aimed to use creative qualitative assessment tools to assess the values and opinions of PwD in nursing homes on freedom and safety. Twenty-two nursing home residents with memory problems participated in this study. Important themes related to freedom and safety were identified using a diverse set of methodologies. Overall, residents had a similar view on \'safety\', relating this to having a homely environment where people look out for you, with a good balance between busy and quiet areas and being able to retain cognitive and physical function. Values around freedom were more diverse. Residents who were still capable of logical speech generally voiced a wish for independence, making one\'s own decisions and wanting to go outside. For residents who no longer spoke, freedom seemed to be experienced more through the connection to other people. These results show that PwD still have distinct personal values concerning freedom and safety, which should be given due consideration in decision-making regarding nursing home policy, thereby potentially improving the quality of life of PwD.

暂无摘要。

Freedom, safety, and ease of movement are innate human urges attributed to conscience along with many other preferences such as attractiveness (beauty), economy, and life. This article addresses the physics basis of the innate urge to have freedom. It unveils the connection between animal freedom and the universal (constructal) tendency toward easier movement and greater access in all evolutionary systems throughout nature (animate & inanimate). The demonstration is made with a model of lack of freedom in animal movement: a man who walks his dog on a leash. When two animals are coerced to move at the same speed, their combined effort (the spent power) is greater than when they move freely, and independently. When the speed of the couple is dictated by the big body (man), the big one walks freely, and the small one must run. Participants in organized movement (life, society) are not equal. All participants move with less effort when they are not coerced to move the same way. The implications of this part of physics (nature) are numerous and help unify the animal realm with the design and evolution of human society. If you want diversity, give the population freedom, not prescriptions.

UNASSIGNED: Collaboration is a vital skill that needs to be developed in health professions students. Developing tolerance for differing viewpoints and valuing an understanding of others\' lived experiences are instrumental skills in learning to provide patient-centered care. Fostering the expression of diverse viewpoints and working through uncomfortable and distressful situations are a part of the experience in acquiring these skills. It is the educator\'s duty to facilitate these encounters in a way that upholds the tenants of academic freedom and civility to create optimal educational outcomes. Doing so creates opportunities for transformative learning and the facilitation of higher cognitive development when compared with the avoidance of exposing students to divergent viewpoints. It is through freedom of discussion that one must teach students that ultimately the pursuit of truth, even when it may be unwelcome, disagreeable, or deeply offensive, greatly outweighs the discomfort the process of discovering it may bring.

To clarify the place of time direction of change in nature (time arrow), the present article shows why Evolution and Irreversibility are two distinct phenomena. Their distinct laws of nature are the Constructal Law and the Second Law, respectively. The demonstration is based on the simplest setting imaginable: a solid body moving in a pool of water. The view is holistic: the system selected for analysis is the body and the pool, not the body alone, and the phenomenon is the evolution of the image (configuration) of the whole. New is also the answer to the question of what flows in this evolving flow configuration. Along the way, important terms are defined: phenomenon, law, irreversibility, nature, design, freedom, theory versus empiricism, information, knowledge, selection, purpose, engine, refrigeration, and wheel. More complex natural settings for the demonstration are in the second part of the article: engines, refrigeration, heating and cooling, the wheel, and a pushed boat sliding on water.

UNASSIGNED: To examine in-depth experiences of loneliness and freedom after late-life divorce from an intergenerational familial/dyadic perspective in a family-oriented society that also values self-determination. Considering the expansion of late-life divorce, it is important to understand its consequences for the family wellbeing.
UNASSIGNED: According to phenomenology tradition, data was collected through 51 semi-structured qualitative interviews, comprised from 7 family units (n = 33) including all/most family members and 9 parent-child dyads (n = 18), using thematic-analysis and dyadic interview-analysis principles. Analyzing family units enables a more complex examination of the phenomena, providing a holistic view of family life.
UNASSIGNED: Loneliness and freedom experienced simultaneously was the most common. A gap was identified between generations regarding benefits and costs of late-life divorce. Whereas most divorcees emphasized the benefits of freedom, most of their adult-children mainly described the disadvantages of loneliness, perceiving both loneliness and freedom as negative.
UNASSIGNED: Late-life divorce is a complex experience comprised of both loneliness and freedom. Each generation experiences the benefits and costs of late-life divorce differently. Unique aspects of freedom and loneliness at old age in a socio-cultural context located between self-determination and family-oriented are discussed, including strategies of coping with loneliness. Implications for families and professionals are presented.

The collective action of MOCAO, Movimiento en resistencia contra las agresiones oculares del ESMAD (Escuadrón Móvil An-tidisturbios) is a social strateg y to demand access to justice and the fulfilment of guarantees of reparation and non-repetition in Colombia. A brief account of significant events in our trajecto-ry as a social movement is presented, together with our letter of petitions to the national government as victims and survivors of ocular aggressions in the framework of police violence. Al-though ESMAD today has been reformed under the name of the Unit for Dialogue and Maintenance of Order (UNDMO), we consider that there have not yet been structural changes to ensure that its function is related to protecting the constitution-al right to social protest.