布基纳法索加入了全球妇女融资机制,儿童和青少年(GFF)在2017年解决持续的生殖资金缺口,母性,新生,孩子,和青少年健康和营养(RMNCAH-N)。很少有实证论文涉及全球筹资机制,特别是GFF,全国卫生支持资源动员。
■本研究描述了在布基纳法索制定GFF规划文件(投资案例和项目评估文件)的政策过程。
■我们进行了探索性定性政策分析。数据收集包括文件审查(N=74)和深入的半结构化访谈(N=23)。根据卫生政策三角的组成部分对数据进行了分析。
■对RMNCAH-N的干预有强有力的国家政治支持,投资案例(IC)和项目评估文件的起草过程是包容性和多部门的。尽管有高层的政策承诺,世界银行项目的后续实施,包括GFF的贡献,被受访者认为具有挑战性,即使在项目重组过程发生之后。这些挑战是由于RMNCAH-N持续的政策分散,在制定工作时,利益相关者之间的不同程序和观点的导航,克服对GFF性质的误解,IC的制度锚定薄弱。不安全和政治不稳定也导致在执行商定承诺方面出现的延误和困难。为了解决这些问题,应该促进和提高变革和分配领导的有效性。
■很少有研究审查与GFF或其他全球卫生倡议相关的国家政策进程。需要进行此类研究,以更好地了解在不同卫生系统背景下,在调整捐助者和国家优先事项方面遇到的挑战范围。这项研究可能会激励其他人确保GFF和其他全球卫生举措响应当地需求和政策环境,以更好地实施。
主要发现:布基纳法索对全球融资基金的政治承诺很高,但是它的实施受到政策分裂的阻碍,相互竞争的利益,制度锚定薄弱,和误解。补充知识:本研究记录了全球卫生倡议的启动,特别是全球融资基金,包括其规划文件的制定和实施,即投资案例和项目评估文件。全球卫生对政策和行动的影响:了解促进或阻碍制定和实施全球融资基金的政策进程的因素可以为未来举措的设计和实施提供信息。
UNASSIGNED: Burkina Faso joined the Global Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents (GFF) in 2017 to address persistent gaps in funding for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health and nutrition (RMNCAH-N). Few empirical papers deal with how global funding mechanisms, and specifically GFF, support resource mobilisation for health nationally.
UNASSIGNED: This study describes the policy processes of developing the GFF planning documents (the Investment Case and Project Appraisal Document) in Burkina Faso.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted an exploratory qualitative policy analysis. Data collection included document review (N = 74) and in-depth semi-structured interviews (N = 23). Data were analysed based on the components of the health policy triangle.
UNASSIGNED: There was strong national political support to RMNCAH-N interventions, and the process of drawing up the investment case (IC) and the project appraisal document was inclusive and multi-sectoral. Despite high-level policy commitments, subsequent implementation of the World Bank project, including the GFF contribution, was perceived by respondents as challenging, even after the project restructuring process occurred. These challenges were due to ongoing policy fragmentation for RMNCAH-N, navigation of differing procedures and perspectives between stakeholders in the setting up of the work, overcoming misunderstandings about the nature of the GFF, and weak institutional anchoring of the IC. Insecurity and political instability also contributed to observed delays and difficulties in implementing the commitments agreed upon. To tackle these issues, transformational and distributive leaderships should be promoted and made effective.
UNASSIGNED: Few studies have examined national policy processes linked to the GFF or other global health initiatives. This kind of research is needed to better understand the range of challenges in aligning donor and national priorities encountered across diverse health systems contexts. This study may stimulate others to ensure that the GFF and other global health initiatives respond to local needs and policy environments for better implementation.
Main findings: There was a high level of political commitment to the Global Financing Facility in Burkina Faso, but its implementation has been hindered by policy fragmentation, competing interests, weak institutional anchoring, and misunderstandings.Added knowledge: This study documents the initiation of a global health initiative, specifically the Global Financing Facility, including the development and implementation of its planning documents, namely the Investment Case and Project Appraisal Document.Global health impact for policy and action: An understanding of the factors that facilitated or impeded the policy processes of developing and implementing the Global Financing Facility can inform the design and implementation of future initiatives.