• 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的/背景血清瘤形成是乳腺手术后最常见的并发症。然而,关于这个问题的在线患者教育材料的可读性几乎没有证据。本研究旨在评估相关在线信息的可访问性和可读性。方法对文献进行系统回顾,确定了37个相关网站进行进一步分析。通过使用一系列可读性公式来评估每篇在线文章的可读性。结果所有患者教育材料的Flesch-ReadingEase平均得分为53.9(±21.9),Flesch-Kincaid平均阅读等级为7.32(±3.1),这表明他们“相当困难”阅读,并且高于推荐的阅读水平。结论关于术后乳腺血清肿的在线患者教育材料处于高于公众推荐阅读等级的水平。改善将允许所有患者,不管识字水平如何,获取这些资源,以帮助进行乳房手术的决策。
    Aims/Background Seroma formation is the most common complication following breast surgery. However, there is little evidence on the readability of online patient education materials on this issue. This study aimed to assess the accessibility and readability of the relevant online information. Methods This systematic review of the literature identified 37 relevant websites for further analysis. The readability of each online article was assessed through using a range of readability formulae. Results The average Flesch-Reading Ease score for all patient education materials was 53.9 (± 21.9) and the average Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was 7.32 (± 3.1), suggesting they were \'fairly difficult\' to read and is higher than the recommended reading level. Conclusion Online patient education materials regarding post-surgery breast seroma are at a higher-than-recommended reading grade level for the public. Improvement would allow all patients, regardless of literacy level, to access such resources to aid decision-making around undergoing breast surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氢吗啡酮与罗哌卡因联合应用于超声引导下的竖脊肌平面阻滞可增强乳腺手术患者的术后镇痛效果并降低白细胞介素-6的表达。
    方法:在本研究中,乳腺癌改良根治术患者随机分为3组(每组30例):标准一般(C组),罗哌卡因平立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)(R组),和ESPB与罗哌卡因加氢吗啡酮(HR组)。诊断:乳腺癌患者。手术后,疼痛程度,IL-6,麻醉剂量,额外的镇痛需求,和恢复里程碑进行比较,以评估ESPB增强的疗效.
    结果:3组基线特征无显著差异,操作时间,术后恶心的例数,和T1时(手术后返回病房的时间)的血清IL-6浓度。在T2(手术后第二天早上6:00),HR组血清IL-6浓度显著低于R组和C组(P<0.05);舒芬太尼,HR和R组的丙泊酚明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR和R组的视觉模拟评分在T3(术后4小时)明显降低,T4(术后12小时),和T5(术后24小时)高于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组接受术后镇痛的患者比例明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组术后恶心的患者比例明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组术后第一次肛门排气时间和术后第一次下床活动时间明显短于C组(P<0.05)。
    结论:氢吗啡酮复合罗哌卡因对全麻下MRM患者的术后镇痛效果更好。联合镇痛引起的不良反应少,抑制炎症因子IL-6的表达水平,从而促进术后恢复。使用氢吗啡酮和罗哌卡因的ESPB改善MRM后疼痛控制,减少不利影响,更有效地抑制IL-6,促进恢复。
    BACKGROUND: Combining hydromorphone with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks enhances postoperative analgesia and reduces interleukin-6 expression in breast surgery patients.
    METHODS: In this study, breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized into 3 groups for anesthesia (30 patients in each group): standard general (group C), Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with ropivacaine (group R), and ESPB with ropivacaine plus hydromorphone (group HR). Diagnosis: Breast cancer patients. Postsurgery, pain levels, IL-6, anesthetic doses, additional analgesia needs, and recovery milestones were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the ESPB enhancements.
    RESULTS: The 3 groups were not significantly different in baseline characteristics, operation time, number of cases with postoperative nausea, and serum IL-6 concentrations at T1 (the time of being returned to the ward after surgery). At T2 (at 6:00 in the next morning after surgery), the serum IL-6 concentration in group HR was significantly lower than that in groups R and C (P < .05); the intraoperative doses of remifentanil, sufentanil, and propofol were significantly lower in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05); Groups HR and R had significantly lower visual analog scale scores at T3 (4 hours postoperatively), T4 (12 hours postoperatively), and T5 (24 hours postoperatively) than those in group C (P < .05); the proportions of patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesia were significantly lower in groups HR and R than in group C (P < .05); groups HR and R had significantly lower proportions of patients with postoperative nausea than group C (P < .05); the time to the first anal exhaust and the time to the first ambulation after surgery were significantly shorter in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for ESPB achieved a greater postoperative analgesic effect for patients receiving MRM under general anesthesia. The combined analgesia caused fewer adverse reactions and inhibited the expression level of the inflammatory factor IL-6 more effectively, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery. ESPB using hydromorphone with ropivacaine improved pain control post-MRM, reduced adverse effects, and more effectively suppressed IL-6, enhancing recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当采用传统的倒T重建技术时,切除肿瘤后乳房下极的组织体积不足会损害美学结果。为了减少术后畸形,我们改进了这项技术。共有104例患者接受了T技术,32人接受了改良的T技术,72人接受了传统的T技术。在这项研究中,我们介绍了改良T技术组的手术结果,并将手术和肿瘤结果与传统T技术组进行了比较.在改良的T技术组中,肿瘤平均大小为23.34mm,平均手术时间为107.75分钟,显著短于传统T技术(p=0.039)。此外,平均失血量为95.93mL,显著低于传统T技术(p=0.011)。尽管两组的并发症发生率没有显著差异(p=0.839),与传统T技术相比,改良T技术产生了更好的美学效果(p=0.019).生存分析显示两组5年无复发生存率差异无统计学意义。倾向得分匹配前后(p=0.381与p=0.277)。作为我们针对下乳房象限的一系列致癌技术的一部分,改进的倒T型技术利用具有成本效益的襟翼来解决较低的极点缺陷,减轻畸形和恢复乳房的自然形状。
    Inadequate tissue volume at the lower pole of the breast following tumor excision can compromise aesthetic outcomes when employing the conventional inverted-T reconstruction technique. With the aim of reducing postoperative deformities, we have refined this technique. A total of 104 patients underwent the T technique, while 32 underwent the modified T technique and 72 underwent the traditional T technique. In this study, we present the surgical outcomes of the modified T technique group and compare both surgical and oncological outcomes with those of the traditional T technique group. In the modified T technique group, the average tumor size was 23.34 mm, and the mean operation duration was 107.75 min, which was significantly shorter than that of the traditional T technique (p = 0.039). Additionally, the average blood loss was 95.93 mL, which was significantly lower than that of the traditional T technique (p = 0.011). Although complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.839), the modified T technique yielded superior aesthetic outcomes compared to the traditional T technique (p = 0.019). Survival analysis indicated no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free survival between the two groups, both before and after propensity score matching (p = 0.381 vs. p = 0.277). As part of our series of oncoplastic techniques for the lower breast quadrant, the modified inverted-T technique utilizes a cost-effective flap to address lower pole defects, mitigating deformities and restoring the breast\'s natural shape.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估经腋窝入路无充气单孔内镜手术(TAWISES)和常规开放颈前入路(COACAS)手术的卫生技术。
    方法:回顾性分析2021年01月至2022年12月期间我院收治的60例单侧甲状腺癌根治术患者的临床资料。对照组行COACAS(30例),实验组接受TAWISES(30例)。患者手术时间,术中出血量,术后24h疼痛指数,引流管携带时间,对两组患者的住院时间和并发症发生率进行比较分析。术后随访3、6、12个月,根据患者麻木情况进行评估,肌肉紧绷,颈部疼痛和其他不适,以及对社会适应和美容切口的满意度。评估两组患者1年的复发状况。进行问卷调查以评估患者对两种手术方法的接受程度。综合评价了我区不同方法的经济特征(成本效益和成本效用)。
    结果:切口的长度,试验组引流管携带时间和住院时间均大于对照组(P<0.05)。并发症发生率的差异,术中出血量,两组术后24h疼痛指数及复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组颈部不适更大,术后3个月随访,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月和12个月随访时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,轻度不适明显多见于实验组(63.33%>36.67%,80%>53.33%,P<0.05)。实验组具有较好的社会适应能力,总医疗费用更高,患者总体医疗满意度优于对照组(P<0.05)。TAWISL的接受度大于COACAS(P<0.05)。
    结论:与COACLAS相比,TAWISES是安全有效的,更好地满足化妆品,患者的心理和社会适应需求。TAWISES也更具成本效益,可以更好地用于我们地区的人口,填补了我们地区甲状腺癌手术方式的空白。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sanitary techniques for radical thyroid cancer surgery via the transaxillary approach without inflation single-port endoscopic surgery (TAWISES) and the conventional open anterior cervical approach (COACAS) in a controlled manner.
    METHODS: This work was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 60 patients admitted to our hospital for unilateral radical thyroid cancer surgery between 01/2021 and 12/2022. The control group underwent COACAS (30 patients), and the experimental group underwent TAWISES (30 patients). The patients\' operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, 24-h postoperative pain index, drainage tube carrying time, hospitalization duration and complication rate were compared and analyzed. The patients were followed up for 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively and evaluated based on numbness, muscular tightness, pain and other discomfort in the neck, as well as satisfaction with social adaptation and cosmetic incisions. The recurrence status was assessed for 1 year in both groups of patients. A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess patient acceptance of the two surgical approaches. The economic characteristics (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility) of the different approaches in our region were evaluated comprehensively.
    RESULTS: The length of the incision, drainage tube carrying time and hospitalization duration were greater in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The differences in complication rate, intraoperative bleeding volume, 24-h postoperative pain index and recurrence rate were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). Neck discomfort was greater in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant at the 3-month postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05). The differences at the 6- and 12-month postoperative follow-ups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, mild discomfort was significantly more common in the experimental group (63.33% > 36.67%, 80% > 53.33%, P < 0.05). The experimental group had better social adaptability, greater total medical costs, and better overall patient medical satisfaction than did the control group (P < 0.05). The acceptance of TAWISL was greater than that of COACAS (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with COACLAS, TAWISES is safe and effective and better meets the cosmetic, psychological and social adaptation needs of patients. TAWISES is also more cost effective and can be better utilized for the population in our region, filling the gap in surgical modalities for thyroid cancer in in our region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:性别确认乳房切除术(GAM)可改善跨性别和非双性恋(TGNB)个体的心理社会功能和生活质量。然而,围手术期通常以情绪压力为标志,对手术结果的担忧,和身体不适。虽然住院手术提供了与患者互动和教育的多种机会,门诊手术,比如GAM,由于患者术后随访<24小时,因此构成了独特的挑战。鉴于TGNB个体经常经历的与性别焦虑相关的情绪和心理困扰加剧,解决这些差距可以显着改善结果。这项研究旨在表征该人群中与患者发起的沟通(PIC)频率相关的患者和手术特征。方法:对2018年2月至2022年11月接受GAM的TGNB患者进行单中心回顾性分析。人口统计,手术特点,记录围手术期PIC的频率和原因(手术前后30天)。主要结果是围手术期PIC的发生率。次要结果包括(1)PIC的基本原理和(2)患者和与PIC相关的手术特征。结果:共纳入352例患者。其中,285(74.6%)在围手术期开始沟通,总共659个PIC。中位年龄为25.0岁(四分位距[IQR]:9.0)。中位体重指数(BMI)为28.5(IQR:8.5)kg/m2。术前平均PIC数为0.7±1.3,术后为1.3±1.7(p<0.001)。术前PIC受试者最常见的是行政问题(AI;n=66,30.7%),术前要求(n=43,20.0%),以及成本和保险(n=33,15.0%)。术后最常见的PIC受试者是伤口护理(n=77,17.3%),AI(n=70,15.0%),活动限制(n=60,13.5%),排水量(n=56,12.6%),和肿胀(n=37,8.3%)。总的来说,老年患者(β=0.234,p=0.001),有重度抑郁症或广泛性焦虑症病史的人(2.4±3.0vs.1.7±1.9;p=0.019),和那些没有术后引流(n=16/17,94.1%vs.n=236/334,70.7%;p=0.025)从事更高水平的PIC。其他患者特征之间没有显著关联,围手术期细节,或并发症和PIC频率。结论:围手术期PIC在我们机构的大多数GAM患者中普遍存在,随着年龄,精神病诊断,术后引流使用被确定为重要的预测因素。为了减轻PIC频率,确保足够的支持人员和提供全面的术后指导至关重要,特别是关于活动限制和排水管理。这些干预措施可能会减少高容量中心的PIC。进一步的研究应探讨有针对性的干预措施,以进一步支持TGNB患者围手术期。
    Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) improves the psychosocial functioning and quality of life of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals. However, the perioperative period is often marked by emotional stress, concerns about surgical outcomes, and physical discomfort. While inpatient procedures provide multiple opportunities to engage with and educate patients, outpatient surgeries, such as GAM, pose a unique challenge as patients are followed for <24 h postoperatively. Given the heightened emotional and psychological distress related to gender dysphoria TGNB individuals often experience, addressing these gaps can significantly improve outcomes. This study aims to characterize patient and surgical characteristics associated with patient-initiated communication (PIC) frequency in this population. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of TGNB patients undergoing GAM from February 2018 to November 2022 was conducted. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and frequency of and reasons for perioperative PIC (30 days before and after surgery) were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative PIC. The secondary outcomes included (1) the rationale for PIC and (2) patient and surgical characteristics associated with PIC. Results: A total of 352 patients were included. Of these, 285 (74.6%) initiated communication in the perioperative period, totaling 659 PICs. The median age was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0) years. The median body mass index (BMI) was 28.5 (IQR: 8.5) kg/m2. The mean number of PICs was 0.7 ± 1.3 preoperatively and 1.3 ± 1.7 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The most frequent preoperative PIC subjects were administrative issues (AI; n = 66, 30.7%), preoperative requirements (n = 43, 20.0%), and cost and insurance (n = 33, 15.0%). The most frequent postoperative PIC subjects were wound care (n = 77, 17.3%), AI (n = 70, 15.0%), activity restrictions (n = 60, 13.5%), drainage (n = 56, 12.6%), and swelling (n = 37, 8.3%). Collectively, older patients (β = 0.234, p = 0.001), those with a history of major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder (2.4 ± 3.0 vs. 1.7 ± 1.9; p = 0.019), and those without postoperative drains (n = 16/17, 94.1% vs. n = 236/334, 70.7%; p = 0.025) engaged in higher levels of PIC. There were no significant associations between other patient characteristics, perioperative details, or complications and PIC frequency. Conclusions: Perioperative PIC is prevalent among the majority of GAM patients at our institution, with age, psychiatric diagnosis, and postoperative drain use identified as significant predictors. To mitigate PIC frequency, it is crucial to ensure adequate support staffing and provide comprehensive postoperative instructions, particularly concerning activity restrictions and drainage management. These interventions may reduce PICs in high-volume centers. Further research should investigate targeted interventions to further support TGNB patients during the perioperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景与目的:乳腺分泌癌是一种少见的乳腺癌组织学亚型。关于这个实体的研究很少,只有一些更大的研究,缺乏共识。我们的目的是报告该亚型中特定的顶腺分泌分化,并考虑该病例的临床结果。病例介绍:我们报告了一名72岁女性患者的病例,该患者到我院就诊,患有可疑的乳腺肿瘤。核心活检和乳房切除术显示低度乳腺癌,一种分泌型亚型,具有大汗腺分化。免疫组织化学证实了肿瘤细胞的分泌性质和大汗腺性质。手术切除被认为是治愈性的,患者正在接受任何复发的长期监测。结论:对分泌性癌伴大汗腺分化的临床行为研究甚少。临床结果未知,不幸的是,除了手术,没有其他辅助治疗显示出疗效.对于这种罕见的实体,需要对长期临床进展进行进一步研究。
    Background and Objectives: Secretory carcinoma of the breast is an uncommon histological subtype of breast cancer. There is little research on this entity and only a few larger studies, which lack consensus. We aim to report a particular apocrine differentiation in this subtype and ponder upon the clinical outcome of this case. Case presentation: We report the case of a 72-year-old female patient who presented to our hospital with a suspicious breast tumor. Core biopsy and mastectomy showed a low-grade breast carcinoma, a secretory subtype with apocrine differentiation. Immunohistochemistry confirmed both the secretory nature and the apocrine nature of the tumor cells. Surgical excision was considered curative and the patient is under long-term surveillance for any recurrences. Conclusions: There is very little research on the clinical behavior of secretory carcinomas with apocrine differentiation. The clinical outcome is unknown and, unfortunately, besides surgery, no other adjuvant treatments have shown efficacy. Further studies on long-term clinical progression are required for this rare entity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)研究背景:乳腺癌是全球范围内的主要恶性肿瘤,在加纳,总体生存率很低。然而,大约50%的病例是早期疾病,随着乳腺癌治疗的进步和生存率的提高,生活质量(QOL)正变得与疾病的治疗一样重要。(2)方法:这是一项对接受保乳手术(BCS)的幸存者的横断面研究,2016年至2020年在加纳的一家三级医院进行的仅乳房切除术(M)和乳房再造乳房切除术(BRS),使用EORTCQLQC-30和EORTCQLQBR-23比较评估他们的生活质量。(3)结果:研究参与者的总体健康状况(GHS)中位数为83.3[IQR:66.7-91.7],手术类型之间没有显着差异。BRS组的功能量表中位数得分较低(82.8和51.0),症状量表得分最高(15.7和16.5)。BRS组的身体图像显着最低(83.3)[68.8-91.7],而BCS组的身体图像最高(100)[91.7-100](p<0.001)。(4)结论:有必要开发专门的支持系统,以改善乳腺癌幸存者的QOL,同时考虑所进行的手术类型。
    (1) Background: Breast cancer is the leading malignancy worldwide, and in Ghana, it has a poor overall survival rate. However, approximately 50% of cases are cases of early-stage disease, and with advances in breast cancer treatment and improvements in survival, quality of life (QOL) is becoming as important as the treatment of the disease. (2) Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study of survivors who had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy only (M) and mastectomy with breast reconstruction (BRS) from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary hospital in Ghana, comparatively assessing their QOL using EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ BR-23. (3) Results: The study participants had an overall global health status (GHS) median score of 83.3 [IQR: 66.7-91.7] with no significant differences between the surgery types. The BRS group had statistically significant lower median scores for the functional scale (82.8 and 51.0) and the highest scores for the symptomatic scale (15.7 and 16.5). Body image was significantly lowest for the BRS group (83.3) [68.8-91.7] and highest (100) [91.7-100] for the BCS group (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: There is a need to develop support systems tailored at improving the QOL of breast cancer survivors taking into consideration the type of surgery performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们介绍了新加坡樟宜总医院乳腺中心淋巴水肿监测策略的主要发现,该策略使用了患者报告的症状,标准臂围测量和临床评估诊断乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)。我们的次要目的是强调和讨论可以实施的监测策略的重要元素,以跟踪乳腺癌治疗的结果指标,以供将来研究使用。
    我们对511名乳腺癌患者进行了一项横断面研究,以评估BCRL的患病率及其相关危险因素。我们根据患者的自我报告定义了BCRL患病率,基于国际淋巴学会(ISL)分期的客观臂围测量和临床诊断。
    患者的中位随访时间为88.8个月。队列中的累积患病率为30.9%。BCRL患者的队列年龄较大(58.4岁与[vs]54.9岁),平均体重指数较高(27.7vs25.2),乳房切除术的比例更高(77%vs64.3%),腋窝间隙,乳房重建的可能性较小,高级别肿瘤,切除更多的淋巴结,更晚期的淋巴结疾病,并接受了辅助化疗。然而,临床上明显的BCRL仅为6.5%(511例患者中有33例).在接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)或腋窝采样的患者中,具有临床意义的BCRL的比例为1.7%,而在接受腋窝清除的患者中为9.9%。大多数BCRL的严重程度为亚临床或轻度。
    我们的研究表明,我们的BCRL比率与国际比率相当,并强调了有患病风险的相似患者。拥有全面的淋巴水肿监测策略对于为未来的研究铺平道路至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: We presented the key findings from Singapore\'s Changi General Hospital Breast Centre\'s lymphedema surveillance strategy that used patients\' reported symptoms, standard arm circumference measurements and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our secondary aim was to highlight and discuss important elements of a surveillance strategy that can be implemented to track this outcome measure of breast cancer treatment for future research.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 511 breast cancer patients to assess the prevalence of BCRL and its associated risk factors. We defined BCRL prevalence rates based on patients\' self-reporting, objective arm circumference measure-ments and clinical diagnosis based on International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging.
    UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up of patients was 88.8 months. The cumulative prevalence rate in the cohort was 30.9%. The cohort of BCRL patients were older (58.4 versus [vs] 54.9 years), had higher mean Body Mass Index (27.7 vs 25.2), higher proportion of mastectomy (77% vs 64.3%), axillary clearance, less likely breast reconstruction, higher-grade tumour, more lymph nodes excised, more advanced nodal disease, and had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy. However, clinically apparent BCRL was only 6.5% (33 out of 511 patients). The proportion of clinically significant BCRL in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary sampling was 1.7% compared to 9.9% in patients who had undergone axillary clearance. Majority of the BCRL were subclinical or mild in severity.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study showed that our rates of BCRL were comparable to international rates and highlighted similar patient profiles who were at risk of developing the disease. Having a comprehensive lymphedema surveillance strategy is paramount in paving the way for future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    多形性癌(PC)是一种罕见的高级乳腺癌形式,其特征是存在独特的多形性巨大肿瘤细胞,表现出奇异的核和非典型的有丝分裂。在这项研究中,我们报告了3例患者,他们在显微镜下出现了由大型多形性细胞增生组成的病变,其中多核巨细胞占优势。免疫组织化学分析显示,在各个恶性成分中具有不同的免疫学特征。值得注意的是,这份报告旨在提供有价值的见解,增加了对这种罕见肿瘤的理解,伴随着文献综述。尽管它很罕见,由于其独特的形态学和病理学特征,乳腺中的PC仍然具有临床相关性。这些独特的属性需要在临床表现和管理方面进行具体考虑。
    Pleomorphic carcinoma (PC) is an uncommon and high-grade form of breast carcinoma characterized by the presence of distinctive pleomorphic giant tumor cells exhibiting bizarre nuclei and atypical mitosis. In this study, we report three patients who presented with lesions composed of a proliferation of large pleomorphic cells with a predominance of multinucleated giant cells on a microscope. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed distinct immunologic profiles within the respective malignant components. Notably, this report aims to contribute valuable insights, adding to the understanding of this uncommon tumor, accompanied by a literature review. Despite its rarity, PC in the breast remains clinically relevant due to its distinctive morphological and pathological features. These unique attributes require specific considerations in both clinical presentation and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是比较局部晚期乳腺癌患者的即时乳房重建(IBR)和单独乳房切除术的安全性和有效性结果。
    方法:我们对PUBMED进行了全面的文献检索,EMBASE,和Cochrane数据库。评估的主要结果是总生存率,无病生存,局部复发。次要结果是手术并发症的发生率。所有数据均使用ReviewManager5.3进行分析。
    结果:16项研究,本荟萃分析纳入了15,364名参与者.汇总数据表明,接受IBR的患者比仅接受乳房切除术的患者更容易出现手术并发症(HR:3.96,95CI[1.07,14.67],p=0.04)。总生存率无显著差异(HR:0.94,95CI[0.73,1.20],p=0.62),无病生存率(HR:1.03,95CI[0.83,1.27],p=0.81),或乳腺癌特异性生存率(HR:0.93,95CI[0.71,1.21],IBR组和非IBR组之间的p=0.57)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,乳房切除术后的IBR不影响局部晚期乳腺癌患者的总生存期和无病生存期。然而,IBR带来了不可忽视的更高的并发症风险,需要充分评估和仔细决定。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and mastectomy alone in locally advanced breast cancer patients.
    METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence. The secondary outcome was the incidence of surgical complications. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.
    RESULTS: Sixteen studies, involving 15,364 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that patients underwent IBR were more likely to experience surgical complications than those underwent mastectomy alone (HR: 3.96, 95%CI [1.07,14.67], p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in overall survival (HR: 0.94, 95%CI [0.73,1.20], p = 0.62), disease-free survival (HR: 1.03, 95%CI [0.83,1.27], p = 0.81), or breast cancer specific survival (HR: 0.93, 95%CI [0.71,1.21], p = 0.57) between IBR group and Non-IBR group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that IBR after mastectomy does not affect the overall survival and disease-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer patients. However, IBR brings with it a nonnegligible higher risk of complications and needs to be fully evaluated and carefully decided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号