OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of guidelines on the pancreatic perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery both domestically and internationally, providing reference and reference for clinical practice.
METHODS: Systemically retrieved in the guideline websites, professional association websites and databases, such as up to date, BMJ Best Practice, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), Medlive, Guidelines International Network(GIN), National Guideline Clearinghouse(NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE), Registered Nurses Association of Ontario(RNAO), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network(SIGN), Joanna Briggs Institute Library(JBI), including guidelines and expert consensus on enhanced postsurgical recovery in pancreatic surgery published as of December 20, 2023. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II(AGREE II) tool was applied to evaluate the quality of the guidelines by four assessors.
RESULTS: This study included seven guidelines, all of which were rated as Grade B in terms of quality, with ICC coefficients ranging from 0.752 to 0.884, indicating a high level of consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: When formulating guidelines in the future, it is recommended to use AGREE II as a reference, emphasizing the standardization of the guideline development process and methods, fully considering patients\' values and preferences, focusing on the applicability of the guidelines, and striving to create high-quality evidence-based recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in elderly patients undergoing surgery for kidney stones.
METHODS: Clinical data of 104 elderly patients who underwent kidney stone surgery at West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to different nursing plans. Among them, 52 patients in the control group received conventional nursing, and 52 patients in the study group received ERAS mode nursing. Postoperative recovery, anxiety, complications, stress response and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The time to recovery of postoperative rehabilitation indices in the research group was significantly shorter compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The research group also exhibited a significantly lower incidence of complications such as hematuria, abdominal pain, vomiting, chills, fever, and hypotension (all P < 0.05). Before the initiation of nursing care, there were no significant differences in the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) scores between the two groups (both P > 0.05). However, after nursing care, the research group exhibited lower SAI and TAI scores compared to the control group (all P < 0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the General Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) scores in any dimension between the two groups before nursing care (P > 0.05), but the research group showcased higher scores in every dimension after nursing care (P < 0.05). The levels of Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1), Endothelin-1 (ET-1), Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH), and Cortisol (Cor) were significantly lower in the research group after nursing care (all P < 0.05). The acknowledgment and approval scores of nursing care in the research group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of ERAS in elderly patients with kidney stones undergoing transurethral ureteral holmium laser lithotripsy is efficacious in mitigating stress reactions, enhancing quality of life and reducing perioperative anxiety, minimizing the incidence of complications, and promoting overall patient recovery.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the effect of pelvic floor function exercises based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept on lower urinary tract symptoms after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted using clinical data of patients admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 and underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. In accordance with the nursing method, the patients were divided into the routine group (conventional care) and the ERAS pelvic floor function exercise group, for which ERAS concept-based pelvic floor function exercises were carried out on the basis of the former group. The confounders between the two groups were matched by propensity score, and the scores of urination, pelvic floor muscle strength, lower urinary tract symptoms and quality of life (QoL) were compared between the two groups after matching.
RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included in the study, of whom 60 patients were identified after propensity score matching, consisting of 30 patients each in the ERAS and routine groups. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Compared with the routine group, the observation group showed significantly shorter first spontaneous urination time, greater first urination volume (p < 0.05), better pelvic floor muscle strength, considerably lower urinary tract symptoms and better QoL at discharge and 3 months after discharge (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor function exercises based on the ERAS concept can relieve lower urinary tract symptoms, accelerate urination and improve pelvic floor muscle strength and QoL after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Hysterectomy is a common gynecological surgery associated with significant postoperative discomfort and extended hospital stays. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), a multidisciplinary approach, has emerged as a strategy aimed at improving perioperative outcomes and promoting faster patient recovery and satisfaction. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols on clinical outcomes, such as hospital stay length, readmission rates, and postoperative complications, in patients undergoing gynecological hysterectomy.
METHODS: Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for relevant studies published up to January 31, 2023. A total of seventeen studies were selected based on predefined eligibility and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model with the STATA SE 14.0 software, focusing on outcomes like length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and readmission rates.
RESULTS: ERAS protocols significantly reduced the length of hospital stays and incidence of postoperative complications such as ileus, without increasing readmission rates or the level of patient-reported pain. Notable heterogeneity was observed among included studies, attributed to the variation in patient populations and the specificity of the documented study protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in enhancing recovery trajectories in gynecological hysterectomy patients. This reinforces the imperative for broader, standardized adoption of ERAS pathways as an evidence-based approach, fostering a safer and more efficient perioperative care paradigm.

UNASSIGNED: To observe the efficacy and safety of multimodal standardized analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective, double-blind, randomized study of patients who were admitted to our hospital between December 2020 and March 2022 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer and who intended to undergo elective laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery was conducted. The participants were randomly divided into two intervention groups, namely, a multimodal standardized analgesia group and a routine analgesia group. In both groups, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores while resting at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h and during movement at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h; the number of patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump button presses and postoperative recovery indicators within 3 days after surgery; the interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the 1st and 4th days after surgery; and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions and complications were recorded.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with the control group, the multimodal standardized analgesia group had significantly lower VAS pain scores at different time points while resting and during movement (P<0.05), significantly fewer PCIA pump button presses during the first 3 postoperative days (P<0.05), and significantly lower IL-6 and CRP levels on the 1st postoperative day (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to out-of-bed activity, the time to first flatus, the IL-6 and CRP levels on the 4th postoperative day or the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions and complications between the two groups (P >0.05).
UNASSIGNED: For patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery, multimodal standardized analgesia with ropivacaine combined with parecoxib sodium and a PCIA pump had a better analgesic effect, as it effectively inhibited early postoperative inflammatory reactions and promoted postoperative recovery and did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions and complications. Therefore, it is worthy of widespread clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, which have not previously been compared.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included prospective PRO data from August 2019 to June 2021. Clinical outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific module (QLQ-OES18) preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally compare quality of life (QOL) scores between the two modes.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing conventional care and ERAS were analyzed (n = 348 and 109, respectively). The ERAS group had fewer overall complications, pneumonia, arrhythmia, and a shorter PLOS than the conventional group, and outperformed the conventional group in five functional QLQ-C30 domains and five symptom QLQ-OES18 domains, including less dysphagia (p < 0.0001), trouble talking (p = 0.0006), and better eating (p < 0.0001). These advantages persisted for 3 months postoperatively. For the cervical circular stapled anastomosis, the initial domains and duration of benefit were reduced in the ERAS group.
CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol has significant advantages over conventional care in terms of clinical outcomes, lowering postoperative symptom burden, and improving functional QOL in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Selection of the optimal technique for cervical anastomosis is a key operative component of ERAS that maintains the symptom domains and duration of the advantages of PROs.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is an acute abdominal surgery that is often accompanied by severe abdominal inflammation. Oral probiotics are one of the postoperative treatments for rapid rehabilitation. However, there is a lack of prospective studies on this topic after appendectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the postoperative probiotics can modulate the inflammatory response and restore intestinal function in patients following appendectomy.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized trial. A total of 60 emergency patients were randomly divided into a control group (n = 30) and a probiotic group (n = 30). Patients in the control group started to drink some water the first day after surgery, and those in the probiotic group were given water supplemented with Bacillus licheniformis capsules for 5 consecutive days postsurgery. The indices of inflammation and postoperative conditions were recorded, and the data were analyzed with RStudio 4.3.2 software.
RESULTS: A total of 60 participants were included. Compared with those in the control group, the C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were significantly lower in the probiotic group at 2 d after surgery (P = 2.224e-05, P = 0.037, and P = 0.002, respectively, all P < 0.05). This trend persisted at day 5 post-surgery, with CRP and PCT levels remaining significantly lower in the probiotic group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.043, both P < 0.05). Furthermore, probiotics resulted in a shorter time to first flatus and a greater percentage of gram-negative bacilli in the feces (P = 0.035, P = 0.028, both P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative oral administration of probiotics may modulate the gut microbiota, benefit the recovery of the early inflammatory response, and subsequently enhance recovery after appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included.
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

暂无摘要。