Antithrombotic agents, including antiplatelet agent and anticoagulants are widely used in Korea due to increasing incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular disease and aging population. The management of patients using antithrombotic agents during endoscopic procedures is an important clinical challenge. Clinical practice guideline regarding this issue which was developed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was published in 2020. However, since then, new evidence has emerged for the use of dual antiplatelet therapy and direct anticoagulant management, and revised guidelines were issued in the US and Europe. Accordingly, the previous guidelines were revised, cardiologists also participated in the development group, and the recommendations went through a consensus process among international experts. This guideline presents 14 recommendations made according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology, and was reviewed by multidisciplinary experts. This guideline provides useful information that can assist endoscopists in the management of patients on antithrombotic agents who require diagnostic and elective therapeutic endoscopy. It will be revised as necessary to cover changes in technology, evidence, or other aspects of clinical practice.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for cancer. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is established as a safe procedure providing accelerated weight loss and comorbidity improvement or remission. Additionally, it is approved as a bridging procedure for various non-oncologic surgeries, with very limited data for oncologic procedures. The aim of this study is to present a series of patients with severe obesity and concomitant cancer who underwent LSG prior to definitive oncological procedure.
METHODS: A retrospective review (2008-2023) was conducted in three institutions, identifying 5 patients with cancer and severe obesity who underwent LSG as bridging procedure. Variables analyzed were initial weight, initial body mass index (BMI), type of malignancy, comorbidities, interval between LSG and oncological surgery, weight and BMI before the second intervention, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and postoperative morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: Malignancies identified were 2 prostate cancers, 1 periampullary neuroendocrine tumor, 1 rectal cancer, and 1 renal clear cell carcinoma. Mean age of patients was 50.2 years, mean initial BMI 47.4 kg/ m 2 , and mean BMI before oncological surgery 37 kg/ m 2 . Mean time interval between LSG and oncological surgery was 8.3 months. Mean %EWL achieved was 45.2%. Two thromboembolic events were encountered after LSG, while none of the patients developed complications after definitive oncological treatment. The mean follow-up after oncological surgery was 61.6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: LSG can be proposed as bridging procedure before oncological surgery in meticulously selected patients. Achieved weight loss can render subsequent oncological procedures easier and safer.

BACKGROUND: When pregnant patients present with nonobstetric pathology, the physicians caring for them may be uncertain about the optimal management strategy. The aim of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations for pregnant patients presenting with common surgical pathologies including appendicitis, biliary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee convened a working group to address these issues. The group generated five key questions and completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. An expert panel then met to form evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Expert opinion was utilized when the available evidence was deemed insufficient.
RESULTS: The expert panel agreed on ten recommendations addressing the management of appendicitis, biliary disease, and IBD during pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of appendectomy over nonoperative treatment of appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over nonoperative treatment of biliary disease and acute cholecystitis specifically. Based on expert opinion, the panel also suggested either operative or nonoperative treatment of biliary diseases other than acute cholecystitis in the third trimester, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rather than common bile duct exploration for symptomatic choledocholithiasis, applying the same criteria for emergent surgical intervention in pregnant and non-pregnant IBD patients, utilizing an open rather than minimally invasive approach for pregnant patients requiring emergent surgical treatment of IBD, and managing pregnant patients with active IBD flares in a multidisciplinary fashion at centers with IBD expertise.

Far-advanced gastric cancer has always been a challenging problem in clinical treatment and a key direction for breakthrough research. Non-surgical treatments are primarily managed in patients with far-advanced gastric cancer. However, with the advancement of therapeutic methods in recent years, tumor foci can be significantly regressed after effective preoperative treatment, in prospect ofregaining the opportunity of radical gastrectomy. In the surgical field, laparoscopic surgery, as one of the routine methods for gastric cancer, has proven effective in the treatment of initially resectable gastric cancer. However, its application in far-advanced gastric cancer still lacks high-level medical evidence. Nevertheless, global clinicians have widely participated in research exploration, achieving certain progress. This consensus, formulated based on the latest research developments and adopting through the international Delphi method with multiple expert votes and amendments, divides the perioperative period after conversion therapy for far-advanced gastric cancer into three parts, i.e., preoperative assessment, rational implementation of laparoscopic surgery, and postoperative assessment and treatment. It forms a preliminary consensus of 18 items, aiming to provide a basic reference and guidance for clinicians.
晚期胃癌一直是临床治疗的难点，也是亟待突破的重点研究方向之一。晚期胃癌患者以非手术治疗为主，但近年来随着治疗手段的进步，部分患者经过有效的术前治疗，肿瘤灶可明显退缩，有望重新获得根治性手术机会。在外科方面，腹腔镜技术目前作为胃癌外科治疗的常规手段之一，在初始可切除胃癌中的治疗效果已经证实，但其在晚期胃癌中的应用仍未有高级别循证医学证据。目前国内外学者广泛参与研究探索，取得了一定的进展。本共识的制订结合当下最新研究进展，采用国际通用的Delphi法经多位专家投票和修改，将晚期胃癌转化治疗后的围手术期分为术前评估、腹腔镜手术的合理实施以及术后评估与治疗三方面，并形成初步共识18条，旨在为广大临床医师提供基本参考与指导。.

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE: We present an overview of the 2024 updates for the European Association of Urology (EAU)/European Society for Paediatric Urology (ESPU) guidelines on paediatric urology to offer evidence-based standards for perioperative management, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), hydrocele, congenital lower urinary tract obstruction (CLUTO), trauma/emergencies, and fertility preservation.
METHODS: A broad literature search was performed for each condition. Recommendations were developed and rated as strong or weak on the basis of the quality of the evidence, the benefit/harm ratio, and potential patient preferences.
UNASSIGNED: Recommendations for perioperative management include points related to fasting, premedication, antibiotic prophylaxis, pain control, and thromboprophylaxis in patients requiring general anaesthesia. MIS use is increasing in paediatric urology, with no major differences observed among different MIS approaches. For hydrocele, observation is the initial approach recommended. For persistent cases, treatment varies according to the type of hydrocele. CLUTO cases should be managed in tertiary centres with multidisciplinary expertise in prenatal and postnatal management. Neonatal valve ablation remains the mainstay of treatment, but associated bladder dysfunction requires continuous treatment. Among urological traumas and emergencies, renal trauma is still an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Conservative management has become the standard approach in haemodynamically stable children. Ischaemic priapism is a medical emergency and requires stepwise management. Initial management of nonischaemic priapism is conservative. Fertility preservation in prepubertal children and adolescents has become an increasingly relevant issue owing to the ever-increasing number of cancer survivors receiving gonadotoxic therapies. A major limitation is the scarcity of relevant literature.
CONCLUSIONS: This summary of the 2024 EAU/ESPU guidelines provides updated guidance for evidence-based management of some paediatric urological conditions.
RESULTS: We provide a summary of the updated European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology guidelines on paediatric urology. There are recommendations on steps to take before and immediately after surgery, management of hydrocele, congenital lower urinary tract obstruction, and urological trauma/emergencies, as well as preservation of fertility. Recommendations are based on a comprehensive review of recent studies.

The incidence of gallbladder cancer has been increasing. Radial resection is still the most promising curable treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer. Although the techniques required for laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer have matured, the number of reports is also on the rise, and laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer is still controversial. To standardize laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer, the Biliary Surgery Branch, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, together with the Chinese Medical Doctor Association in Chinese Committee of Biliary Surgeons, gathered experts to formulate recommendations and consensus on laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer. This consensus includes several parts: safety, preoperative evaluation, indications, surgical team, positioning of patient and trocars, intraoperative frozen examination, lymph node dissection, liver resection,bile duct resection, etc. Furthermore, suggestions on the principle of treatment, surgical procedures, and precautions were also provided for patients with delayed diagnoses of gallbladder cancer undergoing resection. This consensus aims to offer valuable suggestions for the standardization of laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer.
近年来，胆囊癌的发病率呈增高趋势。根治性手术仍是胆囊癌患者最有希望获得治愈的手段。目前腹腔镜胆囊癌根治术所需的各项技术虽已日渐成熟，报道呈增加趋势，但胆囊癌的腹腔镜治疗仍存在一定争议。为规范腹腔镜胆囊癌根治术的开展，中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组和中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科专家工作组组织讨论并制订了腹腔镜胆囊癌根治术的操作流程相关建议，从安全性、术前评估、适应证、手术团队、患者体位布孔、术中冰冻病理、淋巴结清扫、肝切除方式、胆管切除等多方面提出了建议，此外，在延迟诊断的胆囊癌行再次根治术的处理原则、操作流程和注意事项等方面也提出了建议，为腹腔镜胆囊癌根治术的规范性开展提供指导性意见。.