Introduction: Preventing the development of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the most prevalent and severe complication of herpes zoster (HZ), is vital. Recently, it has been suggested that using temporary spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) for 10-14 days can improve HZ-associated pain (ZAP) and prevent PHN. However, myelitis complicates HZ. Permanent SCS has been successful in treating neuropathic pain induced by postoperative transverse myelitis of the spine that has not responded to traditional multidisciplinary treatment. However, it is unknown whether tSCS can reduce ZAP complicated with myelitis. Methodology: Between January 2020 and April 2022, all patients with HZ who visited our pain clinic with spinal cord edema and who underwent tSCS were enrolled in this study; their medical records were retrospectively examined. Pain intensity was assessed at baseline (before initiating interventional procedures), just before tSCS, after tSCS removal, and one and three months after tSCS. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled. The mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was 7.9 ± 1.6 at baseline (before interventional procedures), 6.8 ± 2.2 before tSCS (after interventional procedures), and 3.5 ± 2.4 after tSCS. Compared with before tSCS, the mean NRS decreased to 3.3 ± 2.3 after tSCS (P = 0.0004). The mean NRS changes with interventional procedures before and after tSCS were -1.2 ± 2.2 (P = 0.0945) and 3.3 ± 2.3 (P = 0.0004), respectively; the change after tSCS was significantly higher (between-group difference: -2.1 ± 3.7; P = 0.0324). Conclusions: Temporary SCS alleviated pain in cases of shingles with myelitis refractory to interventional therapy. Even in cases with myelitis, tSCS for ZAP remains an effective way to prevent PHN.

暂无摘要。

Background and Objectives: Achieving adequate pain reduction in the acute phase of herpes zoster is essential for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). For this purpose, appropriate antiviral medications, oral analgesic medications, and various nerve block methods could be applied. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a simple, novel ultrasound-guided block technique, and its use has increased because the procedure is convenient and relatively safe. Although several cases have reported the zoster-associated pain (ZAP) control effect of ESPB, the efficacy of ESPB has not been compared with that of other types of nerve blocks for managing ZAP. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ESPB with that of other types of nerve blocks for managing ZAP. Study Design: Retrospective case-control study. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 53 patients with acute thoracic herpes zoster were reviewed. We divided the participants into two groups: patients who received transforaminal epidural injection (TFEI) (n = 32) and those who received ESPB (n = 21). The efficacy of the procedure was assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS) and by recording patient medication doses before the procedure and at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after the procedure. Results: The time required for pain intensity to decrease to NRS ≤ 2 was not significantly different between the groups. The rate of medication discontinuation also was not different between the groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of clinically significant PHN (NRS ≥ 3) at any time point. Limitations: The relatively small sample size from a single center and the retrospective nature of the study served as limitations. Conclusions: The clinical effects of ESPB and TFEI were similar in patients with acute thoracic herpes zoster. ESPB could be considered an interventional option for ZAP management.

Background Herpes zoster is a common viral infection caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) characterized by the presence of a segmental distribution of painful grouped vesicles on an erythematous base. It is associated with several complications like zoster-associated pain (ZAP), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), pigmentary changes, scarring, secondary infections, and dermatosis as well as severe systemic complications. Aims/objectives The aim of the study was to analyze the various clinical and epidemiological patterns of herpes zoster and post-herpetic complications. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center observational cross-sectional study on 72 patients with herpes zoster and post-herpetic complications attending the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) to understand its various clinical and epidemiological patterns. A detailed history taking regarding the onset, progression, and complications of the disease, as well as the type, duration, and severity of pain, was taken, followed by a general physical, systemic, and cutaneous examination, along with investigations wherever needed. Results A total of 72 patients were included in the study, comprising 32 (44.4%) patients suffering from herpes zoster and 40 (55.5%) patients suffering from post-herpetic complaints. The minimum age was 14 years, the maximum age was 83 years, and the mean age in our study was 52 ± 17 years. The most commonly affected age group was 41-60 years. A total of 52 males and 22 females were included in the study, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 2.3:1. The thoracic dermatome was the most commonly involved dermatome, observed in 43 (59.7%) patients, and the left side was more commonly affected, seen in 41 (56.9%) patients. Among the total 72 patients, 26 (36.1%) had co-morbidities, with hypertension (18%) being the most common, followed by diabetes mellitus (12.5%). Regarding the post-herpetic complaints encountered in our study, the most common was post-herpetic neuralgia, seen in 31 (77.5%) patients, followed by post-herpetic pigmentation (macular), observed in 22 (55%) patients, and scarring (papules, plaques, hypertrophic scar, and keloid), observed in 17 (42.5%) patients. Conclusion A broader understanding of the clinical and epidemiological factors of herpes zoster and post-herpetic complications is important as this disease constitutes a considerable burden in a tertiary care center and if not treated adequately, the after-effects might last for many years altogether. Hence, early diagnosis and initiation of adequate antiviral therapy as well as pain management is the key aspect of management.

UNASSIGNED: Herpes zoster (HZ) is a skin disease that can also cause virus-infectious peripheral neuropathies. Despite this, there is limited information on patient preferences for seeking medical attention for HZ and zoster-associated pain (ZAP). Our study aimed to evaluate how frequently patients with ZAP choose to visit neurologists for their symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records in three general hospitals from January 2017 to June 2022. Using association rule mining, the study analyzed referral behaviors.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 33,633 patients with 111,488 outpatient visits over 5.5 years. The study found that the majority of patients (74.77-91.22%) visited dermatologists during their first outpatient visit, while only a small percentage (0.86-1.47%) preferred to consult a neurologist. The proportion of patients referred to a specialist during their medical visit varied significantly between different specialties within the same hospital (p <0.05) and even within the same specialty (p<0.05). There was a weak association (Lift:1.00-1.17) of referral behaviors between dermatology and neurology. Across the three hospitals, the average number of visits to a neurologist for ZAP was 1.42-2.49, with an average electronic health record duration of 11-15 days per patient. After consulting with a neurologist, some patients were referred to other specialists.
UNASSIGNED: It was observed that patients with HZ and ZAP tended to visit a variety of specialists, with only a small number seeking the assistance of neurologists. However, from the perspective of neuroprotection, it is the duty of neurologists to provide more means.

UNASSIGNED: Globally, the incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) is increasing, and the resulting zoster-associated pain (ZAP) severely affects the quality of life of patients. Therefore, active treatment of ZAP and prevention of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are very important for patients in the early stage of the disease. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the effect of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with ozone injection on zoster-associated pain.
UNASSIGNED: From 2018 to 2020, 84 patients with AHN (n=28), SHN (n=32), or PHN (n=24) underwent PRF combined with ozone injection treatment after pharmacologic and conservative therapies failed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and pregabalin consumption were recorded at baseline, post-PRF, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The number of remediations performed and adverse reactions were recorded, and treatment inefficiency was calculated using a VAS score greater than 3 as the criterion.
UNASSIGNED: The pooled results demonstrated statistically significant decreases in VAS scores, PSQI scores and consumption of pregabalin post-PRF and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up (P<0.05). Compared with the PHN group, both the AHN and SHN groups showed clinical and statistical improvement in VAS scores and PSQI scores and in consumption of pregabalin (P< 0.05). At 1 year after the operation, the PHN group had a significantly greater number of remediation events and greater treatment inefficiency than the other two groups. No serious adverse events were observed during the procedure or during the follow-up period.
UNASSIGNED: CT-guided PRF combined with ozone injection is safe and effective for individuals with ZAP, and its short-term and long-term effects are significant. In a sense, early PRF combined with ozone injection is more effective.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with zoster-associated pain exhibit a variety of sensory symptoms and forms of pain and complain of different pain patterns. The purpose of this study is to subgroup patients with zoster-associated pain who visited a hospital using painDETECT sensory symptom scores, analyze their respective characteristics and pain-related data, and compare similarities and differences among the groups.
UNASSIGNED: The characteristics of 1,050 patients complaining of zoster-associated pain and pain-related data were reviewed retrospectively. To identify subgroups of patients with zoster-associated pain according to sensory symptom profiles, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed based on the responses to a painDETECT questionnaire. Demographics and pain-related data were compared among all subgroups.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with zoster-associated pain were classified into 5 subgroups according to the distribution of sensory profiles, with each subgroup exhibiting distinct differences in the expression of sensory symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 complained of burning sensations, allodynia, and thermal sensitivity, but felt numbness less strongly. Cluster 2 and 3 patients complained of burning sensations and electric shock-like pain, respectively. Cluster 4 patients complained of most sensory symptoms at similar intensities and reported relatively strong prickling pain. Cluster 5 patients suffered from both burning and shock-like pains. Patient ages and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease were significantly lower in cluster 1. Patients in clusters 1 and 4 reported longer pain duration compared with those in clusters 2 and 3. However, no significant differences were found with respect to sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, mental health problems, and sleep disturbance. Pain scores, distribution of dermatomes and gabapentinoid use were also similar among the groups.
UNASSIGNED: Five different subgroups of patients with zoster-associated pain were identified on the basis of sensory symptoms. A subgroup of younger patients with longer pain duration showed specific and distinct symptoms, such as burning sensations and allodynia. Unlike patients with acute or subacute pain, patients with chronic pain were associated with diverse sensory symptom profiles.

UNASSIGNED: Zoster-associated pain (ZAP) is notoriously difficult to treat. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and short-term nerve electrical stimulation (st-NES) have been proven effective treatments for ZAP. However, it is still unclear which technique provides improved analgesia in ZAP. This study is based on a large-scale, long-term follow-up to evaluate the efficacy and safety between st-NES and PRF.
UNASSIGNED: All eligible ZAP patients treated with st-NES or PRF in our department were enrolled. Cohorts were divided into the st-NES group and the PRF group. A 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. The PS-matched cohort was adopted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the two treatments. The ordinal regression analysis was performed to determine the variables affecting the treatment effect of ZAP.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 226 patients were included after PSM. The numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in st-NES and PRF groups considerably reduced compared to baseline levels after treatment. The NRS scores in the st-NES group were obviously lower than those in the PRF group at discharge, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. During the follow-up period, the NRS reduction rate remained higher in the st-NES group than in the PRF group (P < 0.01). The dosage of medication, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, and the number of patients with aggravated pain after discharge in the st-NES group were significantly less than in the PRF group after treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Short-term nerve electrical stimulation has been shown to be more advantageous than PRF for pain relief and quality of life improvement for ZAP patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate the risk factors for poor pain control in patients with herpes zoster (HZ)-associated neuropathic pain treated with drugs combined with nerve block therapy. Neuropathic pain commonly follows HZ. Nerve block therapy is the most commonly used clinical treatment for such pain, combining anti-inflammation and analgesia to prevent peripheral sensitization of nerve.
METHODS: Using clinical practice data from a cohort study at our research center, we established a multivariate logistic regression model to investigate potential risk factors for poor control of zoster-associated pain (ZAP) treated with drugs plus nerve block therapy, including demographic characteristics, complications, laboratory tests, and characteristics of HZ attacks.
RESULTS: Of the 429 patients with ZAP who received drugs plus nerve block therapy, 95 (22.14%) had poor pain control after treatment. The risk of poor pain control was closely related to presence of cancer (odds ratio (OR) 4.173, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.342-12.970), numerical rating scale score on admission (OR 1.929, 95% CI 1.528-2.434), and red blood cell count (OR 0.560, 95% CI 0.328-0.954). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.730. Goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow) was 0.874.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of poor pain control in patients with ZAP increased as a result of certain patient characteristics and complications, especially severe pain before treatment and cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amenamevir is a new anti-varicella-zoster virus drug that inhibits the helicase-primase complex involved in viral replication. Amenamevir has the same effect as valaciclovir on acute pain and skin eruption, but no studies have examined the presence of long-term zoster-associated pain (ZAP) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after amenamevir treatment.
METHODS: A total of 785 herpes zoster patients treated with amenamevir were followed up for 12 months. Patients recorded their pain status on a questionnaire once a month.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with pain was 20.8% at 90 days, 8.0% at 180 days, 3.8% at 270 days, and 2.7% at 360 days after treatment. The median residual pain duration was 48 days. ZAP resolution rate slowed between 90 and 120 days, suggesting that the main feature of ZAP is a shift from nociceptive pain to neuropathic pain. Older age and more severe skin symptoms at the first visit were associated with a higher risk of developing PHN. Median ZAP duration was high for the head, face, and upper back and chest. Regarding the nature of pain, sudden pain attacks that felt like electric shocks, sensation of numbness, burning sensation, and cold/heat pain tended to remain as PHN.
CONCLUSIONS: Although conclusions must remain tentative without further comparative studies, amenamevir seems to have a similar effect on PHN as conventional nucleoside analogs, despite having a different action mechanism.
BACKGROUND: UMIN000035938.