sleep restriction

睡眠限制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在高海拔和有时睡眠限制(SR)引起的环境限制下,飞机飞行员面临着很高的心理工作量(MW)。我们的目的是使用多属性测试电池(MATB)-II和额外的听觉Oddball样任务来评估缺氧和睡眠限制对不同MW水平的认知和生理反应的综合影响。17名健康受试者按随机顺序接受三个12分钟的MW水平升高(低,中等,和高):睡眠限制(SR,<3小时的总睡眠时间(TST))与习惯性睡眠(HS,>6小时TST),缺氧(HY,2h,FIO2=13.6%,~3500mvs.常氧,NO,FIO2=21%)。在每个MW级别之后,参与者完成了NASA-TLX主观MW量表。增加MW会降低MATB-II跟踪任务的性能(p=0.001,MW难度主要影响)并增加NASA-TLX(p=0.001)。在组合的HY/SR条件下,MATB-II性能较低,与NO/HS条件相比,NASA-TLX评分更高,而没有观察到单独缺氧的影响。在听觉任务的准确性中,低氧和MW困难之间存在显著的相互作用(F(2-176)=3.14,p=0.04),在低氧条件下的高MW值较低。呼吸速率,瞳孔大小,对听觉刺激的瞳孔扩张反应(PDR)的幅度与增加的MW有关。这些参数是增加MW的最佳预测因子,独立于生理约束。添加心电图,SpO2或皮肤电导不会改善模型性能。总之,低氧和睡眠限制对MW有累加作用。在设计MW预测模型和交叉验证时,必须考虑生理和电生理反应。
    Aircraft pilots face a high mental workload (MW) under environmental constraints induced by high altitude and sometimes sleep restriction (SR). Our aim was to assess the combined effects of hypoxia and sleep restriction on cognitive and physiological responses to different MW levels using the Multi-Attribute Test Battery (MATB)-II with an additional auditory Oddball-like task. Seventeen healthy subjects were subjected in random order to three 12-min periods of increased MW level (low, medium, and high): sleep restriction (SR, <3 h of total sleep time (TST)) vs. habitual sleep (HS, >6 h TST), hypoxia (HY, 2 h, FIO2 = 13.6%, ~3500 m vs. normoxia, NO, FIO2 = 21%). Following each MW level, participants completed the NASA-TLX subjective MW scale. Increasing MW decreases performance on the MATB-II Tracking task (p = 0.001, MW difficulty main effect) and increases NASA-TLX (p = 0.001). In the combined HY/SR condition, MATB-II performance was lower, and the NASA-TLX score was higher compared with the NO/HS condition, while no effect of hypoxia alone was observed. In the accuracy of the auditory task, there is a significant interaction between hypoxia and MW difficulty (F(2-176) = 3.14, p = 0.04), with lower values at high MW under hypoxic conditions. Breathing rate, pupil size, and amplitude of pupil dilation response (PDR) to auditory stimuli are associated with increased MW. These parameters are the best predictors of increased MW, independently of physiological constraints. Adding ECG, SpO2, or electrodermal conductance does not improve model performance. In conclusion, hypoxia and sleep restriction have an additive effect on MW. Physiological and electrophysiological responses must be taken into account when designing a MW predictive model and cross-validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童和青少年睡眠时间的慢性减少与焦虑和抑郁的发生率增加有关。在老鼠身上,长期睡眠剥夺或慢性睡眠限制(CSR)的协议被认为是压力源。在先前的研究中,我们发现雄性大鼠的断奶后CSR会引起焦虑样行为和与情绪相关的大脑区域的神经传递变化。在本研究中,我们研究了这种逆境的影响是否与性别有关。22窝,将包含4名男性和4名女性的患者分为对照组(CTL)和CSR组。CSR在出生后第21天(PND)开始,持续了21天;每天将动物放在浸入水中的小平台上18小时,并在剩下的6小时内自由地睡在笼子里。在整个CSR中,所有动物每周接受一次蔗糖飞溅试验,以评估其自我保健和享乐行为.在PND21和42上测量体重。在CSR期间结束时,青少年被允许自由睡眠2天,之后,行为测试开始了。在每一窝里,1名男性和1名女性(对)未进行测试,并提供血液和大脑用于测定基础皮质酮(CORT)水平和海马BDNF。在蔗糖偏好测试(SPT)中测试了一对,一对在高架迷宫(EPM)上,一对在强迫游泳测试(FST)中。在所有条件之后测量CORT。CSR损害了男性和女性的自我护理行为和体重增加,仅在男性中增加了相对肾上腺重量。SPT中蔗糖的摄入量没有变化;CSR女性在FST中表现出较少的不动,而CSR男性在EPM中表现出更多的焦虑样行为。CTL和CSR男性的CORT水平相似,在所有实验条件下,女性的CSR低于CTL。在CSR大鼠的背侧海马中未检测到BDNF水平的变化。结果表明,CSR损害了两性的自我照顾行为,但只有男性表现出焦虑样的行为,而女性的睡眠恢复似乎使她们的行为正常化。
    Chronic reduction of sleep time in children and adolescents has been related to increased incidence of anxiety and depression. In rats, protocols of protracted sleep deprivation or chronic sleep restriction (CSR) are considered a stressor. In previous studies we showed that post-weaning CSR in male rats induces anxiety-like behaviour and changes in neurotransmission in emotion-related brain areas. In the present study we examined whether the effects of this adversity are sex-dependent. Twenty-two litters, containing four males and four females were distributed into control (CTL) and CSR groups. CSR began on postnatal day (PND) 21 and lasted for 21 days; each day the animals were placed onto small platforms immersed in water for 18 h and were allowed to sleep freely in their home-cages for the remaining 6 h. Throughout the CSR, all animals underwent the sucrose splash test once/week to assess their self-care and hedonic behaviours. Body weight was measured on PNDs 21 and 42. At the end of CSR period, the adolescents were allowed to sleep freely for 2 days, after which, behavioural tests began. Within each litter, one male and one female (pair) were not tested and provided blood and brain for determination of basal corticosterone (CORT) levels and hippocampal BDNF. One pair was tested in the sucrose preference test (SPT), one pair on the elevated plus maze (EPM) and one pair in the forced swim test (FST). CORT was measured after all conditions. CSR impaired self-care behaviour and body weight gain in males and females and increased relative adrenal weight only in males. There were no changes in sucrose intake in the SPT; CSR females displayed less immobility in the FST and CSR males displayed more anxiety-like behaviour in the EPM. CORT levels were similar between CTL and CSR males, whilst lower in CSR females than CTL ones in all experimental conditions. No changes in BDNF levels were detected in the dorsal hippocampus of CSR rats. The results indicate that CSR impaired self-care behaviour in both sexes, but only males displayed anxiety-like behaviour, whilst sleep recovery in females appeared to normalise their behaviour.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海事行业利用许多不同的值班时间表来全天候保持警惕和船员安全。这些时间表可能会让人疲劳,对警惕的注意力产生负面影响。这导致了对时间表的考虑,这些时间表可能允许更多的睡眠时间,但这些时间表如何影响高阶认知功能仍不清楚.这些时间表需要评估与海上船舶实际运营相关的任务。这项研究调查了四种时间表对高阶认知功能的影响。N=27(16名女性)参与者被招募到为期10天的实验室研究,比较四个时间表。调查的时间表是八开/八关/四开/四关(8/8/4/4),睡眠时间为09:30至16:00(条件A);六开/六关(6/6),睡眠时间为08:30至12:30和21:30至00:00(条件B);四开/四关(4/4/4),从30到4C(4):4(4)使用视觉扫描测试,每天2-3倍评估高阶认知功能,同时“观察”,学习,工作记忆,心理灵活性,和视觉运动控制。使用Kruskal-Wallis测试对条件进行分级,并在条件之间比较手表性能的稳定性。在大多数任务中,条件B中的认知功能排名最差。然而,在A条件下,在醒着的一天中,高阶认知功能的稳定性最差。这些发现强调了在不同的手表保持时间表期间认知能力的变异性。
    Maritime industries utilize many different watch keeping schedules to maintain vigilance and crew safety around the clock. These schedules can be fatiguing, negatively impacting vigilant attention. This has led to the consideration of schedules that might allow for more sleep time, but how these schedules impact higher order cognitive function remains unclear. These schedules require assessment with tasks that are relevant to real-world operations on maritime vessels. This study investigated the effect of four schedules on higher order cognitive function. N = 27 (16 female) participants were recruited to a 10-day laboratory study, comparing four schedules. The schedules investigated were eight-on/eight-off/four-on/four-off (8/8/4/4) with sleep from 09:30 to 16:00 (condition A); six-on/six-off (6/6) with sleep from 08:30 to 12:30 and 21:30 to 00:00 (condition B); four-on/four-off (4/4/4/4/4/4) with sleep from 18:00 to 00:30 (condition C); and four-on/four-off (4/4/4/4/4/4) with sleep from 01:30 to 08:00 (condition D). Higher order cognitive function was assessed 2-3× daily whilst \"on watch\" using tests of visual scanning, learning, working memory, mental flexibility, and visuomotor control. Conditions were ranked and stability of performance on watch was compared between conditions using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Cognitive function within condition B was ranked the worst for most of the tasks. However, the stability of higher order cognitive function was poorest across the waking day within condition A. These findings highlight the variability in cognitive capacities during different watch keeping schedules.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的:我们检查了两组男性是否补充了天冬氨酸锌镁(ZMA),部分睡眠受限(4小时)或习惯性睡眠(8小时)2晚,有利于睡眠和随后的早晨Stroop表现。
    方法:参与者被随机分配到两个独立的组,他们有4小时(33名男性)或8小时(36名男性)睡眠两个晚上。使用双盲,随机平衡设计,然后他们完成了五次会议,(i)两次熟悉课程,包括7天的睡眠和饮食摄入,(ii)三种情况下4小时或8小时睡眠和NoPill控制(NoPill),安慰剂(PLAC)或ZMA(ZMA)。通过活动测量法和睡眠问卷评估睡眠,认知能力通过Stroop测试进行评估。使用具有重复测量的一般线性模型分析数据。
    结果:发现了“睡眠”(4或8小时)的主要影响,更多的睡眠机会导致更好的“睡眠”指标(客观和主观)以及更好的Stroop得分(较低的颜色干扰和单词干扰得分以及较低的单词错误)。除了情绪状态抑郁,没有发现“药丸”的主要作用,其中PLAC组的主观评分低于其他两种情况。互动是在愤怒中发现的,放松睡眠和醒来的时间。
    结论:与4小时相比,有8小时的睡眠机会可以获得更好的“睡眠”指标以及更好的Stroop得分。补充ZMA4或8小时2晚对随后的早晨认知表现没有影响,但与其他条件相比,睡眠或总睡眠时间减少了约0.46小时。发现了一种相互作用,即与NoPill或PLAC相比,ZMA组在8h条件下的睡眠时间减少了约0.94h。
    OBJECTIVE: Purpose: We examined whether supplementation of zinc magnesium aspartate (ZMA) in two groups of males, either partially sleep-restricted (4 h) or with habitual sleep (8 h) for 2 nights, was beneficial for sleep and subsequent morning Stroop performance.
    METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to two independent groups who either had 4 h (33 males) or 8 h (36 males) sleep for two nights. Using a double-blinded, randomised counterbalanced design, they then completed five sessions, (i) two familiarisation sessions including 7 days of sleep and dietary intake, (ii) three conditions with 4 h or 8 h sleep and either NoPill control (NoPill), placebo (PLAC) or ZMA (ZMA). Sleep was assessed by actimetry and sleep questionnaires, and cognitive performance was assessed by the Stroop test. The data were analysed using a general linear model with repeated measures.
    RESULTS: A main effect for \"sleep\" (4 or 8 h) was found, where more opportunity to sleep resulted in better \"sleep\" metrics (both objective and subjective) as well as better Stroop scores (lower colour-interference and word-interference scores and lower error in words). No main effect for \"Pill\" was found other than the mood state depression, where subjective ratings for the PLAC group were lower than the other two conditions. Interactions were found in anger, ease to sleep and waking time.
    CONCLUSIONS: Having 8 h opportunity to sleep resulted in better \"sleep\" metrics as well as better Stroop scores compared to 4 h. Supplementation of ZMA for 4 or 8 h for 2 nights had no effect on subsequent morning cognitive performance but reduced sleep or total sleep time by ~0.46 h compared to the other conditions. An interaction was found where sleep time was reduced by ~0.94 h in the ZMA group in the 8 h condition compared to NoPill or PLAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠不足,如表现为睡眠时间短或失眠症状,已知会增加涉及免疫病理学的多种疾病的风险。据推测,炎症是睡眠不足作为这些疾病的危险因素的一种机制。因此,减轻与睡眠不足相关的负面健康后果的一个潜在方法是靶向炎症。很少有干预性睡眠研究调查改善睡眠是否会影响炎症过程。但结果表明,补充方法可能需要针对与睡眠不足相关的炎症。我们调查了是否通过低剂量乙酰水杨酸靶向炎症(ASA,即,阿司匹林)能够减弱实验性睡眠限制的炎症反应。
    方法:46名健康参与者(19F/27M,年龄范围19-63岁)在一项双盲随机安慰剂对照交叉试验中进行了研究,每个方案包括14天的家庭监测阶段,然后是11天(10晚)实验室停留(睡眠限制/ASA,睡眠限制/安慰剂,控制睡眠/安慰剂)。在睡眠限制/ASA条件下,参与者在家庭阶段和随后的实验室停留期间,在晚上(22:00)每日服用低剂量ASA(81mg/天).在睡眠限制/安慰剂和对照睡眠/安慰剂条件下,参与者每天服用安慰剂.每次实验室停留从2晚开始,睡眠机会为8小时/晚(23:00-07:00),用于适应和基线测量。在两种睡眠限制条件下,参与者暴露于5个晚上的睡眠,限制睡眠时间为4小时/夜(03:00-07:00),随后是3个晚上的恢复睡眠,睡眠时间为8小时/夜.在控制睡眠条件下,在整个实验室逗留期间,参与者的睡眠机会为8小时/晚.在每次实验室逗留期间,参与者进行了3天的强化监测(基线时,第5天睡眠限制/控制睡眠,和恢复睡眠的第二天)。变量,包括促炎免疫细胞功能,C反应蛋白(CRP),和活动图估计的睡眠测量,使用广义线性混合模型进行分析。
    结果:低剂量ASA给药降低了LPS刺激的单核细胞中白细胞介素(IL)-6的表达(对于条件*天,p<0.05),并降低了血清CRP水平(对于条件为p<0.01)与睡眠限制条件下的安慰剂给药相比,在5个晚上的睡眠限制后。与安慰剂相比,低剂量ASA还减少了5晚睡眠限制后2晚恢复睡眠后LPS刺激的单核细胞中环氧合酶(COX)-1/COX-2双阳性细胞的量(p<0.05条件)。低剂量ASA在恢复睡眠的前2个晚上进一步降低了睡眠开始后的觉醒(WASO)并增加了睡眠效率(SE)(对于条件和条件*日,p<0.001)。基线比较显示所有研究变量的条件之间没有差异(条件p>0.05)。
    结论:这项研究表明,预先给予低剂量ASA可以减少对睡眠限制的炎症反应。这一发现可能为预防或控制炎症及其在睡眠不足患者中的后果开辟了新的治疗方法。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03377543。
    BACKGROUND: Sleep deficiencies, such as manifested in short sleep duration or insomnia symptoms, are known to increase the risk for multiple disease conditions involving immunopathology. Inflammation is hypothesized to be a mechanism through which deficient sleep acts as a risk factor for these conditions. Thus, one potential way to mitigate negative health consequences associated with deficient sleep is to target inflammation. Few interventional sleep studies investigated whether improving sleep affects inflammatory processes, but results suggest that complementary approaches may be necessary to target inflammation associated with sleep deficiencies. We investigated whether targeting inflammation through low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, i.e., aspirin) is able to blunt the inflammatory response to experimental sleep restriction.
    METHODS: 46 healthy participants (19F/27M, age range 19-63 years) were studied in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial with three protocols each consisting of a 14-day at-home monitoring phase followed by an 11-day (10-night) in-laboratory stay (sleep restriction/ASA, sleep restriction/placebo, control sleep/placebo). In the sleep restriction/ASA condition, participants took low-dose ASA (81 mg/day) daily in the evening (22:00) during the at-home phase and the subsequent in-laboratory stay. In the sleep restriction/placebo and control sleep/placebo conditions, participants took placebo daily. Each in-laboratory stay started with 2 nights with a sleep opportunity of 8 h/night (23:00-07:00) for adaptation and baseline measurements. Under the two sleep restriction conditions, participants were exposed to 5 nights of sleep restricted to a sleep opportunity of 4 h/night (03:00-07:00) followed by 3 nights of recovery sleep with a sleep opportunity of 8 h/night. Under the control sleep condition, participants had a sleep opportunity of 8 h/night throughout the in-laboratory stay. During each in-laboratory stay, participants had 3 days of intensive monitoring (at baseline, 5th day of sleep restriction/control sleep, and 2nd day of recovery sleep). Variables, including pro-inflammatory immune cell function, C-reactive protein (CRP), and actigraphy-estimated measures of sleep, were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
    RESULTS: Low-dose ASA administration reduced the interleukin (IL)-6 expression in LPS-stimulated monocytes (p<0.05 for condition*day) and reduced serum CRP levels (p<0.01 for condition) after 5 nights of sleep restriction compared to placebo administration in the sleep restriction condition. Low-dose ASA also reduced the amount of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1/COX-2 double positive cells among LPS-stimulated monocytes after 2 nights of recovery sleep following 5 nights of sleep restriction compared to placebo (p<0.05 for condition). Low-dose ASA further decreased wake after sleep onset (WASO) and increased sleep efficiency (SE) during the first 2 nights of recovery sleep (p<0.001 for condition and condition*day). Baseline comparisons revealed no differences between conditions for all of the investigated variables (p>0.05 for condition).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that inflammatory responses to sleep restriction can be reduced by preemptive administration of low-dose ASA. This finding may open new therapeutic approaches to prevent or control inflammation and its consequences in those experiencing sleep deficiencies.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03377543.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在美国,大约三分之一的成年人每晚的睡眠时间少于建议的7小时。数十年的流行病学数据和实验性睡眠限制研究的数据表明,睡眠时间短与不良的心脏代谢风险有关。包括2型糖尿病和心血管疾病的风险。然而,这种风险的确切机制尚未完全阐明,并且缺乏旨在减轻这种风险的基于睡眠的干预措施.克服这些限制的一种策略是开发将习惯性短睡眠时间与不良心脏代谢风险联系起来的生物标志物。这些生物标志物可以告知生化机制,确定新的干预目标,通过识别最有可能从基于睡眠的干预措施中受益的个人来支持精准医学,并最终改善习惯性睡眠时间短的人的心脏代谢健康。早期的进展证明了原理证明,基于组学的技术是创建短睡眠时间的生化特征(生物标志物)的可行方法。主要来自对实验性睡眠限制的急性研究。然而,还有很多工作要做。值得注意的是,将实验睡眠限制的早期发现转化为习惯性睡眠时间短的自由生活成年人的研究具有很高的潜力。这些研究也为更大规模的随机对照试验创造了一个令人兴奋的机会,这些试验同时识别习惯性短睡眠持续时间的生物标志物并评估基于睡眠的干预措施的有效性。最终,睡眠时间短的分子生物标志物的早期发展与睡眠和代谢领域的前几十年的进展相结合,为生物标志物发展空间的令人兴奋的进展提供了基础。
    Approximately one in three adults in the United States sleeps less than the recommended 7 h per night. Decades of epidemiological data and data from experimental sleep restriction studies demonstrate short sleep duration is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk, including risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, the precise mechanisms underlying this risk are not fully elucidated and there is a lack of sleep-based interventions designed to mitigate such risk. One strategy to overcome these limitations is to develop biomarkers that link habitual short sleep duration with adverse cardiometabolic risk. Such biomarkers could inform biochemical mechanisms, identify new targets for interventions, support precision medicine by identifying individuals most likely to benefit from sleep-based interventions, and ultimately lead to improved cardiometabolic health in people with habitual short sleep durations. Early progress demonstrates proof-of-principle that omics-based technologies are a viable approach to create biochemical signatures (biomarkers) of short sleep duration, primarily derived from acute studies of experimental sleep restriction. Yet, much work remains. Notably, studies that translate early findings from experimental sleep restriction to free-living adults with habitual short sleep duration have high potential to advance the field. Such studies also create an exciting opportunity for larger randomized controlled trials that simultaneously identify biomarkers of habitual short sleep duration and evaluate the efficacy of sleep-based interventions. Ultimately, early progress in developing molecular biomarkers of short sleep duration combined with the prior decades of progress in the sleep and metabolism fields provide the foundation for exciting progress in the biomarker development space.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定针对记忆处理中涉及的睡眠特征的干预方法是认知衰老领域的优先事项。具有更高睡眠效率和非快速眼动慢波活动(SWA)(0.5-4Hz脑电图活动)的老年人倾向于表现出更好的记忆和认知能力。矛盾的是,在老年人中,总睡眠时间较长与认知能力较差有关.因此,最大化睡眠效率和SWA可以是相对于仅增加总睡眠时间的优先级。由于临床行为睡眠治疗不能持续增强SWA,SWA的倾向随着清醒时间的增加,我们通过概念验证试点干预检查了更大剂量的卧床时间(TiB)限制(占习惯性TiB的75%)是否会在不损害记忆表现的情况下提高睡眠效率和SWA.
    参与者为55-80岁的成年人,日记报告的睡眠效率<90%,睡眠开始后(WASO)>20分钟。睡眠日记,肌动学,多导睡眠图(PSG),在为期一周的TiB限制干预之前和之后,评估了配对的相关记忆获取和保留(n=30)。TiB被限制为日记报告的习惯性TiB的75%。n=5名参与者的比较组重复评估,同时遵循他们通常的睡眠时间表,以获得与重复测试相关的效应大小的初步估计。
    TIB限制组睡眠质量的主观和客观睡眠措施得到了有力改善,睡眠深度,睡眠效率和WASO,以TiB和N1和N2睡眠时间为代价。正如假设的那样,SWA随着TiB限制在0.5-4Hz范围内强劲增加,以及主观睡眠深度,主观和客观的WASO。尽管嗜睡评分有所增加,没有发现记忆获取或记忆保留方面的损伤.
    在睡眠维持困难的老年人中,相当于习惯性TiB的75%的TiB限制剂量强烈增加了睡眠连续性和SWA,而不会损害内存性能。这些发现可能会为旨在改善记忆表现和认知障碍风险的长期行为SWA增强干预提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Identifying intervention methods that target sleep characteristics involved in memory processing is a priority for the field of cognitive aging. Older adults with greater sleep efficiency and non-rapid eye movement slow-wave activity (SWA) (0.5-4 Hz electroencephalographic activity) tend to exhibit better memory and cognitive abilities. Paradoxically, long total sleep times are consistently associated with poorer cognition in older adults. Thus, maximizing sleep efficiency and SWA may be a priority relative to increasing mere total sleep time. As clinical behavioral sleep treatments do not consistently enhance SWA, and propensity for SWA increases with time spent awake, we examined with a proof-of concept pilot intervention whether a greater dose of time-in-bed (TiB) restriction (75% of habitual TiB) would increase both sleep efficiency and SWA in older adults with difficulties staying asleep without impairing memory performance.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were adults ages 55-80 with diary-reported sleep efficiency <90% and wake after sleep onset (WASO) >20 min. Sleep diary, actigraphy, polysomnography (PSG), and paired associate memory acquisition and retention were assessed before and after a week-long TiB restriction intervention (n = 30). TiB was restricted to 75% of diary-reported habitual TiB. A comparison group of n = 5 participants repeated assessments while following their usual sleep schedule to obtain preliminary estimates of effect sizes associated with repeated testing.
    UNASSIGNED: Subjective and objective sleep measures robustly improved in the TiB restriction group for sleep quality, sleep depth, sleep efficiency and WASO, at the expense of TiB and time spent in N1 and N2 sleep. As hypothesized, SWA increased robustly with TiB restriction across the 0.5-4 Hz range, as well as subjective sleep depth, subjective and objective WASO. Despite increases in sleepiness ratings, no impairments were found in memory acquisition or retention.
    UNASSIGNED: A TiB restriction dose equivalent to 75% of habitual TiB robustly increased sleep continuity and SWA in older adults with sleep maintenance difficulties, without impairing memory performance. These findings may inform long-term behavioral SWA enhancement interventions aimed at improving memory performance and risk for cognitive impairments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们之前报道过,在为期45天的模拟太空任务中,动态照明时间表(DLS)改善了昼夜节律相位对齐,并在选定的日期进行了一次评估。这项研究旨在评估DLS如何影响在选定的日子每天多次执行5分钟精神运动警惕任务(PVT)的表现。
    16名船员(37.4±6.7岁;5F)经历了6个2×8小时/夜的周期,然后是5×5小时/夜的睡眠机会。在DLS(n=8)期间,睡前3小时,白天的白光暴露富含蓝色(〜6000K;1级:1079,2级:76黑视等效白天照度(melEDI)lux)和蓝色耗尽(〜3000-4000K;L1:21,L2:2melEDIlux)。在标准照明时间表(SLS;n=8)中,照明保持恒定(~4500K;L1:284,L262melEDIlux)。照明条件的影响(DLS/SLS),睡眠状况(5/8小时),进入任务的时间,以及它们的相互作用,使用广义线性混合模型分析了时间清醒对PVT性能的影响。
    与SLS相比,DLS与更少的注意力失误(反应时间[RT]>500毫秒)相关。失败,意思是RT,10%最快/最慢的RT在5小时后比8小时的睡眠更差,但在照明条件之间没有。任务时间对RT有影响,可能是由于睡眠不足。整体表现因时间而异,在一天的开始和结束时使用更长的RT。与DLS条件相比,SLS下午的失误更多,RT更慢。
    未来的任务应纳入DLS,以增强昼夜节律对齐和性能。本文是睡眠和昼夜节律的一部分:职业环境中的疲劳管理收集。
    UNASSIGNED: We previously reported that during a 45-day simulated space mission, a dynamic lighting schedule (DLS) improved circadian phase alignment and performance assessed once on selected days. This study aimed to evaluate how DLS affected performance on a 5-minute psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) administered multiple times per day on selected days.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixteen crewmembers (37.4 ± 6.7 years; 5F) underwent six cycles of 2 × 8-hour/night followed by 5 × 5-hour/night sleep opportunities. During the DLS (n = 8), daytime white light exposure was blue-enriched (~6000 K; Level 1: 1079, Level 2: 76 melanopic equivalent daytime illuminance (melEDI) lux) and blue-depleted (~3000-4000 K; L1: 21, L2: 2 melEDI lux) 3 hours before bed. In the standard lighting schedule (SLS; n = 8), lighting remained constant (~4500K; L1: 284, L2 62 melEDI lux). Effects of lighting condition (DLS/SLS), sleep condition (5/8 hours), time into mission, and their interactions, and time awake on PVT performance were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
    UNASSIGNED: The DLS was associated with fewer attentional lapses (reaction time [RT] > 500 milliseconds) compared to SLS. Lapses, mean RT, and 10% fastest/slowest RTs were worse following 5 compared to 8 hours of sleep but not between lighting conditions. There was an effect of time into mission on RTs, likely due to sleep loss. Overall performance differed by time of day, with longer RTs at the beginning and end of the day. There were more lapses and slower RTs in the afternoon in the SLS compared to the DLS condition.
    UNASSIGNED: Future missions should incorporate DLS to enhance circadian alignment and performance. This paper is part of the Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Management of Fatigue in Occupational Settings Collection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    习惯性的短睡眠时间与几种心血管疾病有关。实验研究通常支持这些发现,因为在完全剥夺睡眠和较长时间的部分睡眠限制后,动脉功能指标受损。单例部分睡眠限制(PSR)的急性影响,然而,尚未定义。我们两次评估了32名大学年龄的参与者的动脉结构和功能:一次在正常的习惯性睡眠(NS)后,在进行急性部分睡眠限制(PSR)干预后的早晨,该干预仅涉及一个晚上的3小时睡眠。通过血流介导的扩张(FMD)在肱动脉使用超声检查测量内皮功能,斜坡峰值摄氧量试验用于评估心肺适应性。从一部分参与者中收集血液样本,以研究循环因素对内皮功能相关细胞机制的影响。与NS相比,PSR过夜后的睡眠时间较低(P<0.001);然而,不同条件之间的血流动力学结果没有明显差异.FMD在NS和PSR之间没有差异(NS:6.5±2.9%;PSR:6.3±2.9%;P=0.668),和心肺适应性不能减轻对PSR的血流动力学反应(均P>0.05)。离体细胞培养结果与体内数据一致,表明急性PSR不会改变涉及内皮功能的细胞内过程。在健康和年轻参与者中,NS和急性PSR之间没有观察到动脉结构或功能的差异。和心肺健康不调节动脉对急性睡眠限制的反应。
    Habitual short sleep durations are associated with several cardiovascular diseases. Experimental research generally supports these findings as metrics of arterial function are impaired after complete deprivation of sleep and after longer periods of partial sleep restriction. The acute influence of a single instance of partial sleep restriction (PSR), however, has not been defined. We evaluated arterial structure and function among 32 university-aged participants on two occasions: once after normal habitual sleep (NS), and again the morning after an acute partial sleep restriction (PSR) intervention involving only 3 h of sleep for a single night. Endothelial function was measured using ultrasonography at the brachial artery via flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and a ramp peak oxygen uptake test was used to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness. Blood samples were collected from a subset of participants to investigate the influence of circulatory factors on cellular mechanisms implicated in endothelial function. Sleep duration was lower after a night of PSR compared to NS (P < 0.001); however, there were no appreciable differences in any haemodynamic outcome between conditions. FMD was not different between NS and PSR (NS: 6.5 ± 2.9%; PSR: 6.3 ± 2.9%; P = 0.668), and cardiorespiratory fitness did not moderate the haemodynamic response to PSR (all P > 0.05). Ex vivo cell culture results aligned with in vivo data, showing that acute PSR does not alter intracellular processes involved in endothelial function. No differences in arterial structure or function were observed between NS and acute PSR in healthy and young participants, and cardiorespiratory fitness does not modulate the arterial response to acute sleep restriction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠和压力通过作用于影响新陈代谢的大脑回路而双向相互作用。睡眠及其改变对血液瘦素水平有影响,调节食欲的代谢激素。大脑表达由脂肪细胞产生的肽激素瘦素的受体。下丘脑食欲素神经元在睡眠时很低,清醒时很活跃,受与瘦素复杂相互作用的影响。发现胸腺醌是紫花苜蓿的主要生物活性成分。本研究的目的是研究百里香醌对睡眠限制的作用及其对大鼠脑内瘦素介导的信号通路的缓解作用。
    结果:将30只成年雄性Wistar大鼠分为5组,每组6只动物:对照组;胸醌(TQ);玉米油;慢性睡眠限制(CSR);和CSR+TQ。30天后,行为分析,抗氧化剂,血脂谱,葡萄糖水平,肝肾功能检查,神经递质,神经肽,还评估了体内研究中的mRNA表达,并对百里香醌进行了药代动力学和对接。胸醌还显示了对靶蛋白的良好结合亲和力。CSR在离散的大脑区域和血浆中诱导了氧化应激。目前的研究表明,许多证据表明睡眠限制改变了神经行为,抗氧化状态,血脂谱,神经递质,神经肽水平,和摄食行为,破坏调节睡眠和摄食的食欲素-瘦素系统,导致代谢功能障碍。
    结论:在计算机研究中揭示了胸腺醌的潜力,其在体内的作用研究已经证明了其有效性。该研究得出结论,胸腺醌通过其神经保护作用减少代谢功能障碍,抗氧化剂,和降血脂特性。
    BACKGROUND: Sleep and stress interact bidirectionally by acting on brain circuits that affect metabolism. Sleep and its alterations have impact on blood leptin levels, metabolic hormone that regulates appetite. Brain expresses the receptors for the peptide hormone leptin produced from adipocytes. The hypothalamic orexin neurons are low during sleep and active when awake, influenced by a complex interaction with leptin. Thymoquinone was found to be the major bioactive component of Nigella sativa. The aim of this study was to study the role of thymoquinone on sleep restriction and its mitigating effect on leptin-mediated signaling pathway in rat brain.
    RESULTS: 30 adult male Wistar rats were divided into 5 groups with 6 animals in each group: Control; Thymoquinone (TQ); Corn oil; Chronic Sleep restriction (CSR); and CSR + TQ. After 30 days, behavioral analysis, antioxidant, lipid profile, glucose level, liver and kidney function test, neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and mRNA expression in in vivo studies were also assessed and pharmacokinetic and docking were done for thymoquinone. Thymoquinone has also shown good binding affinity to the target proteins. CSR has induced oxidative stress in the discrete brain regions and plasma. Current study has shown many evidences that sleep restriction has altered the neurobehavioral, antioxidant status, lipid profile, neurotransmitters, neuropeptide levels, and feeding behavior which damage the Orexin-leptin system which regulates the sleep and feeding that leads to metabolic dysfunction.
    CONCLUSIONS: The potentiality of Thymoquinone was revealed in in silico studies, and its action in in vivo studies has proved its effectiveness. The study concludes that Thymoquinone has exhibited its effect by diminishing the metabolic dysfunction by its neuroprotective, antioxidant, and hypolipidemic properties.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号