sexual and gender minorities

性和性别少数群体
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反黑人种族主义,异性恋,和变性恐惧症是导致青少年健康状况不佳的重大公共卫生问题。作者介绍了适应健康公平的STYLE框架,以增加对黑人和女同性恋的知识和认识,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,非二进制,酷儿,提问,无性,或双性恋(LGBTQ)+交叉性。以案例为例,作者确定了促进反种族主义的关键策略,反异性恋,和反恐惧行为。青少年保健提供者利用这一框架可以促进黑人和LGBTQ青少年的健康和福祉。
    Anti-Black racism, heterosexism, and transphobia are significant public health concerns contributing to poor adolescent health outcomes. The authors introduce the health-equity adapted STYLE framework to increase knowledge and awareness of Black and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, non-binary, queer, questioning, asexual, or intersex (LGBTQ) + intersectionality. Guided by case examples, the authors identify key strategies to promote anti-racist, anti-heterosexist, and anti-transphobic practices. Utilization of this framework by adolescent health providers could promote the health and well-being of Black and LGBTQ + adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:睡眠对青少年发育至关重要。性别和性别少数(SGM;例如,拉拉,同性恋,双性恋,跨性别)成年人睡眠不良的风险很高,部分是由于少数族裔的压力(例如,歧视)。然而,在SGM青少年中很少研究睡眠。在全国早期青少年样本中,我们分析了性少数(SM)和性别少数(GM)身份,性别不一致,和性别不一致与睡眠有关,并测试少数群体和一般压力源作为中介。
    方法:我们对10,070名10-14岁青少年大脑认知发育的数据进行了横断面分析。使用逻辑回归模型,我们分析了身份(SM和GM)之间的关联,性身份歧视,少数群体和一般压力源(性身份歧视,戏弄,和与父母的冲突)和睡眠健康(持续时间,延迟,和干扰)。我们使用男爵和肯尼的方法来测试调解。
    结果:参与者报告了性认同(4%SM,4%的提问)和性别认同(0.4%的GM,0.6%的询问);65%是白人,20%是西班牙裔,52%出生时被分配为男性。与异性恋相比,SM参与者睡眠时间短的几率更高,长睡眠潜伏期,和睡眠障碍。转基因参与者和那些报告性别不一致和不一致的人有较高的机会长睡眠潜伏期和睡眠障碍。性身份歧视和一般社会压力源部分介导了某些关联。
    结论:SGM参与者报告睡眠较差。少数族裔和一般社会压力源部分造成了一些差异。政策需要解决SGM基于身份的歧视,并挑战给SGM早期青少年带来少数群体压力的社会规范。
    OBJECTIVE: Sleep is essential to adolescent development. Sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) adults are at high risk for poor sleep, partially due to minority stress (e.g., discrimination). However, sleep has rarely been studied among SGM adolescents. In a national sample of early adolescents, we analyzed sexual minority (SM) and gender minority (GM) identity, gender incongruence, and gender nonconformity in association with sleep and tested minority and general stressors as mediators.
    METHODS: We cross-sectionally analyzed data from 10,070 adolescents aged 10-14 in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development℠ Study. Using logistic regression models, we analyzed associations between identity (SM and GM), sexual identity discrimination, minority and general stressors (sexual identity discrimination, teasing, and conflict with parents) and sleep health (duration, latency, and disturbance). We used Baron and Kenny\'s method to test for mediation.
    RESULTS: Participants reported sexual identity (4% SM, 4% questioning) and gender identity (0.4% GM, 0.6% questioning); 65% were White, 20% were Hispanic, and 52% were assigned male at birth. Compared to heterosexual, SM participants had higher odds of short sleep duration, long sleep latency, and sleep disturbance. GM participants and those reporting gender incongruence and nonconformity had higher odds of long sleep latency and sleep disturbance. Sexual identity discrimination and general social stressors partially mediated some associations.
    CONCLUSIONS: SGM participants reported poorer sleep. Minority and general social stressors partially accounted for some disparities. Policies need to address SGM identity-based discrimination and challenge social norms that produce minority stress for SGM early adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在过去的十年中,无性性行为成为一个日益增长的研究课题,关于被认定为无性的人的心理健康的数据仍然很少。本研究的主要目的是检查识别为无性的个体中的抑郁症状。LGBTQIA+的数据(女同性恋,同性恋,双性,Trans*,酷儿,国际*,在德国的COVID-19封锁期间,通过在线调查收集了无性和/或表明社区内的其他人)和顺性异性恋个体。调查包括关于性和性别认同的问题,抑郁症状,和无性身份。对N=6601名参与者进行分析。总共n=445个人被鉴定为无性。回归结果表明,识别为无性与较高的抑郁症状显著相关。结果表明,被认定为无性的人代表了性少数群体中的弱势群体,从根本上需要特殊的社会心理支持,尤其是在大流行时期。
    Although asexuality became a growing research subject over the last decade, data on the mental health of individuals identifying as asexual is still rare. The key objective of the present study was to examine depressive symptoms among individuals identifying as asexual. Data of LGBTQIA+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Trans*, Queer, Inter*, Asexual and/or + indicating others within the community) and cisgender heterosexual individuals was collected through an online survey during the COVID-19 lockdowns in Germany. The survey included questions about sexual and gender identity, depressive symptoms, and asexual identity. An analysis of N = 6601 participants was conducted. A total of n = 445 individuals identified as asexual. Regression results indicated identifying as asexual being significantly associated with higher depressive symptoms. Results suggest that individuals identifying as asexual represent a vulnerable group within the group of sexual minorities, one that fundamentally requires special psychosocial support, especially in times of pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学校是预防和早期干预公共心理健康的重要场所,性和性别少数族裔学生是行动的优先群体。背景对于理解学校性和性别少数群体如何塑造心理健康和福祉很重要,快速变化的社会和政治力量需要持续的研究。这项联合制作的英国中学研究旨在了解(a)心理的关键组成部分,为LGBTQ+学生提供社会和情感健康的学校环境,考虑到交叉的人口统计学身份;(b)员工信息,技能和能力需求,以及(c)影响吸收和实施的因素。对63名参与者进行了在线访谈和焦点小组(22名工作人员,32名学生(13-19岁),和9个培训提供者),在性别和性认同方面有所不同,种族,宗教和社会背景。数据进行了主题分析。一个总体主题抓住了对交叉性知情的需求,上下文适应性,整个学校的方法,“将叙事从赤字思维中转移出来”,挑战流行的顺式/异形规范和白人规范。这支撑了四个主题:(1)\'感觉安全,看到和庆祝:嵌入交叉标志,信号和符号\',(2)\'每个人的业务:需要协作\',(3)“嵌入变革文化”,和(4)“重新定位问题:挑战赤字思维”。需要进行背景多样化的研究,以批判性地解决社会权力在个人和结构上制定的方式,以阻碍学校制定LGBTQ包容性。为体制变革提供信息和制定实施战略以及倡导更广泛的社会政治支持的证据也是减轻与不公平学校环境有关的不平等现象扩大的可能性的关键。
    School is a key site for prevention and early intervention in public mental health, with sexual and gender minority students being a priority group for action. Context is important in understanding how school inclusion of sexual and gender minorities shapes mental health and well-being, with rapidly changing social and political forces necessitating ongoing research. This coproduced UK secondary school-based study aimed to understand (a) key components of mentally, socially and emotionally healthy school environments for LGBTQ+ students considerate of intersecting minoritised identities; (b) staff information, skills and capacity needs and (c) factors influencing uptake and implementation. Online interviews and focus groups were conducted with 63 participants (22 staff, 32 students (aged 13-19 years), and 9 training providers), diverse in relation to gender and sexual identity, ethnicity, religious and social context. Data were analysed thematically. One overarching theme captured the need for an intersectionality-informed, contextually adaptable, whole school approach which \'shifts the narrative\' away from deficit thinking, challenging prevailing cis/heteronormative and White norms. This underpinned four themes: (1) \'Feeling safe, seen and celebrated: embedding intersectional signs, signals and symbols\', (2) \'Everyone\'s business: the need for collaboration\', (3) \'Embedding a culture of change\', and (4) \'Re-locating the problem: challenging deficit thinking\'. Contextually diverse research is needed which critically addresses ways in which social power enacted interpersonally and structurally serves to hinder schools from enacting LGBTQ+ inclusivity. Evidence to inform and develop implementation strategies for institutional changes and to advocate for wider socio-political support is also key to mitigate the potential for widening inequities linked to inequitable school environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作者介绍了一个关于同性恋的句,以及他们在偏执和不公正的医疗保健方面的经历。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    The author presents a haiku about being queer and their experiences with bigotry and unjust healthcare. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探讨了婴儿潮一代男同性恋者在初级医疗保健方面的经验以及他们对未来长期护理的看法。在美国,婴儿潮一代男同性恋者对初级医疗保健的观点仍未得到充分研究。对美国西南部30名婴儿潮一代男性进行了描述性定性研究。我们使用半结构化访谈来评估参与者对初级医疗保健的启动和维护,向提供者披露性取向,以及对未来医疗保健需求的展望,包括长期护理。用潜在主题分析对数据进行了分析。我们发现,每当与新的提供者建立医疗保健时,婴儿潮一代的男同性恋者都会因为性取向而受到歧视。参与者将新医疗保健环境中的间接舒适度确定为公开其性取向的关键动机。因此,婴儿潮一代男同性恋者特别寻求同性恋或同性恋友好的医疗保健提供者,以减轻管理披露的负担,并允许自由讨论他们的性取向和医疗保健需求。参与者面临医疗保健提供者的拒绝和歧视的反复预期,这延伸到他们对当前医疗保健遭遇和未来长期护理安置的看法。医疗保健提供者将受益于理解这种动态的实践含义。需要对初级医疗保健包容性进行未来研究。
    This research explored baby boomer gay men\'s experiences with primary healthcare and their perspectives of future long-term care. Baby boomer gay men\'s perspectives about primary healthcare remain understudied in the United States. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 30 baby boomer men in the Southwest USA. We used semi-structured interviews to assess participants\' initiation and maintenance of primary healthcare, disclosure of sexual orientation to providers, and perspectives about future healthcare needs, including long-term care. Data were analyzed with a latent thematic analysis. We found baby boomer gay men anticipate discrimination because of their sexual orientation whenever they establish healthcare with new providers. Participants identified circumstantial comfort in the new healthcare setting as a key motivator to disclose their sexual orientation. Thus, baby boomer gay men specifically sought gay or gay-friendly healthcare providers to ease the burden of managing disclosure and to permit free discussion of their sexual orientation and healthcare needs. Participants faced recurring anticipation of rejection and discrimination from healthcare providers, which extends to their perceptions of current healthcare encounters and future long-term care placement. Healthcare providers would benefit from understanding the practice implications of this dynamic. Future research on primary healthcare inclusivity is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在为女同性恋护士制定文化能力量表,同性恋,双性恋,和变性者(LGBT)社区,并检验其有效性和可靠性。
    方法:该研究遵循了DeVellis概述的8步过程,最初的25个项目是通过文献综述和个人访谈得出的。经过专家有效性评估,验证了24个项目。随后,我们对23名有LGBT患者护理经验的护士进行了初步调查.然后使用24个项目从322名护士的最终样本中收集数据。项目分析,项目-总分相关性,结构效度和收敛效度的检验,并进行了可靠性测试。
    结果:项目级内容效度指数超过.80,结构效度的解释力为63.63%。因子载荷在0.57和0.80之间变化。量表包括五个因素:文化技能,有七个项目;文化意识,有五个项目;文化接触,有三个项目;文化追求,有三个项目;和文化知识,有三项;共21项。收敛有效性表现出高度的相关性,确认量表的有效性。内部一致性分析得出的总体可靠性系数为0.97,表示可靠性很高。每个项目的得分从1到6(总分范围,21-126),更高的分数反映了LGBT护理中更大的文化能力。
    结论:该量表有助于测量护士的LGBT文化能力。因此,其使用应提供基础数据,以支持以LGBT为重点的护理教育计划.
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to develop a cultural competence scale for nurses regarding the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community and to test its validity and reliability.
    METHODS: The study adhered to the 8-step process outlined by DeVellis, with an initial set of 25 items derived through a literature review and individual interviews. Following an expert validity assessment, 24 items were validated. Subsequently, a preliminary survey was conducted among 23 nurses with experience caring for LGBT patients. Data were then collected from a final sample of 322 nurses using the 24 items. Item analysis, item-total score correlation, examination of construct and convergent validity, and reliability testing were performed.
    RESULTS: The item-level content validity index exceeded .80, and the explanatory power of the construct validity was 63.63%. The factor loadings varied between 0.57 and 0.80. The scale comprised five factors: cultural skills, with seven items; cultural awareness, with five items; cultural encounters, with three items; cultural pursuit, with three items; and cultural knowledge, with three items; totaling 21 items. Convergent validity demonstrated a high correlation, affirming the scale\'s validity. Internal consistency analysis yielded an overall reliability coefficient of 0.97, signifying very high reliability. Each item is scored from 1 to 6 (total score range, 21-126), with higher scores reflecting greater cultural competence in LGBT care.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scale facilitates the measurement of LGBT cultural competence among nurses. Therefore, its use should provide foundational data to support LGBT-focused nursing education programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:同性恋,双性恋,和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)是罗马尼亚艾滋病毒传播的高危人群,然而,他们拥有很少的预防资源。尽管无法通过卫生系统正式获得暴露前预防(PrEP),罗马尼亚的GBMSM对这种药物表现出很高的需求和兴趣。预期在全国范围内推出PrEP,这项研究测试了一种新策略的功效,准备罗马尼亚,结合了两种基于证据的PrEP促进罗马尼亚GBMSM的干预措施。
    方法:本研究使用随机对照试验设计来检查居住在罗马尼亚的GBMSM是否接受罗马尼亚的准备,文化适应的咨询和移动健康干预(预期n=60),与分配到PrEP教育控制组的患者相比,PrEP的依从性和持久性更高(预期n=60)。来自罗马尼亚两个主要城市的参与者在随机分组后3个月和6个月接受PrEP和随访。PrEP依从性数据是通过每周自我报告调查和随访时的干血斑点测试获得的。潜在的调解员(例如,还评估了PrEP使用动机)的干预效果。此外,准备罗马尼亚的实施(例如,参加医疗就诊的登记参与者比例,干预经验)将通过与参与者的访谈进行检查,研究实施者,和医疗官员。
    结论:从这项研究中获得的知识将用于进一步完善和扩大罗马尼亚的规模,以进行未来的多城市有效性试验。通过研究支持PrEP依从性和持久性的工具的功效,这项研究有可能为PrEP在罗马尼亚和类似情况下的推广奠定基础。试验注册这项研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符NCT05323123,2022年3月25日
    BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) represent a high-risk group for HIV transmission in Romania, yet they possess few resources for prevention. Despite having no formal access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) through the health system, GBMSM in Romania demonstrate a high need for and interest in this medication. In anticipation of a national rollout of PrEP, this study tests the efficacy of a novel strategy, Prepare Romania, that combines two evidence-based PrEP promotion interventions for GBMSM living in Romania.
    METHODS: This study uses a randomized controlled trial design to examine whether GBMSM living in Romania receiving Prepare Romania, a culturally adapted counseling and mobile health intervention (expected n = 60), demonstrate greater PrEP adherence and persistence than those assigned to a PrEP education control arm (expected n = 60). Participants from two main cities in Romania are prescribed PrEP and followed-up at 3 and 6 months post-randomization. PrEP adherence data are obtained through weekly self-report surveys and dried blood spot testing at follow-up visits. Potential mediators (e.g., PrEP use motivation) of intervention efficacy are also assessed. Furthermore, Prepare Romania\'s implementation (e.g., proportion of enrolled participants attending medical visits, intervention experience) will be examined through interviews with participants, study implementers, and healthcare officials.
    CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from this study will be utilized for further refinement and scale-up of Prepare Romania for a future multi-city effectiveness trial. By studying the efficacy of tools to support PrEP adherence and persistence, this research has the potential to lay the groundwork for PrEP rollout in Romania and similar contexts. Trial registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05323123 , on March 25, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结构因素(例如,civeteronomativity)促进少数民族压力源,这在性和性别少数群体(SGM)人群(也称为女同性恋,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿,双性恋者,无性,和其他性和性别膨胀的人--LGBTQIA+)患有癌症。个人的生物学,行为,社会,对少数民族压力源的心理反应在他们的一生中会有所不同。然而,在SGM亚组中,缺乏概念化健康结局的经验和理论指导.
    目的:提出一种促进SGM癌症患者健康的护理理论。
    方法:遵循Walker和Avant的理论推导策略。
    结果:我提出了定义,理论假设,概念,命题,以及对实践的影响,教育,研究,和政策的派生理论。
    结论:该理论提供了一个护理框架,以了解和解决少数群体压力在整个癌症护理过程中对SGM个体健康的多层次影响。
    BACKGROUND: Structural factors (e.g., cisheteronormativity) promote minority stressors, which generate healthcare disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations (also known as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersexual, asexual, and other sexual and gender-expansive persons--LGBTQIA+) with cancer. The individual\'s biological, behavioral, social, and psychological response to minority stressors will vary throughout their life course. However, there is a lack of empirical and theoretical guidance for conceptualizing health outcomes among SGM subgroups.
    OBJECTIVE: To propose a nursing theory for the health promotion of SGM populations with cancer.
    METHODS: Walker and Avant\'s strategies for theoretical derivation were followed.
    RESULTS: I present the definition, theoretical assumptions, concepts, propositions, and implications for practice, education, research, and policy of the derived theory.
    CONCLUSIONS: The theory provides a nursing framework to understand and address the multilevel impact of minority stress on the health of SGM individuals throughout their cancer care continuum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管越来越接受LGBT+个人,即使在医疗保健领域,潜在的污名仍然存在,导致LGBT+个体的不合格护理和更糟糕的医疗保健结果。
    研究和比较斯洛文尼亚LGBT+个人和全科医生(GP)对初级保健的经验和期望。
    我们使用开放式问题进行了一项在线全国性定性研究。为了达到LGBT+人口,采用了滚雪球式招聘方法,通过LGBT+组织分享问卷,而全科医生是通过斯洛文尼亚家庭医生协会的电子邮件邀请的。匿名数据于2021年10月至12月收集,问卷包括25名全科医生和90名不同年龄的LGBT+个人,背景,性别认同和性取向使用主题分析进行审查.
    LGBT+参与者和全科医生都表达了平等对待的愿望。然而,虽然所有全科医生都声称平等对待所有患者,LGBT+参与者报告了更多不同的经历。具体的知识,特别是在LGBT+术语和医疗保健方面,被认为是全科医生中缺乏的,领导LGBT+个人向专家或社区咨询寻求建议。系统性障碍,包括对LGBT+问题的社会污名化和有限的正规教育,被确认,强调需要指定的安全空间和改进的GP培训。安全成为中心主题,对于培养患者和医疗保健提供者之间的信任和披露至关重要。
    该研究强调了患者与医生关系中安全感的重要性,并强调需要改进培训和态度,为LGBT+个人提供包容性和肯定的医疗保健。
    初级保健机构必须优先考虑为更好的LGBT+医疗保健创造安全和非判断性的环境。关于LGBT+术语的正式GP教育,身份,医疗保健需求对于提供包容性护理至关重要。克服系统性障碍,比如社会偏见和同性恋恐惧症,需要在初级保健设置中创建可见的安全空间信号。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite growing acceptance of LGBT + individuals, an underlying stigma persists even in healthcare, resulting in substandard care and worse healthcare outcomes for LGBT + individuals.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine and compare the experiences and expectations regarding primary healthcare among LGBT + individuals and general practitioners (GPs) in Slovenia.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted an online national qualitative study using open-ended questions. To reach LGBT + population snowball method of recruitment was employed by sharing the questionnaire through LGBT + organisations, while GPs were invited by email of Association of family doctors in Slovenia. Anonymous data was collected from October to December 2021 and the questionnaires of 25 GPs and 90 LGBT + individuals of various ages, backgrounds, gender identities and sexual orientations were reviewed using thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Both LGBT + participants and GPs expressed a desire for equal treatment. However, while all GPs claimed to treat all patients equally, LGBT + participants reported more varied experiences. Specific knowledge, especially on LGBT + terminology and healthcare, was perceived as lacking among GPs, leading LGBT + individuals to seek advice from specialists or community counselling. Systemic barriers, including societal stigmatisation and limited formal education on LGBT + issues, were identified, highlighting the need for designated safe spaces and improved GP training. Safety emerged as a central theme, crucial for fostering trust and disclosure between patients and healthcare providers.
    UNASSIGNED: The study underscores the significance of a sense of safety in the patient-doctor relationship and highlights the need for improved training and attitudes to provide inclusive and affirming healthcare for LGBT + individuals.
    Primary care settings must prioritise creating safe and non-judgmental environments for better LGBT + healthcare.Addressing formal GP education on LGBT + terminology, identities, and healthcare needs is crucial to provide inclusive care.Overcoming systemic barriers, such as societal prejudice and homophobia, requires creating visible safe space signals in primary care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号