背景:虽然人们普遍认为性别和性别相关因素对干预措施的设计很重要,已实施,并评估,目前尚不清楚酒精治疗研究如何解释性别特征和/或性别认同和方式.这种方法系统的审查记录和评估性别特征,性别认同,和性别模式在涉及青年的酒精治疗干预研究中得以实施。
结果:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane中央控制试验登记处,PsycINFO,CINAHL,LGBT生活,谷歌学者,WebofScience,以及2008年至2023年的灰色文学。我们纳入了报道30岁及以下参与者性别和/或性别的文章,并使用AUDIT对参与者进行了筛选,AUDIT-C,或使用DSM-IV标准的结构化访谈。我们将纳入纳入酒精治疗干预措施参与者并使用定量研究设计的研究。我们提供了调查结果的叙述概述。在筛选纳入的8019项研究中,86篇文章被纳入审查。没有一项研究定义,测量,并准确报告了性别和性别变量。只有2项研究报告包括跨性别参与者。大多数研究使用性别或性别措施作为协变量来控制性别或性别对干预的影响,但没有讨论该程序的原理或含义。
结论:我们的研究发现,大多数针对年轻人的酒精治疗干预研究都将性别和性别因素混为一谈,包括术语,概念上,和方法上。基于这些发现,我们建议在这一领域的未来研究定义和解释一系列性别模式,身份,和/或性别特征在整个研究生命周期中,包括在研究设计期间,数据收集,数据分析,和报告。还必须广泛使用性别和性别变量,以确保双性恋和跨性别青年得到有意义的融合。
背景:注册:PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42019119408。
BACKGROUND: While there is widespread consensus that sex- and gender-related factors are important for how interventions are designed, implemented, and evaluated, it is not currently known how alcohol treatment research accounts for sex characteristics and/or gender identities and modalities. This methodological systematic
review documents and assesses how sex characteristics, gender identities, and gender modalities are operationalized in alcohol treatment intervention research involving youth.
RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LGBT Life, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and grey literature from 2008 to 2023. We included articles that reported genders and/or sexes of participants 30 years of age and under and screened participants using AUDIT, AUDIT-C, or a structured interview using DSM-IV criteria. We limited the inclusion to studies that enrolled participants in alcohol treatment interventions and used a quantitative study design. We provide a narrative overview of the findings. Of 8,019 studies screened for inclusion, 86 articles were included in the
review. None of the studies defined, measured, and reported both sex and gender variables accurately. Only 2 studies reported including trans participants. Most of the studies used gender or sex measures as a covariate to control for the effects of sex or gender on the intervention but did not discuss the rationale for or implications of this procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify that the majority of alcohol treatment intervention research with youth conflate sex and gender factors, including terminologically, conceptually, and methodologically. Based on these findings, we recommend future research in this area define and account for a spectrum of gender modalities, identities, and/or sex characteristics throughout the research life cycle, including during study design, data collection, data analysis, and reporting. It is also imperative that sex and gender variables are used expansively to ensure that intersex and trans youth are meaningfully integrated.
BACKGROUND: Registration: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42019119408.