rapid diagnostic test

快速诊断试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血清学筛查试验在诊断冈比亚人非洲锥虫病(gHAT)中起着至关重要的作用。目前,他们预选个人进行微观确认,但在未来的“筛选和治疗”策略中,他们将确定需要治疗的个体。报告的特异性的可变性,新的快速诊断试验(RDT)的发展以及疟疾感染可能降低RDT特异性的假设,促使我们评估5gHAT筛查试验的特异性.
    方法:在主动筛查期间,来自科特迪瓦和几内亚的1095名个体的静脉血样本进行了连续商业测试(CATT,HATSero-K-SeT,雅培BiolineHAT2.0)和原型(DCNHATRDT,HATSero-K-SeT2.0)gHAT筛查测试和疟疾RDT。gHAT筛查试验≥1阳性的个体接受了显微镜检查和进一步的免疫学检查(用T.b.gambienseLiTat1.3、1.5和1.6进行胰蛋白酶分解;间接ELISA/T.b.gambiense;用T.b.gambienseLiTat1.3和1.5VSG进行T.b.7SL佐恩,和TgsGP;锥虫虫S2-RT-qPCR18S2,177T,GPI-PLC和TgsGP多重;RT-qPCRDT8、DT9和TgsGP多重)。显微镜锥虫检测证实gHAT,而其他人则被认为是无gHAT。通过卡方评估组间分数的差异,并通过McNemar对同一个体进行2次测试之间的特异性差异。
    结果:诊断为一例gHAT病例。总体测试特异性(n=1094)为:CATT98.9%(95%CI:98.1-99.4%);HATSero-K-SeT86.7%(95%CI:84.5-88.5%);BiolineHAT2.082.1%(95%CI:79.7-84.2%);在疟疾阳性中,gHAT筛查测试似乎不太具体,但仅在几内亚,雅培BiolineHAT2.0(P=0.03)和HATSero-K-Set2.0(P=0.0006)的差异显着。gHAT血清阳性的免疫学和分子实验室检测的特异性为98.7-100%(n=399)和93.0-100%(n=302),分别。在44个参考实验室测试阳性中,只有确诊的gHAT患者和1个筛查试验血清阳性的结合免疫学和分子参考实验室检测阳性。
    结论:虽然不能排除疟疾的轻微影响,gHATRDT特异性远低于WHO目标产品概况规定的95%最低特异性,这是一种简单的诊断工具,用于识别符合治疗条件的个体。除非特异性得到改善,基于RDT的“筛查和治疗”策略将导致大规模的过度治疗。鉴于其结果不一致,参考实验室测试的诊断性能的额外比较评估是为了更好地识别,在筛查测试阳性中,那些对gHAT越来越怀疑的人。
    背景:该试验于2022年7月15日在clinicaltrials.gov中根据NCT05466630进行回顾性注册。
    BACKGROUND: Serological screening tests play a crucial role to diagnose gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT). Presently, they preselect individuals for microscopic confirmation, but in future \"screen and treat\" strategies they will identify individuals for treatment. Variability in reported specificities, the development of new rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and the hypothesis that malaria infection may decrease RDT specificity led us to evaluate the specificity of 5 gHAT screening tests.
    METHODS: During active screening, venous blood samples from 1095 individuals from Côte d\'Ivoire and Guinea were tested consecutively with commercial (CATT, HAT Sero-K-SeT, Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0) and prototype (DCN HAT RDT, HAT Sero-K-SeT 2.0) gHAT screening tests and with a malaria RDT. Individuals with ≥ 1 positive gHAT screening test underwent microscopy and further immunological (trypanolysis with T.b. gambiense LiTat 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6; indirect ELISA/T.b. gambiense; T.b. gambiense inhibition ELISA with T.b. gambiense LiTat 1.3 and 1.5 VSG) and molecular reference laboratory tests (PCR TBRN3, 18S and TgsGP; SHERLOCK 18S Tids, 7SL Zoon, and TgsGP; Trypanozoon S2-RT-qPCR 18S2, 177T, GPI-PLC and TgsGP in multiplex; RT-qPCR DT8, DT9 and TgsGP in multiplex). Microscopic trypanosome detection confirmed gHAT, while other individuals were considered gHAT free. Differences in fractions between groups were assessed by Chi square and differences in specificity between 2 tests on the same individuals by McNemar.
    RESULTS: One gHAT case was diagnosed. Overall test specificities (n = 1094) were: CATT 98.9% (95% CI: 98.1-99.4%); HAT Sero-K-SeT 86.7% (95% CI: 84.5-88.5%); Bioline HAT 2.0 82.1% (95% CI: 79.7-84.2%); DCN HAT RDT 78.2% (95% CI: 75.7-80.6%); and HAT Sero-K-SeT 2.0 78.4% (95% CI: 75.9-80.8%). In malaria positives, gHAT screening tests appeared less specific, but the difference was significant only in Guinea for Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 (P = 0.03) and HAT Sero-K-Set 2.0 (P = 0.0006). The specificities of immunological and molecular laboratory tests in gHAT seropositives were 98.7-100% (n = 399) and 93.0-100% (n = 302), respectively. Among 44 reference laboratory test positives, only the confirmed gHAT patient and one screening test seropositive combined immunological and molecular reference laboratory test positivity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although a minor effect of malaria cannot be excluded, gHAT RDT specificities are far below the 95% minimal specificity stipulated by the WHO target product profile for a simple diagnostic tool to identify individuals eligible for treatment. Unless specificity is improved, an RDT-based \"screen and treat\" strategy would result in massive overtreatment. In view of their inconsistent results, additional comparative evaluations of the diagnostic performance of reference laboratory tests are indicated for better identifying, among screening test positives, those at increased suspicion for gHAT.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was retrospectively registered under NCT05466630 in clinicaltrials.gov on July 15 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多哥的国家疟疾控制计划已针对Bassar卫生区农村地区的所有年龄段启动了积极的基于家庭的疟疾管理模式。此报告描述了该模型,报告其主要结果,并确定与阳性快速诊断测试结果相关的因素。
    方法:从2014年到2017年,在巴萨卫生区的三个外围护理单位(Binaparba,Nangbani,和Baghan),社区卫生工作者每周访问居民家中,以确定有疟疾症状的患者,对有症状的患者进行快速诊断测试,对阳性病例给予药物治疗。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与阳性测试相关的因素。
    结果:该研究涵盖了11,337人(2014年为817人,2015年为1804人,2016年为2638人,2017年为6078人)。总体平均年龄为18岁(95%CI5-29;最小-最大:0-112岁)。中位年龄为10岁(SD:16.9)。比纳帕巴检测呈阳性的人数比例为75.3%,南巴尼的77.4%,和56.6%在巴汉。5-10岁年龄组是受影响最大的类别(24.2%阳性测试)。雨季的阳性测试比旱季更频繁(62vs.38%),雨季期间的阳性测试概率是旱季期间的1.76倍(调整后的OR=1.74;95%CI1.60-1.90)。发烧(37.5°C或更高)显着增加了阳性测试的可能性(校正OR=2.19;95%CI1.89-2.54)。被动检测阳性的风险是主动检测的1.89倍(校正OR=1.89;95%CI1.73-2.0)。
    结论:多哥这种新颖的实验性社区和基于家庭的疟疾管理表明,在24小时内积极检测疟疾病例是可行的,这允许在进展为通常致命的并发症之前进行快速治疗。该PECAOM计划将帮助多哥的国家疟疾控制计划降低偏远和难以到达的社区的疟疾发病率和死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: Togo\'s National Malaria Control Programme has initiated an active home-based malaria management model for all age groups in rural areas of Bassar Health District. This report describes the model, reports its main results, and determines the factors associated with positive rapid diagnostic test results.
    METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, in three peripheral care units of Bassar Health District (Binaparba, Nangbani, and Baghan), community health workers visited residents\' homes weekly to identify patients with malaria symptoms, perform rapid diagnostic tests in symptomatic patients, and give medication to positive cases. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with positive tests.
    RESULTS: The study covered 11,337 people (817 in 2014, 1804 in 2015, 2638 in 2016, and 6078 in 2017). The overall mean age was 18 years (95% CI 5-29; min-max: 0-112 years). The median age was 10 years (SD: 16.9). The proportions of people tested positive were 75.3% in Binaparba, 77.4% in Nangbani, and 56.6% in Baghan. The 5-10 age group was the most affected category (24.2% positive tests). Positive tests were more frequent during the rainy than during the dry season (62 vs. 38%) and the probability of positive test was 1.76 times higher during the rainy than during the dry season (adjusted OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.60-1.90). A fever (37.5 °C or higher) increased significantly the probability of positive test (adjusted OR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.89-2.54). The risk of positive test was 1.89 times higher in passive than in active malaria detection (adjusted OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.73-2.0).
    CONCLUSIONS: This novel experimental community and home-based malaria management in Togo suggested that active detection of malaria cases is feasible within 24 h, which allows rapid treatments before progression to often-fatal complications. This PECADOM + program will help Togo\'s National Malaria Control Programme reduce malaria morbidity and mortality in remote and hard-to-reach communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The global malaria epidemic is still severe. Because of simple procedures, rapid detection and accuracy results, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) has become the most important and the most widely used diagnostic tool for malaria prevention and control. However, deletions in the RDT target Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 (Pfhrp2/3) genes may cause false-negative results of RDT, which has been included as one of the four biological threats to global malaria elimination. This article reviews the applications of RDT in the global malaria diagnosis, analyzes the threats and challenges caused by Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, proposes methods for monitoring Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, and summarizes the causes and countermeasures of negative RDT detections, so as to provide insights into consolidation of malaria elimination achievements in China and contributions to global malaria elimination.
    [摘要] 全球疟疾流行依然严峻, 疟疾快速诊断试纸条 (rapid diagnostic test, RDT) 操作简便、检测快速、结果准确, 已成为当前疟 疾防控中最重要和最广泛使用的诊断工具。但RDT靶标恶性疟 原虫富组氨酸蛋白2/3 (Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3, Pfhrp2/3) 基因缺失可导致RDT产生假阴性检测结果, 被 WHO列为全球消除疟疾的四大生物学挑战之一。本文通过回顾 RDT在全球疟疾诊断中的应用, 分析Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失带来的威 胁与挑战、提出Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失的监测方法、总结RDT检测阴性 的原因与对策, 为巩固我国消除疟疾成果、助力全球消除疟疾提 供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精确的公共卫生(PPH)可以通过以时间为目标的监视和干预措施来最大化影响,空间,和流行病学特征。尽管快速诊断测试(RDT)在低资源环境中实现了无处不在的即时测试,他们的影响小于预期,部分原因是缺乏简化数据捕获和分析的功能。
    目的:我们旨在通过定义信息和数据公理以及信息利用指数(IUI)将RDT转变为PPH工具;确定设计功能以最大化IUI;并为模块化RDT功能制定开放指南(OGs),使其与数字健康工具链接以创建RDT-OG系统。
    方法:我们审查了已发表的论文,并与技术领域的专家或RDT用户进行了调查,制造,和部署来定义信息利用的特征和公理。我们开发了一个IUI,从0%到100%,并为33个世界卫生组织资格预审的RDT计算了该指数。开发RDT-OG规格是为了最大限度地提高IUI;通过开发基于OGs的疟疾和COVID-19RDT,在肯尼亚和印度尼西亚使用,评估了可行性和规格。
    结果:调查受访者(n=33)包括16名研究人员,7位技术专家,3家制造商,2名医生或护士,其他5个用户他们最关心RDT的正确使用(30/33,91%),他们的解释(28/33,85%),和可靠性(26/33,79%),并相信基于智能手机的RDT阅读器可以解决一些可靠性问题(28/33,85%),读者对复杂或多重RDT更为重要(33/33,100%)。资格预审的RDT的IUI范围为13%至75%(中位数33%)。相比之下,RDT-OG原型的IUI为91%。通过(1)创建参考RDT-OG原型;(2)在智能手机RDT阅读器上实现其功能和功能,云信息系统,和快速医疗互操作性资源;以及(3)分析RDT-OG与实验室集成的潜在公共卫生影响,监视,和生命统计系统。
    结论:政策制定者和制造商可以定义,采用,并与RDT-OG和数字健康计划协同。RDT-OG方法可以通过适应性干预措施进行实时诊断和流行病学监测,以促进通过PPH控制或消除当前和新出现的疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Precision public health (PPH) can maximize impact by targeting surveillance and interventions by temporal, spatial, and epidemiological characteristics. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have enabled ubiquitous point-of-care testing in low-resource settings, their impact has been less than anticipated, owing in part to lack of features to streamline data capture and analysis.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to transform the RDT into a tool for PPH by defining information and data axioms and an information utilization index (IUI); identifying design features to maximize the IUI; and producing open guidelines (OGs) for modular RDT features that enable links with digital health tools to create an RDT-OG system.
    METHODS: We reviewed published papers and conducted a survey with experts or users of RDTs in the sectors of technology, manufacturing, and deployment to define features and axioms for information utilization. We developed an IUI, ranging from 0% to 100%, and calculated this index for 33 World Health Organization-prequalified RDTs. RDT-OG specifications were developed to maximize the IUI; the feasibility and specifications were assessed through developing malaria and COVID-19 RDTs based on OGs for use in Kenya and Indonesia.
    RESULTS: The survey respondents (n=33) included 16 researchers, 7 technologists, 3 manufacturers, 2 doctors or nurses, and 5 other users. They were most concerned about the proper use of RDTs (30/33, 91%), their interpretation (28/33, 85%), and reliability (26/33, 79%), and were confident that smartphone-based RDT readers could address some reliability concerns (28/33, 85%), and that readers were more important for complex or multiplex RDTs (33/33, 100%). The IUI of prequalified RDTs ranged from 13% to 75% (median 33%). In contrast, the IUI for an RDT-OG prototype was 91%. The RDT open guideline system that was developed was shown to be feasible by (1) creating a reference RDT-OG prototype; (2) implementing its features and capabilities on a smartphone RDT reader, cloud information system, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; and (3) analyzing the potential public health impact of RDT-OG integration with laboratory, surveillance, and vital statistics systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers and manufacturers can define, adopt, and synergize with RDT-OGs and digital health initiatives. The RDT-OG approach could enable real-time diagnostic and epidemiological monitoring with adaptive interventions to facilitate control or elimination of current and emerging diseases through PPH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    查加斯病(CD),克氏锥虫引起的,是一个全球健康问题,地理范围不断扩大。尽管改进和易于使用的测试方法,诊断CD的各个阶段仍然很复杂。临床情景的存在,包括免疫抑制患者,移植相关的CD再激活,输血相关病例,经口传播的急性感染,增加了诊断挑战。所有阶段都没有单一的黄金标准测试,以及泛美卫生组织和CDC倡导使用两种血清学方法进行慢性CD诊断的建议,而急性期建议采用分子方法或直接寄生虫检测。鉴于CD诊断领域的复杂性,本范围审查的目的是在临床实验室中描述可用的CD诊断测试.
    在PubMed中对与人类体外诊断(IVD)相关的研究进行了文献检索,以英文发表,西班牙语,或截至2023年8月28日的葡萄牙语,并向后延伸,没有预定的时间框架。研究经过标题和摘要筛选,其次是全文回顾。包括的研究根据所使用的诊断方法进行分类。测试方法分为血清学,分子,和其他方法。性能,可用性,和监管地位也有特点。
    在最终审查中包含的85项研究中,确定了115种不同的测试。这些测试包括89种血清学测试类型,21种分子测试类型,和其他5种测试方法。主要的血清学测试包括ELISA(38项研究,44.70%),快速测试(19项研究,22.35%),和化学发光(10项研究,11.76%)。在分子测试中,聚合酶链反应(PCR)测定是显著的。全球批准了28项测试用于IVD或供体测试,都是血清学方法。在美国,分子检测缺乏对IVD的批准,只有欧洲和哥伦比亚的监管机构接受。
    血清学试验,特别是ELISA,仍然是最常用和市售的诊断方法。考虑到大多数查加斯病的诊断发生在慢性期,并且WHO的黄金标准依赖于2种血清学测试来确定慢性查加斯病的诊断,这是有道理的。ELISA是可行的,成本相对较低,具有良好的性能,灵敏度在77.4%到100%之间,特异性在84.2%到100%之间。分子方法允许检测特定的变体,但依赖于寄生虫的存在,这限制了它们对寄生虫血症水平的效用。根据PCR方法和疾病的阶段,敏感性为58.88~100%,平均特异性为68.8%~100%.尽管他们的表现,分子检测仍然大多无法用于IVD。只有3个分子测试被批准用于IVD,只有在欧洲才有。FDA批准的六种商业血清学测定可用于血液和器官供体筛选。目前,没有测试CD口腔爆发的指南。尽管需要更多的证据来说明如何在特殊的临床场景中使用测试方法,临床评估和诊断测试的综合方法,不包括IVD方法,需要准确的CD诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Chagas disease (CD), caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a global health concern with expanding geographical reach. Despite improved and accessible test methods, diagnosing CD in its various phases remains complex. The existence of clinical scenarios, including immunosuppressed patients, transplant-related CD reactivation, transfusion-associated cases, and orally transmitted acute infections, adds to the diagnostic challenge. No singular gold standard test exists for all phases, and recommendations from PAHO and the CDC advocate for the use of two serological methods for chronic CD diagnosis, while molecular methods or direct parasite detection are suggested for the acute phase. Given the complexity in the diagnostic landscape of CD, the goal of this scoping review is to characterize available diagnostic tests for CD in the clinical laboratory.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search in PubMed was conducted on studies related to In vitro diagnosis (IVD) in humans published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese language as of 28 August 2023, and extended backward with no predefined time frame. Studies underwent title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review. Studies included were classified based on the diagnostic method used. Test methods were grouped as serological, molecular, and other methods. Performance, availability, and regulatory status were also characterized.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 85 studies included in the final review, 115 different tests were identified. These tests comprised 89 serological test types, 21 molecular test types, and 5 other test methods. Predominant serological tests included ELISA (38 studies, 44.70%), Rapid tests (19 studies, 22.35%), and chemiluminescence (10 studies, 11.76%). Among molecular tests, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays were notable. Twenty-eight tests were approved globally for IVD or donor testing, all being serological methods. Molecular assays lacked approval for IVD in the United States, with only European and Colombian regulatory acceptance.
    UNASSIGNED: Serological tests, specifically ELISAs, remain the most used and commercially available diagnostic methods. This makes sense considering that most Chagas disease diagnoses occur in the chronic phase and that the WHO gold standard relies on 2 serological tests to establish the diagnosis of chronic Chagas. ELISAs are feasible and relatively low-cost, with good performance with sensitivities ranging between 77.4% and 100%, and with specificities ranging between 84.2% and 100%. Molecular methods allow the detection of specific variants but rely on the parasite\'s presence, which limits their utility to parasitemia levels. Depending on the PCR method and the phase of the disease, the sensitivity ranged from 58.88 to 100% while the mean specificity ranged from 68.8% to 100%. Despite their performance, molecular testing remains mostly unavailable for IVD use. Only 3 molecular tests are approved for IVD, which are available only in Europe. Six commercial serological assays approved by the FDA are available for blood and organ donor screening. Currently, there are no guidelines for testing CD oral outbreaks. Although more evidence is needed on how testing methods should be used in special clinical scenarios, a comprehensive approach of clinical assessment and diagnostics tests, including not IVD methods, is required for an accurate CD diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在法国,移民在被诊断为艾滋病毒的人中占很大比例,丙型肝炎(HCV)和乙型肝炎(HBV)。这项研究估计了这三种病毒在法国行政拘留中心(CRA)的被拘留者中的流行率,通过系统的快速诊断测试(RDT)筛查。
    方法:这种前瞻性,单中心,横截面,试点研究包括2022年2月至12月在尼姆CRA的被拘留者。主要终点是HIV,由RDT确定的HCV和HBV患病率。次要结果是:共感染;研究可接受性,不包括在内的原因,非贡献样本的原因;以及血清学测试和RDT之间的一致性。
    结果:在同意参加726名符合条件的350人中,五人拒绝了RDT,留下345名可分析参与者,参与率为47.5%(345/726)。参与者主要是男性(90%),平均年龄为31岁。最常见的来源国是阿尔及利亚(34%)。20例(6%)静脉内服用药物,240例(70%)在中位数4.92[1.08;15]个月内发生无保护性行为。病毒患病率为:0%HIV;4.64[2.42;6.86]%HCV;和2.32[1.01;4.52]%HBV。11例(73%)RDTHCV阳性病例经血清学证实。RDT检测到一例HCV假阳性病例,作为抗-HCVAc血清学试验阴性。8例HBVRDT阳性患者中,一个人拒绝了血清学检测,因此,100%(7/7)的测试RDT阳性病例通过血清学证实。
    结论:该研究强调了对被拘留者进行艾滋病毒筛查的必要性,HCV和HBV感染和RDT的适用性。
    BACKGROUND: In France, migrants constitute a significant proportion of people diagnosed with HIV, hepatitis C (HCV) and B (HBV). This study estimated the prevalence of these three viruses among detainees at a French administrative detention centre (CRA), through systematic Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) screening.
    METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, cross-sectional, pilot study included detainees at the Nîmes CRA from February to December 2022. The primary endpoint was HIV, HCV and HBV prevalence determined by RDT. Secondary outcomes were: co-infections; study acceptability, reasons for non-inclusion, causes of non-contributory samples; and concordance between serological tests and RDT.
    RESULTS: Among the 350 people agreeing to participate of 726 eligible, five refused the RDT, leaving 345 analysable participants for a participation rate of 47.5% (345/726). Participants were predominantly male (90%) with an average age of 31 years. The most common country of origin was Algeria (34%). Twenty (6%) had taken drugs intravenously and 240 (70%) had had unprotected sex within a median of 4.92 [1.08; 15] months. Virus prevalence was: 0% HIV; 4.64 [2.42; 6.86] % HCV; and 2.32 [1.01; 4.52] % HBV. Eleven (73%) of the RDT HCV positive cases were confirmed serologically. RDT detected one false-positive HCV case, as an anti-HCV Ac serological test was negative. Of the eight patients with positive HBV RDT, one declined the serology testing, thus 100% (7/7) of the tested RDT positive cases were confirmed by serology.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the need to screen detainees for HIV, HCV and HBV infection and suitability of RDTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在资源丰富的地区每天使用即时测试(POCT),然而,在全球南部是有限的,特别是在院前设置。关于社区卫生工作者(CHW)使用非疟疾性POCT的研究很少。此范围审查的目的是描述院前环境中评估的POCT的当前多样性和广度。
    由经验丰富的医学图书馆员对已知关键文章进行医学主题标题(MeSH)分析,并在每个数据库中进行范围搜索,以捕获“护理点测试”和“社区卫生工作者”。“这项审查是由PRISMA扩展进行范围审查的指导。
    返回了2735个出版物,185人被提名进行全文审查,110项研究被证实符合研究标准.大多数人关注疟疾(74/110;67%)或HIV(25/110;23%);9/110(8%)描述了其他测试。这篇综述的结果表明,地理范围很广,当地CHW的术语具有显著的异质性。
    新POCT的使用正在增加,并且可能会在有限的资源环境中改善早期风险分层。来自数十年疟疾POCT的当前证据可以指导未来的实施战略。
    Point-of-Care Tests (POCTs) are utilized daily in resource abundant regions, however, are limited in the global south, particularly in the prehospital setting. Few studies exist on the use of non-malarial POCTs by Community Health Workers (CHWs). The purpose of this scoping review is to delineate the current diversity in and breadth of POCTs evaluated in the prehospital setting.
    A medical subject heading (MeSH) analysis of known key articles was done by an experienced medical librarian and scoping searches were performed in each database to capture \"point of care testing\" and \"community health workers.\" This review was guided by the PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews.
    2735 publications were returned, 185 were nominated for full-text review, and 110 studies were confirmed to meet study criteria. Majority focused on malaria (74/110; 67%) or HIV (25/110; 23%); 9/110 (8%) described other tests administered. Results from this review demonstrate a broad geographic range with significant heterogeneity in terminology for local CHWs.
    The use of new POCTs is on the rise and may improve early risk stratification in limited resource settings. Current evidence from decades of malaria POCTs can guide future implementation strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)建议登革热疫苗接种前筛查试验对登革热的给药具有至少98%的特异性和75%的敏感性。这项研究评估了商业抗DENVIgG测试的性能,以鉴定可用于疫苗接种前筛查的测试。首先,对于7个测试,我们评估了早期恢复期登革病毒(DENV)感染的敏感性和特异性,使用在症状发作后7-30天收集并通过RT-PCR确认的44个样本。接下来,对于后来可用的5个性能最佳的测试和两个额外的测试(有和没有外部测试读取器),我们评估了2018-2019年从波多黎各9-16岁健康儿童收集的44份样本中检测过去登革热感染的性能.最后,使用来自同一人群的400个样本,对4个表现最好的测试进行全面评估.我们使用病毒焦点减少中和测试和内部DENVIgGELISA作为参考标准。在七个测试中,5例患者在对寨卡病毒具有低交叉反应性的恢复期早期标本中检测抗DENVIgG的灵敏度≥75%。对于以前的DENV感染的检测,性能最高的测试是EuroimmunNS1IgGELISA(灵敏度84.5%,特异性97.1%)和CTK登革热IgG快速测试R0065C与测试读数(灵敏度76.2%特异性98.1%)。有可用的IgG测试,可用于准确地将先前的DENV感染的个体分类为有资格进行登革热疫苗接种,以支持安全的疫苗实施。
    The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that dengue pre-vaccination screening tests for Dengvaxia administration have at least 98% specificity and 75% sensitivity. This study evaluates the performance of commercial anti-DENV IgG tests to identify tests that could be used for pre-vaccination screening. First, for 7 tests, we evaluated sensitivity and specificity in early convalescent dengue virus (DENV) infection, using 44 samples collected 7-30 days after symptom onset and confirmed by RT-PCR. Next, for the 5 best performing tests and two additional tests (with and without an external test reader) that became available later, we evaluated performance to detect past dengue infection among a panel of 44 specimens collected in 2018-2019 from healthy 9-16-year-old children from Puerto Rico. Finally, a full-scale evaluation was done with the 4 best performing tests using 400 specimens from the same population. We used virus focus reduction neutralization test and an in-house DENV IgG ELISA as reference standards. Of seven tests, five showed ≥75% sensitivity detecting anti-DENV IgG in early convalescent specimens with low cross-reactivity to Zika virus. For the detection of previous DENV infections the tests with the highest performance were the Euroimmun NS1 IgG ELISA (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 97.1%) and CTK Dengue IgG rapid test R0065C with the test reader (sensitivity 76.2% specificity 98.1%). There are IgG tests available that can be used to accurately classify individuals with previous DENV infection as eligible for dengue vaccination to support safe vaccine implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疟疾的早期诊断对于控制发病率和死亡率至关重要。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议使用光学显微镜或疟疾快速诊断测试(RDT)诊断疟疾。大多数RDT使用抗体来检测两种名为PfHRP2和PfHRP3的恶性疟原虫富含组氨酸的蛋白质。然而,已知由于取决于物种的RDT的性能差以及Pfhrp2和Pfhrp3基因的缺失而发生假阴性结果。这项研究评估了用于检测人类疟原虫物种的新型疟疾RDT。AcroMalariaP.f./P.v./Pan快速检测盒允许定性检测寄生虫抗原,例如对恶性疟原虫具有特异性的PfHRP2,间日疟原虫特异性PvLDH,和/或panLDH疟原虫属乳酸脱氢酶,在感染者的血液中。对从输入的疟疾病例中收集的229个样本进行了RDT评估,主要来自非洲。先前使用光学显微镜和RDT(SD疟疾AgP.f./Pan,SDBiolineAlereAbbott),然后使用实时PCR进行确认。使用实时PCR作为参考方法的比较来评估两个RDT,并对他们的表现进行了比较。与SDRDT相比,AcroRDT对恶性疟原虫表现出更好的敏感性(96.8%vs.89.8%),间日疟原虫(78.6%与64.3%),P.卵形(73.7%与5.3%),和疟原虫(20.0%与0%)。AcroRDT和SDRDT各自的特异性为90.7%与95.3%至恶性疟原虫,100%对间日疟原虫,和100%vs.100%为疟原虫属。因此,AcroRDT在鉴定卵形疟原虫和恶性疟原虫的低寄生虫血症方面表现出更好的性能。此外,AcroRDT具有检测PvLDH特异性抗原的优点。AcroMalariaRDT具有高灵敏度(96.8%和73.7%)检测恶性疟原虫抗原(PfHRP2)和间日疟原虫抗原(PvLDH)的优点,分别)和特异性(90.7%和100%,分别)。AcroMalariaP.f./P.v./Pan快速诊断测试可以有效地用于流行地区,特别是当显微镜检查不能进行。
    The early diagnosis of malaria is crucial to controlling morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends diagnosing malaria either using light microscopy or a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Most RDTs use antibodies to detect two P. falciparum histidine-rich proteins named PfHRP2 and PfHRP3. However, false-negative results are known to occur due to the poor performance of RDTs depending on the species and the deletion of the Pfhrp2 and Pfhrp3 genes. This study evaluated new malaria RDTs for the detection of the human Plasmodium species. The Acro Malaria P.f./P.v./Pan Rapid Test Cassette allows the qualitative detection of parasite antigens, such as PfHRP2 specific to Plasmodium falciparum, PvLDH specific to Plasmodium vivax, and/or panLDH Plasmodium genus lactate dehydrogenase, in the blood of infected individuals. This RDT was assessed against 229 samples collected from imported malaria cases, mainly from Africa. The samples were previously diagnosed using light microscopy and RDT (SD Malaria Ag P.f./Pan, SD Bioline Alere Abbott), then confirmed using real time PCR. The two RDTs were evaluated using a comparison with real time PCR as the reference method, and their performances were compared with each other. Compared to SD RDT, the Acro RDT showed a better sensitivity to P. falciparum (96.8% vs. 89.8%), P. vivax (78.6% vs. 64.3%), P. ovale (73.7% vs. 5.3%), and P. malariae (20.0% vs. 0%). The respective specificities of the Acro RDT and SD RDT are 90.7% vs. 95.3% to P. falciparum, 100% to P. vivax, and 100% vs. 100% to Plasmodium genus. Therefore, Acro RDT showed better performance in the identification of P. ovale and low parasitaemia of P. falciparum. In addition, Acro RDT has the advantage of detecting PvLDH-specific antigens. The Acro Malaria RDT presents the benefits of detecting a P. falciparum antigen (PfHRP2) and a P. vivax antigen (PvLDH) with high sensitivity (96.8% and 73.7%, respectively) and specificity (90.7% and 100%, respectively). Acro Malaria P.f./P.v./Pan rapid diagnostic tests could be effectively used in endemic areas, especially when microscopic examination cannot be performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    黄热病(YF)是18和19世纪最急性的病毒性出血性疾病之一,继续在非洲造成严重的发病率和死亡率。在尼日利亚21年没有报告黄热病病例之后,直到2017年在Kwara州确认了一个病例,也是在2018年11月,世卫组织获悉江户州出现了一批疑似黄热病病例和死亡病例,尼日利亚。这项研究是在贝宁市卫生中心就诊的所有年龄组中进行的,江户州。从同意的发热患者中收集了总共280份血液样品,并使用快速诊断测试(RDT)试剂盒筛选了针对寨卡病毒的抗体。寨卡病毒(IgM/IgGRDT)阳性的血液样本,进行了分子表征。使用黄科科引物,通过半巢式逆转录PCR(hnRT-PCR)测序证实为阳性的六(6)份样品。核苷酸序列爆炸显示序列与黄热病病毒株相似。系统发育分析表明,黄热病病毒序列与非洲毒株密切相关。尽管黄热病疫苗安全有效,黄热病病毒被认为在循环中,因此需要继续进行大规模疫苗接种。
    Yellow fever (YF) is one of the most acute viral hemorrhagic diseases of the 18th and 19th centuries, which continues to cause severe morbidity and mortality in Africa. After 21 years of no reported cases of yellow fever in Nigeria, till 2017 where a case was confirmed in Kwara State, also in November 2018,WHO was informed of a cluster of suspected yellow fever cases and deaths in Edo state, Nigeria. The study was among all age group attending health centres in Benin City, Edo state. A total of 280 blood samples were collected from consented febrile patients and were screened for antibodies to Zika virus using rapid diagnostic test (RDT) kits. Blood samples positive to Zika virus (IgM/IgG RDT), were subjected to molecular characterization. Using the flavividae family primers, six (6) samples where confirmed positive by Hemi-nested reverse transcription PCR (hnRT-PCR) sequencing. Nucleotide sequence blast revealed the sequenceswere similar to Yellow fever virus strains. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the yellow fever virus sequences are closely related to the African strains. Despite the safe and effective yellow fever vaccine, yellow fever virus is seen to be in circulation, hence the need for continues mass vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号