The global malaria epidemic is still severe. Because of simple procedures, rapid detection and accuracy results, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) has become the most important and the most widely used diagnostic tool for malaria prevention and control. However, deletions in the RDT target Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 (Pfhrp2/3) genes may cause false-negative results of RDT, which has been included as one of the four biological threats to global malaria elimination. This article reviews the applications of RDT in the global malaria diagnosis, analyzes the threats and challenges caused by Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, proposes methods for monitoring Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, and summarizes the causes and countermeasures of negative RDT detections, so as to provide insights into consolidation of malaria elimination achievements in China and contributions to global malaria elimination.
［摘要］ 全球疟疾流行依然严峻, 疟疾快速诊断试纸条 (rapid diagnostic test, RDT) 操作简便、检测快速、结果准确, 已成为当前疟 疾防控中最重要和最广泛使用的诊断工具。但RDT靶标恶性疟 原虫富组氨酸蛋白2/3 (Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3, Pfhrp2/3) 基因缺失可导致RDT产生假阴性检测结果, 被 WHO列为全球消除疟疾的四大生物学挑战之一。本文通过回顾 RDT在全球疟疾诊断中的应用, 分析Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失带来的威 胁与挑战、提出Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失的监测方法、总结RDT检测阴性 的原因与对策, 为巩固我国消除疟疾成果、助力全球消除疟疾提 供参考。.

UNASSIGNED: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) have played an important role in the early detection of clinical malaria in an endemic area. While several mRDTs are currently on the market, the availability of mRDTs with high sensitivity and specificity will merit the fight against malaria. We evaluated the field performance of a novel One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits in Pwani, Tanzania.
UNASSIGNED: In a cross-sectional study conducted in Bagamoyo and Kibiti districts in Tanzania, symptomatic patients were tested using the SD BIOLINE, One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits, microscope, and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). An additional qPCR assay was carried out to detect Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (HRP-2) gene deletion on mRDT negative but microscope and qPCR positive samples. Microscope results confirmed by qPCR were used for analysis, where qPCR was used as a reference method.
UNASSIGNED: The sensitivity and specificity of One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs were 96.0% (CI 93.5-97.7%) and 98.3% (CI 96.8-99.2%), respectively. One Step P.f mRDT had sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% (CI 92.5-97.1%) and 97.9% (CI 96.3-99.0%) respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.6% (CI 95.4-98.7%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.2% (CI 95.5-98.3%) for the One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs respectively, while One Step P.f mRDT had positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.0% (CI 94.8-98.3%) and 96.7 (CI 94.9-97.9%) respectively. 9.8% (CI 7.84-11.76) of all samples tested and reported to be malaria-negative by mRDT had HRP-2 gene deletion.
UNASSIGNED: One Step Malaria P.f/P.v Tri-line and One Step Malaria P.f rapid test kits have similar sensitivity and specificity as the standard mRDT that is currently in the market, demonstrating the potential to contribute in the fight against malaria in endemic settings. However, the identified malaria parasites population with HRP-2 gene deletion pose a threat to the current mRDT usability in the field and warrants further investigations.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has good antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) producing class A and C and some class D carbapenemases, but in recent years, the emergence of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria is growing. Therefore, rapid, accurate, and timely detection of CZA is necessary for clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test was developed; its principle is that metabolically active bacteria (CZA-resistant strains) can change resazurin-PrestoBlue, a viability colorant, from blue to purple or pink in the presence of CZA, whereas CZA-susceptible strains cannot. We used 178 Enterobacterales isolates to evaluate the performance of this test. This test allowed the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to CZA to be detected within 4.5 h with an overall performance of 96% category agreement (CA), 7% major errors (MEs), and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Performance for Escherichia coli included 100% CA and 0% MEs and VMEs. Performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae included 99% CA and 2% MEs and 0% VMEs. Performance for Enterobacter cloacae included 87% CA, 25% MEs, and 0% VMEs. Moreover, this test is both economical ($1.0106 per isolate) and convenient, as it only requires basic laboratory equipment. In a word, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test is rapid and feasible, which may provide certain backing for the rapid screening and timely treatment of CZA-resistant strains in the clinic.

Since its first discovery in December 2019, the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has been posing a serious threat to human life and health. Diagnostic testing is critical for the control and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, diagnostic testing at the point of care (POC) has been widely accepted as part of the post restriction COVID-19 control strategy. Lateral flow assay (LFA) is a popular POC diagnostic platform that plays an important role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in industrialized countries and resource-limited settings. Numerous pioneering studies on the design and development of diverse LFA-based diagnostic technologies for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 have been done and reported by researchers. Hundreds of LFA-based diagnostic prototypes have sprung up, some of which have been developed into commercial test kits for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19. In this review, we summarize the crucial role of rapid diagnostic tests using LFA in targeting SARS-CoV-2-specific RNA, antibodies, antigens, and whole virus. Then, we discuss the design principle and working mechanisms of these available LFA methods, emphasizing their clinical diagnostic efficiency. Ultimately, we elaborate the challenges of current LFA diagnostics for COVID-19 and highlight the need for continuous improvement in rapid diagnostic tests.

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by parasitic protozoans from the genus Plasmodium, with the species P. falciparum causing the highest number of deaths worldwide. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become critical in the management of malaria, but current RDTs that detect P. falciparum are primarily antibody-based, which can have drawbacks in cost and robustness. Here, we report the development of an electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) biosensing alternative. Through selective evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment, we identify DNA aptamers that bind specifically to P. falciparum histidine-rich protein II (PfHRP2). The aptamer is modified with a methylene blue reporter and attached to a gold sensor surface for square-wave voltammetry interrogation. Through this method we are able to quantify PfHRP2 in human serum with an LOD of 3.73 nM. We further demonstrate the biosensor is stable in serum buffers and reusable for multiple detection rounds. These findings provide a promising alternative to conventional PfHRP2 detection for malaria diagnosis, while also expanding the capabilities of E-AB biosensors.

BACKGROUND: In the Anhui Province, China, efforts to interrupt the local malaria transmission were successful, with no endemic cases reported since 2014. Contrastingly, imported malaria cases are still being reported, indicating a disease reintroduction risk after years of elimination. A good surveillance system is key for avoiding the risk, detecting imported cases and possible cases associated with local transmission early. Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were combined with microscopy to strengthen malaria surveillance in the province. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this surveillance strategy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using malaria surveillance data from January 2016 to June 2020. Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic information were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics. The diagnostic performance of the combined toolbox (Wondfo RDTs plus microscopy) was evaluated based on its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Cohen\'s kappa coefficient, using real-time polymerase chain reaction as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The combined toolbox displayed a higher overall sensitivity for malaria cases than that of microscopy alone (93.74% vs 89.37%; padj <0.05), which could detect 94.65%, 88.16%, 95.00%, and 100.00% of Plasmodium falciparum, P. ovale, P. vivax, and P. malariae infections, respectively. In clinical practice, Wondfo RDTs ability to detect P. falciparum infections was better than that of microscopy (97.55% vs 89.67%, padj < 0.05). In contrast, microscopy displayed a higher specificity than that of Wondfo RDTs (81.82% vs 63.28%, p adj <0.05). Moreover, the consistency between microscopy and the gold standard results was also better than that of RDTs (Kappa value:0.669 vs 0.596).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of microscopy and RDTs is an effective strategy for malaria surveillance because it possibly detected more P. falciparum infections due to the introduction of RDTs. In contrast, microscopy is complementary to some limitations related to the use of RDTs in field practice. Thus, monitoring malaria cases in non-endemic areas may require employing more than one diagnostic tool in surveillance strategies. Moreover, further understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of different detection methods is necessary for applying optimum combinations in field settings.

An outbreak of a new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), began in December 2019. Accurate, rapid, convenient, and relatively inexpensive diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 infection are important for public health and optimal clinical care. The current gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection is reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, RTPCR assays are designed for use in well-equipped laboratories with sophisticated laboratory infrastructure and highly trained technicians, and are unsuitable for use in under-equipped laboratories and in the field. In this study, we report the development of an accurate, rapid, and easy-to-implement isothermal and nonenzymatic signal amplification system (a catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA) reaction) coupled with a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) strip-based detection method that can detect SARSCoV-2 in oropharyngeal swab samples. Our method avoids RNA isolation, PCR amplification, and elaborate result analysis, which typically takes 6-8 h. The entire CHA-LFIA detection method, from nasopharyngeal sampling to obtaining test results, takes less than 90 min. Such methods are simple and require no expensive equipment, only a simple thermostatically controlled water bath and a fluorescence reader device. We validated our method using synthetic oligonucleotides and clinical samples from 15 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 15 healthy individuals. Our detection method provides a fast, simple, and sensitive (with a limit of detection (LoD) of 2000 copies/mL) alternative to the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, with 100 % positive and negative predictive agreements.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the rapid diagnostic test for malaria diagnosis in children under 5 years of age.
METHODS: As of August 31, 2020, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases had been systematically searched. Relevant data were extracted and meta-analysis was carried out. A random effects model was used for subgroup analysis.
RESULTS: According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.96) and 0.92 (0.86-0.95), the parasite-specific lactate dehydrogenase-based test were 0.96 (0.85-0.98) and 0.93 (0.86-0.95), the histidine-rich protein 2-based test were 0.94 (0.84-0.98) and 0.86 (0.77-0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that rapid diagnostic test had good accuracy in diagnosing malaria in children under 5 years of age. And the diagnostic performance of parasite-specific lactate dehydrogenase test was better than that of the histidine-rich protein 2 test.

Rapid diagnostic tests as an attractive alternative to enzyme immunoassay could identify hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected persons more expeditiously. The availability of high performing and quality-assured rapid diagnostic tests are essential to scale-up HCV screening. The study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of seven domestic HCV rapid diagnostic tests kits. The kits were evaluated by using HCV serum panels, including HCV basic panel, analytical specificity panel, mixed titre performance panel, characteristic panel, seroconversion panel, and genotype qualification panel. The results showed that clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity and analytical specificity of seven rapid diagnostic tests kits ranged from 94% (95% CI: 83.2-98.6) to 100% (95% CI: 91.5-100). Furthermore, specimens with HCV genotypes 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 6 could be detected by HCV rapid diagnostic tests kits, whereas specimens with genotypes 1a and 2b could not be detected. Additionally, most HCV rapid diagnostic tests kits had great performance in diagnosing different titres and/or different bands samples, but some low S/CO value specimens may not be fully detected by few rapid diagnostic test kits. In conclusion, seven HCV rapid diagnostic tests reagents presented high sensitivity, specificity, good anti-interference and detection ability of early infection, which could meet the requirements of clinical HCV antibody screening.

BACKGROUND: As more and more countries approaching the goal of malaria elimination, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) was recomendated to be a diagnostic strategy to achieve and maintain the statute of malaria free, as it\'s less requirments on equipment and experitise than microscopic examination. But there are very few economic evaluations to confirm whether RDT was cost-effective in the setting of malaria elimination. This research aimed to offer evidence for helping decision making on malaria diagnosis strategy.
METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare RDT with microscopy examination for malaria diagnosis, by using a decision tree model. There were three strategies of malaria diagnostic testing evaluated in the model, 1) microscopy, 2) RDT, 3) RDT followed by microscopy. The effect indicator was defined as the number of malaria cases treated appropriately. Based on the joint perspective of health sector and patient, costs data were collected from hospital information systems, key informant interviews, and patient surveys. Data collection was conducted in Jiangsu from September 2018 to January 2019. Epidemiological data were obtained from local malaria surveillance reports. A hypothetical cohort of 300 000 febrile patients were simulated to calculate the total cost and effect of each strategy. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to test the robustness of the result.
RESULTS: The results showed that RDT strategy was the most effective (245 cases) but also the most costly (United States Dollar [USD] 4.47 million) compared to using microscopy alone (238 cases, USD 3.63 million), and RDT followed by microscopy (221 cases, USD 2.75 million). There was no strategy dominated. One-way sensitivity analysis reflected that the result was sensitive to the change in labor cost and two-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the result was not sensitive to the proportion of falciparum malaria. The result of Monte Carlo simulation showed that RDT strategy had higher effects and higher cost than other strategies with a high probability.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to microscopy and RDT followed by microscopy, RDT strategy had higher effects and higher cost in the setting of malaria elimination.