We report a case of a Morgagni hernia repaired by primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. Moreover, we reviewed cases of laparoscopically repaired Morgagni hernia, in which the size of the hernia defect was known, to establish a size criterion for mesh utilization. An 87-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right upper abdominal pain and vomiting. She had no history of abdominal surgery or trauma. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a Morgagni hernia, with the stomach and transverse colon herniated into the right chest cavity. Initially, an endoscopic repair was performed for the herniated stomach due to her age, which was successful. However, she had a recurrence 2 days later, prompting us to perform a semi-emergent laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic examination revealed a Morgagni defect, with the omentum, transverse colon, and stomach herniated, with the stomach reduced by pneumoperitoneum. Fortunately, the herniated organs could be easily relocated into the abdomen with no adhesions. The hernia defect measured 6 x 3 cm. We performed primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. No sac resection was performed. The operation lasted 98 min. Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 1, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. Chest radiography and CT scans at 1 month postoperatively showed no recurrence, and the patient remained asymptomatic at the 9-month follow-up examination. According to our review findings, primary closure is an efficient method for small hernia defects (rule of thumb: width, <4 cm; length, <7 cm).

BACKGROUND: This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site.
METHODS: Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ).
RESULTS: 198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165).
CONCLUSIONS: STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure.
METHODS: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

This research is intended to explore the influence of second and first degree closure methods on the degree of wound pain and swelling of the face following the removal of the mandible. For the purpose of this study, three data sets, including PubMed and Embase, were selected. A separate statistical analysis was conducted on the choice of the trial, the collection of data and the risk of bias. Differences between trials were analysed with a chi-square approach, with data analyses dependent on I2. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, and a possible publication bias was evaluated. Ultimately, nine qualifying trials were chosen out of an original pool of 1922 related trials following an in-depth evaluation under the eligibility and exclusion criteria, as well as a follow-up screening. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant change in the degree of post-operation pain after 1 day operation between one or secondary closures of treatment (MD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.93, 0.01, p = 0.06); the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences in post-operation wound pain after 3 days in two group (MD, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.37, p = 0.56); the results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post-operation wound pain after the 7th day in two groups (MD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.31, 0.03, p = 0.1). The results showed that there were no statistically different effects on the post-operation wound pain after the 1 day in two groups (MD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.38, -0.13, p < 0.0001); on the 3rd day after surgery, the face was significantly smaller swelling in the secondary closure of closure compared with the first-stage closure group (MD, -0.70; 95% CI, -1.40, -0.00, p = 0.05). While there is no obvious effect on post-operation wound pain in patients with mandibular surgery, there is significant difference in post-operation face swelling. The findings do not support a preference for any of these methods.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Wound infection is the most common post-operative complication encountered after open appendectomy. Various studies have compared the risk of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) in primary closure (PC) and delayed primary closure (DPC) of wounds. However, there is no uniform consensus regarding the method of wound closure.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to compare the two wound closure techniques.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> This is a prospective study which enrolled 50 patients who underwent open appendectomy. The patients\' demographics, characteristics, and operative findings were recorded. Those who were older than 18 years and had an appendectomy with a right lower quadrant incision were included. Patients with any comorbidity, morbid obesity, or pregnancy were excluded. Patients were randomized to undergo two techniques of wound closure: PC and DPC. During follow- -up at 1 week and 1 month, SSI, post-op pain, and LOS were compared among the two groups. Clinical assessment included the Visual Analog Scale (1-10) for pain.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> In our study, the incidence of SSI in the DPC group was significantly lower than in the PC group (p = 0.0002), while post-op pain and LOS were not significantly different between the two groups.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> We concluded that DPC was superior to PC in terms of reducing the incidence of superficial SSI, but with respect to post-op pain and LOS, the two techniques of wound closure were not different.</br>.

UNASSIGNED: Several techniques have been employed for defect reconstruction after total laryngectomy, among others sliding epiglottoplasty. As there is a paucity of data on sliding epiglottoplasty after total laryngectomy, this study aimed to present this reconstruction technique in detail with the retrospective analysis of the patients.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed single-center medical records of patients who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngectomy between 2007-2013, with a follow-up to 2020. The study included patients who had total laryngectomy performed followed by a primary closure or sliding epiglottoplasty. The patients were divided according to the pharyngeal reconstruction technique: sliding epiglottis (n = 38) and primary closure (n = 120).
UNASSIGNED: The baseline characteristics of patients, TNM stages, and previous treatment strategies did not differ significantly between the sliding epiglottis and primary closure group. The postoperative complication rates, including the pharyngocutaneous fistulae formation and strictures were comparable between the analyzed groups; however, a slightly higher incidence of pharyngocutaneus fistulae was noted within the patients after sliding epiglottoplasty. Overall 3-year survival of patients who underwent the epiglottoplasty and primary closure group were 73.7% vs. 57.5%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Sliding epiglottoplasty is considered a safe reconstruction technique. Although slightly better outcomes were noted within the epiglottoplasty group, it is still considered inferior to the primary closure. This technique ought to be considered in meticulously selected patients in whom primary closure is not feasible, epiglottis with nearby structures is spared from disease, and when the distal flaps are less appropriate or contraindicated.

Introduction Emergency surgery has a high risk of complications due to the detrimental effect of perioperative sepsis and the relative lack of preoperative optimization of patients. Despite advances in critical care for the management of sepsis, its prevention is dependent on various patient and surgeon factors. Surgical site infection continues to be a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following emergency abdominal surgery, especially in contaminated or dirty wounds. This study aims to compare two techniques of abdominal wall closure, primary closure with subcutaneous suction drains and delayed primary closure following negative pressure wound therapy, in terms of incidence of surgical site infection and morbidity. Materials and methods The study was a prospective comparative study including 50 patients with an acute surgical abdomen requiring laparotomy. The patients were randomized into two groups, Group A (n=25) who underwent primary closure, and Group B (n=25) who underwent delayed primary closure. In Group B patients, a vacuum-assisted closure device was applied in the subcutaneous space for five days prior to the closure of the skin. Outcomes were compared in terms of the incidence of superficial and deep surgical site infection, its association with diabetes mellitus, and the total duration of hospital stay. A chi-square test and an unpaired t-test were used for the test of significance. Results A total of 50 patients, comparable in age, were included in the study. The overall incidence of surgical site infection was significantly higher in patients of Group A as compared to Group B (p=0.0046). There was a positive correlation between diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of wound infection in both groups with the odds ratio being 2.67 and 2.38 respectively. The incidence of superficial wound infection was significantly higher in Group A when compared to Group B (52% versus 24%; p=0.04). Deep surgical site infection was higher in patients of Group A (20% versus 8%) but was not statistically significant (p=0.22). The average duration of hospital stay was 41.56 ± 6.96 and 37.86 ± 6.68 days for patients who developed complications from Groups A and B respectively, while it was nearly two and a half times lower in uncomplicated cases of Groups A and B (11.71± 1.70 days and 16.58± 1.06 days respectively). The one-tailed unpaired t-test showed a significant difference in means of hospital stay between patients with and without complications (T: 17.06, critical value: 1.677). Conclusion Delayed primary closure is an effective method of managing contaminated and dirty wounds following emergency laparotomy. Negative pressure wound therapy is one technique for preventing wound bed infection and accelerating wound healing in such cases. By combining the above in emergency surgeries, the incidence of surgical site infection and duration of hospital stay can be significantly reduced.

Generally, if the size of a lip cancer defect exceeds 30% of the lower lip, a local flap or free flap is recommended. However, defects up to 50% of the lower lip in size have been reconstructed successfully by primary closure without a local flap or free flap. In one case, an 80-year-old male farmer who had smoked for more than 50 years presented with squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip and underwent mass resection and supraomohyoid neck dissection. The defect accounted for almost 2/3 of the lower lip and was repaired by primary closure with V-shaped resection. Biopsy results confirmed pT2N0cM0 stage II disease with clear margins. In another case, a 68-year-old male also presented with squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip and underwent mass resection. The defect accounted for about half the size of the lower lip but was repaired by primary closure with V-shaped resection. Both patients experienced no discomfort while eating or speaking and were satisfied with the cosmetic and functional outcomes with no evidence of recurrence. Thus, direct closure can be considered even in large lower lip cancers.

Background: Circumferential subcuticular wound approximation (CSWA) of round shaped skin wounds after ileostomy take down is believed to lower the rates of surgical site infection (SSI). We performed this randomized trial to compare the rates of SSI and other short-term outcomes among primary linear skin closure (PC) and CSWA groups of patients. Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing ileostomy reversal during the study period were randomly assigned to either PC or CSWA. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI as assessed by ASEPSIS scoring system. The secondary outcomes included healing time, length of post-operative hospital stay, and patients\' satisfaction regarding cosmetic outcome, expectations, pain, time of healing, wound care, and activity on a five-point Likert scale. Results: Thirty-one patients (PC = 15; CSWA = 16) underwent ileostomy reversal during the study period. There was no SSI in the PC group whereas three patients developed SSI in the CSWA group but the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). The scores for time of healing (p < 0.001), wound care (p = 0.007), and activity (p < 0.001) were significantly better for PC compared with CSWA whereas there was no significant difference in the scores for cosmetic outcome, expectations, and pain. Healing time was shorter in the PC group (6.7 vs. 34.2 days; p < 0.001) whereas the post-operative length of stay was comparable (6.3 vs. 7 days; p = 0.27). Conclusions: Although there was no difference in the incidence of SSI among the two groups, the PC group fared better in terms of mean time to healing and requirement of wound care.

BACKGROUND: Based on the current trend of increasing incidence of choledocholithiasis, it is of great significance to explore the closure method of the common bile duct during laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.
METHODS: Backtracking full-thickness continuous everting suture was selected for primary closure of the common bile duct suture, while traditional T-tube drainage was selected for the control group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce baseline differences between the two groups.
RESULTS: The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative recovery speed, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pancreatitis, recurrence rate of bile duct stones, and hospitalization time in the primary closure group were all less than those in the T-tube drainage group.
CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions, backtracking full-thickness continuous everting suture could benefit patients with choledocholithiasis compared with traditional T-tube drainage.

To review the outcomes of classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) closure without the use of osteotomy or lower extremity/pelvic immobilization.
A prospectively maintained institutional approved exstrophy-epispadias complex database of 1487 patients was reviewed for patients with CBE who had undergone closure without osteotomy nor immobilization. All patients were referred to the authors\' institution for reconstruction later in life or for failed closure.
Of a total of 1016 CBE patients, 56 closure events were identified that met inclusion with a total of 47 unique patients. Thirty-eight closures were completed prior to 1990 (67.9%). Forty-five closure events developed eventual failure (45/56, 80.4%) (Table 1). Thirteen closure events were secondary closures (13/56, 23.2%). The primary closure failure rate was 83.7% (36/43) while the secondary closure failure rate was 69.2% (9/13). Failures were attributed to one or more of dehiscence, bladder prolapse, and vesicocutaneous fistula (25/45, 55.6%) (23/45, 51.1%) (6/45, 13.3%), respectively. Thirty-seven patients developed social continence (37/47, 78.7%), while only 8 patients developed spontaneous voided continence (7/47,17.0%) (Table 2). The most common methods of voiding were continent catheterizable channels (25/47, 53.2%) of which all were socially continent.
These results illustrate the critical role osteotomy and postoperative immobilization can play in both primary and secondary exstrophy closure. While this is a historical case series, the authors believe that these results remain relevant to contemporary exstrophy surgeons.