Introduction Emergency surgery has a high risk of complications due to the detrimental effect of perioperative sepsis and the relative lack of preoperative optimization of patients. Despite advances in critical care for the management of sepsis, its prevention is dependent on various patient and surgeon factors. Surgical site infection continues to be a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following emergency abdominal surgery, especially in contaminated or dirty wounds. This study aims to compare two techniques of abdominal wall closure, primary closure with subcutaneous suction drains and delayed primary closure following negative pressure wound therapy, in terms of incidence of surgical site infection and morbidity. Materials and methods The study was a prospective comparative study including 50 patients with an acute surgical abdomen requiring laparotomy. The patients were randomized into two groups, Group A (n=25) who underwent primary closure, and Group B (n=25) who underwent delayed primary closure. In Group B patients, a vacuum-assisted closure device was applied in the subcutaneous space for five days prior to the closure of the skin. Outcomes were compared in terms of the incidence of superficial and deep surgical site infection, its association with diabetes mellitus, and the total duration of hospital stay. A chi-square test and an unpaired t-test were used for the test of significance. Results A total of 50 patients, comparable in age, were included in the study. The overall incidence of surgical site infection was significantly higher in patients of Group A as compared to Group B (p=0.0046). There was a positive correlation between diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of wound infection in both groups with the odds ratio being 2.67 and 2.38 respectively. The incidence of superficial wound infection was significantly higher in Group A when compared to Group B (52% versus 24%; p=0.04). Deep surgical site infection was higher in patients of Group A (20% versus 8%) but was not statistically significant (p=0.22). The average duration of hospital stay was 41.56 ± 6.96 and 37.86 ± 6.68 days for patients who developed complications from Groups A and B respectively, while it was nearly two and a half times lower in uncomplicated cases of Groups A and B (11.71± 1.70 days and 16.58± 1.06 days respectively). The one-tailed unpaired t-test showed a significant difference in means of hospital stay between patients with and without complications (T: 17.06, critical value: 1.677). Conclusion Delayed primary closure is an effective method of managing contaminated and dirty wounds following emergency laparotomy. Negative pressure wound therapy is one technique for preventing wound bed infection and accelerating wound healing in such cases. By combining the above in emergency surgeries, the incidence of surgical site infection and duration of hospital stay can be significantly reduced.

Background: Circumferential subcuticular wound approximation (CSWA) of round shaped skin wounds after ileostomy take down is believed to lower the rates of surgical site infection (SSI). We performed this randomized trial to compare the rates of SSI and other short-term outcomes among primary linear skin closure (PC) and CSWA groups of patients. Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing ileostomy reversal during the study period were randomly assigned to either PC or CSWA. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI as assessed by ASEPSIS scoring system. The secondary outcomes included healing time, length of post-operative hospital stay, and patients\' satisfaction regarding cosmetic outcome, expectations, pain, time of healing, wound care, and activity on a five-point Likert scale. Results: Thirty-one patients (PC = 15; CSWA = 16) underwent ileostomy reversal during the study period. There was no SSI in the PC group whereas three patients developed SSI in the CSWA group but the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). The scores for time of healing (p < 0.001), wound care (p = 0.007), and activity (p < 0.001) were significantly better for PC compared with CSWA whereas there was no significant difference in the scores for cosmetic outcome, expectations, and pain. Healing time was shorter in the PC group (6.7 vs. 34.2 days; p < 0.001) whereas the post-operative length of stay was comparable (6.3 vs. 7 days; p = 0.27). Conclusions: Although there was no difference in the incidence of SSI among the two groups, the PC group fared better in terms of mean time to healing and requirement of wound care.

UNASSIGNED: In emergency surgery for acute obstruction of the common bile duct (CBD), primary duct closure (PC) of the CBD after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) remains challenging.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the safety and effectiveness of this surgical method after LCBDE in patients with acute choledocholithiasis and discuss the feasibility of PC in the CBD.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study on surgical efficacy and safety involved 232 patients treated at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2015 and December 2019. These patients underwent LC + LCBDE for acute choledocholithiasis and were categorized into PC and T-tube drainage (TD) groups based on the method of closure of the CBD. The basic preoperative information, intraoperative situation, postoperative situation, and complications were analysed and compared between groups.
UNASSIGNED: The baseline characteristics and preoperative information of patients between the 2 groups were balanced. Patients in the PC group had a shorter operation time (p < 0.001) and CBD suturing time (p < 0.001) than those in the TD group. In addition, compared with the TD group in postoperative situations, gastrointestinal recovery (p = 0.002), drainage removal (p < 0.001), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.004) were markedly decreased in the PC group. In terms of intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.961), use of pipe washing (49.0 vs. 54.6%, p = 0.397), use of stone basket (50.0 vs. 42.3%, p = 0.243), use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (1.0 vs. 3.1%, p = 0.525), postoperative liver function, and complications there was no significant difference between the PC and TD groups. No intraoperative transfusion and postoperative mortality occurred in either group. During 6 months of follow-up, only 1 patient showed biliary stricture in the PC group, and 2 and 4 patients in the PC and TD groups, respectively, showed residual stones.
UNASSIGNED: PC after LCBDE in acute choledocholithiasis patients displays better therapeutic outcomes than TD in some intraoperative and postoperative situations. PC of the CBD after LCBDE is a safe and effective therapeutic option in acute choledocholithiasis patients.

Background and Objective: Choledocholithiasis is a frequent pathology, unfortunately when its endoscopic management fails, there is no consensus of how it should be addressed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) using electrosurgery (coagulation) for choledochotomy followed by primary closure after endoscopic treatment failure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LCBDE from 2013 to 2018 was conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical demographics, operative outcomes, recurrence rate of common bile duct stones, and long-term bile duct complications were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: A total of 168 patients were analyzed. Most of the patients were males (53.37%) with a median age of 73 years with no comorbidities (65%). Stone clearance was successful in 167 patients (99.4%). Nonlethal complications were noted in 3 patients during the surgery or in the immediate postoperative (1.79%) and managed with T-tube or endoscopically. No cases of mortality surgery related were observed. There were no signs of any type of biliary injury or stricture observed in any of the patients during the 24-month follow-up period. Conclusions: LCBDE with diathermy and primary closure is a safe and effective treatment option for choledocholithiasis for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in terms of long-term outcome as well as short-term outcome.

Introduction A pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a small passageway in the subcutaneous tissue which develops most frequently in the sacrococcygeal area. In terms of postoperative outcomes, the decision on the best surgical treatment for PNS is still a challenge for a surgeon. Prevention of the disease recurrence and improving quality of the life can be considered primary goals of the treatment. The current study intends to compare two commonly practiced surgical treatments for PNSes-Rhomboid excision with Limberg flap repair against wide-open excision with healing by secondary intention. Methods In a prospective randomized study, 50 patients with sacrococcygeal PNS were divided into two groups. Group A was operated by rhomboid excision with Limberg flap reconstruction and Group B was operated by wide-open excision and healing by secondary intention. Data were collected on a specially designed structured proforma and consisted of patient demographics, medical history, presentation, and postoperative complications assessed for a period of 6 months. Comparative outcomes of interest were postoperative pain, postoperative anxiety, duration of wound healing, duration of work loss, presence of wound infection, and recurrence. Results Mean age of 28 years was observed across the study with a male preponderance (76%). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was greater in Group A during the early postoperative period, i.e., days 1, 3, and 7. However, patients in Group B reported a mean VAS score of 3 ± 0 and 1 ± 0 at one month and 2 months, respectively indicating a longer duration of postoperative pain overall. Patients in Group B also reported a significantly higher VAS for anxiety (VAS-A) score for postoperative anxiety/stress in all the follow-up visits. The mean healing time was 20 ± 2 days in Group A and 57 ± 11 days in Group B showing a significant difference. Duration of work loss was also significantly higher in Group B (31 days). Five patients in Group B developed wound infections. No recurrence was observed across both the groups in this study. Conclusion According to the findings of this study, the Limberg flap method outperforms the wide-open excision approach in terms of healing duration, work loss days, postoperative pain, anxiety, and wound infection. Both the techniques, however, are comparable in terms of recurrence.

The aim of this study was to test the non-inferiority of the contralateral submental island flap (CSIF) compared with primary closure (PC) regarding local recurrence after partial glossectomy in patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). This open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with cT1-2 lateralized OTSCC. The primary outcome was local recurrence by 12 months postoperative. Non-inferiority would be declared if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the proportion difference in local recurrence between the two groups did not exceed a non-inferiority margin of 15.0%. The functional outcome was assessed for superiority through secondary outcomes. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the local recurrence rate was 3.1% (1/32) in the CSIF group versus 9.4% (3/32) in the PC group; the proportion difference was - 6.3% (95% CI -18.0% to 5.5%). In the per-protocol analysis, the local recurrence rate was 3.1% (1/32) versus 3.3% (1/30); the proportion difference was - 0.2% (95% CI -9% to 8.6%). Speech was significantly superior in the CSIF group (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the CSIF was found to be non-inferior to PC regarding local recurrence at 1 year. A limitation of this study is the relatively large non-inferiority margin and consequently relatively small sample size. Further studies with a smaller non-inferiority margin and therefore larger sample size are needed to validate these findings.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcomes of primary carotid artery closure after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have not been sufficiently studied. This prospective study was performed to analyze the 5-year outcomes of the non-shunting and primary arterial repair technique for CEA.
METHODS: This study involved 150 patients who underwent CEA with the primary arterial closure technique without arterial shunting and completed 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: The patients comprised 107 men and 43 women. The 30-day postoperative course was uneventful in 147 (98.0%) patients; however, cerebrovascular accidents occurred in 3 (2.0%) patients. With respect to the long-term results, most cases of restenosis at 5 years were <50%. Two patients developed asymptomatic total internal carotid artery occlusion. Eleven deaths occurred (mortality rate of 7.3%); one death (0.7%) occurred in the first 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary arteriotomy closure provides very good long-term patency. Routine use of patch closure is unnecessary.

Patch angioplasty in conventional carotid endarterectomy is suggested to reduce the risk of restenosis and recurrent ipsilateral stroke compared with primary closure. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials is needed to compare outcomes (benefits and harms) of both techniques.
Searches (CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases) were last updated 3rd of January 2021. We included randomized clinical trials comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure of the arterial wall in patients with a symptomatic and significant (> 50%) carotid stenosis. Primary outcomes are defined as all-cause mortality and serious adverse events.
We included 12 randomized clinical trials including 2187 participants who underwent 2335 operations for carotid stenosis comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch closure (1280 operations) versus carotid endarterectomy with primary closure (1055 operations). Meta-analysis comparing carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy with primary closure may potentially decrease the number of patients with all-cause mortality (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.08; p = 0.08, best-case scenario for patch), serious adverse events (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96; p = 0.02, best-case scenario for patch), and the number of restenosis (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.71; p < 0.01). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the required information sizes were far from being reached for these patient-important outcomes. All the patient-relevant outcomes were at low certainty of evidence according to The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
This systematic review showed no conclusive evidence of a difference between carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure of the arterial wall on all-cause mortality, < 30 days mortality, < 30 days stroke, or any other serious adverse events. These conclusions are based on data from 15 to 35 years ago, obtained in trials with very low certainty according to GRADE, and should be interpreted cautiously. Therefore, we suggest conducting new randomized clinical trials patch angioplasty versus primary closure in carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with an internal carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more. Such trials ought to be designed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement (Chan et al., Ann Intern Med 1:200-7, 2013) and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement (Schulz et al., 7, 2010). Until conclusive evidence is obtained, the standard of care according to guidelines should not be abandoned.
PROSPERO CRD42014013416 . Review protocol publication 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026419 .

BACKGROUND: Various surgical procedures are available for the treatment of pilonidal sinus diseases (PSD), but the best surgical approach remains controversial. Minimally invasive surgical procedures are more popular than surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sinusectomy with primary closure (SPC) in comparison with excision and primary closure (EPC) in primary or recurrent cases.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted with two cohort groups in which 351 patients with PSD underwent either SPC or EPC. The two procedures were compared according to the presence of short-term complications and recurrence of PSD.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 134 underwent EPC and 217 underwent SPC. The length of stay and the wound healing time were significantly longer in the EPC group than in the SPC group. The occurrence rates of wound site infection and abscess were significantly higher in the EPC group than in the SPC group; however, seroma was statistically significantly more common in the SPC group than in the EPC group. The recurrence rates were 18.7% and 5.5% in the EPC and SPC groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: SPC is an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with PSD showing simple and complicated disease patterns.

Lower limb crush injury is a major source of mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. Complications, especially surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major source of financial burden to the institute and to the patient as it delays rehabilitation. As such, every possible attempt should be made to reduce any complications. We, thus, aimed to compare the outcomes in early vs delayed closure of lower extremity stumps in cases of lower limb crush injury requiring amputation, so as to achieve best possible outcome. A randomised controlled study was conducted in the Division of Trauma Surgery & Critical Care at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from 1 September 2018 to 30 June 2019 and included patients undergoing lower limb amputation below hip joint. Patients were randomised in two groups, in one group amputation stump was closed primarily, while in the second group delayed primary closure of stump was performed. We compared rate of SSI, length of hospital stay, and number of surgeries in both the groups. Fifty-six patients with 63 amputation stumps were recruited in the study. Mean age of patients in the study was 34 years, of which about 95% patients were males. The most common mechanism of injury was road traffic injury in 66% of patients. Mean injury severity score was 12.28 and four patients had diabetes preoperatively. Total 63 extremities were randomised with 30 cases in group I and 33 cases in group II as per computer-generated random number. Above knee amputations was commonest (57.14%) followed by below knee amputations (33.3%). Two patients died in the current study. In group I, In-hospital infection was detected in 7 cases (23.3%) and in group II 9 cases (27.3%) had SSI during hospital admission (P > .05). Mean hospital stay in group I was 10.32 ± 7.68 days and in group II was 11 ± 8.17 days (P > .05). Road traffic injuries and train-associated injuries are a major cause of lower limb crush injuries, leading to limb loss. Delayed primary closure of such wounds requires extra number of surgical interventions than primary closure. There is no difference in extra number of surgical interventions required in both the groups. Thus, primary closure can be safely performed in patients undergoing lower limb amputations following trauma, provided that a good lavage and wound debridement is performed.