mesh repair

网格修复
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    弓状线疝通常是无症状的,腹膜内结构在弧线上的上升突起。文献中很少报道弓状线疝。只发现了一些出版物。也没有发表关于修复技术的明确描述。我们的目标是提供诊断图像,并说明我们修复这种疝的方法。
    An arcuate line hernia is a generally asymptomatic, ascending protrusion of intraperitoneal structures over the linea arcuata. Arcuate line herniae are scarcely reported in the literature. Only a few publications were found. No clear descriptions of the techniques for repair have been published either. We aim to provide diagnostic images and illustrate our method to repair this hernia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食管裂孔疝(HH)修复与高复发率相关。本研究旨在调查患者自我报告的GERD健康相关生活质量(HRQL)评分随时间的变化是否与长期手术结果相关。
    方法:对2018年至2022年在三级护理中心进行腹腔镜或机器人HH修复的所有患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。收集了关于初始BMI的信息,内窥镜HH测量,手术,术前和术后HRQL评分。然后评估手术修复后至少一年的重复成像是否有任何复发的证据。配对t检验用于比较术前和术后HRQL评分。使用Wilcoxon排名和检验来比较不同时间点复发队列和非复发队列之间的HRQL评分。
    结果:共有126例患者接受了HH修复,并有术前和术后HRQL评分。网格用于23次维修(18.25%)。42例患者记录HH复发(33.3%),35人没有复发的证据(27.7%),49例患者(38.9%)没有随访影像学检查。术前平均QOL评分为24.99(SD±14.95),术后2周时显著提高至5.63(SD±8.51)(p<0.0001)。这种改善在术后1年持续(平均7.86,SD±8.26,p<0.0001)。初次手术至复发的平均时间为2.1年(SD±1.10)。网状修复的复发可能性明显较小(p=0.005)。2周时QOL评分无显著差异,3个月,6个月,或术后1年之间的队列(p=NS)。
    结论:患者术后HH修复术后HRQL评分有长期显著改善,尽管复发。对HH复发患者重新干预的需要应基于其QOL评分,而不一定基于已确定的复发。
    BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) repairs have been associated with high recurrence rates. This study aimed to investigate if changes in patient\'s self-reported GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores over time are associated with long-term surgical outcomes.
    METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on all patients who had laparoscopic or robotic HH repairs between 2018 and 2022 at a tertiary care center. Information was collected regarding initial BMI, endoscopic HH measurement, surgery, and pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Repeat imaging at least a year following surgical repair was then evaluated for any evidence of recurrence. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Wilcoxon ranked-sum tests were used to compare the HRQL scores between the recurrence cohort and non-recurrence cohorts at different time points.
    RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent HH repairs and had pre- and post-operative HRQL scores. Mesh was used in 23 repairs (18.25%). 42 patients had recorded HH recurrences (33.3%), 35 had no evidence of recurrence (27.7%), and 49 patients (38.9%) had no follow-up imaging. The average pre-operative QOL score was 24.99 (SD ± 14.95) and significantly improved to 5.63 (SD ± 8.51) at 2-week post-op (p < 0.0001). That improvement was sustained at 1-year post-op (mean 7.86, SD ± 8.26, p < 0.0001). The average time between the initial operation and recurrence was 2.1 years (SD ± 1.10). Recurrence was significantly less likely with mesh repairs (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in QOL scores at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year postoperatively between the cohorts (p = NS).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients had significant long-term improvement in their HRQL scores after surgical HH repair despite recurrences. The need to re-intervene in patients with HH recurrence should be based on their QOL scores and not necessarily based on established recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹壁疝是当今男性和女性最常见的外科疾病之一。然而,文献中只有少数病例报道,肝圆韧带疝是一种少见的临床表现。这种情况显示了常见的症状,例如上腹痛,可能与这种罕见的疾病有关。总的来说,腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)图像是评估并发症和不同肠道部位受累的研究选择。可以进行一些实验室检查以怀疑继发于绞窄性疝的肠缺血。利用网片的初级修复是优选的手术治疗。这个过程可以通过腹腔镜或开放技术进行,取决于外科医生的技能和患者的偏好。
    Abdominal wall hernias are one of the most common surgical diseases present in both males and females nowadays. However, with only a few cases reported in the literature, hepatic round ligament hernias are a rare clinical manifestation. This case shows how a common symptom such as epigastric pain can be associated with this rare condition. In general, abdominal computed tomography (CT) images are the choice of study to evaluate complications and the involvement of different intestinal sections. Some laboratory tests can be performed to suspect intestinal ischemia secondary to strangulated hernias. Primary repair utilizing mesh is the preferred surgical treatment. This procedure can be performed through laparoscopic or open technique, depending on the surgeon\'s skills and patient preference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Spigelian疝是一种罕见的腹壁疝,仅占所有腹部疝的0.12%。Spigelian疝气,也称为自发性腹侧疝或半月线疝,当一部分腹部内容物通过Spigelian筋膜突出时发生。由于它的解剖位置,仅通过体格检查很难诊断出Spigelian疝。在这里,我们报告了一个40岁的女性,她经历了右腹痛和肿胀,其中超声成像对术中诊断Spigelian疝至关重要。患者接受了剖腹手术网状修复术以解决这种情况。缺乏一致的体检结果和罕见的疾病需要高度的临床怀疑来诊断Spigelian疝。其相关的腹部不适通常是模糊和非特异性的,让它更具挑战性。此病例强调了利用成像技术帮助诊断Spigelian疝并及时进行手术干预以防止与疝相关的并发症的重要性。
    Spigelian hernia is a rare type of abdominal wall hernia that accounts for only 0.12% of all abdominal hernias. A Spigelian hernia, also known as a spontaneous lateral ventral hernia or a hernia of the semilunar line, occurs when a part of the abdominal contents protrudes through the Spigelian fascia. Due to its anatomical location, Spigelian hernia can be difficult to diagnose through physical examination alone. Here we report a case of a 40-year-old female who experienced right abdominal pain and swelling, where ultrasonography imaging was crucial in the intraoperative diagnosis of Spigelian hernia. The patient underwent laparotomy mesh repair to address the condition. The lack of consistent physical findings and the rarity of the disease require a high level of clinical suspicion in the diagnosis of a Spigelian hernia. Its associated abdominal complaints are often vague and nonspecific, making it even more challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of utilizing imaging techniques to aid in the diagnosis of a Spigelian hernia and prompt surgical intervention to prevent complications associated with the hernia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    膈肌肋间疝是一种罕见的损伤,可能与钝性创伤有关。自1946年文献中的第一份文献以来,报告的病例不到50例。我们介绍了一例涉及一名56岁女性的病例,她向我们的创伤中心介绍了由高速T骨车辆碰撞造成的钝性创伤引起的跨the肌肋间疝。在介绍时,她表现出双侧呼吸音;然而,呼吸紧张,胸痛,和缺氧。最初的胸部X光片解释显示存在“左下叶浸润”,随后的计算机断层扫描成像确定了“左腹部中部有一个小的外侧疝”。初步复苏后,她的病情恶化了,表现出呼吸窘迫和变得越来越大碳,需要插管.影像学检查显示,左半膈肌破裂,结肠和胃的胸腔内疝通过第九和第十根肋骨之间的胸壁。因此,在手术室进行了开胸手术,显示两根肋骨之间的大缺陷,肋间肌破坏和肋骨空间移位。肺和网膜通过破裂的肋骨间隙疝出,diaphragm肌破裂向前减弱,尺寸11x6cm。在减少了突出的器官后,放置生物猪网片,并对胸壁疝进行中间复杂闭合.病人后来被拔管,她受伤后康复,没有并发症,并出院。经膈肋间疝的发病率较低,没有规范的手术管理。最近的文献表明,这些损伤应该用网状物管理,而不仅仅是缝合,由于复发率高。此外,膈肌损伤可能会延迟诊断。因此,对于钝性创伤后出现呼吸窘迫的患者,应保持高度怀疑,密切检查计算机断层扫描。
    Transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation is a rare injury that can be associated with blunt trauma. Since its first documentation within the literature in 1946, there have been less than 50 cases reported. We present a case involving a 56-year old female who presented to our Trauma Center with transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation caused by blunt trauma from a high-velocity T-bone vehicular collision. Upon presentation, she exhibited bilateral breath sounds; however, with labored breathing, chest pain, and hypoxia. The initial chest radiograph interpretation indicated the presence of \"left lower lobe infiltrates\", and subsequent computed tomography imaging identified \"a small lateral hernia along the left mid abdomen\". After initial resuscitation, her condition deteriorated, exhibiting respiratory distress and becoming increasingly hypercarbic, requiring intubation. Review of the imaging showed disruption of the left hemidiaphragm with intrathoracic herniation of colon and stomach through the thoracic wall between the ninth and tenth ribs. Consequently, a thoracotomy was performed in the operating room, revealing a large defect between the two ribs with disruption of the intercostal muscles and inferior displacement of rib space. Lung and omentum had herniated through the disrupted rib space and the diaphragmatic rupture was attenuated anteriorly, measuring 11x6cm. After reduction of the herniated organs, a biologic porcine mesh was placed and an intermediate complex closure of the thoracic wall hernia was performed. The patient was later extubated, recovered from her injuries with no complications and was discharged. With the low incidence of transdiaphragmatic intercostal herniation, there is no standardized surgical management. Recent literature suggests that these injuries should be managed with mesh, rather than sutures only, due to high rates of recurrence. Furthermore, diaphragmatic injuries may suffer a delay in diagnosis. Therefore, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in patients with respiratory distress following a blunt trauma, with close review of computed tomography.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:随着日本社会的老龄化,老年食管裂孔疝(HH)患者的手术数量正在增加.在这项研究中,我们检查了可行性,安全,在老年日本HH患者中,在有或没有网状修复和/或胃底折叠术的情况下,在组织成形术中增加前胃切除术的潜在有效性。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了2010年至2021年间接受腹腔镜HH修复的39例患者。我们根据年龄将他们分为两组:“年轻”组(<75岁,n=21),和“老年”组(≥75岁,n=18)。病人的特点,术中数据,收集术后结果。
    结果:年轻和老年组的平均年龄分别为68和82岁,分别,两组之间的女性比例相似(年轻vs.年龄:67%vs.78%,p=0.44)。老年组比年轻组有更多的III/IV型HH病例(19%vs.83%,p<0.001)。老年组手术时间长于年轻组,但在失血方面没有显著差异,围手术期并发症,或术后住院时间。老年组的前胃切除术病例明显增多(0%vs.78%,p<0.001)和较少的胃底折叠(100%vs.67%,p=0.004)比年轻组。两组之间的HH复发没有显着差异(5%vs.11%,p=0.46)。
    结论:在其他手术中增加前胃切除术是可行的,安全,对日本老年HH患者可能有效。
    OBJECTIVE: As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the \"younger\" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the \"older\" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected.
    RESULTS: The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46).
    CONCLUSIONS: The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后常见的并发症。IH的手术修复与症状的缓解和生活质量的改善有关。手术干预可能对患者和医疗保健设施造成重大负担。本研究旨在描述和比较IH的择期和急诊手术修复的结果。
    方法:本研究是一项单中心回顾性对比研究,包括IH修复患者。患者分为I组(急诊)和II组(选择性),并在它们之间进行了比较。
    结果:确定了200名患者,平均年龄为61.8±14.2岁,其中152人(58%)为女性。平均BMI为31.6±7.2kg/m2。超过58%有至少一种合并症。169例(64.5%)患者接受了选择性修复,93人(35.5%)接受了紧急维修。接受紧急修复的患者年龄明显较大,BMI较高,分别为p=0.031和p=0.002。显著并发症发生率(Clavien-DindoIII和IV)为9.54%。30天和90天死亡率分别为2.3%(n=6)和2.68%(n=7),分别。在紧急小组中,整体并发症,30天和90天的死亡率明显高于选修组,p分别≤0.001、0.002和0.001。总的来说,42(16.1%)出现伤口并发症,25(9.6%)经历了复发,41例(15.71%)在90天内再次入院,两组之间无显著差异。
    结论:接受急诊修复的患者明显年龄较大,BMI高于择期病例。急诊IH修复比选择性修复具有更高的并发症发生率和死亡率。
    OBJECTIVE: Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication following abdominal surgery. Surgical repair of IH is associated with the alleviation of symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Operative intervention can pose a significant burden to the patient and healthcare facilities. This study aims to describe and compare outcomes of elective and emergency surgical repair of IH.
    METHODS: This study is a single-centre comparative retrospective study including patients who had repair of IH. Patients were divided into Group I (Emergency) and Group II (Elective), and a comparison was conducted between them.
    RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-two patients were identified with a mean age of 61.8 ± 14.2 years, of which 152 (58%) were females. The mean BMI was 31.6 ± 7.2 kg/m2. More than 58% had at least one comorbidity. 169 (64.5%) patients had an elective repair, and 93 (35.5%) had an emergency repair. Patients undergoing emergency repair were significantly older and had higher BMI, p = 0.031 and p = 0.002, respectively. The significant complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III and IV) was 9.54%. 30 and 90-day mortality rates were 2.3% (n = 6) and 2.68% (n = 7), respectively. In the emergency group, the overall complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly higher than in the elective group, p ≤ 0.001, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively. Overall, 42 (16.1%) developed wound complications, 25 (9.6%) experienced a recurrence, and 41 (15.71%) were readmitted within 90 days, without significant differences between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent emergency repair were significantly older and had a higher BMI than the elective cases. Emergency IH repair is associated with higher complication rates and mortality than elective repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:女性腹壁疝修补术患病率最高。上腹部疝修补术后的结果很少独立报道。尽管病理和手术技术可能与其他原发性腹侧疝不同。这项研究的目的是在全国范围内评估女性上腹疝修补术后的长期结局。方法:来自丹麦疝数据库的全国队列研究。提取了12年(2007-2018年)期间接受择期腹壁疝修补术的妇女的完整数据。通过结合来自国家民事登记册的数据获得了100%的随访。主要结果是手术复发,次要结局是并发症的再入院和手术治疗.开放性缝合修复的结果,开放网格修复网格,与腹腔镜修补术进行比较。结果:总的来说,3,031名妇女在研究期间接受了择期腹壁疝修补术。约1,671名(55.1%)妇女接受了开放性缝合修复,796(26.3%)接受了开放网孔修复,564(18.6%)接受了腹腔镜修复。随访时间中位数为4.8年。缝合修复后复发的手术率高于开放网片和腹腔镜修复后(7.7%vs.3.3%,vs.6.2%,p<0.001)。与缝合修补术和腹腔镜修补术相比,开放网片修补术后并发症的手术风险略高(2.6%vs.1.2%,vs.2.0%,p=0.032),开放网眼组的伤口并发症手术更多(2.0%,p=0.006)。结论:超过一半的女性接受了缝合修复,虽然网状修复降低了复发的风险。开放网片修复术后复发风险最低,但费用略有增加伤口相关并发症的风险。
    Aim: Women have the highest prevalence of epigastric hernia repair. Outcomes after epigastric hernia repair are rarely reported independently, although pathology and surgical techniques may be different than for other primary ventral hernias. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after epigastric hernia repairs in women on a nationwide basis. Methods: Nationwide cohort study from the Danish Hernia Database. Complete data from women undergoing elective epigastric hernia repair during a 12 years period (2007-2018) was extracted. A 100% follow-up was obtained by combining data from the National Civil Register. The primary outcome was operation for recurrence, secondary outcomes were readmission and operation for complications. Outcomes for open sutured repair, open mesh repair mesh, and laparoscopic repairs were compared. Results: In total, 3,031 women underwent elective epigastric hernia repair during the study period. Some 1,671 (55.1%) women underwent open sutured repair, 796 (26.3%) underwent open mesh repair, and 564 (18.6%) underwent laparoscopic repair. Follow-up was median 4.8 years. Operation for recurrence was higher after sutured repairs than after open mesh and laparoscopic repairs (7.7% vs. 3.3%, vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The risk of operation for complications was slightly higher after open mesh repair compared with sutured repair and laparoscopic repair (2.6% vs. 1.2%, vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032), with more operations for wound complications in the open mesh group (2.0%, p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than half of the women underwent a suture-based repair, although mesh repair reduces risk of recurrence. Open mesh repair had the lowest risk of recurrence, but on the expense of slightly increased risk of wound-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹壁重建(AWR)是一种外科手术,用于解决各种疾病,例如疝气,切口疝,和复杂的腹壁缺损。网格固定在AWR期间为弱化的腹壁提供机械增强中起着至关重要的作用。传统上,缝合一直是网片固定的首选方法;然而,作为一种替代方法,使用组织粘合剂或胶水的粘附技术已经受到关注。本系统综述旨在比较AWR网片固定的缝合和粘连技术,并评估其预防疝气复发的有效性。在相关数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括PubMed,MEDLINE,Embase,还有Cochrane图书馆.包括满足预定资格标准的研究。感兴趣的主要结果指标是疝复发率。次要结果包括网状相关并发症,手术部位感染,患者报告的结果,和功能结果。对纳入的研究进行了偏倚风险评估,数据进行了定性合成。总的来说,纳入研究的结果提示,用胶进行无创伤网片固定可能具有减轻慢性腹股沟疼痛(CGP)的潜力.然而,患者选择标准存在显著差异,胶水管理技术,试验中的疝修复方法,这限制了得出明确结论的能力。此外,CGP的定义和术后疼痛的测量量表在研究中各不相同,使比较结果具有挑战性。审查的局限性包括在一些试验中样本量小,随访持续时间相对较短,以及缺乏评估异物感和腹股沟顺应性等变量的标准化标准。此外,与传统缝线固定相比,使用胶水固定的经济意义需要考虑。
    Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a surgical procedure performed to address various conditions such as hernias, incisional hernias, and complex abdominal wall defects. Mesh fixation plays a crucial role in providing mechanical reinforcement to the weakened abdominal wall during AWR. Traditionally, suturing has been the preferred method for mesh fixation; however, adhesion techniques using tissue adhesives or glues have gained attention as an alternative approach. This systematic review aims to compare suturing and adhesion techniques for mesh fixation in AWR and assess their effectiveness in preventing hernia recurrence. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that fulfilled the predetermined eligibility criteria were included. The primary outcome measure of interest was hernia recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, surgical site infections, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes. A risk of bias assessment was performed for the included studies, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Overall, the results of the included studies suggest that atraumatic mesh fixation with glue may have the potential to reduce chronic groin pain (CGP). However, there were significant variations in patient selection criteria, glue administration techniques, and hernia repair methods among the trials, which limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, the definitions of CGP and measurement scales for postoperative pain varied across studies, making it challenging to compare outcomes. The limitations of the review include the small sample sizes in some trials, relatively short follow-up durations, and the lack of standardized criteria for assessing variables such as foreign body sensation and groin compliance. Furthermore, the economic implications of using glue fixation compared to traditional suture fixation need to be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    切口疝(IH)是腹部手术后的常见并发症。IH的发展可能比腹壁的简单解剖故障更复杂。报告的IH发病率因研究而异。这篇综述概述了定义,分子基础,危险因素,发病率,临床表现,外科技术,术后护理,成本,风险预测工具,并提出了预防措施。对PubMed进行了文献检索,以纳入关于IH的高质量研究。IH的发病率取决于原发性手术病理,切口部位和范围,相关的医疗合并症,和风险因素。审查强调了固有和可改变的风险因素。细胞外基质的解体,成纤维细胞功能缺陷,不同胶原蛋白类型的比例变化与分子机制有关。IH的选择性修复可缓解症状,预防并发症,并提高了生活质量(QOL)。最近的研究引入了风险预测工具来实施预防措施,包括缝合线加固或在高危人群中预防性应用网状物。选择性修复可改善QOL并防止与紧急IH修复相关的险恶结果。应该审查警惕的等待策略,在患者咨询期间,应彻底讨论各种选择。用于预测IH的风险分层工具将有助于采取预防措施。
    Incisional hernia (IH) is a frequent complication following abdominal surgery. The development of IH could be more sophisticated than a simple anatomical failure of the abdominal wall. Reported IH incidence varies among studies. This review presented an overview of definitions, molecular basis, risk factors, incidence, clinical presentation, surgical techniques, postoperative care, cost, risk prediction tools, and proposed preventative measures. A literature search of PubMed was conducted to include high-quality studies on IH. The incidence of IH depends on the primary surgical pathology, incision site and extent, associated medical comorbidities, and risk factors. The review highlighted inherent and modifiable risk factors. The disorganisation of the extracellular matrix, defective fibroblast functions, and ratio variations of different collagen types are implicated in molecular mechanisms. Elective repair of IH alleviates symptoms, prevents complications, and improves the quality of life (QOL). Recent studies introduced risk prediction tools to implement preventative measures, including suture line reinforcement or prophylactic mesh application in high-risk groups. Elective repair improves QOL and prevents sinister outcomes associated with emergency IH repair. The watchful wait strategy should be reviewed, and options should be discussed thoroughly during patients\' counselling. Risk stratification tools for predicting IH would help adopt prophylactic measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号